Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #400770
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Why the universe must be logically consistent and logically complete |
| Date | 2016-12-04 19:58 +0100 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <2366621.BIqFSZicM5@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <2016120412143945148-EdgarOwen@attnet> |
Edgar Owen wrote: > A computational universe must be logically consistent and logically > complete. No. > If it weren't it would tear itself apart at the > inconsistencies and pause at the incompletenesses and could not exist. Incorrect. Logic is (more or less) a human thing, and all our scientific understanding of the universe/multiverse are *models* of it, not the absolute truth. > This is a basic tenant of the computational theory of reality I present A “tenant” is a person. I think you mean “_tenet_” (foundation, theorem) instead. > in my book Universal Reality, The New Theory of Everything. […] Yet another crackpot publication that has nothing to do with the topic of this newsgroup, the theories of _relativity_ (_not_ “reality”). > Applying Godel's incompleteness theorem to the universe is incorrect. No. > Godel's theorem applies to systems in which someone can arbitrarily > state a wff (well formed formula) in the system and then it may be > impossible to determine whether or not it can ever be reached (proven) > from the axioms. No, it applies to *every* formal axiomatic system containing basic arithmetic instead. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems> You have no clue what you are talking about. Please go away. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Why the universe must be logically consistent and logically complete Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-12-04 19:58 +0100
Re: Why the universe must be logically consistent and logically complete Wilda Bolander <WdaaddoiBleld@WdaaddoiBleld.Wda> - 2016-12-04 20:27 +0000
Re: Why the universe must be logically consistent and logically complete Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-12-05 00:06 +0100
Re: Why the universe must be logically consistent and logically complete mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-12-04 13:15 -0800
csiph-web