Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #390481

Re: Question....Good Question.

From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Question....Good Question.
Date 2016-08-21 11:48 +0200
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Message-ID <1970458.aaTrBrGtfs@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References <npaogt$1rjb$1@gioia.aioe.org> <npbjus$tv2$1@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw


Paul B. Andersen wrote:

> […]
> This is what SR say:

_says_ (third-person singular simple present of “(to) say”), because it is 
*one* item: (the) special (theory of) relativity.  [“(to) say” is used 
figuratively here, meaning “to indicate in a written form”.]

<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/say#Verb>

> https://paulba.no/div/Is_c_invariant.pdf

Should be _pseudonym_, not “synonym”.

A *synonym* of an original word is another word that has the same or nearly 
the same meaning as the original word (from Ancient Greek σύν /syn/ “with”, 
ὄνομα /ónoma/ “name”). 

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synonym>
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/synonym#English>

A *pseudonym* (*synonym*: alias) is a *name*, different from a person’s or 
group’s real name, assumed for a particular purpose (from Greek ψευδώνυμον 
/pseudṓnymon/, from ψεῦδος /pseûdos/ “lie, falsehood”; and ὄνομα /ónoma/ 
“name”).

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudonym>
<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pseudonym#English>

There are other linguistic errors in your texts.  I recommend to you that 
you proofread your writings in that regard.  English is not my native 
language, but I am very good at it (like CEFR C1), so I can help you there.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Question....Good Question. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-21 09:19 +1000
  Re: Question....Good Question. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-20 21:12 -0400
    Re: Question....Good Question. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-20 22:28 -0500
  Re: Question....Good Question. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-21 09:07 +0200
    Re: Question....Good Question. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-21 19:28 +1000
      Re: Question....Good Question. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-21 13:31 +0200
        Re: Question....Good Question. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-22 07:20 +1000
          Re: Question....Good Question. Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-08-22 05:38 -0700
            Re: Question....Good Question. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-23 05:46 +1000
              Re: Question....Good Question. Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-08-22 14:30 -0700
                Re: Question....Good Question. "HGW." <hw@....> - 2016-08-23 08:11 +1000
                Re: Question....Good Question. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-08-22 18:41 -0700
          Re: Question....Good Question. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-22 23:07 +0200
      Re: Question....Good Question. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-08-23 09:35 -0500
    Re: Question....Good Question. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-08-21 11:48 +0200
      Re: Question....Good Question. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-08-21 14:05 +0200
      Re: Question....Good Question. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-08-22 07:22 +1000

csiph-web