Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #386121
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: LIGO |
| Followup-To | sci.physics.relativity |
| Date | 2016-06-18 11:06 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <1748388.oMNUckLgyt@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <njsg91$pkk$1@pcls7.std.com> <nju8vd$ujj$1@pcls7.std.com> <nk2vrq$opd$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Followups directed to: sci.physics.relativity
Steven Carlip wrote: > On 6/16/16 3:18 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: >> Apparently there is a third event, from October 12, 2015, that has not >> (yet?) been confirmed. > > It was actually already reported in the first paper. It's > characterized as a "trigger" rather than an "event" -- it's > *probably* a gravitational wave signal from another binary > black hole merger, but there's about a 5-10% chance that it > could be noise. More details are in arxiv.org/abs/1606.04856. First of all, when you refer to resources, you should post URIs; not only is that unambiguous, it is also more convenient for many readers since their software would create hyperlinks. Additionally, in this case you should not refer to the version on the preprint server, arXiv.org, but to the official version since (AFAIK) all the LSC and VC’s papers can be read online for free. <https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1600088/main/public> referenced in <https://www.ligo.caltech.edu/page/detection-companion-papers> Second, from where do you have those figures? The abstract of that paper says: “[…] It also identified a third possible signal, LVT151012, with substantially lower significance, which has a 87% probability of being of astrophysical origin. […]” That is a _13_ % chance of being noise, is it not? F'up2 sci.physics.relativity -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
LIGO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-15 21:10 +0000
Re: LIGO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-16 13:18 +0000
Re: LIGO Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2016-06-18 10:13 +0200
Re: LIGO Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-18 11:06 +0200
Re: LIGO Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2016-06-21 23:20 -0700
Re: LIGO Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-06-25 00:09 +0200
Re: LIGO moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-18 15:36 +0000
Re: LIGO "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 10:04 -0700
Re: LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 14:41 -0500
Re: LIGO "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 22:07 -0700
Re: LIGO Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 08:30 -0500
csiph-web