Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #377938
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? |
| Followup-To | alt.1d |
| Date | 2016-03-05 12:35 +0100 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <1559788.f7NWEUn2RC@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <0c11b935-67aa-40a9-aba9-9b4ee6db93ae@googlegroups.com> <2847267a-1c5c-40d3-981f-88b2c0b2f6fd@googlegroups.com> <nba3bg$1th6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Followups directed to: alt.1d
Helénē Swanhild wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Obnoxious liar. > JanPB wrote: >> On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 9:10:14 AM UTC-8, Pentcho Valev wrote: >>> Since general relativity is an empirical model, it can predict anything >>> - e.g. both existence and non-existence of gravitational waves. Or both >>> static and expanding universe. Or both constant and variable speed of >>> light. Anything! >> >> Not even wrong. Simply N/A. > > You not, of course. Gibberish. > Pentcho is 100% consistent. The gibbering, ’nym-shifting troll still does not know the difference between “consistent” and “correct”. > Relativity is been invented Relativity is not an invention. > BEFORE the discovery of an Universe being in expanding mode. Instead, general relativity (1915) suggested to Lemaître in 1927 that it could be a correct description of reality even in an expanding universe, and Hubble showed the expansion of our universe in 1929 as a side-effect of his astronomical observations. > And Relativity remained valid. Relativity as it is commonly understood nowadays includes two theories, the special theory of relativity (special relativity, less commonly abbreviated “SR”), and the general theory of relativity (general relativity, commonly abbreviated “GR”). Theories are not considered “valid” at any point in their existence. The ’nym-shifting troll still has not understood that theories come along with uncertainties. However, those theories have been experimentally confirmed many times. No modern device would work if they were fundamentally flawed as no microchip would work as designed then. > It does not really mater whether the Universe is expanding or not, or, > whether the misunderstood Gravity Waves are real and detectable or not. Once again, gravity waves are not gravitational waves. Gravity waves can be observed daily on Terra with the naked eye, in the oceans and the clouds. Gravitational waves have been detected by LIGO recently with a statistical significance of 2σ, i.e. a probability of 95.4499736 %. Future detections by LIGO and similar experiments on Terra and in outer space are expected. The one who has misunderstood everything is, once again, only the ’nym- shifting troll. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_wave> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave> > Relativity will still be valid. Nor whether the Speed of Gravity (SoG) > coincide with the Speed of Light (SoL). Relativity will still be valid. > You don't know your own theory. Moreover, SR will still be valid, GR or > not, at ANY value of c, be that whatever. That's why is been said Rather vomited into science newsgroups by nobody but the ’nym-shifting troll. > that SR is a stronger and more fundamental theory than GR. GR > is based only on suppositions and postulates. SR is not. SR is clean. Not even wrong. *PLONK* PointedEars -- Q: Who's on the case when the electricity goes out? A: Sherlock Ohms. (from: WolframAlpha)
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-02 09:10 -0800
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 18:47 -0800
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Helénē Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-03 19:29 +0000
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-05 12:35 +0100
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Helene Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-06 01:38 +0000
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-06 08:22 -0800
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 13:54 -0800
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-07 12:54 -0800
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-02 23:04 -0800
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-03-03 07:52 -0800
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-03 11:22 -0800
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-04 08:09 -0800
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-04 10:41 -0800
csiph-web