Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #667262
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.logic, sci.math, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Could the AI Persona evolve over time? [With Local AI?] (Was: T-theory A-theory theatheory) |
| Date | 2025-11-13 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <10f52ra$dm4a$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <dKqcnTafh9KZJZr0nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> <10eocnn$5ga9$1@solani.org> <ybCdnaPnPLo0Z5L0nZ2dnZfqnPv_fwAA@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Hi, With RAG it could react on news. RAG (Retrieval- Augmented Generation) and other techniques can make a local AI evolve dynamically — both in knowledge and personality. Lets say I put such a AI Persona in a News Group loop. I could feedback the posts there, to make it also evolve. One can collect community reactions (upvotes, replies, sentiment). Or apply automatic evaluation — e.g., sentiment analysis or engagement score. This becomes your fitness function. You can even run multiple personas in the same loop Different viewpoints (e.g., “optimist”, “skeptic”, “data scientist”) They interact and debate posts. This is ideal for dead open source projects, such as SWI-Prolog, to pretend user participation, very important in our new marketing world that is totally engagement focus. The quality(*) of content doesn't count. LoL Bye (*) Same for research paper mills. BTW, ChatGPT suggests me the following tech stack: LLM: Ollama (LLaMA 3, Mistral, Gemma, etc.) LangChain / LlamaIndex: context + memory ChromaDB / SQLite: memory store Feedparser / API client: ingest news or group posts Transformers / VADER: sentiment scoring Simple scheduler or cron job: to run the loop daily > Hi, > > There are different ways to make an AI Persona. > For example Twitter aka X, has a grok account. > But grok is not trimmed towards a particular > > profile, maybe an alter ego of Elon Musk was > speculated. What could be interesting would be > to go towards character.ai : > > "Character.ai was established in November 2021. > The company's co-founders, Noam Shazeer and > Daniel de Freitas, were both engineers from > Google. They both worked on AI-related projects: > Shazeer was a lead author on a paper that > Business Insider reported in April 2023 "has > been widely cited as key to today's chatbots", > and Freitas was the lead designer of an > experimental AI at Google initially called Meena, > which later became known as LaMDA. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Character.ai > > Maybe this can be even done with Local AI. By for > example populating a context. Or creating a kind > of LangChain memory. ChatGPT calls it persistent context. > > So yes you could "spam" an AI Archimedes Plutonium > probably from your desktop with an AI Laptop, maybe > already in 2025, or later in 2026. > > bye
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Taxon (TBox) / Affirm (ABox) was a thing in the 90s? (Was: T-theory A-theory theatheory) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-11-08 18:21 -0800
Could the AI Persona evolve over time? [With Local AI?] (Was: T-theory A-theory theatheory) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-13 18:00 +0100
Boris the Loris and Nazi-Retard Julio (Was: Could the AI Persona evolve over time? [With Local AI?]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-13 18:07 +0100
csiph-web