Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #437481 > unrolled thread

Re: Fire the entire Cornell Univ math dept-- unable to even teach Add in Logic is not OR but rather is AND

Back to article view | Back to sci.math

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Fire the entire Cornell Univ math dept-- unable to even teach Add in Logic is not OR but rather is AND Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-18 08:59 -0700
    Re: Archimedes "unofficial state idiot of South Dakota" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-18 16:48 +0000
      Re: Fire the entire Cornell Univ math dept-- unable to even teach Add in Logic is not OR but rather is AND Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-19 12:13 -0700
        Re: Archimedes "unofficial state idiot of South Dakota" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-19 20:03 +0000

#437481 — Re: Fire the entire Cornell Univ math dept-- unable to even teach Add in Logic is not OR but rather is AND

On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 3:00:47 PM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:
> On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 3:15:47 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Cornell Univ math dept which none of them can even do correct logic, so, hopeless in doing correct math. All of which made worse in that these failing professors control Arxiv.org. The blind leading the blind.
> > 
> 
> Archie Pu is a crank and a troll. He can't tell the difference between AND and OR, and doesn't want to know. So, if you don't want to know the difference either, read on! 
> 
> 
> Dan
> 
> Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
> Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com


Discussion
Fundamentals Of Corporate Finance 9th Canadian Edition by Stephen A. Ross test bank
By tomato hello 1 post 1 view updated 8:29 AM
 


Discussion
Re: unpaid AP doing the world's finest logic, while Cambridge, Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton teach dunce Logic
By Michael Moroney 8 posts 40 views updated 8:25 AM

AP writes: look,they tore down the wretched fool Christensen's logic page, now the wretched fool is spamming sci.math with tomato hello to push people off the front page

Time for prison for Dan Christensen, Moroney, Jan Burse

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#437489 — Re: Archimedes "unofficial state idiot of South Dakota" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test

AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>Discussion

Why does hypocrite Archimedes Plutonium actually quote how these groups
are about discussion, yet he refuses to participate in actual discussion
of his failed ideas? And he attacks anyone who actually tries to engage
him in discussion?

>Fundamentals Of Corporate Finance 9th Canadian Edition by Stephen A. Ross test bank
>By tomato hello 1 post 1 view updated 8:29 AM

>Discussion
>Fundamentals Of Corporate Finance 9th Canadian Edition by Stephen A. Ross test bank
>By tomato hello 1 post 1 view updated 8:29 AM

Why does hypocrite Archimedes Plutonium complain about spammers and
babblers when Archimedes Plutonium is the biggest spammer and babbler
in these groups? Does Plutonium think he's special and thus allowed to
spam and babble? Or is he really so dumb and stoopid that he doesn't even
understand he is a spammer and babbler?


>AP writes: look,they tore down the wretched fool Christensen's logic page, now the wretched fool is spamming sci.math with tomato hello to push people off the front page

They did? Why does it work for me?

>Time for prison for Dan Christensen, Moroney, Jan Burse

Plutonium, you are lucky that spamming and babbling here isn't punishable
by a prison term. You'd get a life sentence if it was!

x-no-archive: yes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#437591

Is it Moroney, or Burse or Christensen and his comrades that spams sci.math with books and solution manuals-- not to sell -- but to push people off the front page


About


Discussion
Ebook for; Solutions Manual For; Test Bank for Managerial Accounting, The Cornerstone of Business Decision-Making, 7e Maryanne Mowen, Don Hansen, Dan Heitger, contact direct by email at studentshelp(at)hotmail(dot)com (1)
By smtb...@gmail.com 1 post 0 views updated 2:02 PM

Cynthia Larive,Mark Alber,John Baez, UC-Riverside vs. Matthias Franz,Nicole Lemire,UWO// Dan asks for sine of 45 degrees in your goofy math--when you still teach the ellipse is a conic when it never was-- are you all education parasites?(see proof)
1 post by 1 author 




me (Archimedes Plutonium change)



9:30 PM (10 minutes ago)




On Saturday, February 16, 2019 at 7:49:33 PM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote: 

> 
> Did you ever figure out the sine of 45 degrees in your new trig system, 


Cynthia Larive,Mark Alber,John Baez, UC-Riverside vs. Matthias Franz,Nicole Lemire,UWO// Dan asks for sine of 45 degrees in you goofy math-- when you still teach the ellipse is a conic when it never was-- are you all education parasites? (see proof below) 

Newsgroups: sci.physics 
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 00:28:31 -0800 (PST) 
In-Reply-To: <421c6f56-7355-4ec6-9747-d13345ca3364@googlegroups.com> 
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com 
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.208.232.34; 
 posting-account=jPnQ2goAAAA461y3QD0lbyw0oKeThma1 
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.208.232.34 
References: <0f307785-464a-4e59-b400-f26396465d90@googlegroups.com> 
 <a06f5f30-857e-4c33-9094-2bfc67a63fb5@googlegroups.com> <afe56d2e-3fca-4c76-81da-401216c0fad2@googlegroups.com> 
 <421c6f56-7355-4ec6-9747-d13345ca3364@googlegroups.com> 
User-Agent: G2/1.0 
MIME-Version: 1.0 
Message-ID: <69d8bde6-bcb6-472f-9765-65e2aa178d03@googlegroups.com> 
Subject: asshole 
From: noTthaTguY <abu.ku...@gmail.com> 
Injection-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 08:28:33 +0000 


On Sunday, March 12, 2017 at 3:28:35 AM UTC-5, noTthaTguY wrote: 
> ellipses are ovals, but not all ovals are elipses, of course; 
> just grab a dictionary, asshole 
> 



Robin Armstrong,Mustafa Akcoglu,Spyros Alexakis,Univ Toronto asked by UWO Dan Christensen asks for the sine of 45 degrees in their goofy trig system, never realizing the sine function is actually a semicircle wave? 


Robin Armstrong,Mustafa Akcoglu,Spyros Alexakis,Univ Toronto asked by UWO Dan Christensen asks for the sine of 45 degrees in their goofy trig system, never realizing the sine function is actually a semicircle wave? 


On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 11:40:34 PM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote: 
> STILL cannot even give us the sine of 45 degrees in his goofy trig system. Again, he just runs away and hides, desperately trying to change the subject. 
> 
> 
> Dan 
  

David Eggen, Gordon Wyant, Zach Churchill,UWO's,Matthias  Franz,John Jardine,Massoud Khalkhali,Nicole Lemire// Are you as ignorant and a education parasite as Christensen on the ELLIPSE is never a conic?? 

Definition: education parasite: a person or a group of people that values money or convenience ahead of the Truth. They never want to fix errors but teach errors forever because it takes time and money out of them to teach the truth. 



   /\-------/\ 
   \::O:::O::/ 
  (::_  ^  _::) 
   \_`-----'_/ 
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Canada. 
And, even though you-- professors of physics, want to remain stupid in not knowing what is really the electron in atoms has to be the muon at 105MeV and proton at 840MeV with Dirac's magnetic monopole being .5MeV, your students deserve better. Or math professors remaining stupid on ellipse is never a conic, 3 OR 2 = 5 is bad failed logic and Trig is based on semicircle wave, not sinusoid. 

The world no longer needs physics professors who cannot understand Angular Momentum and that the Chemical bond cannot exist with proton = 938MeV, electron= .5MeV. 

And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better. 

Yes, there, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars. 

But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV. 

What answer did they give? 


Univ Western Ontario math dept 
Janusz Adamus, Tatyana  Barron,   Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias  Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon 


Amit Chakma (chem engr) 

Univ. Western Ontario physics dept 
Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang 


Christensen asks Univ Western Ontario Drs  Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami which is AP's 2nd greatest theory- Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law of atoms, or, AP theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole   

Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong 

Univ Toronto math dept 
Mustafa Akcoglu, Spyros Alexakis, Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook, Chandler Davis, Nicholas Derzko, Eric Ellers, Ilya Gekhtman, Ian Graham, Steve Halpern, Wahidul Haque, Abe Igelfeld, Velimir Jurdjevic, Ivan Kupka, Anthony Lam, Michael Lorimer, James McCool, Eric Mendelsohn, Kunio Murasugi, Jeremy Quastel, Peter Rosenthal, Paul Selick, Dipak Sen, Rick Sharpe, Stuart Smith, Frank Tall, Steve Tanny 


Canadian Educ Ministers-- endorsing stalking hypocrites like Dan Christensen with his insane 2 OR 10 = 12 when even a Canadian 8 year old knows 2 AND 10 = 12. Endorsing the "perpetual stalking by Dan Christensen" 

Sebastien Proulx, Jordan Brown, David Eggen, Gordon Wyant, Zach Churchill, Ian Wishart, Rob Fleming, Justin Trudeau 


UC Riverside Math Dept, provost: Cynthia Larive- chemist, 
Mark Alber, John Baez, Mei-Chu Chang, Vyjayanthi Chari, Kevin Costello, Po-Ning Chen, Wee Liang Gan, Gerhard Gierz, Jacob Greenstein, Jose Gonzalez, Zhuang-dan Guan, Jim  Kelliher, Sara Lapan, Michel Lapidus, Carl Mautner, Amir  Moradifam, Yat Sun Poon, Ziv Ran, David Rush, Reinhard Schultz, Stefano Vidussi, David Weisbart, Fred Wilhelm, Bun Wong, Yulong Xing, Feng Xu, Qi Zhang 

Proofs ellipse is never a conic, always a cylinder section by 
Archimedes Plutonium 
-------------------- 
AP's proof the ellipse is never a Conic Section, always a Cylinder section, and how the proof works 

Let us analyze AP's Proof 

On Friday, September 14, 2018 at 6:57:36 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 

  
  Array:: Analytic Geometry proof that Cylinder section= Ellipse//Conic 
  section = Oval, never ellipse 
  
  Now I did 3 Experiments and 3 models of the problem, but it turns out 
  that one model is superior over all the other models. One model is the 
  best of all. 
  
  That model is where you construct a cone and a cylinder and then 
  implant a circle inside the cone and cylinder attached to a handle so 
  that you can rotate the circle inside. Mine uses a long nail that I 
  poked holes into the side of a cylinder and another one inside a cone 
  made from heavy wax paper of magazine covers. And I used a Mason or 
  Kerr used lid and I attached them to the nail by drilling two holes 
  into each lid and running a wire as fastener. All of this done so I 
  can rotate or pivot the circle inside the cylinder and cone. You need 
  a long nail, for if you make the models too small or too skinny, you 
  lose clarity. 
  
  ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Cylinder Section is a Ellipse:: 
  
  
                E 
               __ 
        .-'              `-. 
      .'                    `. 
    /                         \ 
   ;                           ; 
  | G          c              | H 
   ;                           ; 
    \                         / 
     `.                     .' 
        `-.    _____  .-' 
                  F 
  


Alright, focus on the distance from c to F in the cone-cut compared to the distance from c to E 

In a Cylinder cut, those two distances are the same because a cylinder has two axes of symmetry. 

The side view of a cylinder is this 

|    | 
|    | 
|    | 

That allows cE to be the same distance as cF 


But the side view of the cone is 

     /\E 
    /c \ 
F /     \ 


The distance c to E is shorter because the slant of the side walls of the cone are in the direction of shortening cE, whereas the slant opposite c in cF make that distance larger than cE 

  The above is a view of a ellipse with center c and is produced by the 
  Sectioning of a Cylinder as long as the cut is not perpendicular to 
  the base, and as long as the cut involves two points not larger than 
  the height of the cylinder walls. What we want to prove is that the 
  cut is always a ellipse, which is a plane figure of two axes of 
  symmetry with a Major Axis and Minor Axis and center at c. 
  
  Side view of Cylinder EGFH above with entry point cut at E and exit 
  point cut at F and where c denotes the central axis of the cylinder 
  and where x denotes a circle at c parallel with the base-circle of 
  cylinder 
  
  |                              | 
  |                              | E 
  |                              | 
  |                              | 
  |x            c              |x 
  |                              | 
  |                              | 
  |                              | 
  |F                            | 
  |                              | 
  |                              | 
  |                              | 
  
  

So we can see that the distance cE = cF in cylinder for the walls are Parallel to one another, giving distance symmetry 

But in the Cone, the walls are not parallel, shortening the distance cE compared to cF. Leaving only one axis of symmetry that of EF. The oval is the conic section of a cut at a slant, while the cylinder cut at a slant is a ellipse. The Oval has just one axis of symmetry. 

  So, what is the proof that figure EGFH is always an ellipse in the 
  cylinder section? The line segment GH is the diameter of the circle 
  base of cylinder and the cylinder axis cuts this diameter in half such 
  that Gc = cH. Now we only need to show that Fc = cE. This is done from 
  the right triangles cxF and cxE, for we note that by Angle-Side-Angle 
  these two right triangles are congruent and hence Fc = cE, our second 
  axis of symmetry and thus figure EGFH is always an ellipse. QED 
  
  
  
  Array proof:: Analytic Geometry proof that Conic section= Oval// never ellipse 
  
  ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Conic Section is a Oval, never an ellipse:: 
  
  
           A 
        ,'"   "`. 
     /            \ 
  C |     c       | D 
   \               / 
      ` . ___ .' 
           B 
  
  The above is a view of a figure formed from the cut of a conic with 
  center c as the axis of the cone and is produced by the Sectioning of 
  a Cone as long as the cut is not perpendicular to the base, and as 
  long as the cut is not a hyperbola, parabola or circle (nor line). 
  What we want to prove is that this cut is always a oval, never an 
  ellipse. An oval is defined as a plane figure of just one axis of 
  symmetry and possessing a center, c, with a Major Diameter as the axis 
  of symmetry and a Minor Diameter. In our diagram above, the major 
  diameter is AB and minor diameter is CD. 
  
  Alright, almost the same as with Cylinder section where we proved the 
  center was half way between Major Axis and Minor Axis of cylinder, 
  only in the case of the Conic, we find that the center is half way 
  between CD the Minor Diameter, but the center is not halfway in 
  between the Major Diameter, and all of that because of the reason the 
  slanted walls of the cone cause the distance cA to be far smaller than 
  the distance cB. In the diagram below we have the circle of x centered 
  at c and parallel to base. The angle at cx is not 90 degrees as in 
  cylinder. The angle of cAx is not the same as the angle cBx, as in the 
  case of the cylinder, because the walls of the cone-for line segments- 
  are slanted versus parallel in the cylinder. Triangles cAx and cBx are 
  not congruent, and thus, the distance of cA is not equal to cB, 
  leaving only one axis of symmetry AB, not CD. 
  
       /  \A 
   x/  c  \x 
  B/         \ 
  
  Hence, every cut in the Cone, not a hyperbola, not a parabola, not a 
  circle (not a line) is a Oval, never an ellipse. 
  
  QED 
  
  --Archimedes Plutonium 


AP 
Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.      

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. 

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#437597 — Re: Archimedes "unofficial state idiot of South Dakota" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test

AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 3:19:12 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:

>> Oh dear, it appears that poor autistic Archimedes Plutonium

>AP writes: are you saying that Relf is always off-topic because he is 
>autistic???????

You failed again, poor autistic Archimedes Plutonium! I wrote "poor 
autistic Archimedes Plutonium", not about Relf.  Could you please
quit failing in here?  All you do is fail, fail fail and fail!
But that's what autistic people lile Archimedes Plutonium do, the same
thing over and over.

<snip several hundred lines of Plutonium's autistic "12 Failures of Plutonium>

x-no-archive: yes

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.math

csiph-web