Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.math > #436797 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-03-10 17:13 -0700 |
| Last post | 2019-03-11 02:20 +0000 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.math
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Eastside asks why is Caltech math idiots of the ellipse, Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari,Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris// ellipse is never a conic (see proof below) Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 17:13 -0700
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-11 02:20 +0000
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-10 17:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Eastside asks why is Caltech math idiots of the ellipse, Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari,Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris// ellipse is never a conic (see proof below) |
| Message-ID | <92c5a95a-276c-4fcc-813e-85ee2e7c79b8@googlegroups.com> |
On Sunday, March 10, 2019 at 2:07:15 PM UTC-5, eastsi...@gmail.com wrote: > > Of course there's a word for it: insanity. Eastside asks why is Caltech math idiots of the ellipse, Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari,Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris// ellipse is never a conic (see proof below) On Thursday, March 7, 2019 at 6:02:46 PM UTC-6, eastsi...@gmail.com wrote: > > Archie, ALL scientists know what causes summer and winter. Show me one who dossn't. NOBOBY suggests it because of Doppler redshift. OLGA K. DUDKO, RAPHAEL M. FLAUGER,MICHAEL M. FOGLER, of UC San Diego, are you as stupid as Eastside to never understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole// ellipse is never a conic (see proof below) AP writes: Eastside a 5 year endless insane stalker, time for medication for Erik Eastside, instead of his senseless barking attack dog stunts .. .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-.. , . `.' ' `. .' .' ` ` ' `.. ; . ; .' . `. ; ; . ' `. . ' . ' ` `. | . '. ' . 0 0 ' `. ' ` ; ` .' ` ; U ` ; '; ` : | ;.. :` ` : `;. ```. .-; | ' '. ` ``.., .' :' ' ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I'm the village idiot Erik Eastside, and although I gargle a few lines of meaningless math, I spend my time attacking those on sci.math who actually do math. I am a loser and life for me boils down to attack attack attack for I am a depressed worthless soul, and my parents won't give me the money to see a psychologists to help. So I have "no life" unless I can attack AP 24 -- 7 -- 365 ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' ' ` ` ; ; ' ' ` ` ; ; ' ' ` `. ````'''''' ' ' ` . ' ' / ` `. ' ' . / ` .. ..' .'"""""...' / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....''' / .'' ; ` .' ` ...'.' ; .' ` .' ` "" .' .' | ` .; \ ` ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ ` :' | ' ` , `. ` | ' ` ' `. ` ` ' ` ; `. | `.' ` ; `-' `...' NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.201.118.229 From: eastsi...@gmail.com Stanford University, math dept. Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience) Provost: Persis Drell (physics) Stanford physics dept. Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian CalTech math dept Michael Aschbacher, Alexei Borodin, Danny Calegari Matthias Flach, Anton N. Kapustin, Alexander Kechris Alexei Kitaev, Matilde Marcolli, Nikolai Makarov, Vladimir Markovic, Hiroshi Oguri, Eric Rains, Dinakar Ramakrishnan Barry Simon, Richard Wilson, Tom Graber, Sergei Gukov, Elena Mantovan, Yi NI, Caltech Physics Dept Barry Barish, Felix Boehm, Steven Frautschi Murray Gell-Mann, David Goodstein, Thomas Phillips, John Schwarz, Barry Simon, Kip Thorne, Petr Vogel, Rochus Vogt, Ward Whaling, Michael E. Brown, Konstantin Batygin UCLA chancellor: Gene D. Block (biology) UCLA Physics dept Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, Katsushi Arisaka, Michalis Bachtis Eric Becklin, Zvi Bern, Rubin Braunstein, Stuart Brown, Robijn Bruinsma Charles Buchanan, Wesley Campbell, Troy Carter, Sudip Chakravarty W. Gilbert Clark, John Cornwall, Robert Cousins, Eric D'Hoker Robert Finkelstein, Christian Fronsdal, Walter Gekelman, Graciela Gelmini George Gruner, Michael Gutperle, Brad Hansen, Jay Hauser, Karoly Holczer Huan Huang, Eric Hudson, George Igo, Per Kraus, Alexander Kusenko Thomas Mason, George Morales, Warren Mori, Steven Moszkowski Christoph Niemann, Kumar Patel, Roberto Peccei, Claudio Pellegrini Seth Putterman, B. Regan, James Rosenzweig, Joseph Rudnick David Saltzberg, William Slater, Reiner Stenzel, Terry Tomboulis, Jean Turner Univ Calif San Diego, physics dept HENRY D. I. ABARBANEL, KAM S. ARNOLD, DANIEL P. AROVAS, RICHARD D. AVERITT, JULIO T. BARREIRO, DIMITRI N. BASOV, STEVEN BOGGS, JAMES G. BRANSON, ADAM J. BURGASSER, LEONID V. BUTOV, ALISON COIL,EVA-MARIA S. COLLINS, MAX (MASSIMILIANO) DI VENTRA, PATRICK H. DIAMOND, FRED C. DRISCOLL, DANIEL H. DUBIN, OLGA K. DUDKO, RAPHAEL M. FLAUGER,MICHAEL M. FOGLER, ALEX FRAÑÓ, GEORGE M. FULLER,DANIEL R GREEN, KIM GRIEST, BENJAMIN GRINSTEIN,ALEXANDER GROISMAN, TARUN GROVER, JORGE E. HIRSCH, MICHAEL HOLST, TERENCE T. HWA, KENNETH A. INTRILIGATOR, ELIZABETH JENKINS, SUCKJOON JUN, BRIAN KEATING, DUSAN KERES, DAVID KLEINFELD , QUINN M. KONOPACKY, ELENA F. KOSLOVER, JULIUS KUTI, TONGYAN LIN, ANEESH V. MANOHAR, M. BRIAN MAPLE, JOHN A. MCGREEVY, THOMAS W. MURPHY, KAIXUAN NI, MICHAEL L. NORMAN, THOMAS M. O'NEIL, HANS P. PAAR, MARK PADDOCK, JEREMIE PALACCI, TENIO POPMINTCHEV, WOUTER-JAN RAPPEL,KARIN M. SANDSTROM, IVAN K. SCHULLER, LU J. SHAM,VIVEK SHARMA, TATYANA O. SHARPEE, BRIAN SHOTWELL, OLEG SHPYRKO, ELIZABETH H SIMMONS,SUNIL K. SINHA, DOUGLAS E. SMITH, HARRY SUHL Math dept Univ Calif, San Diego Edward Bender, James Bunch, Thomas Enright, Ronald Evans, Jay Fillmore, Carl FitzGerald, Michael Freedman, Adriano Garsia, Fan Graham, Leonard Haff, Hubert Halkin, Richard Hamilton, Bill Helton, Jim Lin, Alfred Manaster, John O'Quigley, Yose Rinott, Burt Rodin, Murray Rosenblatt, Linda Rothschild, Michael Sharpe, Lance Small, Don Smith, Harold Stark, Audrey Terras, Adrian Wadsworth, Nolan Wallach, John Wavrik, Daniel Wulbert /\-------/\ \::O:::O::/ (::_ ^ _::) \_`-----'_/ You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in LA? And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better. Yes, there , what did they say--Which AP theory do they love the most, that real electron is the muon or the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars. But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV. What answer did they give? Proofs ellipse is never a conic, always a cylinder section by Archimedes Plutonium -------------------- AP's proof the ellipse is never a Conic Section, always a Cylinder section, and how the proof works Let us analyze AP's Proof On Friday, September 14, 2018 at 6:57:36 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Array:: Analytic Geometry proof that Cylinder section= Ellipse//Conic section = Oval, never ellipse Now I did 3 Experiments and 3 models of the problem, but it turns out that one model is superior over all the other models. One model is the best of all. That model is where you construct a cone and a cylinder and then implant a circle inside the cone and cylinder attached to a handle so that you can rotate the circle inside. Mine uses a long nail that I poked holes into the side of a cylinder and another one inside a cone made from heavy wax paper of magazine covers. And I used a Mason or Kerr used lid and I attached them to the nail by drilling two holes into each lid and running a wire as fastener. All of this done so I can rotate or pivot the circle inside the cylinder and cone. You need a long nail, for if you make the models too small or too skinny, you lose clarity. ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Cylinder Section is a Ellipse:: E __ .-' `-. .' `. / \ ; ; | G c | H ; ; \ / `. .' `-. _____ .-' F Alright, focus on the distance from c to F in the cone-cut compared to the distance from c to E In a Cylinder cut, those two distances are the same because a cylinder has two axes of symmetry. The side view of a cylinder is this | | | | | | That allows cE to be the same distance as cF But the side view of the cone is /\E /c \ F / \ The distance c to E is shorter because the slant of the side walls of the cone are in the direction of shortening cE, whereas the slant opposite c in cF make that distance larger than cE The above is a view of a ellipse with center c and is produced by the Sectioning of a Cylinder as long as the cut is not perpendicular to the base, and as long as the cut involves two points not larger than the height of the cylinder walls. What we want to prove is that the cut is always a ellipse, which is a plane figure of two axes of symmetry with a Major Axis and Minor Axis and center at c. Side view of Cylinder EGFH above with entry point cut at E and exit point cut at F and where c denotes the central axis of the cylinder and where x denotes a circle at c parallel with the base-circle of cylinder | | | | E | | | | |x c |x | | | | | | |F | | | | | | | So we can see that the distance cE = cF in cylinder for the walls are Parallel to one another, giving distance symmetry But in the Cone, the walls are not parallel, shortening the distance cE compared to cF. Leaving only one axis of symmetry that of EF. The oval is the conic section of a cut at a slant, while the cylinder cut at a slant is a ellipse. The Oval has just one axis of symmetry. So, what is the proof that figure EGFH is always an ellipse in the cylinder section? The line segment GH is the diameter of the circle base of cylinder and the cylinder axis cuts this diameter in half such that Gc = cH. Now we only need to show that Fc = cE. This is done from the right triangles cxF and cxE, for we note that by Angle-Side-Angle these two right triangles are congruent and hence Fc = cE, our second axis of symmetry and thus figure EGFH is always an ellipse. QED Array proof:: Analytic Geometry proof that Conic section= Oval// never ellipse ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Conic Section is a Oval, never an ellipse:: A ,'" "`. / \ C | c | D \ / ` . ___ .' B The above is a view of a figure formed from the cut of a conic with center c as the axis of the cone and is produced by the Sectioning of a Cone as long as the cut is not perpendicular to the base, and as long as the cut is not a hyperbola, parabola or circle (nor line). What we want to prove is that this cut is always a oval, never an ellipse. An oval is defined as a plane figure of just one axis of symmetry and possessing a center, c, with a Major Diameter as the axis of symmetry and a Minor Diameter. In our diagram above, the major diameter is AB and minor diameter is CD. Alright, almost the same as with Cylinder section where we proved the center was half way between Major Axis and Minor Axis of cylinder, only in the case of the Conic, we find that the center is half way between CD the Minor Diameter, but the center is not halfway in between the Major Diameter, and all of that because of the reason the slanted walls of the cone cause the distance cA to be far smaller than the distance cB. In the diagram below we have the circle of x centered at c and parallel to base. The angle at cx is not 90 degrees as in cylinder. The angle of cAx is not the same as the angle cBx, as in the case of the cylinder, because the walls of the cone-for line segments- are slanted versus parallel in the cylinder. Triangles cAx and cBx are not congruent, and thus, the distance of cA is not equal to cB, leaving only one axis of symmetry AB, not CD. / \A x/ c \x B/ \ Hence, every cut in the Cone, not a hyperbola, not a parabola, not a circle (not a line) is a Oval, never an ellipse. QED --Archimedes Plutonium AP Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu ::\ ::|:: /:: ::\::|::/:: _ _ (:Y:) - - ::/::|::\:: ::/ ::|:: \:: One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. . \ . . | . /. . . \. . .|. . /. . ..\....|.../... ::\:::|::/:: --------------- ------------- --------------- (Y) ------------- --------------- -------------- ::/:::|::\:: ../....|...\... . . /. . .|. . \. . . / . . | . \ . http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe Archimedes Plutonium
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-11 02:20 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <q64glc$5ln$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #436797 |
AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science: >So here we see that redshift of light is about the medium light travels >through and says nothing about distance to source nor motion of source. Dopple= "We" again, Archie? You and your diseased cats? Don't you think you should take your diseased cats to the vet rather than trying to teach them astronomy and optics? x-no-archive: yes
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.math
csiph-web