Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #434817 > unrolled thread

Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT

Back to article view | Back to sci.math

Contents

  Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 06:11 -0800
    many case studies in a math proof is a sign of weakness and likely fakery Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 07:10 -0800
      Re: many case studies in a math proof is a sign of weakness and likely fakery Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2019-02-19 15:57 +0000
        how logic fruitcakes try to plug up Euler's flaw Re: many case studies in a math proof is a sign of weakness and likely fakery Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 14:02 -0800
          Euler's logic fallacy-- put the cart before the horse Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 14:23 -0800
            Euler's double assumptions as one in his fake FLT exp3 Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 15:16 -0800
              Euler's missing case proof of three evens Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 17:48 -0800
                math phd needs a logic course Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-19 22:00 -0800
                  math phd needs a logic course Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 07:11 -0800
                    2^3 + 2^3 = 2^4 Re: math phd needs a logic course Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 08:42 -0800
                      Re: 2^3 + 2^3 = 2^4 Re: math phd needs a logic course Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 09:29 -0800
                        Re: 2^3 + 2^3 = 2^4 Re: math phd needs a logic course Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 09:56 -0800
                          math professors today seek fame and fortune-- not the truth of math Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 14:43 -0800
                            math professors today seek fame and fortune-- not the truth of math Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-20 21:18 -0800
                              math professors today seek fame and fortune-- not the truth of math Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 09:53 -0800
                                math professors enjoy fake math like Wiles more than they enjoy math truth Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-21 14:38 -0800
                                  math professors enjoy fake math like Wiles more than they enjoy math truth Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 17:48 -0800
                                    apparently Wiles choses fame and fortune, not math truth Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-22 21:57 -0800
                                      Re: apparently Wiles choses fame and fortune, not math truth Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Bill <WhoKnows@newsguy.com> - 2019-02-23 02:22 -0500
                                        Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-23 15:28 +0000
                                      two cases independent of each other had to be proven Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 12:49 -0800
                                        Re: two cases independent of each other had to be proven Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT konyberg <konyberg@online.no> - 2019-02-23 14:35 -0800
                                        Re: two cases independent of each other had to be proven Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 14:56 -0800
                                          Re: two cases independent of each other had to be proven Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-23 22:03 -0800
                                            case study proofs are often junky proofs Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 00:07 -0800
                                              Re: case study proofs are often junky proofs Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT konyberg <konyberg@online.no> - 2019-02-24 00:46 -0800
                                              case study proofs are often junky proofs Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 15:32 -0800
                                                Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-25 03:36 +0000
                                                case study proofs are often junky proofs Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 22:12 -0800
                                                  Re: case study proofs are often junky proofs Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 22:24 -0800
                                                  case study proofs are often junky proofs Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-25 22:24 -0800
                                                    Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-26 07:51 +0000
                                                    when math professors never take Logic in college-- it shows in their error filled fake proofs Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 15:07 -0800
                                                      Re: when math professors never take Logic in college-- it shows in their error filled fake proofs Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-26 23:30 +0000
                                                      Re: when math professors never take Logic in college-- it shows in their error filled fake proofs Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 17:02 -0800
                                                        Three evens Re: when math professors never take Logic in college-- it shows in their error filled fake proofs Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 23:47 -0800
                                                          Three evens Re: when math professors never take Logic in college-- it shows in their error filled fake proofs Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 12:36 -0800
                                                            Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-27 21:44 +0000
                                                            Re: Three evens Re: when math professors never take Logic in college-- it shows in their error filled fake proofs Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 13:54 -0800
                                                              Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-28 05:13 +0000
                                                              Re: Three evens Re: when math professors never take Logic in college-- it shows in their error filled fake proofs Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 01:11 -0800
                                                                the three evens case requires proof Re: when math professors never take Logic in college-- it shows in their error filled fake proofs Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 19:48 -0800
                                                                  the three evens case requires proof Re: when math professors never take Logic in college-- it shows in their error filled fake proofs Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 02:42 -0800
                                                                    Re: the three evens case requires proof Re: when math professors never take Logic in college-- it shows in their error filled fake proofs Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 22:11 -0800
                        Re: 2^3 + 2^3 = 2^4 Re: math phd needs a logic course Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT qbwrfmlx@gmail.com - 2019-02-20 12:19 -0800
              Re: Euler's double assumptions as one in his fake FLT exp3 Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2019-02-20 09:46 +0000
      Re: many case studies in a math proof is a sign of weakness and likely fakery Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Mathedman <Mathedman@hotmail.com> - 2019-02-20 12:01 -0600
    Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-19 16:12 +0000
    STUDENTS BEWARE: AP WANTS YOU TO FAIL IN SCHOOL AND JOIN HIS SINISTER CULT Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> - 2019-02-19 14:21 -0800
      There is now an alternative to the insane asylum that sci.math has become Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> - 2019-02-19 14:25 -0800
    Re: Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2019-02-25 10:17 +0100
    Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-01 06:31 +0000
    AP’s proof of FLT//Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 13:17 -0800
      Re: AP’s proof of FLT//Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT j4n bur53 <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 14:08 -0800
      Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-02 22:15 +0000
      AP’s proof of FLT//Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 00:07 -0800
        One paragraph proof of FLT//Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 09:39 -0800
          Re: One paragraph proof of FLT//Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-03 14:20 -0800
            stalker Eastside POEM, poem corner Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 14:58 -0800
              Re: stalker Eastside POEM, poem corner eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-03 15:10 -0800
          Re: One paragraph proof of FLT//Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 15:12 -0800
            Re: One paragraph proof of FLT//Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-03 15:19 -0800
            Re: One paragraph proof of FLT//Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 15:34 -0800
              Re: One paragraph proof of FLT//Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-03 15:43 -0800
                Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 15:53 -0800
                  Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 00:30 +0000
              Re: One paragraph proof of FLT//Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 15:45 -0800
                need a clarity update on my 2014 proof of FLT//Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-06 08:11 -0800

Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]

#436149 — Re: One paragraph proof of FLT//Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT

Yes, below is a nice one paragraph proof that the Regular FLT cannot exist with a solution because it would tear up the fabric of Algebra axioms. Nothing more needs to be done or said than the paragraph proof, showing that you cannot have Algebra and have a solution in Regular FLT

On Sunday, March 3, 2019 at 11:39:28 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Alright, perhaps there is a one paragraph pure algebra proof of FLT.
> 
> Using two axioms:
> 1) axiom of equality — multiply equation by factor k, to retain equality, every term must be multiplied by k.
> 
> 2) axiom of exponents— given equations A^x + B^y = C^z and D^n + E^n = F^n in counting numbers only the second equation retains equality with a common factor reduction.
> 
> Example of axiom of exponents— 
> 2^3 + 2^3 = 2^4 common factor 2 yields inequality 1^3 + 1^3 =/= 1^4 whereas 6^2 + 8^2 = 10^2 , common factor reduces to 3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2.
> 
> Proof of FLT: if there exists a solution to D^n + E^n = F^n then it is a solution to A^x + B^y = C^z. Impossible for that violates the two axioms listed. Hence a solution to Regular FLT is impossible.
> 
> QED
> 
> Comments: here i simply point out two axiom laws of algebra. And if the world has a solution to Regular FLT, the world cannot have those two axioms.
> 
> AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#436150 — Re: One paragraph proof of FLT//Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT

On Sunday, March 3, 2019 at 3:12:48 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Yes, below is a nice one paragraph proof that the Regular FLT cannot exist with a solution because it would tear up the fabric of Algebra axioms. Nothing more needs to be done or said than the paragraph proof, showing that you cannot have Algebra and have a solution in Regular FLT
> 
> On Sunday, March 3, 2019 at 11:39:28 AM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Alright, perhaps there is a one paragraph pure algebra proof of FLT.
> > 
> > Using two axioms:
> > 1) axiom of equality — multiply equation by factor k, to retain equality, every term must be multiplied by k.
> > 
> > 2) axiom of exponents— given equations A^x + B^y = C^z and D^n + E^n = F^n in counting numbers only the second equation retains equality with a common factor reduction.
> > 
> > Example of axiom of exponents— 
> > 2^3 + 2^3 = 2^4 common factor 2 yields inequality 1^3 + 1^3 =/= 1^4 whereas 6^2 + 8^2 = 10^2 , common factor reduces to 3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2.
> > 
> > Proof of FLT: if there exists a solution to D^n + E^n = F^n then it is a solution to A^x + B^y = C^z. Impossible for that violates the two axioms listed. Hence a solution to Regular FLT is impossible.
> > 
> > QED
> > 
> > Comments: here i simply point out two axiom laws of algebra. And if the world has a solution to Regular FLT, the world cannot have those two axioms.
> > 
> > AP

No, Archie.  2^3/2 != 1^3.  2^3 = 2*2*2.  2^4 = 2*2*2*2. Remember?  You knew
that once.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#436151 — Re: One paragraph proof of FLT//Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT

On Sunday, March 3, 2019 at 5:12:48 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Yes, below is a nice one paragraph proof that the Regular FLT cannot exist with a solution because it would tear up the fabric of Algebra axioms. Nothing more needs to be done or said than the paragraph proof, showing that you cannot have Algebra and have a solution in Regular FLT
> 

It is nice not only for its brevity-- one paragraph, but very very nice in that you need never even have to show samples or examples. All you need to say is merely

Generalized FLT  is A^x + B^y = C^z where A,B,C are counting numbers and x,y,z are counting numbers larger than 2

Regular FLT is A^k + B^k = C^k where A,B,C,k are counting numbers and the constant k is larger than 2

Axiom of Equality-- to keep the equality, multiply every term by a constant k
Axiom of Exponents-- only time you can factor out A^x + B^y = C^z and retain equality is when x,y,z = a constant

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#436152 — Re: One paragraph proof of FLT//Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT

On Sunday, March 3, 2019 at 3:34:45 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Sunday, March 3, 2019 at 5:12:48 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Yes, below is a nice one paragraph proof that the Regular FLT cannot exist with a solution because it would tear up the fabric of Algebra axioms. Nothing more needs to be done or said than the paragraph proof, showing that you cannot have Algebra and have a solution in Regular FLT
> > 
> 
> It is nice not only for its brevity-- one paragraph, but very very nice in that you need never even have to show samples or examples. All you need to say is merely
> 
> Generalized FLT  is A^x + B^y = C^z where A,B,C are counting numbers and x,y,z are counting numbers larger than 2
> 
> Regular FLT is A^k + B^k = C^k where A,B,C,k are counting numbers and the constant k is larger than 2
> 
> Axiom of Equality-- to keep the equality, multiply every term by a constant k
> Axiom of Exponents-- only time you can factor out A^x + B^y = C^z and retain equality is when x,y,z = a constant
> 
> AP

No Archie.  There is a simple example for A^x + B^y = C^z.  You gave it
yourself:

A = 2, B = 2, C = 2, x = 3, y = 3, z = 4.  8 + 8 = 16.  x, y, z are not the
same.  You really need to go back and learn arithmetic again.  You're not ready
for algebra.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#436155 — Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole

On Sunday, March 3, 2019 at 5:43:23 PM UTC-6, eastsi...@gmail.com wrote:
> No Archie.  There is a simple example for A^x + B^y = C^z.  You gave it
> yourself:

Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
3 posts by 2 authors 



me (Archimedes Plutonium change) 	
12/31/18



Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole 

Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block 
Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, Katsushi Arisaka too stupid to understand AP's two theories- Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law of atoms, and Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole 

On Monday, December 31, 2018 at 4:19:25 PM UTC-6, eastsi...@gmail.com wrote: 
>AP serves word salad with oil and vinegar 

AP writes: Eastside a 5 year endless insane stalker, time for medication for the sick-fuck Erik Eastside, instead of his senseless barking attack dog stunts 


NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.201.118.229 
From: eastsi...@gmail.com 


UCLA chancellor: Gene D. Block (biology) 

UCLA Physics dept 
Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, Katsushi Arisaka, Michalis Bachtis 
Eric Becklin, Zvi Bern, Rubin Braunstein, Stuart Brown, Robijn Bruinsma 
Charles Buchanan, Wesley Campbell, Troy Carter, Sudip Chakravarty 
W. Gilbert Clark, John Cornwall, Robert Cousins, Eric D'Hoker 
Robert Finkelstein, Christian Fronsdal, Walter Gekelman, Graciela Gelmini 
George Gruner, Michael Gutperle, Brad Hansen, Jay Hauser, Karoly Holczer 
Huan Huang, Eric Hudson, George Igo, Per Kraus, Alexander Kusenko 
Thomas Mason, George Morales, Warren Mori, Steven Moszkowski 
Christoph Niemann, Kumar Patel, Roberto Peccei, Claudio Pellegrini 
Seth Putterman, B. Regan, James Rosenzweig, Joseph Rudnick 
David Saltzberg, William Slater, Reiner Stenzel, Terry Tomboulis, Jean Turner 



Univ Calif San Diego, physics dept 

HENRY D. I. ABARBANEL, KAM S. ARNOLD, DANIEL P. AROVAS, RICHARD D. AVERITT, JULIO T. BARREIRO 
DIMITRI N. BASOV, STEVEN BOGGS, JAMES G. BRANSON 
ADAM J. BURGASSER, LEONID V. BUTOV, ALISON COIL, 
EVA-MARIA S. COLLINS 
MAX (MASSIMILIANO) DI VENTRA, 
PATRICK H. DIAMOND, FRED C. DRISCOLL, DANIEL H. DUBIN, OLGA K. DUDKO, RAPHAEL M. FLAUGER 
MICHAEL M. FOGLER, ALEX FRAÑÓ, GEORGE M. FULLER, 
DANIEL R GREEN, KIM GRIEST, BENJAMIN GRINSTEIN, 
ALEXANDER GROISMAN, TARUN GROVER, JORGE E. HIRSCH, MICHAEL HOLST, TERENCE T. HWA, KENNETH A. INTRILIGATOR, ELIZABETH JENKINS, SUCKJOON JUN, 
BRIAN KEATING, DUSAN KERES, DAVID KLEINFELD 
, QUINN M. KONOPACKY, ELENA F. KOSLOVER, JULIUS KUTI, TONGYAN LIN, ANEESH V. MANOHAR, M. BRIAN MAPLE, JOHN A. MCGREEVY, THOMAS W. MURPHY, 
KAIXUAN NI, MICHAEL L. NORMAN, THOMAS M. O'NEIL, 
HANS P. PAAR, MARK PADDOCK, JEREMIE PALACCI, 
TENIO POPMINTCHEV, WOUTER-JAN RAPPEL, 
KARIN M. SANDSTROM, IVAN K. SCHULLER, LU J. SHAM, 
VIVEK SHARMA, TATYANA O. SHARPEE, BRIAN SHOTWELL, OLEG SHPYRKO, ELIZABETH H SIMMONS, 
SUNIL K. SINHA, DOUGLAS E. SMITH, HARRY SUHL 


Math dept Univ Calif, San Diego 


Edward Bender, James Bunch, Thomas Enright, Ronald Evans, Jay Fillmore, Carl FitzGerald, 
Michael Freedman, Adriano Garsia, Fan Graham, Leonard Haff, Hubert Halkin, Richard Hamilton, Bill Helton, Jim Lin, Alfred Manaster, John O'Quigley, Yose Rinott, Burt Rodin, Murray Rosenblatt, Linda Rothschild, Michael Sharpe, Lance Small, Don Smith, Harold Stark, Audrey Terras, Adrian Wadsworth, Nolan Wallach, John Wavrik, Daniel Wulbert 



   /\-------/\ 
   \::O:::O::/ 
  (::_  ^  _::) 
   \_`-----'_/ 
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in LA? 
And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better.   


Yes, there Eastside, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars. 

But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV. 

What answer did they give? Eastside? 

AP 


Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.      

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. 

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#436168 — Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test

AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math:
~
>On Sunday, March 3, 2019 at 5:43:23 PM UTC-6, eastsi...@gmail.com wrote:
>> No Archie.  There is a simple example for A^x + B^y = C^z.  You gave it
>> yourself:

>Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile
>Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecil
>the sick-fuck Erik Eastside, instead of his senseless barking attack dog
>AP writes: Eastside a 5 year endless insane stalker, time for medication
>Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile
<snip 100+ lines of stalker spam>

Hey Uncle Al, what do you think of Failure Plutonium attacking someone who
points out Archie's dumb mistake, repeatedly calls him "sickfuck" and
stalks uninvolved professors? How dumb and stoopid is that?


"I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is.  I mean rock-hard
stupid.  Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid.  Surface of Venus
under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid vapor
dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid.  Stupid so stupid that
it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different sensorium of
stupid.  Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid.  Stupid so
collapsed upon itself that it is within its own Schwarzschild radius.  
Black hole stupid.  Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no intellect
can escape.  Singularity stupid. Archie-Poo emits more stupid/second than
our entire galaxy otherwise emits stupid/year.  Quasar stupid.  Nothing
else in the universe can be this stupid.  Archie-Poo is an oozingly
putrescent primordial fragment from the original Big Bang of Stupid, a
pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond
the laws of physics that define maximally extrapolated hypergeometric
n-dimensional backgroundless stupid as we can imagine it.  Archie-Poo is
Planck stupid, a quantum foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid, a grand
unified theory of stupid.

Archie-Poo is the epitome of stupidity, the epiphany of stupid, the
apotheosis of stupidity.  Archie-poo is stooopid."



x-no-archive: yes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#436153 — Re: One paragraph proof of FLT//Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT

Re: One paragraph proof of FLT//Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT

On Sunday, March 3, 2019 at 5:12:48 PM UTC-6, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> Yes, below is a nice one paragraph proof that the Regular FLT cannot exist with a solution because it would tear up the fabric of Algebra axioms. Nothing more needs to be done or said than the paragraph proof, showing that you cannot have Algebra and have a solution in Regular FLT 
> 

It is nice not only for its brevity-- one paragraph, but very very nice in that you need never even have to show samples or examples. All you need to say is merely 

Generalized FLT  is A^x + B^y = C^z where A,B,C are counting numbers and x,y,z are counting numbers larger than 2 

Regular FLT is A^k + B^k = C^k where A,B,C,k are counting numbers and the constant k is larger than 2 

Axiom of Equality-- to keep the equality, multiply every term by a constant k 
Axiom of Exponents-- only time you can factor out A^x + B^y = C^z and retain equality is when x,y,z = a constant k

If Generalized FLT has a solution, then Regular FLT cannot have a solution. If Regular FLT had a solution, then Generalized FLT cannot have a solution. Both cannot exist with a solution set, only one can have a solution set.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#436468 — need a clarity update on my 2014 proof of FLT//Euler’s fake proof of FLT exponent 3 and Wiles fake proof of FLT

Alright no new proof of FLT but i could do with a clarity update on the transition from Generalized to Regular FLT. That was a sticking point for me back in 2014.

It goes something like this— all solutions in Generalized have a prime factor. Assume FLT has a solution. Now factor out the prime factor and inspect what is left. Since all the exponents are the same this leftover from factoring out the prime should also be a solution. But it is not a solution because Generalized says to be a solution we can factor out a prime factor yet this leftover has no prime factor to factor out.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]

Back to top | Article view | sci.math

csiph-web