Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.math > #435930 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-03-01 14:17 -0800 |
| Last post | 2019-03-04 18:56 -0800 |
| Articles | 9 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.math
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Racist-math at Reed College-- ellipse is never a conic, David Perkinson, Lyudmila Korobenko, John Lind, Dylan McNamee, Kyle Ormsby, Angelica Osorno Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 14:17 -0800
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-01 22:39 +0000
AP writes: never any math, never any physics from Moroney, only stalk stalk stalk hatred for 26 years Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 18:22 -0800
Is Moroney, std, Shein, kibo, education shitheads 26 yr long stalking Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 12:35 -0800
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-02 22:18 +0000
Moroney discusses Reed College till the cows come home Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 16:36 -0800
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-04 00:55 +0000
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 18:13 -0800
Re: Moroney discusses Reed College till the cows come home Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 18:56 -0800
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 14:17 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Racist-math at Reed College-- ellipse is never a conic, David Perkinson, Lyudmila Korobenko, John Lind, Dylan McNamee, Kyle Ormsby, Angelica Osorno |
| Message-ID | <d2f4e53c-2eb2-400c-a138-337a0e0a0a1f@googlegroups.com> |
Apparently everyone at Reed College is as blind and ignorant of the ellipse as is Moroney. Here is a proof the ellipse is never a conic and was shown hundreds of times in sci.math and sci.physics. Reed College needs to catch up on the learning curve. Proofs ellipse is never a conic, always a cylinder section by Archimedes Plutonium -------------------- AP's proof the ellipse is never a Conic Section, always a Cylinder section, and how the proof works Let us analyze AP's Proof On Friday, September 14, 2018 at 6:57:36 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Array:: Analytic Geometry proof that Cylinder section= Ellipse//Conic section = Oval, never ellipse Now I did 3 Experiments and 3 models of the problem, but it turns out that one model is superior over all the other models. One model is the best of all. That model is where you construct a cone and a cylinder and then implant a circle inside the cone and cylinder attached to a handle so that you can rotate the circle inside. Mine uses a long nail that I poked holes into the side of a cylinder and another one inside a cone made from heavy wax paper of magazine covers. And I used a Mason or Kerr used lid and I attached them to the nail by drilling two holes into each lid and running a wire as fastener. All of this done so I can rotate or pivot the circle inside the cylinder and cone. You need a long nail, for if you make the models too small or too skinny, you lose clarity. ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Cylinder Section is a Ellipse:: E __ .-' `-. .' `. / \ ; ; | G c | H ; ; \ / `. .' `-. _____ .-' F Alright, focus on the distance from c to F in the cone-cut compared to the distance from c to E In a Cylinder cut, those two distances are the same because a cylinder has two axes of symmetry. The side view of a cylinder is this | | | | | | That allows cE to be the same distance as cF But the side view of the cone is /\E /c \ F / \ The distance c to E is shorter because the slant of the side walls of the cone are in the direction of shortening cE, whereas the slant opposite c in cF make that distance larger than cE The above is a view of a ellipse with center c and is produced by the Sectioning of a Cylinder as long as the cut is not perpendicular to the base, and as long as the cut involves two points not larger than the height of the cylinder walls. What we want to prove is that the cut is always a ellipse, which is a plane figure of two axes of symmetry with a Major Axis and Minor Axis and center at c. Side view of Cylinder EGFH above with entry point cut at E and exit point cut at F and where c denotes the central axis of the cylinder and where x denotes a circle at c parallel with the base-circle of cylinder | | | | E | | | | |x c |x | | | | | | |F | | | | | | | So we can see that the distance cE = cF in cylinder for the walls are Parallel to one another, giving distance symmetry But in the Cone, the walls are not parallel, shortening the distance cE compared to cF. Leaving only one axis of symmetry that of EF. The oval is the conic section of a cut at a slant, while the cylinder cut at a slant is a ellipse. The Oval has just one axis of symmetry. So, what is the proof that figure EGFH is always an ellipse in the cylinder section? The line segment GH is the diameter of the circle base of cylinder and the cylinder axis cuts this diameter in half such that Gc = cH. Now we only need to show that Fc = cE. This is done from the right triangles cxF and cxE, for we note that by Angle-Side-Angle these two right triangles are congruent and hence Fc = cE, our second axis of symmetry and thus figure EGFH is always an ellipse. QED Array proof:: Analytic Geometry proof that Conic section= Oval// never ellipse ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Conic Section is a Oval, never an ellipse:: A ,'" "`. / \ C | c | D \ / ` . ___ .' B The above is a view of a figure formed from the cut of a conic with center c as the axis of the cone and is produced by the Sectioning of a Cone as long as the cut is not perpendicular to the base, and as long as the cut is not a hyperbola, parabola or circle (nor line). What we want to prove is that this cut is always a oval, never an ellipse. An oval is defined as a plane figure of just one axis of symmetry and possessing a center, c, with a Major Diameter as the axis of symmetry and a Minor Diameter. In our diagram above, the major diameter is AB and minor diameter is CD. Alright, almost the same as with Cylinder section where we proved the center was half way between Major Axis and Minor Axis of cylinder, only in the case of the Conic, we find that the center is half way between CD the Minor Diameter, but the center is not halfway in between the Major Diameter, and all of that because of the reason the slanted walls of the cone cause the distance cA to be far smaller than the distance cB. In the diagram below we have the circle of x centered at c and parallel to base. The angle at cx is not 90 degrees as in cylinder. The angle of cAx is not the same as the angle cBx, as in the case of the cylinder, because the walls of the cone-for line segments- are slanted versus parallel in the cylinder. Triangles cAx and cBx are not congruent, and thus, the distance of cA is not equal to cB, leaving only one axis of symmetry AB, not CD. / \A x/ c \x B/ \ Hence, every cut in the Cone, not a hyperbola, not a parabola, not a circle (not a line) is a Oval, never an ellipse. QED --Archimedes Plutonium AP Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu ::\ ::|:: /:: ::\::|::/:: _ _ (:Y:) - - ::/::|::\:: ::/ ::|:: \:: One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. . \ . . | . /. . . \. . .|. . /. . ..\....|.../... ::\:::|::/:: --------------- ------------- --------------- (Y) ------------- --------------- -------------- ::/:::|::\:: ../....|...\... . . /. . .|. . \. . . / . . | . \ . http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe Archimedes Plutonium
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 22:39 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <q5ccbu$olq$4@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #435930 |
AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science: >Apparently everyone at Reed College is as blind and ignorant of the ellipse > as is Moroney. Here is a proof the ellipse is never a conic and was shown You want to learn from Reed College why the ellipse is a conic section? Perhaps they will teach this! x-no-archive: yes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 18:22 -0800 |
| Subject | AP writes: never any math, never any physics from Moroney, only stalk stalk stalk hatred for 26 years |
| Message-ID | <62d15ddf-1446-465d-87bc-a2dcc92c7aaa@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #435934 |
On Friday, March 1, 2019 at 4:40:03 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > Alzheimer On Friday, March 1, 2019 at 5:14:20 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > Alzheimer AP writes: never any math, never any physics from Moroney, only stalk stalk stalk hatred for 26 years
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 12:35 -0800 |
| Subject | Is Moroney, std, Shein, kibo, education shitheads 26 yr long stalking |
| Message-ID | <38a0a5e2-76a5-4ae8-87d0-8f2a779cd7e8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #435934 |
Introduction to Data Mining, By solution...@gmail.com. Last updated 7:55 AM 1 post Testbank, Solutions Manual for By tbs...@gmail.com. Last updated 1:58 AM AP writes: whenever the spam-scam appears in sci.math there appears jan burse stalks— are they connected?? Anyway, Dr. hales is still in denial ellipse is never a conic— how retarded is he—cannot even understand AP’s proof. And the Hales bozo thinks he proved Kepler Packing when he is so stupid— cannot tell a ellipse apart from a oval.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 22:18 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <q5evgb$285$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #436031 |
AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>Subject: Re: Drs.Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram of Stanford, are you as dumb as
> Jan Bielawski, never seeing that a Conic section is a OVAL, never an
> ellipse?? Proofs contained
Oh you want to see the ellipse proof again? Here you go!
Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic
sections are ellipses.
Some preliminaries:
Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
in the proof:
^ x
|
-+- <= x=h
.' | `.
. | .
| | |
' | '
`. | .'
y <----------+ <= x=0
Cone (side view):
.
/|\
/ | \
/b | \
/---+---' <= x = h
/ |' \
/ ' | \
/ ' | \
x = 0 => '-------+-------\
/ a | \
Proof:
r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
qed
x-no-archive: yes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 16:36 -0800 |
| Subject | Moroney discusses Reed College till the cows come home |
| Message-ID | <11edfe9e-bb0a-42ba-85fc-fc02d5dcefbb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #436038 |
On Saturday, March 2, 2019 at 4:18:56 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > Alzheimer Yes, Moroney why are they Alzheimer stupid at Reed College over the ellipse???? Cynthia Larive,Mark Alber,John Baez, UC-Riverside vs. Matthias Franz,Nicole Lemire,UWO// Dan asks for sine of 45 degrees in your goofy math--when you still teach the ellipse is a conic when it never was-- are you all education parasites?(see proof) 1 post by 1 author   me (Archimedes Plutonium change)  9:30 PM (10 minutes ago) On Saturday, February 16, 2019 at 7:49:33 PM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote: > > Did you ever figure out the sine of 45 degrees in your new trig system, Cynthia Larive,Mark Alber,John Baez, UC-Riverside vs. Matthias Franz,Nicole Lemire,UWO// Dan asks for sine of 45 degrees in you goofy math-- when you still teach the ellipse is a conic when it never was-- are you all education parasites? (see proof below) Newsgroups: sci.physics Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 00:28:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <421c6f56-7355-4ec6-9747-d13345ca3364@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups...@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.208.232.34; posting-account=jPnQ2goAAAA461y3QD0lbyw0oKeThma1 NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.208.232.34 References: <0f307785-464a-4e59-b400-f26396465d90@googlegroups.com> <a06f5f30-857e-4c33-9094-2bfc67a63fb5@googlegroups.com> <afe56d2e-3fca-4c76-81da-401216c0fad2@googlegroups.com> <421c6f56-7355-4ec6-9747-d13345ca3364@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <69d8bde6-bcb6-472f-9765-65e2aa178d03@googlegroups.com> Subject: asshole From: noTthaTguY <abu.ku...@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 08:28:33 +0000 On Sunday, March 12, 2017 at 3:28:35 AM UTC-5, noTthaTguY wrote: > ellipses are ovals, but not all ovals are elipses, of course; > just grab a dictionary, asshole > Robin Armstrong,Mustafa Akcoglu,Spyros Alexakis,Univ Toronto asked by UWO Dan Christensen asks for the sine of 45 degrees in their goofy trig system, never realizing the sine function is actually a semicircle wave? Robin Armstrong,Mustafa Akcoglu,Spyros Alexakis,Univ Toronto asked by UWO Dan Christensen asks for the sine of 45 degrees in their goofy trig system, never realizing the sine function is actually a semicircle wave? On Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 11:40:34 PM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote: > STILL cannot even give us the sine of 45 degrees in his goofy trig system. Again, he just runs away and hides, desperately trying to change the subject. > > > Dan David Eggen, Gordon Wyant, Zach Churchill,UWO's,Matthias Franz,John Jardine,Massoud Khalkhali,Nicole Lemire// Are you as ignorant and a education parasite as Christensen on the ELLIPSE is never a conic?? Definition: education parasite: a person or a group of people that values money or convenience ahead of the Truth. They never want to fix errors but teach errors forever because it takes time and money out of them to teach the truth. /\-------/\ \::O:::O::/ (::_ ^ _::) \_`-----'_/ You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Canada. And, even though you-- professors of physics, want to remain stupid in not knowing what is really the electron in atoms has to be the muon at 105MeV and proton at 840MeV with Dirac's magnetic monopole being .5MeV, your students deserve better. Or math professors remaining stupid on ellipse is never a conic, 3 OR 2 = 5 is bad failed logic and Trig is based on semicircle wave, not sinusoid. The world no longer needs physics professors who cannot understand Angular Momentum and that the Chemical bond cannot exist with proton = 938MeV, electron= .5MeV. And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better. Yes, there, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars. But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV. What answer did they give? Univ Western Ontario math dept Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon Amit Chakma (chem engr) Univ. Western Ontario physics dept Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang Christensen asks Univ Western Ontario Drs Peter Brown, Alex Buchel, Jan Cami which is AP's 2nd greatest theory- Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law of atoms, or, AP theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong Univ Toronto math dept Mustafa Akcoglu, Spyros Alexakis, Edward Barbeau, Thomas Bloom, Man-Duen Choi, Stephen Cook, Chandler Davis, Nicholas Derzko, Eric Ellers, Ilya Gekhtman, Ian Graham, Steve Halpern, Wahidul Haque, Abe Igelfeld, Velimir Jurdjevic, Ivan Kupka, Anthony Lam, Michael Lorimer, James McCool, Eric Mendelsohn, Kunio Murasugi, Jeremy Quastel, Peter Rosenthal, Paul Selick, Dipak Sen, Rick Sharpe, Stuart Smith, Frank Tall, Steve Tanny Canadian Educ Ministers-- endorsing stalking hypocrites like Dan Christensen with his insane 2 OR 10 = 12 when even a Canadian 8 year old knows 2 AND 10 = 12. Endorsing the "perpetual stalking by Dan Christensen" Sebastien Proulx, Jordan Brown, David Eggen, Gordon Wyant, Zach Churchill, Ian Wishart, Rob Fleming, Justin Trudeau UC Riverside Math Dept, provost: Cynthia Larive- chemist, Mark Alber, John Baez, Mei-Chu Chang, Vyjayanthi Chari, Kevin Costello, Po-Ning Chen, Wee Liang Gan, Gerhard Gierz, Jacob Greenstein, Jose Gonzalez, Zhuang-dan Guan, Jim Kelliher, Sara Lapan, Michel Lapidus, Carl Mautner, Amir Moradifam, Yat Sun Poon, Ziv Ran, David Rush, Reinhard Schultz, Stefano Vidussi, David Weisbart, Fred Wilhelm, Bun Wong, Yulong Xing, Feng Xu, Qi Zhang Proofs ellipse is never a conic, always a cylinder section by Archimedes Plutonium -------------------- AP's proof the ellipse is never a Conic Section, always a Cylinder section, and how the proof works Let us analyze AP's Proof On Friday, September 14, 2018 at 6:57:36 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Array:: Analytic Geometry proof that Cylinder section= Ellipse//Conic section = Oval, never ellipse Now I did 3 Experiments and 3 models of the problem, but it turns out that one model is superior over all the other models. One model is the best of all. That model is where you construct a cone and a cylinder and then implant a circle inside the cone and cylinder attached to a handle so that you can rotate the circle inside. Mine uses a long nail that I poked holes into the side of a cylinder and another one inside a cone made from heavy wax paper of magazine covers. And I used a Mason or Kerr used lid and I attached them to the nail by drilling two holes into each lid and running a wire as fastener. All of this done so I can rotate or pivot the circle inside the cylinder and cone. You need a long nail, for if you make the models too small or too skinny, you lose clarity. ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Cylinder Section is a Ellipse:: E __ .-' `-. .' `. / \ ; ; | G c | H ; ; \ / `. .' `-. _____ .-' F Alright, focus on the distance from c to F in the cone-cut compared to the distance from c to E In a Cylinder cut, those two distances are the same because a cylinder has two axes of symmetry. The side view of a cylinder is this | | | | | | That allows cE to be the same distance as cF But the side view of the cone is /\E /c \ F / \ The distance c to E is shorter because the slant of the side walls of the cone are in the direction of shortening cE, whereas the slant opposite c in cF make that distance larger than cE The above is a view of a ellipse with center c and is produced by the Sectioning of a Cylinder as long as the cut is not perpendicular to the base, and as long as the cut involves two points not larger than the height of the cylinder walls. What we want to prove is that the cut is always a ellipse, which is a plane figure of two axes of symmetry with a Major Axis and Minor Axis and center at c. Side view of Cylinder EGFH above with entry point cut at E and exit point cut at F and where c denotes the central axis of the cylinder and where x denotes a circle at c parallel with the base-circle of cylinder | | | | E | | | | |x c |x | | | | | | |F | | | | | | | So we can see that the distance cE = cF in cylinder for the walls are Parallel to one another, giving distance symmetry But in the Cone, the walls are not parallel, shortening the distance cE compared to cF. Leaving only one axis of symmetry that of EF. The oval is the conic section of a cut at a slant, while the cylinder cut at a slant is a ellipse. The Oval has just one axis of symmetry. So, what is the proof that figure EGFH is always an ellipse in the cylinder section? The line segment GH is the diameter of the circle base of cylinder and the cylinder axis cuts this diameter in half such that Gc = cH. Now we only need to show that Fc = cE. This is done from the right triangles cxF and cxE, for we note that by Angle-Side-Angle these two right triangles are congruent and hence Fc = cE, our second axis of symmetry and thus figure EGFH is always an ellipse. QED Array proof:: Analytic Geometry proof that Conic section= Oval// never ellipse ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Conic Section is a Oval, never an ellipse:: A ,'" "`. / \ C | c | D \ / ` . ___ .' B The above is a view of a figure formed from the cut of a conic with center c as the axis of the cone and is produced by the Sectioning of a Cone as long as the cut is not perpendicular to the base, and as long as the cut is not a hyperbola, parabola or circle (nor line). What we want to prove is that this cut is always a oval, never an ellipse. An oval is defined as a plane figure of just one axis of symmetry and possessing a center, c, with a Major Diameter as the axis of symmetry and a Minor Diameter. In our diagram above, the major diameter is AB and minor diameter is CD. Alright, almost the same as with Cylinder section where we proved the center was half way between Major Axis and Minor Axis of cylinder, only in the case of the Conic, we find that the center is half way between CD the Minor Diameter, but the center is not halfway in between the Major Diameter, and all of that because of the reason the slanted walls of the cone cause the distance cA to be far smaller than the distance cB. In the diagram below we have the circle of x centered at c and parallel to base. The angle at cx is not 90 degrees as in cylinder. The angle of cAx is not the same as the angle cBx, as in the case of the cylinder, because the walls of the cone-for line segments- are slanted versus parallel in the cylinder. Triangles cAx and cBx are not congruent, and thus, the distance of cA is not equal to cB, leaving only one axis of symmetry AB, not CD. / \A x/ c \x B/ \ Hence, every cut in the Cone, not a hyperbola, not a parabola, not a circle (not a line) is a Oval, never an ellipse. QED --Archimedes Plutonium AP Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu ::\ ::|:: /:: ::\::|::/:: _ _ (:Y:) - - ::/::|::\:: ::/ ::|:: \:: One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. . \ . . | . /. . . \. . .|. . /. . ..\....|.../... ::\:::|::/:: --------------- ------------- --------------- (Y) ------------- --------------- -------------- ::/:::|::\:: ../....|...\... . . /. . .|. . \. . . / . . | . \ . http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe Archimedes Plutonium
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-04 00:55 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <q5ht19$6ds$6@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #436170 |
AlzheimerPlutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
>Yes, Moroney why are they Alzheimer stupid at Reed College over the ellipse???
Oh you really like seeing that ellipse proof! Here it is!
Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic
sections are ellipses.
Some preliminaries:
Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
in the proof:
^ x
|
-+- <= x=h
.' | `.
. | .
| | |
' | '
`. | .'
y <----------+ <= x=0
Cone (side view):
.
/|\
/ | \
/b | \
/---+---' <= x = h
/ |' \
/ ' | \
/ ' | \
x = 0 => '-------+-------\
/ a | \
Proof:
r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
qed
x-no-archive: yes
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-05 18:13 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <ad0420fe-ebe1-4bc0-9fea-5866718e0ea8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #436180 |
Why let this Moroney stalking creep fill up sci.math with spam-scam to push legitimate math off the front page On Sunday, March 3, 2019 at 6:55:10 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > Alzheimer Discussion advanced engineering mathematics , By Erwin Kreyszig , 3rd ed Vol.2 (solutions manual) (1) By trustsolu...@gmail.com 1 post 1 view updated 7:12 PM Discussion adaptive control , Karl Astrom , 2nd ed (solutions manual) (1) By ineedsolu...@gmail.com 1 post 1 view updated 7:06 PM Discussion Accounting Information Systems 14th Global Edition by Marshall B. Romney (Test Bank/solutions manual) (1) By ineedsolu...@gmail.com 1 post 1 view updated 7:03 PM Discussion Accompany Elementary Statistics Ninth Edition by MILTON LOYER (solutions manual) (1) By asoluti...@gmail.com 1 post 1 view updated 6:58 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-04 18:56 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Moroney discusses Reed College till the cows come home |
| Message-ID | <99983469-8b6e-420a-bb85-f6ce9c5380d0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #436170 |
On Monday, March 4, 2019 at 2:45:39 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > Alzheimer AP writes: The Moroney Stalker SONG SONG( played with a light rapp and reggae music beat) Stalk, stalk stalk Moroney, crock, crock, crock SAGA I Moroney has a feeble mind-brain Your conic cut is just insane For a slant cut in cone is an oval Your moron brain is a joke-offal You failed the ellipse, and too stupid for the plane For you are just simply totally insane Why you stalk, stalk stalk, you worthless crock crock crock Not even an ellipse, can you do The oval is the conic cut but you are so dumb and stupid too Your entire head is up your loo loo lu Moroney, so dumb in physics evermore the kook thinks electron is .5MeV, or so the gook thinks proton is 938MeV, mass why does he keep his head up his ass For the real proton is 840MeV rest mass The real electron is the muon wouldn't you know And it is 105 MeV rest mass, hello hello Moroney, still with his head up his ass The .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole Yes, at last, .5MeV rest mass But there is Moroney, still, with head up his ass Stalk, stalk,stalk, worthless Moroney crock crock Then there is the negative numbers foolery Which the Moroney is a subscribed buffoonery Touting negative here, negative there Yet no negative number exists anywhere. Then there is the way the Sun and stars shine Moroney has his head in grime The oaf thinks the stars and Sun shine from fusion When in truth, they shine electromagnetic no confusion Faraday law, but the Moroney is a failure bent on crime Yes the Sun and stars shine from Faraday law Inside each and every atom of a star Muon thrusting through proton The Faraday law produces magnetic monopoles Not by fusion does a star shine, but by monopoles Believers in fusion have their head full of holes Moroney thinks Boole logic is great With its 5 OR 3 equalling 8 Even a village idiot knows 5 AND 3 is 8 What can you expect from Moroney borne A pinhead brain and a day late Moroney, Christensen, Burse cabal Model their minds after the Boole pitfall They love contradiction of Either..Or..Or..Both Is that why they are all three such a screwball But the true story of Boole needs be told after-all The story of Boole needs be told For western civilization logic was sold Boole went to school in a downpour rain Not carrying a umbrella and not changing clothes Taught his class in a freezing shivering cold Of course the students were all laughing at this Boole clown From whence Boole caught pneumonia and frowned You would think Boole had a logical mind But no, he insisted his wife make him more cold By cold bathes and wet the bed in cold drown Of course Boole would not pneumonia survive But his foolish logic of 3 OR 2 equals five , thrives Would carry on and fill books for Education Parasites like Christensen, Burse, Moroney, Jan Bielawski, Eastside to teach phony lies. Shame that Western Civilization bases its logic on pinheads Instead of sound reasoning, but what can be said Is that education in schools these days is more concerned About money flow of textbooks teaching fakery that it be Then about the real truth of the world where 2 AND 1 is 3 SAGA II Then these stalking education parasites of Moroney galore As if parents paying $50,000 dollars a year in tuition and more To schools like ETH, MIT, Harvard, Stanford admission For their kids to be brainwashed that calculus is addition Of rectangles of zero width, for zero multiply is zero 1 OR 1 equals 2 all so that parasites of math get their textbook Cash of the profits along with professors, who cares about Truth of math or science as long as money flows to parasitoids Flows to Parasitoids Parasitoids infesting education so much that it be Of course that is where much of money is found easily Where there is money there are parasites, for sure We can easily see and the truth of Climate Change And math and physics textbooks are mangled and deranged For parasites of education are money grubs of highest degree Just as the textbooks of math and physics authored by grubs Are so expensive and never free And our students and kids brainwashed by these grubs So math and physics professors can live rich and free And never worrying nor needing to fix their mistakes And errors for that takes time away Mediterranean vacation Sea So why fix mistakes and errors in physics and math Asks Wiles, Conway, Tao, Singh, Hales, Stillwell from a Med vacation Sea bath For fixing math mistakes and errors, crimps the flow of cash When we all would like to take another Med vacation Sea bath For we like the steaks, champagne, chocolate cherries alas And leave the trash of fixing errors to students, and AP to bash Then again the trigonometry of sine wave needs mending But Stillwell, Tao, Conway, Wiles, Ribet, Hales back on Greek isle cocktail blending Sine was never a sinusoid wave, but rather a semicircle wave For Stillwell,Tao,Conway, Wiles,Ribet,Hales refuse to fix sine So long as they get their money flow suits them just fine The matter of the sine wave being truly a semicircle wave Not a sinusoid wave caught the attention of Conway in rave And so did Conway admit the sine was truly a semicircle wave Surreal he measured the money flow in fixing that math error And like his Game of Life, decided another Med cruise is fairer With the chance of a brand new wife, in the Game of Life The American Mathematical Society, AMS, what is their creed? What is there philosophy and creed we must ask For certainly, fixing errors and mistakes in math is not on their agenda at all So is it money that moves the AMS, big or small Money and only money seems what the AMS is all about Because, well they can never even admit the ellipse was never a conic, without a doubt. And ask any of those of AMS, or Fields or Abel persons Why they never bothered with a proof of Fundamental Theorem Of Calculus as a geometry proof? Was it too hard or they too dumb to do a geometry proof thereof And why hand out more prizes left and right When no prizewinner can ever fix the errors and mistakes strewn before Are you in math all dumb and stupid as the rug on the floor? Why do you scold your students when they make math mistakes? You lower their grade and make them stay late You penalize and exercise students who make mistakes Yet you math professors never fix your own errors and mistakes You ignore, ellipse is no conic, Calculus needs a geometry proof, Sine is a semicircle wave not sinusoid, Either..Or..Or..Both is embraced by stupid math professors, oops, late for that coffee and Danish Now once was Wiles with a FLT proof offered But so dumb is Wiles in FLT he could not recognize the mistake of Euler For Euler proffered FLT in exponent three But Euler forgot he had to prove the case of all three evens Euler just proved one case of two odds, one even But then Wiles desired fame and fortune not truth of math So Wiles ends up littering the world with another mindnumbing trash The story of FLT keeps going on, for another play was Beal He pondered about Generalized FLT, and did the math He figured if he offered a prize for its proof and rigged it so So he never had to pay-out, for AP proved his conjecture in 2014 Then he would have free publicity for life As a stunt and would run all the way to the bank laughing like a wild teen Even though Andrew Beal and AMS custody, none of them could tell the difference between an ellipse and a oval, yet expected to tell FLT AP
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.math
csiph-web