Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.math > #435289 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-24 19:28 -0800 |
| Last post | 2019-02-25 03:53 +0000 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.math
Arthur B. McDonald,Francois Englert,Saul Perlmutter,Brian P. Schmidt are you like Moroney too stupid to learn proton is _not_ 938MeV electron .5MeV when they really are 840MeV, 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-02-24 19:28 -0800
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-02-25 03:53 +0000
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-24 19:28 -0800 |
| Subject | Arthur B. McDonald,Francois Englert,Saul Perlmutter,Brian P. Schmidt are you like Moroney too stupid to learn proton is _not_ 938MeV electron .5MeV when they really are 840MeV, 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding |
| Message-ID | <f4b7a73d-6919-4ec2-a5a5-7d50d141c6de@googlegroups.com> |
Arthur B. McDonald,Francois Englert,Saul Perlmutter,Brian P. Schmidt are you like Moroney too stupid to learn proton is _not_ 938MeV electron .5MeV when they really are 840MeV, 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding On Sunday, February 24, 2019 at 9:18:51 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > Alzheimer AP writes: Well, I do not think any of the Nobel physics winners at the moment have Alzheimers. What they do have is a blind ignorance that the proton to electron cannot be 938 to .5 and have chemistry bonding Gilbert Strang,L. Reif,William Bertozzi, MIT vs. Daniela L. Rus,Farnum Jahanian,Jeremy Avigad,CMU are you like Moroney too stupid to learn proton is _not_ 938MeV electron .5MeV when they really are 840MeV, 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding CMU versus MIT are you like Moroney too stupid to learn proton is _not_ 938MeV electron .5MeV when they really are 840MeV, 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding Too stupid to learn proton is _not_ 938MeV electron .5MeV when they really are 840MeV, 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding Isaac Silvera, Andrew Strominger, Christopher Stubbs Harvard physicists are you like Moroney too stupid to learn proton is _not_ 938MeV electron .5MeV when they really are 840MeV, 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, MIT physicists are you like Moroney too stupid to learn proton is _not_ 938MeV electron .5MeV when they really are 840MeV, 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding The world no longer needs physics professors who cannot understand Angular Momentum and that the Chemical bond cannot exist with proton = 938MeV, electron= .5MeV. The true proton is 840MeV, true electron= muon = 105MeV and the little particle of .5MeV that JJ Thomson discovered is actually Dirac's magnetic monopole. On Thursday, February 14, 2019 at 6:45:40 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > Math Failure Path: o145ni2280wme.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!nntpfeed.proxad.net!news.muarf.org!news.uzoreto.com!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!4.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!nntp.TheWorld.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: mor...@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.math Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:13:10 +0000 (UTC) On Monday, February 11, 2019 at 6:13:16 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > Was he too much of a failure way > back then as well? .. .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-.. , . `.' ' `. .' .' ` ` ' `.. ; . ; .' . `. ; ; . ' `. . ' . ' ` `. | . '. ' . 0 0 ' `. ' ` ; ` .' ` ; U ` ; '; ` : | ;.. :` ` : `;. ```. .-; | ' '. ` ``.., .' :' ' ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am the loud mouth idiot hatemonger nonstop, stalker. I post under the name Moroney or kibo or dozens of other fake names for hatred is my game, not science. I love it when Usenet was created because I was a bully but did not want to be pommeled into the ground for spitting hatred on people and Usenet allows me to spit hatred 24 hours 360 days. I am a hate monger who hates people and hates science-- for I am a worthless shithead of a living being-Moroney. As kibo Moroney shein, I want to teach new kids on the block how to pester, harass, authors, just as I have done for 26 years-- the new kids of Dan Christensen, Jan Burse (if not in prison), Zelos Malum, qwbr, Jan Bielawski, Erik Eastside, Earle Jones, Konyberg, Franz, teach them how to be a shithead just like me. ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' ' ` ` ; ; ' ' ` ` ; ; ' ' ` `. ````'''''' ' ' ` . ' ' / ` `. ' ' . / ` .. ..' .'"""""...' / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....''' / .'' ; ` .' ` ...'.' ; .' ` .' ` "" .' .' | ` .; \ ` ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ ` :' | ' ` , `. ` | ' ` ' `. ` ` ' ` ; `. | `.' ` ; `-' `...' Moroney math failure, here is where the fool thinks 938 is short of 945 by 12%, and he pretends he is an electrical engineer. Perhaps the first e.e. in the world that cannot do a percentage correctly On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. President: L. Reif (electrical engineer) MIT physics dept William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter, James Young LIST OF Failed Physicists, in no order Peter Higgs Rainer Weiss Kip S. Thorne Barry C. Barish David J. Thouless F. Duncan M. Haldane John M. Kosterlitz Takaaki Kajita Arthur B. McDonald Francois Englert Saul Perlmutter Brian P. Schmidt Adam G. Riess Makoto Kobayashi Toshihide Maskawa Yoichiro Nambu John C. Mather George F. Smoot Roy J. Glauber David J. Gross Hugh David Politzer Frank Wilczek Raymond Davis Jr. Masatoshi Koshiba Riccardo Giacconi Gerardus 't Hooft Martinus J.G. Veltman Jerome I. Friedman Henry W. Kendall Richard E. Taylor Carlo Rubbia Simon van der Meer William Alfred Fowler Kenneth G. Wilson James Watson Cronin Val Logsdon Fitch Sheldon Lee Glashow Steven Weinberg . . little fishes . . layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = 1 while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu more and more layers of error thinking physics . . John Baez Brian Greene Lisa Randall Alan H. Guth Michael E. Brown Konstantin Batygin Ben Bullock Larry Harson Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley Edward Witten Yes, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars. But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the silly idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV. In that manner, physics departments are racist physicists for the knowledge that Real Electron = 105MeV, Real Proton = 840 MeV, and the .5MeV was Dirac's Magnetic Monopole is going on 2 years now in the public eye starting 2017, yet none of these physicists (these poor physicists lacking understanding of angular momentum has raised a single peep). The reason they keep their mouths shut, is because they are so poor in physics, they do not want to be embarrassed. These gentlemen and ladies are not physicists, for a real physicist would debate the issue, not hide from the issue. And real physicist would not discount a discovery because of the person-- Archimedes Plutonium who discovered it. Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu ::\ ::|:: /:: ::\::|::/:: _ _ (:Y:) - - ::/::|::\:: ::/ ::|:: \:: One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. . \ . . | . /. . . \. . .|. . /. . ..\....|.../... ::\:::|::/:: --------------- ------------- --------------- (Y) ------------- --------------- -------------- ::/:::|::\:: ../....|...\... . . /. . .|. . \. . . / . . | . \ . http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe Archimedes Plutonium
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-02-25 03:53 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <q4vosj$sis$4@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #435289 |
Stupid Alzheimer Plutonium fails: >Arthur B. McDonald,Francois Englert,Saul Perlmutter,Brian P. Schmidt are you Even more Plutonium Failure! Who is still taking Plutonium to Taco Bell and later giving him an overdose of Ex-Lax? All this Plutonium failure! What a mess!!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.math
csiph-web