Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #426572 > unrolled thread

why does Moroney talk to Dr Meyer's as if a baby? is it because ellipse or Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

Back to article view | Back to sci.math

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  why does Moroney talk to Dr Meyer's as if a baby?  is it because ellipse or Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-01 06:23 -0700
    Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-01 18:42 +0000

#426572 — why does Moroney talk to Dr Meyer's as if a baby? is it because ellipse or Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

Why does Moroney talk to Dr. Meyer as if some baby? Is it because Meyer is in denial the ellipse is never a conic section, always a cylinder section, or is it because Dr. Meyer is too stupid in mathematics to realize Calculus demands a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, not just the hideously wrong Cauchy limit analysis. Does Dr. Meyer also deny Global Warming, when the world needs no more deniers?

Michael Moroney writes:
Oct 31 (10 hours ago)
>25 years of babbling and 
>attacking other posters, no math, no physics, only attacks and babble.


On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

> >>No answer?
> >>
> >>Can you round off 105.658 to three digits?
> >>What is 106*9?
> >>What is 105.658*9?
> >>What is 105.658*9-938?
> >>If someone owed you $900.00 and he gave you $888.00, would you be
> >>satisfied that he paid you back in full?
> 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#426579 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Subject: Re: why does Moroney talk to Dr Meyer's as if a baby? is it 

There you go, projecting again. FAIL.

>Why does Moroney talk to Dr. Meyer as if some baby? Is it because Meyer is
>in denial the ellipse is never a conic section, always a cylinder section,

Oh you want to see the ellipse proof Again!!!

Here you go!


Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic 
sections are ellipses.

Some preliminaries:

Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used 
in the proof:

              ^ x
              |
             -+- <= x=h
         .'   |   `.
        .     |     .
        |     |     |
        '     |     '      
         `.   |   .'
 y <----------+ <= x=0
             
Cone (side view):
                 .
                /|\
               / | \
              /b |  \
             /---+---' <= x = h
            /    |'   \
           /   ' |     \
          / '    |      \
x = 0 => '-------+-------\
        /    a   |        \

Proof:

r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x  and  d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x,  hence

y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.

Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1  ...equation of an ellipse

qed



>Michael Moroney writes:
>Oct 31 (10 hours ago)
>>[Plutonium's posts are nothing but] 25 years of babbling and
>>attacking other posters, no math, no physics, only attacks and babble.

No comment, Failure Plutonium?


>On Monday, May 14, 2018 at 3:10:12 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:

>> >>No answer?
>> >>
>> >>Can you round off 105.658 to three digits?
>> >>What is 106*9?
>> >>What is 105.658*9?
>> >>What is 105.658*9-938?
>> >>If someone owed you $900.00 and he gave you $888.00, would you be
>> >>satisfied that he paid you back in full?

Thanks for reminding me! You never did answer these simple questions!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.math

csiph-web