Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.math > #426465 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-10-30 17:10 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-12-12 14:32 -0800 |
| Articles | 8 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.math
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
why does Boston put up with MM Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 17:10 -0700
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-31 03:28 +0000
-Racist-math at MIT Henry Cohn, Laurent Demanet, Richard Dudley,Michael Artin, Martin Bazant, Bonnie Berger, Roman Bezrukavnikov, Alexei Borodin, John Bush, Herman Chernoff// Ellipse is never a conic (see proof below) Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 21:10 -0700
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-31 04:20 +0000
Moroney never has math, never physics-- always bad mouthing people-- kick him out Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 18:42 -0700
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-01 02:50 +0000
Randall & Glashow flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 22:46 -0700
Re: why does Boston put up with MM Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole Jan <filmart@gmail.com> - 2018-12-12 14:32 -0800
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-30 17:10 -0700 |
| Subject | why does Boston put up with MM Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole |
| Message-ID | <2b80fecc-f9d4-4153-9a35-99f7aea7f74d@googlegroups.com> |
On Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 10:24:48 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > Autistic ssors. Michael Moroney writes : Oct30, 1:49 PM (5 hours ago) Who are "we" and "us", Failure AP writes: 25 years of this stalking creep, never any math, never any physics, only hatred. MM is abuse to the max
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-31 03:28 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <prb7hr$bou$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #426465 |
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails: > To understand Ohm's law, we mirror it to Aren't you going to tell me who "we"/"us" are? Do you have a mouse in your pocket? >Michael Moroney writes : >Oct30, 1:49 PM (5 hours ago) >Who are "we" and "us", Failure Plutonium? BTW thank you for asking me to start discussions in all your threads. I'm glad you finally realize that these are discussion groups.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-30 21:10 -0700 |
| Subject | -Racist-math at MIT Henry Cohn, Laurent Demanet, Richard Dudley,Michael Artin, Martin Bazant, Bonnie Berger, Roman Bezrukavnikov, Alexei Borodin, John Bush, Herman Chernoff// Ellipse is never a conic (see proof below) |
| Message-ID | <6f54723d-8c26-4d2d-909a-606dc3a56131@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #426479 |
On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 10:29:05 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > Aren't you going to tell me who "we"/"us" are? Do you have a mouse in > your pocket? > -Racist-math at MIT Henry Cohn, Laurent Demanet, Richard Dudley,Michael Artin, Martin Bazant, Bonnie Berger, Roman Bezrukavnikov, Alexei Borodin, John Bush, Herman Chernoff// Ellipse is never a conic (see proof below) On Friday, October 5, 2018 at 4:21:43 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Archie has DEFINITION of a racist-scientist , racist-mathematician Racist Mathematician & Scientist definition— this is a person or group of people who reject a idea or proof or experiment on simply the grounds of __who the person was that gave/discovered the idea___, proof, or experiment. Hatred of the source. Hatred of the author/s. Racists ignore or deny the truth because they hate the source. And racists would rather keep on teaching a fakery or wrong science than to change to the true science. Most people think Racist Mathematicians and Physicists are rare. But sci.math and sci.physics from 1993 to 2018 is proving that the majority of physics and math professors around the world are Racists, for example-- the AP proof ellipse is never a conic cut, but rather a cylinder cut. And the AP discovery that the Real Electron = muon = 105MeV, real proton = 840MeV, and the .5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole. Drs.Noam Elkies, Dennis Gaitsgory, Robin Gottlieb of Harvard, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//Volney has a difficult time of percentages of how much is 938 short of 945. But worse yet, why do you keep teaching the ellipse is a conic when it never was, but rather the ellipse is always a cylinder section. On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. President: L. Reif (electrical engineer) MIT math dept. Michael Artin, Martin Bazant, Bonnie Berger, Roman Bezrukavnikov, Alexei Borodin, John Bush, Herman Chernoff, Henry Cohn, Laurent Demanet, Richard Dudley, Jörn Dunkel, Alan Edelman, Pavel Etingof, Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan , Victor Guillemin, Larry Guth, Sigurdur Helgason, Anette Hosoi , David Jerison, Steven Johnson*, Victor Kac, Steven Kleiman, Daniel Kleitman, Andrew Lawrie, Tom Leighton, George Lusztig, Arthur Mattuck, Davesh Maulik, Richard Melrose, Haynes Miller, William Minicozzi, Ankur Moitra, Elchanan Mossel, Tomasz Mrowka, James Munkres, Andrei Negut, Aaron Pixton, Bjorn Poonen, Alexander Postnikov, Philippe Rigollet, Rodolfo Rosales, Giulia Saccà, Gerald Sacks, Paul Seidel, Scott Sheffield, Peter Shor, Isadore Singer, Michael Sipser, Jared Speck, Gigliola Staffilani, Richard Stanley, Harold Stark, Gilbert Strang, Daniel Stroock, Goncalo Tabuada, Alar Toomre, David Vogan shein,std,kibo, Moroney 26 year virulent stalker harasser and pest .. .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-.. , . `.' ' `. .' .' ` ` ' `.. ; . ; .' . `. ; ; . ' `. . ' . ' ` `. | . '. ' . 0 0 ' `. ' ` ; ` .' ` ; U ` ; '; ` : | ;.. :` ` : `;. ```. .-; | ' '. ` ``.., .' :' ' ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' I am Moroney, stupid in math, but a pestering bully, trying to scrape a joke off of another person by destroying their character ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' ' ` ` ; ; ' ' ` ` ; ; ' ' ` `. ````'''''' ' ' ` . ' ' / ` `. ' ' . / ` .. ..' .'"""""...' / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....''' / .'' ; ` .' ` ...'.' ; .' ` .' ` "" .' .' | ` .; \ ` ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ ` :' | ' ` , `. ` | ' ` ' `. ` ` ' ` ; `. | `.' ` ; `-' `...' Harvard Math dept Noam Elkies, Dennis Gaitsgory, Robin Gottlieb, Benedict Gross, Joseph Harris, Heisuke Hironaka, Michael Hopkins, Arthur Jaffe, David Kazhdan, Mark Kisin, Peter Kronheimer, Jacob Lurie , Eric Maskin, Barry Mazur *, Curtis McMullen, David Mumford, Martin Nowak, Gerald Sacks, Wilfried Schmid, Yum-Tong Siu, Shlomo Sternberg, John Tate, Cliff Taubes, Hugh Woodin, Horng-Tzer Yau, Shing-Tung Yau /\-------/\ \::O:::O::/ (::_ ^ _::) \_`-----'_/ You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Boston? And, even though you-- professors of math who never want to fix and clean up error filled mathematics, your students deserve better, and you should quit teaching if you cannot come around to admitting a ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic section. For it is embarrassing to have students smarter than the math professor who by taking a cone, cylinder can and a round lid, can prove on the spot, in the classroom that the cone yields an oval, never an ellipse. And, even though you-- professors of math who never want to fix and clean up error filled mathematics, your students deserve better, and you should quit teaching if you cannot come around to admitting a ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic section. For it is embarrassing to have students smarter than the math professor who by taking a cone, cylinder can and a round lid, can prove on the spot, in the classroom that the cone yields an oval, never an ellipse. Proofs ellipse is never a conic, always a cylinder section by Archimedes Plutonium -------------------- AP's proof the ellipse is never a Conic Section, always a Cylinder section, and how the proof works Let us analyze AP's Proof On Friday, September 14, 2018 at 6:57:36 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Array:: Analytic Geometry proof that Cylinder section= Ellipse//Conic section = Oval, never ellipse Now I did 3 Experiments and 3 models of the problem, but it turns out that one model is superior over all the other models. One model is the best of all. That model is where you construct a cone and a cylinder and then implant a circle inside the cone and cylinder attached to a handle so that you can rotate the circle inside. Mine uses a long nail that I poked holes into the side of a cylinder and another one inside a cone made from heavy wax paper of magazine covers. And I used a Mason or Kerr used lid and I attached them to the nail by drilling two holes into each lid and running a wire as fastener. All of this done so I can rotate or pivot the circle inside the cylinder and cone. You need a long nail, for if you make the models too small or too skinny, you lose clarity. ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Cylinder Section is a Ellipse:: E __ .-' `-. .' `. / \ ; ; | G c | H ; ; \ / `. .' `-. _____ .-' F Alright, focus on the distance from c to F in the cone-cut compared to the distance from c to E In a Cylinder cut, those two distances are the same because a cylinder has two axes of symmetry. The side view of a cylinder is this | | | | | | That allows cE to be the same distance as cF But the side view of the cone is /\E /c \ F / \ The distance c to E is shorter because the slant of the side walls of the cone are in the direction of shortening cE, whereas the slant opposite c in cF make that distance larger than cE The above is a view of a ellipse with center c and is produced by the Sectioning of a Cylinder as long as the cut is not perpendicular to the base, and as long as the cut involves two points not larger than the height of the cylinder walls. What we want to prove is that the cut is always a ellipse, which is a plane figure of two axes of symmetry with a Major Axis and Minor Axis and center at c. Side view of Cylinder EGFH above with entry point cut at E and exit point cut at F and where c denotes the central axis of the cylinder and where x denotes a circle at c parallel with the base-circle of cylinder | | | | E | | | | |x c |x | | | | | | |F | | | | | | | So we can see that the distance cE = cF in cylinder for the walls are Parallel to one another, giving distance symmetry But in the Cone, the walls are not parallel, shortening the distance cE compared to cF. Leaving only one axis of symmetry that of cx. The oval is the conic section of a cut at a slant, while the cylinder cut at a slant is a ellipse. The Oval has just one axis of symmetry. So, what is the proof that figure EGFH is always an ellipse in the cylinder section? The line segment GH is the diameter of the circle base of cylinder and the cylinder axis cuts this diameter in half such that Gc = cH. Now we only need to show that Fc = cE. This is done from the right triangles cxF and cxE, for we note that by Angle-Side-Angle these two right triangles are congruent and hence Fc = cE, our second axis of symmetry and thus figure EGFH is always an ellipse. QED Array proof:: Analytic Geometry proof that Conic section= Oval// never ellipse ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Conic Section is a Oval, never an ellipse:: A ,'" "`. / \ C | c | D \ / ` . ___ .' B The above is a view of a figure formed from the cut of a conic with center c as the axis of the cone and is produced by the Sectioning of a Cone as long as the cut is not perpendicular to the base, and as long as the cut is not a hyperbola, parabola or circle (nor line). What we want to prove is that this cut is always a oval, never an ellipse. An oval is defined as a plane figure of just one axis of symmetry and possessing a center, c, with a Major Diameter as the axis of symmetry and a Minor Diameter. In our diagram above, the major diameter is AB and minor diameter is CD. Alright, almost the same as with Cylinder section where we proved the center was half way between Major Axis and Minor Axis of cylinder, only in the case of the Conic, we find that the center is half way between CD the Minor Diameter, but the center is not halfway in between the Major Diameter, and all of that because of the reason the slanted walls of the cone cause the distance cA to be far smaller than the distance cB. In the diagram below we have the circle of x centered at c and parallel to base. The angle at cx is not 90 degrees as in cylinder. The angle of cAx is not the same as the angle cBx, as in the case of the cylinder, because the walls of the cone-for line segments- are slanted versus parallel in the cylinder. Triangles cAx and cBx are not congruent, and thus, the distance of cA is not equal to cB, leaving only one axis of symmetry AB, not CD. / \A x/ c \x B/ \ Hence, every cut in the Cone, not a hyperbola, not a parabola, not a circle (not a line) is a Oval, never an ellipse. QED --Archimedes Plutonium Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu ::\ ::|:: /:: ::\::|::/:: _ _ (:Y:) - - ::/::|::\:: ::/ ::|:: \:: One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. . \ . . | . /. . . \. . .|. . /. . ..\....|.../... ::\:::|::/:: --------------- ------------- --------------- (Y) ------------- --------------- -------------- ::/:::|::\:: ../....|...\... . . /. . .|. . \. . . / . . | . \ . http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe Archimedes Plutonium
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-31 04:20 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <prbahq$vqo$4@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #426486 |
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails: >On Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 8:44:43 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: >> Poor, poor, Failure Plutonium... >Drs.C.Eisgruber, Edward Witten, N. Katz >Proofs that the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV, and that the >.5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole, after all >by Archimedes Plutonium >12 PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon Oh wow, it has been a while since you posted the 12 Failures of Plutonium! Do you have any new failures?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-31 18:42 -0700 |
| Subject | Moroney never has math, never physics-- always bad mouthing people-- kick him out |
| Message-ID | <b15e0822-6112-423c-971a-1b530bc3c3a4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #426488 |
On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 11:20:15 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: > >Drs.C.Eisgruber, Edward Witten, N. Katz > Michael Moroney wrote: >So is it true you never thought to stop and think how dumb and stoopid >your off-topic attack posts are? You aren't very smart, are you. AP writes: from Moroney, never any math, never any physics, always bad mouthing and put down, for 25 years
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-01 02:50 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <prdpm4$o8q$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #426541 |
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails: Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: don't they teach footnotes and citing references in Israel-- or only stealing is taught Re: Why does Israel steal so much science? Porat stealing Lord Kelvin, &Tait's circlon Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes: >Y.Porat >Never any physics, all about stealing Archimedes Plutonium. Never any physics, all about attacking other posters. >AP writes: from Moroney, never any math, never any physics, always bad >mouthing and put down, for 25 years Archimedes Plutonium, never any math, never any physics, always bad mouthing and put down, for 25 years
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-31 22:46 -0700 |
| Subject | Randall & Glashow flunked the Physics Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <11ce586d-7cb9-4d6e-8248-a15182d3152e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #426546 |
Why you talk of Drs. Randall & Glashow as if babies? Is it because they never understood angular momentum so chemistry can have bonding of proton at 840MeV, electron is 105MeVand the .5MeV was Dirac’s magnetic monopole. Moroney is the baby needs kicked out of sci math and sci physics Michael Moroney Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails: >Discussion >Re: 1Canadian Stalker DAN anal buttfuckmanure CHRISTENSEN stalk reports::: 6 year stalker >By Zelos Malum 8 posts 61 views updated 10:48 PM >Discussion >Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test >By Michael Moroney 1 post 7 views updated 10:27 PM >Discussion >Re: Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test (1) >By Jan 54 posts 1625 views updated 9:57 PM >Discussion >Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1) >By Michael Moroney 16 posts 159 views updated 9:50 PM >Discussion >WARNING TO STUDENTS: Don't be a victim >By Dan Christensen 2 posts 10 views updated 9:00 PM ... Stoopid Plutonium, it is you who is "clogging up sci.math". You started every single one of those topics in order to "clog up sci.math". Every single one. Just because someone else shows up on Google's broken list when you delete Google's copy of your initial post doesn't change the fact that you clog up sci.math by repeatedly posting attack posts. Also notice something else, Stoopid Plutonium? The word "Discussion" next to every single topic. Which means that it's for discussing things. People discussing your posts can't be stalkers. Do you have a problem with the English language? You don't seem to understand the following words: Discussion, stalk, we, proof/prove, racist, hate, fail etc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jan <filmart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-12 14:32 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <efb13b5c-44c5-46cd-a859-f719e26ca9c3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #426465 |
On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 5:10:40 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > On Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 10:24:48 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: > > Autistic ssors. > > > > Michael Moroney writes : > Oct30, 1:49 PM (5 hours ago) > Who are "we" and "us", Failure > > AP writes: 25 years of this stalking creep, never any math, You are describing yourself here. All you post is invective. Do you think mathematics research is based on invective? -- Jan
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.math
csiph-web