Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #426463 > unrolled thread

1.4To understand Ohm's law, we mirror it to velocity v= distance/time ; current = voltage/resistance

Back to article view | Back to sci.math

Contents

  1.4To understand Ohm's law, we mirror it to velocity v= distance/time ; current = voltage/resistance Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 15:35 -0700
    Re: 1.4To understand Ohm's law, we mirror it to velocity v= distance/time ; current = voltage/resistance Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 15:44 -0700
      Magnetic Field * torque is width ? Re: 1.4To understand Ohm's law, we mirror it to velocity v= distance/time ; current = voltage/resistance Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 19:13 -0700
        Re: Magnetic Field * torque is width ? Re: 1.4To understand Ohm's law, we mirror it to velocity v= distance/time ; current = voltage/resistance Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 11:54 -0700
          Re: Magnetic Field * torque is width ? Re: 1.4To understand Ohm's law, we mirror it to velocity v= distance/time ; current = voltage/resistance Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 13:34 -0700
            Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-11-01 00:13 +0000

#426463 — 1.4To understand Ohm's law, we mirror it to velocity v= distance/time ; current = voltage/resistance

1.4To understand Ohm's law, we mirror it to velocity v= distance/time ; current = voltage/resistance

Alright, in the AP Equations of Maxwell, we dismiss old Ohm's law as incomplete. Instead of Voltage = current*resistance we have Voltage = current*magnetic field*torque. 

And to fully understand what Ohm's law is all about, we see it as a mirror image of Velocity = distance/time. 

We see voltage not as pressure as so many would like to call it, no not pressure. But rather, we see voltage as a distance-- as Space itself, distance or area or volume to be more general. 

And we see Resistance as broken into two separate parameters of a Magnetic Field multiplied by a torque L. 

So New Ohm's law is V=iBL. ViBL is easy to remember like the mnemonic "visible". 

So, let us talk about Voltage being Space and Magnetic Field*torque being time. 

AP 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#426464

On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 5:38:55 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
So let us look and inspect Voltage = current*Resistance as we look at Area = Length*Width of a rectangle. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#426475 — Magnetic Field * torque is width ? Re: 1.4To understand Ohm's law, we mirror it to velocity v= distance/time ; current = voltage/resistance

On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 5:44:31 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 5:38:55 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> So let us look and inspect Voltage = current*Resistance as we look at Area = Length*Width of a rectangle.

In this scheme of mirroring, then, the Area is Voltage, the length is current, and what we consider Resistance in physics becomes of all things width. How could resistance ever be considered width? Well, if you take Resistance to be Magnetic Field * torque, we can somewhat glimpse that torque is width.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#426520 — Re: Magnetic Field * torque is width ? Re: 1.4To understand Ohm's law, we mirror it to velocity v= distance/time ; current = voltage/resistance

So we have these, all in the form of math of A= B*C and more general A = B*C*D as we break down Resistance into that of Magnetic Field * L (torque L)

So in math we have

Area = Length * Width
Volume = L * W* D  where D = depth

In physics we have

Velocity = distance/time
Voltage = current*Resistance

New Ohm's law 
Voltage = current * Magnetic Field*L(torque)

We break down Velocity = distance/time into that of distance = velocity*time

So now we have these of form A = B*C

distance = velocity*time
area = length*width
voltage = current*resistance

What this does, is help us to keep straight the concepts involved, so we can think of distance, area, voltage as similar. We can think of velocity, length and current as similar. And we can think of time, width, resistance as similar.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#426529 — Re: Magnetic Field * torque is width ? Re: 1.4To understand Ohm's law, we mirror it to velocity v= distance/time ; current = voltage/resistance

On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 1:54:39 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> So we have these, all in the form of math of A= B*C and more general A = B*C*D as we break down Resistance into that of Magnetic Field * L (torque L)
> 
> So in math we have
> 
> Area = Length * Width
> Volume = L * W* D  where D = depth
> 
> In physics we have
> 
> Velocity = distance/time
> Voltage = current*Resistance
> 

Now I could add another one, acceleration is distance/time^2 so that we have

distance = acceleration*t^2



> New Ohm's law 
> Voltage = current * Magnetic Field*L(torque)
> 
> We break down Velocity = distance/time into that of distance = velocity*time
> 
> So now we have these of form A = B*C
> 
> distance = velocity*time
distance = acceleration*time^2
> area = length*width
> voltage = current*resistance
> 
> What this does, is help us to keep straight the concepts involved, so we can think of distance, area, voltage as similar. We can think of velocity, length and current as similar. And we can think of time, width, resistance as similar.
> 
> AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#426536 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Re: Magnetic Field * torque is width ? Re: 1.4To understand Ohm's law, we 
>mirror it to

Why won't you tell me who else is included in your "we"?

Maybe it is the royal "we", because you are the King of Failure?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.math

csiph-web