Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #425123 > unrolled thread

Probably have a proof of the AP Conjecture (New Math's Riemann Hypothesis replacement)

Back to article view | Back to sci.math

Contents

  Probably have a proof of the AP Conjecture (New Math's Riemann Hypothesis replacement) Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-07 13:37 -0700
    Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-07 21:18 +0000

#425123 — Probably have a proof of the AP Conjecture (New Math's Riemann Hypothesis replacement)

The AP Conjecture was about the AP Columns such as the first odd composite number 9

9  0
8  1
7  2
6  3
5  4

And the AP Conjecture asks, can you have a Odd composite that has only NonCoprime Reduce to Lowest Terms or must there always be a Outright Division such as 6/3 above in 9 being Odd Composite. For if we look at 21, we see both Outright Division and Reduce to Lowest Terms NonCoprime

21  0
20  1
19   2
18   3
17  4
16  5
15  6
14  7
13  8
12  9
11   10

In Primes the AP conjecture would state that you never have either Outright Division nor can you have NonCoprime Reduce to Lowest Terms. For example 11

11  0
10  1
9   2
8   3
7   4
6   5

Today I am on my way to a proof of the AP Conjecture-- stated as every Odd Composite has an Outright Division and never solely just NonCoprime Reduce to Lowest Terms, and for primes, primes have neither a Outright Division nor a Reduce to Lowest Terms.

Proof comes from noting that these Columns are all the additons of a specific number. And noting a fact of Algebra that a number if composite, is comprised of its divisors. For example, 9 is odd composite due to only 3 as divisor so that 9 is comprised of the divisors 3, 6, 9, and further example 49 is 7*7 with 7 as the only divisor and so 49 is comprised of 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49.

In the case of 49 as example, you have the Outright Division of 42/7, then the NonCoprime Reduce to Lowest Terms of 35/14  and 28/21

So in all Odd Numbers you have two numbers added together to achieve a given odd number and that means one is even and the other is odd. And you have, if a factor divides the odd number you have an even number of Pairs that can be either Outright Division or be Reduce to Lowest Terms.

Reduce to Lowest Terms calls into play the Distributive Law of Algebra, so that in the case of 21 we have 15/6 is that of 3(5 + 2).

What I am building up to, is a proof that if you had a sole outlyer of a Reduce to Lowest Terms in either a prime odd or a composite odd, that you destroy rules of Algebra.


Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.      

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium 



Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 13:29:35 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: All of Arithmetic is embodied in AP Columns Re: AP Hypothesis becomes
 the new era math Riemann Hypothesis-- RH was phony baloney, but AP's has substance
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2018 20:29:36 +0000

All of Arithmetic is embodied in AP Columns Re: AP Hypothesis becomes the new era math Riemann Hypothesis-- RH was phony baloney, but AP's has substance

What these AP Columns are, are the entire structure of a number in terms of addition, multiplication, division, subtraction. By that I mean the past history of a number and in terms of its parts. 

So that looking at 10 in Column form 

10  0 
9   1 
8   2 
7   3 
6   4 
5   5 

We know 10 is even composite because 8/2 so that you have a trail of 2s, next in 6+2 = 8, next in 4+2 =6. And you know 10 has NonCoprimes of 6/4. As for multiplication 5^2 = 25 comes from 5+5=10. So that the number 25 is deeply connected to the number 10, although in Old Math, there is no connection at all between 5*5 and 5+5. Now in New Math there is a deep connection of 5+3=8 with the number 5*3=15, so here we connect 15 with 8 which never was connected before. So let me call these COLUMN CONNECTIONS, in that I have no better name at the moment. For we see in the 10 Column, that we have 7*3= 21 is deeply connected to the number 10 in the fact of 7+3= 10. 

Now those are connections of add and multiply. But there are connections of Add and Divide, for it is only in the 10 Column that you have 8/2 or 6/4 or even 5/5. 

Now can the AP Columns bring in subtraction and is subtraction unique to specific columns? Well yes, unique as are all four operations of mathematics is unique to AP Columns, for you will never find 6-4 in any other column. Sure, you find the answer 2 from many different columns but you find 6-4 uniquely in the 10 Column. And another word about subtraction in columns, that tells us, subtraction comes from Column mathematics and not the silly crap that Old Math teaches -- subtraction has no origins-- but exists out of thin air-- popped out of existence. The reason is easy to see-- you cannot subract more than is available. 

In Column Arithmetic and Mathematics-- you can never subtract more using the leftside and subtract the rightside of column. 

As in 10 column above you can subtract 4 from 6 but never 6 from 4. 

So, Arithmetic and Mathematics starts by AP Columns, all of Algebra starts from AP columns. 

So now, what is the AP Column Conjecture that is the modern day true conjecture replacing the fake-conjecture of Riemann Hypothesis? 

On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 12:44:24 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> In the below earlier posts of yesterday, I outline the AP COLUMN. This is new important math, and is the bulk of how the Goldbach conjecture was proven true, that every even number (yes I include 2 as 1+1 when we consider 1 as prime by default) is the sum of two primes. Goldbach is easily proven by the AP Column for example: the number 8 
> 
> 8  0 
> 7  1 
> 6  2 
> 5  3 
> 4  4 
> 
> You see, these columns to addition and multiplication are unique, and the only place you can find 5x3 is in the 8 column, meaning if 8 = sum of two primes as 8=5+3 did not exist, then the two prime number 3*5= 15 does not exist. 
> 
> But I am not here to talk about Goldbach, I am here to talk about the Riemann Hypothesis of the 1800s, that thoroughly error filled hypothesis, because in true math, the Negative Numbers do not exist, the Complex Numbers do not exist, the Irrational and Transcendental numbers were phony baloney, and even the concept of "being prime" needed some refurbishing. So in such a state of condition of math where the true numbers that truly exists are the Grid Numbers, in that condition, we throw out all of Old Math on the question of Riemann Hypothesis, much like in medicine where they threw out all of the Humor Theory of medicine-- black bile, yellow bile, phlegm, blood which led to the idiotic leeching of victims not patients. One can honestly say, the Riemann Hypothesis is the modern day version of the Humor theory only in mathematics, not medicine. 
> 
> So, we throw out the entire Riemann Hypothesis save for a narrow piece of a glimmer of truth-- the idea that the Primes lie on a line, not the 1/2 Real line in the Complex plane phoney baloney. No, nothing like that at all. But rather instead, the PRIMES lie in the AP Columns with never a Outright Division and never a NonCoprime Reduce to Lowest Terms. 
> 

The AP Column Conjecture says-- all primes have no Outright Division and, have no NonCoprime Reduce to Lowest Terms. But, the conjecture does not stop with Primes, but says that all Odd Composites of mathematics have at least one Outright Division (there cannot be an odd composite composed of just NonCoprime Reduce to Lowest Terms). So in this sense, the AP Conjecture is vastly more mature in math content than the piddle paddle obnoxious fakery of Riemann Conjecture. 

> So, the modern day proof of AP's Conjecture-- Prove, no prime has a Outright Division and no NonCoprime Reduce to Lowest Terms. Let me give you an example using the composite odd number 21 
> 
> 21   0 
> 20  1 
> 19  2 
> 18  3 
> 17  4 
> 16  5 
> 15  6 
> 14  7 
> 13  8 
> 12  9 
> 11  10 
> 
> Notice we run first into 18/3 is an Outright Division, then we run into a NonCoprime Reduce to Lowest Terms of 15/6, then we run into another Outright Division 14/7, and finally one more NonCoprime Reduce to Lowest Terms 12/9. 
> 
> So, the modern day math era is prove AP Conjecture of Primes-- no prime has a Outright Division and no prime has a NonCoprime Reduce to Lowest Terms. This is now the modern day version of the fakery of Riemann Hypothesis. And you can sort of see the glimmering similarity between AP and RH, in that RH was about a 1/2 Real line where all the primes reside, whereas AP's Column now becomes that mythical fake 1/2 Real line for a Column is like a geometry 1/2 line. 
> 

There is an easy proof that All Even Numbers obey the AP conjecture because immediately down two horizontals you run into an even number with outright-division, for example 8 +2 in the 10 Column and proving no even number can have just a solo NonCoprime Reduce to Lowest Terms. 

But the AP Conjecture requires rolling up the sleeves to prove no odd composite can have a NonCoprime Reduce to Lowest Terms and lacking any Outright Division. To prove a Odd Composite cannot exist on solely a NonCoprime Reduce to Lowest Terms. To prove Primes cannot have either a Outright Division, but also, cannot have a NonCoprime Reduce to Lowest Terms. 

So, some may think this AP conjecture is obvious and needs no proof, and some may think, this conjecture is easier than the fake RH. But they be wrong as usual. 


AP

Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 14:48:14 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Parallel lines of Geometry mirror image the Columns of Algebra Re:
 All of Arithmetic is embodied in AP Columns
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2018 21:48:15 +0000

Parallel lines of Geometry mirror image the Columns of Algebra Re: All of Arithmetic is embodied in AP Columns

On Saturday, October 6, 2018 at 3:29:42 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> What these AP Columns are, are the entire structure of a number in terms of addition, multiplication, division, subtraction. By that I mean the past history of a number and in terms of its parts. 
> 

A remarkable claim for AP Columns, to think all of Algebra and Arithmetic of mathematics comes from AP Column for Algebra is one half of mathematics and to think that placing numbers into columns is the embodiment of all of Algebra and Arithmetic. Can we see anything like this in geometry? 

Well there is of course the two parallel lines of geometry. 

|  | 
|  | 
|  | 

And parallel lines leads to perpendicular lines 

|__ 

And in Algebra, Arithmetic, there is the Peano Axioms that gives rise to Numbers, and their algebra is basically just N+1 

But now, say you created numbers from 1 then adding 1, then adding more 1, the successor axiom of N+1. Say you created the counting numbers, 1,2,3,4,5,6,.... 

But you do not have any operators of multiply, divide, subtract. You do have addition for you used that in creating the Counting Numbers. But now that you created them, you really have no multiplication no division no subtraction. 

So say you then have Columns of 0 with 1,2,3,..... 

Like our 10 column 

10   0 
9    1 
8    2 
7    3 
6    4 
5    5 

Now, let there be multiplication, division and subtraction in a world where none existed before. Up until the Column, only addition existed along with Counting Numbers 1,2,3,4, etc. Now you added the number 0 and placed the Counting Numbers into a Column. And now exists not only addition but multiplication, division, subtraction. 

Think of the Column as Geometry's two parallel lines. Think of the horizontal in the column as addition and think of the horizontal as perpendicular in geometry. So in a sense the column is a graph, although its axes are parallel instead of perpendicular. Think of the Column as the precursor to a Coordinate System Graph of functions. 

AP 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#425131 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Moroney says: Racist Physicists, Barry Barish, Kip Thorne, Rainer Weiss,
>John M. Kosterlitz, F Duncan M. Haldane, David J. Thouless, Arthur B.
>McDonald, Takaaki Kajita// fail in Chemistry bonding for it cannot exist
>when proton=938MeV, electron=.5MeV

So you are now lying about what I say? I am glad you like for me to
reply to your posts, and asked for me to do it again!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.math

csiph-web