Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.math > #424722 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-10-01 13:20 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-10-03 01:14 -0700 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.math
Racist-mathematicians at Reed College rather than accept Ellipse is never a Conic, Andrew Bray Safia Chettih Jim Fix Eitan Frachtenberg Adam Groce Heather Kitada Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 13:20 -0700
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-02 02:48 +0000
Racist attack dog sounds tired Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 01:14 -0700
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 13:20 -0700 |
| Subject | Racist-mathematicians at Reed College rather than accept Ellipse is never a Conic, Andrew Bray Safia Chettih Jim Fix Eitan Frachtenberg Adam Groce Heather Kitada |
| Message-ID | <fa371909-b56f-402b-9b03-57f65ee39db7@googlegroups.com> |
On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 11:45:24 AM UTC-5, qbwr...@gmail.com wrote:
(snipped)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.237.196.100
Message-ID: <84303647-4b3e-42d4-9b7a-54dd8a4881ae@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: math professors and teachers are hypocrites when they make
mistakes Re: Oval is the Conic, never ellipse (Ellipse is Cylinder section)
From: qbwr...@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 05:44:32 +0000
>
> No time for insults and pointing out that nobody but you is a stupor powered logic brain and with a depressing lack of ever having convinced anyone of a single one of your claims. NO time for any of that. You need to be POSITIVE here!
>
> So where is your perfect convincing proof of FLT? Or ANY one of your claims? That convinces EVERYONE ELSE, not just you! You are one perfect paragraph away from world wide recognition. Where is your perfect convincing proof?
>
AP: What Racist Mathematicians do, rather than admit the truth over a issue, no, what they do is hire attack dogs to constantly harass the person telling the truth about Ellipse = cylinder section, never a conic.
So AP proves the ellipse is never a conic, and instead of Reed College math professors acknowledging AP's proof, they send out a pestering attack dog like qbwr to constantly harrass AP, and never actually looking at AP's proof.
Why does no-one at Reed College Oregon even examine up close at AP's proof a ellipse is never a conic (see proof below). Why? It is because Reed College math department is a racist-science organization where we define racist in science as this:
DEFINITION of a racist-scientist , racist-mathematician
Racist Mathematician & Scientist definition— this is a person or group of people who reject a idea or proof or experiment on simply the grounds of __who the person was that gave/discovered the idea___, proof, or experiment. Hatred of the source. Hatred of the author/s. Racists ignore or deny the truth because they hate the source. And racists would rather keep on teaching a fakery or wrong science than to change to the true science.
Most people think Racist Mathematicians are rare. But sci.math from 1993 to 2018 is proving that the majority of math professors around the world are Racists, for example-- the AP proof ellipse is never a conic cut, but rather a cylinder cut.
When AP asks qbwr-- who constantly, constantly says AP is wrong on everything-- but when qbwr is asked to point to the mistake in AP's proof the harassing pest qbwr says this much:
> {-0.466667, 0, 0.466667}
> { 0.466667, +/-1.19548, 1.28333}
> { 1.4, +/-1.56525, 2.1}
> { 2.33333, +/-1.75, 2.91667}
> { 3.26667, +/-1.80739, 3.73333}
> { 4.2, +/-1.75, 4.55}
> { 5.13333, +/-1.56525, 5.36667}
> { 6.06667, +/-1.19548, 6.18333}
> { 7, 0, 7}
Reed College, math dept, is this how you do mathematics-- when a claim that ellipse is never a conic and given a proof of that, do you even bother to read the proof and debate from there, or, do you just send out your attack dogs like qbwr and go on teaching students a ellipse is a conic.
AP: You, know, I have put up with the Depression laden QBWR, the attack dog of AP, for approx 6 years, and enough is enough. Can someone there in Oregon please help him combat his depression-- everything he touches in his replies to my posts seems to fall into a abyss of depression for him and nothing but attacks on AP.
Reed College physics dept
Alison Crocker
John Essick
Joel Franklin
Lucas Illing
Mary James
Andrew Larkoski
Johnny Powell
Darrell Schroeter
Jenna Smith
Ragnar Stroberg
David Griffiths
Robert Reynolds
Nicholas Wheeler
qbwr, caught on occasion smiling over his depression
..
.- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
, . `.' ' `.
.' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
. ; .' . `. ;
; . ' `. . '
. ' ` `. |
. '. '
. 0 0 ' `.
' `
; `
.' `
; U `
; '; `
: | ;.. :` `
: `;. ```. .-; | '
'. ` ``.., .' :' '
; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' ellipse is a conic because qbwr is a racist-mathematician
` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` ` ; ; ' '
` `. ````'''''' ' '
` . ' '
/ ` `. ' ' .
/ ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
/ .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
/ .'' ; ` .' `
...'.' ; .' ` .' `
"" .' .' | ` .; \ `
; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
:' | ' ` , `. `
| ' ` ' `. `
` ' ` ; `. |
`.' ` ; `-'
`...'
Reed College Math dept
Andrew Bray
Safia Chettih
Jim Fix
Eitan Frachtenberg
Adam Groce
Heather Kitada
Lyudmila Korobenko
John Lind
Dylan McNamee
Kyle Ormsby
Angelica Osorno
David Perkinson
Jamie Pommersheim
Kelly Shaw
Jerry Shurman
Irena Swanson
Joe Buhler
Hubert Chrestenson
Albyn Jones
Ray Mayer
V. Potluri
Joe Roberts
Thomas Wieting
/\-------/\
\::O:::O::/
(::_ ^ _::)
\_`-----'_/
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Portland?
Proofs ellipse is never a conic, always a cylinder section by
Archimedes Plutonium
--------------------
AP's proof the ellipse is never a Conic Section, always a Cylinder section, and how the proof works
Let us analyze AP's Proof
On Friday, September 14, 2018 at 6:57:36 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Array:: Analytic Geometry proof that Cylinder section= Ellipse//Conic
section = Oval, never ellipse
Now I did 3 Experiments and 3 models of the problem, but it turns out
that one model is superior over all the other models. One model is the
best of all.
That model is where you construct a cone and a cylinder and then
implant a circle inside the cone and cylinder attached to a handle so
that you can rotate the circle inside. Mine uses a long nail that I
poked holes into the side of a cylinder and another one inside a cone
made from heavy wax paper of magazine covers. And I used a Mason or
Kerr used lid and I attached them to the nail by drilling two holes
into each lid and running a wire as fastener. All of this done so I
can rotate or pivot the circle inside the cylinder and cone. You need
a long nail, for if you make the models too small or too skinny, you
lose clarity.
ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Cylinder Section is a Ellipse::
E
__
.-' `-.
.' `.
/ \
; ;
| G c | H
; ;
\ /
`. .'
`-. _____ .-'
F
Alright, focus on the distance from c to F in the cone-cut compared to the distance from c to E
In a Cylinder cut, those two distances are the same because a cylinder has two axes of symmetry.
The side view of a cylinder is this
| |
| |
| |
That allows cE to be the same distance as cF
But the side view of the cone is
/\E
/c \
F / \
The distance c to E is shorter because the slant of the side walls of the cone are in the direction of shortening cE, whereas the slant opposite c in cF make that distance larger than cE
The above is a view of a ellipse with center c and is produced by the
Sectioning of a Cylinder as long as the cut is not perpendicular to
the base, and as long as the cut involves two points not larger than
the height of the cylinder walls. What we want to prove is that the
cut is always a ellipse, which is a plane figure of two axes of
symmetry with a Major Axis and Minor Axis and center at c.
Side view of Cylinder EGFH above with entry point cut at E and exit
point cut at F and where c denotes the central axis of the cylinder
and where x denotes a circle at c parallel with the base-circle of
cylinder
| |
| | E
| |
| |
|x c |x
| |
| |
| |
|F |
| |
| |
| |
So we can see that the distance cE = cF in cylinder for the walls are Parallel to one another, giving distance symmetry
But in the Cone, the walls are not parallel, shortening the distance cE compared to cF. Leaving only one axis of symmetry that of cx. The oval is the conic section of a cut at a slant, while the cylinder cut at a slant is a ellipse. The Oval has just one axis of symmetry.
So, what is the proof that figure EGFH is always an ellipse in the
cylinder section? The line segment GH is the diameter of the circle
base of cylinder and the cylinder axis cuts this diameter in half such
that Gc = cH. Now we only need to show that Fc = cE. This is done from
the right triangles cxF and cxE, for we note that by Angle-Side-Angle
these two right triangles are congruent and hence Fc = cE, our second
axis of symmetry and thus figure EGFH is always an ellipse. QED
Array proof:: Analytic Geometry proof that Conic section= Oval// never ellipse
ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Conic Section is a Oval, never an ellipse::
A
,'" "`.
/ \
C | c | D
\ /
` . ___ .'
B
The above is a view of a figure formed from the cut of a conic with
center c as the axis of the cone and is produced by the Sectioning of
a Cone as long as the cut is not perpendicular to the base, and as
long as the cut is not a hyperbola, parabola or circle (nor line).
What we want to prove is that this cut is always a oval, never an
ellipse. An oval is defined as a plane figure of just one axis of
symmetry and possessing a center, c, with a Major Diameter as the axis
of symmetry and a Minor Diameter. In our diagram above, the major
diameter is AB and minor diameter is CD.
Alright, almost the same as with Cylinder section where we proved the
center was half way between Major Axis and Minor Axis of cylinder,
only in the case of the Conic, we find that the center is half way
between CD the Minor Diameter, but the center is not halfway in
between the Major Diameter, and all of that because of the reason the
slanted walls of the cone cause the distance cA to be far smaller than
the distance cB. In the diagram below we have the circle of x centered
at c and parallel to base. The angle at cx is not 90 degrees as in
cylinder. The angle of cAx is not the same as the angle cBx, as in the
case of the cylinder, because the walls of the cone-for line segments-
are slanted versus parallel in the cylinder. Triangles cAx and cBx are
not congruent, and thus, the distance of cA is not equal to cB,
leaving only one axis of symmetry AB, not CD.
/ \A
x/ c \x
B/ \
Hence, every cut in the Cone, not a hyperbola, not a parabola, not a
circle (not a line) is a Oval, never an ellipse.
QED
--Archimedes Plutonium
Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu
::\ ::|:: /::
::\::|::/::
_ _
(:Y:)
- -
::/::|::\::
::/ ::|:: \::
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy.
. \ . . | . /.
. . \. . .|. . /. .
..\....|.../...
::\:::|::/::
--------------- -------------
--------------- (Y) -------------
--------------- --------------
::/:::|::\::
../....|...\...
. . /. . .|. . \. .
. / . . | . \ .
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.
Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
Archimedes Plutonium
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 02:48 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <poumac$1d0$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #424722 |
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails: >>Subject: Re: Racist-Physicists, Weinberg,Witten,Glashow,Gell-Mann,Higgs >>who refuse to admit proton=840MeV, electron=105MeV, Dirac monopole >>.5MeV, proofs by AP, because they never respect the source >** because they never respect the source ** >Respect must be earned, Archie. You will NEVER earn any respect Quote me properly, Archie. Respect must be earned, Archie. You will NEVER earn any respect BY POSTING STALKER LISTS AND ATTACKING OTHER POSTERS instead of LEARNING from them. Hey Al, don't go anywhere, I'll probably need you in a few minutes...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-03 01:14 -0700 |
| Subject | Racist attack dog sounds tired |
| Message-ID | <dc944e80-3176-452a-8fb5-662594e322c7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #424735 |
qbwr...@gmail.com On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 at 11:26:37 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > But in the Cone, the walls are not parallel, shortening the distance cE compared to cF. Leaving only one axis of symmetry that of cx. The oval is the conic section of a cut at a slant, while the cylinder cut at a slant is a ellipse. The Oval has just one axis of symmetry. It has already been demonstrated multiple different ways that your claim is simply mentally ill crank brain wrong. And because you do not have a logic brain, because you are not a stupor genius, you just keep screeching the same false nonsense again and again.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.math
csiph-web