Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #424645 > unrolled thread

Are these Math Racists at American Mathematical Society of Charles Fefferman, Ron Graham, Daniel Mauldin,Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal as Moroney is a racist of math and science????

Back to article view | Back to sci.math

Contents

  Are these Math Racists at American Mathematical Society of Charles Fefferman, Ron Graham, Daniel Mauldin,Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal as Moroney is a racist of math and science???? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:07 -0700
    Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-10-01 03:24 +0000

#424645 — Are these Math Racists at American Mathematical Society of Charles Fefferman, Ron Graham, Daniel Mauldin,Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal as Moroney is a racist of math and science????

Are these Math Racists at American Mathematical Society of Charles Fefferman, Ron Graham, Daniel Mauldin,Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal as Moroney is a racist of math and science????

A racist-scientist or mathematician is one who ignores and refuses to admit true science or math depending on the source the author of that knowledge. They dismiss any science or news based solely on who the author was. In a word-- they are racists not scientists.

A real mathematician or scientist weighs only the substance and content of the __any claim__, not by who did the work. 

AP proved Generalized FLT, Fermat's Last Theorem in 2014 and Andrew Beal has used that as an opportunity for free advertisement, claiming to reward anyone who proves it, with a reward of $1 million. This is now 2018, and Andrew seems to be not really honest about the matter, never wanting to payout, and keep free advertisement. Why will not Beal nor AMS recognize AP's FLT proof? Why can they not even recognize a ellipse is never a Conic but always a Cylinder section, and the oval is the conic cut? Is it because these gentlemen are all racists, not scientists , not mathematicians.

Can someone in the Boston area make sure this numbskull is never a science teacher in Boston-- and the damage he can do to a classroom

Moroney math failure, here is where the fool thinks 938 is short of 945 by 12%, and he pretends he is an electrical engineer. Perhaps the first ee in the world that cannot do a percentage correctly

On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
  
  Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon. 
  Hardly "exactly" 9 muons. 
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 
  
  Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572.  A proton is about the mass 
  of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short. 

Here is the Moroney math failure in geometry, so foolish that he never thought you can nest a cone inside a cylinder and thus prove the ellipse is never a conic section, always a cylinder section, and prove the oval is the cone cut, never the ellipse.


On Saturday, September 29, 2018 at 1:02:16 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> 
> One of his so-called "proofs" claims there is no second axis of symmetry 
> because the part of the intersection curve near the tip of the cone is 
> smaller than the end away from the tip. But that assumes the axis of 
> symmetry of the curve is the axis of the cone. It is not; the center of 
> the ellipse is closer to the intersection away from the tip of the cone, 
> not the axis of the cone. (does the axis of the cone always go through a 
> focus of the ellipse?) 
> 


Here is the failure Moroney parsing his way through geothermal energy and of all things-- bad mouthing the TV show I love so much "This Old House" from PBS Boston. You would think every Bostonian would love This Old House for I have learned so much from that show. But then Moroney is a incessant stalker for 26 years now-- meaning-- he is insane person.



Moroney, science failure-- on geothermal 


(1) 
On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 12:15:22 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> 
> There are some places here that use "geothermal" for heating and cooling 
> but even these are solar power in disguise.  They pump water from wells 
> from where the temperature is the average over many years and extract heat 
> from it (in the winter) and dump heat into it (in the summer) and pump the 
> water back into the ground.  The water is about 55F out of the ground. 



(2) 
On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 1:31:27 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:   

> 
> >Just as a point of order, what you described is not geothermal. What 
> >you've just described is thermal balancing with water, using water 
> >cooler than air from the water table to cool a building in the summer, 
> >and using water warmer than air from the water table to warm a building 
> >in the winter. 
> 
> In other words, glorified solar energy.  Solar energy stored and averaged 
> out over many, many years. 
> 

(3) 
On Friday, December 23, 2016 at 8:44:12 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> 
> Admit it, you were fooled by a "This Old House" type show where they 
> use a high-tech sounding buzzword to impress people who don't know any 
> better. 
> 
> Just answer one question, if you can.  If it's really geothermal, why 
> is the temperature only 51 degrees, but in Iceland, where there's real 
> geothermal, they're accessing temperatures of hundreds of degrees? 


(4) 
> On Friday, December 23, 2016 at 10:40:09 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> > 
> > Pretty cool, fossil solar energy! 51 degrees, the average of summer and 
> > winter temperatures for hundreds or even thousands of years, depending 
> > on how deep they go. 
> > 
> > Too bad you do have to use real energy to run the heat pump, although it 
> > is much better than simply using that energy to make heat. 
> 

(5) 
On Tuesday, September 19, 2017 at 12:30:56 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> 
> It's amusing how he can't handle that at all. Just like he can't 
> handle the concept of permafrost when he goes off on geothermal 
> energy.  All he can do is attack. 

(6) 


On Saturday, October 14, 2017 at 12:21:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: 

> geothermal heat energy is 99% from the sun where he was (unsure where, 
> Mass. I think) 
> 
> Now tell us where Permafrost comes from. 
> 
> p.p.s. I was searching because I am actually looking into getting 
> geothermal heat. Fossil solar energy is a great resource! 



Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.      

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#424648 — Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

[snip attack post]

Oh dear, Archie Poo didn't learn his lesson. I guess Archie just plain 
isn't smart enough to 'get it'.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.math

csiph-web