Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #424217 > unrolled thread

new Prime Predictor called Conservation Equilibrium //My best prime predictor of years back has sigma error of 20%, what is Ulam's sigma error?

Back to article view | Back to sci.math

Contents

  new Prime Predictor called Conservation Equilibrium //My best prime predictor of years back has sigma error of 20%, what is Ulam's sigma error? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:42 -0700
    Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-25 00:16 +0000

#424217 — new Prime Predictor called Conservation Equilibrium //My best prime predictor of years back has sigma error of 20%, what is Ulam's sigma error?

2,3Newsgroups: sci.math 
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 16:52:20 -0700 (PDT) 

Subject: A new Prime Predictor called Conservation Equilibrium //My best prime 
 predictor of years back has sigma error of 20%, what is Ulam's sigma error? 
 Re: AP wants to do one better on Ulam's Prime Spiral 
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 23:52:20 +0000 

A new Prime Predictor called Conservation Equilibrium //My best prime predictor of years back has sigma error of 20%, what is Ulam's sigma error? Re: AP wants to do one better on Ulam's Prime Spiral 

CONSERVATION, Equilibrium Prime Pattern Re: Alright, last night I thought of a new prime predictor, better than my prior year-- heavily dense composite 

Let me call this new Prime Predictor-- Conservation of Primes. I thought of it last night, in the desire to find some mechanism that relieves the Twin Primes, for the twin primes become obnoxious disturbances of finding a prime pattern. But, we can say the same for quad primes or sextet primes the further we go out. So, last night, in sight of these obnoxious primes of twin, upsetting any pattern. I thought of Conservation. 

So, we jump to 100 number, and we know there are 25 primes below 100 and what I am doing is arbitrarily picking a spot to do a Conservation Pairing, in hopes that the pairing will dissolve the differences of Twin Primes that breaks up so many patterns. I do not know how Ulam's Spiral negotiates with twin primes, but would hazard to guess, Ulam had trouble with twin primes. So in that light, last night I thought of this Predictor 

97 + 101 = 198 
89 + 103 = 192 
83 + 107 = 190 
79 + 109 = 188 
73 + 113 = 186 
71 + 127 = 198 
67 + 131 = 198 
61 + 137 = 198 
59 + 139 = 198 
53 + 149 = 202 

So that within a span of 50 or so numbers, the Conservation equilibrium point was 198 and varied from 186 to 202. 

This is the type of pattern that sort of sandpapers away the twin primes as breaking up a pattern, for it incorporates one prime against another prime. 

Now in the above I went out as far as 11 + 199 = 210 

So from 97+101 to that of 11+ 199 the variance was from 186 to 210 which is not much variance. 

And I shall look to see if I can do something to make the variance much smaller. 

Now I can jump ahead to say 1000 and do the same there and see if the variance increases or decreases. If I jump to a starting number of 10,000 adding the downward primes to the upward primes, can my Equilibrium point improve? 

AP

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#424228 — Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

> kibo-shein-stalkershitparade-Moroney loves AP's theory that Starpower is 

Still haven't figured out not to attack me, have you, Failure Plutonium.
You attack, I respond... and not the way you want me to....

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.math

csiph-web