Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #424218 > unrolled thread

1,3-Spiraling triangles of PPT Re: 1,2-AP's prime predictor-- superior to that of Ulam's Prime Spiral

Back to article view | Back to sci.math

Contents

  1,3-Spiraling triangles of PPT Re: 1,2-AP's prime predictor-- superior to that of Ulam's Prime Spiral Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:45 -0700
    Is this a spiral of triangles or a polygon box? Re: 1,3-Spiraling triangles of PPT Re: 1,2-AP's prime predictor-- superior to that of Ulam's Prime Spiral Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:53 -0700
      Re: Archimedes "village idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-25 00:14 +0000

#424218 — 1,3-Spiraling triangles of PPT Re: 1,2-AP's prime predictor-- superior to that of Ulam's Prime Spiral

1,3Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:16:50 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Spiraling triangles of PPT Re: 1,2-AP's prime predictor-- superior to
 that of Ulam's Prime Spiral
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 17:16:51 +0000

Spiraling triangles of PPT Re: 1,2-AP's prime predictor-- superior to that of Ulam's Prime Spiral

- show quoted text -
Alright, a bit of an inspiration here. 

I notice that some primes are repeated such as 3,4,5 then 5,12,13 

Now if we stack the repeated primes one onto the other we have a four sided something with a right angle 

3,4,12,13 

I have yet to work out the other diagonal, whence the first is obviously 5 

But I was thinking, is it possible that only ALL primes repeat, not composite odd such as 9, 15, 21, .... which although some of them repeat but not all odd composites repeat? I wonder-- 

And then, what is this 4 sided figure? 

Now, if every every PPT has a side that repeats, we can stack them, so, instead of a Ulam Prime Spiral begot from a spiraling of all the numbers, what the AP is going to do, is spiral out the right triangles of PPT 

So now I need the duplicate of 12 or 13 to continue to form a 5 sided figure then a 6 sided, then a 7 sided and see if that leads to something to predict future primes. 

Call these the Spiraling Triangles of PPT. 

AP



Newsgroups: sci.math 
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 17:20:30 -0700 (PDT) 

Subject: PPT-prime predictor--superior AP prime predictor, over that of the 
 Ulam Prime Spiral 
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:20:31 +0000 

PPT-prime predictor--superior AP prime predictor, over that of the Ulam Prime Spiral 

PPT-Prime Predictor, by Archimedes Plutonium 

Alright as promised, I want to do a superior prime predictor than the current status of the Ulam Prime Spiral. No one has yet mentioned what Ulam's Sigma Error is, perhaps worse than AP's 20% sigma error on dense-composites. 

Now, from reading Wikipedia's description of Ulam's Prime Spiral was mentioned a Algebra formula that ensnares odd numbers, as the explanation for why so many primes are in the spiral. 

But taking a cue from that-- I am aware that if you take the list of perfect squares 

1 
4 
9 
16 
25 
36 
49 
64 
81 
100 
121 
. . 
. . 
. . 

Now subtract consecutive and you get every odd number. 

Why is that, would you think? Well no use in asking a math professor because all math professors of the world today believe a ellipse is a conic section, not that oval which it truly is, and so all math professors today are incompetent ignoramuses, for if they cannot see a ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic, why trust them on anything else in mathematics. 

So, what I plan on doing is finding some part or piece of the Primitive Pythagorean Triples that eliminates the composite odd numbers like 9, 15, 21, 25, 27, 33, etc etc 

So, I suspect the best Prime Predictor is all bundled up inside PPT, if only we unpack that understanding. Now the pattern that the PPT may unravel, may or may not predict future primes any easier than it is to compute the large number PPT. So, we wait and see, for it maybe the case that computing large number PPT is more difficult than just random picking a large number odd number and then go through the Eratosthenes Sieve to see if prime or composite. 

AP 

Newsgroups: sci.math 
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 18:38:01 -0700 (PDT) 

Subject: applying PPT quadrapole theory to separating out odd composite from 
 odd prime Re: PPT-prime predictor--superior AP prime predictor, over that of 
 the Ulam Prime Spiral 
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 01:38:02 +0000 

applying PPT quadrapole theory to separating out odd composite from odd prime Re: PPT-prime predictor--superior AP prime predictor, over that of the Ulam Prime Spiral 

On Sunday, September 23, 2018 at 7:20:39 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> PPT-Prime Predictor, by Archimedes Plutonium 
> 


Alright, I am hopeful, for this is tough mathematics and no guarantee of any success. It is almost a written mantra in math-- primes have no pattern. But then if you subscribe to that idea, Ulam with his Prime Spiral knocked a dent into the mantra. There may not be a formula for all the primes, but there is a underlying pattern that although not 100% accurate, can be say 75% accurate. Math itself is "order" so those of us who play the game of mathematics do not want to hear-- there is no order in primes. There may not be 100% order, but there can be say 75% order. How much order did Ulam find? Is it say 50% or 75% order for primes from 0 to 100? 

What I am hoping to achieve is 90% order. 

And I think the best approach is PPT, Primitive Pythagorean Triples, for they contain all the primes. 

Now recently I was visiting this very same topic of PPT and came up with what I called Quadrapole theory, that of PPT, so we look at 3,4,5 and realize it is squares 9,16,25 and looking further we realize these are contained in a larger square of 3+4 = 7 and 7^2 = 49 so you can fit the 25 square inside of 49 and have remaining 24 area, and that 24 comes from the fact that you have 4 triangles each of area 6, so the 25 + 24 = 49 is involved in the proof of Pythagorean Theorem, and so the quadrapole is this 3,4,5,7. 

For 5,12,13, the quadrapole is 5,12,13, 17 for notice the four triangles involved in the proof of Pythagorean theorem is 1/2(5*12) = 30 and there are four of them 4*30 = 120 and notice that 13^2 + 120 = 17^2. 

So, what I am hoping for, with this new information on PPT, is a way of separating out odd composites from odds as prime. 

AP 


On Sunday, September 23, 2018 at 10:29:56 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
Alright, if we order the PPT in their Natural Order, let us see where the primes pop-out 

3,4,5 
5,12,13 
8,15,17 
7,24,25 
20,21,29 
12,35,37 
9,40,41 
28,45,53 
11,60,61 
16,63,65 
33,56,65 
48,55,73 
36,77,85 
20,99,101 

Now that order is in terms of magnitude of the hypotenuse 
and let us peel away the appearance of primes from that order, and skipping any duplicates 

3, 5, 13, 17, 7, 29, 37, 41, 53, 11, 61, 73, 101 

Now, my first thought is, I may have to use some sort of Conservation Equilibrium method I used earlier, because maybe the PPT order is a Natural Order of Primes. 

Observation-- a lack of primes ending in "9" digit. 

AP 

On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 12:23:47 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
Now a more comprehensive list of PPT in order 

3, 5, 13, 17, 7, 29, 37, 41, 53, 11, 61, 73, 89, 97, 101, 109, 113, 137, 
149, 157, 173, 19, 181, 193, 

3,4,5 
5,12,13 
8,15,17 
7,24,25 
20,21,29 
12,35,37 
9,40,41 
28,45,53 
11,60,61   
16,63,65 
33,56,65 
48,55,73 
13,84,85 
36,77,85 
39,80,89 
65,72,97 
20,99,101 
60,91,109 
15,112,113 
44,117,125 
88,105,137 
17,144,145 
24,143,145 
51,140,149 
85,132,157 
119,120,169 
52,165,173 
19,180,181 
57,176,185 
104,153,185 
95,168,193 

197, 229, 233, 241, 257, 23, 269, 277, 281, 293, 313, 317, 337, 349, 353, 373, 389, 397, 401 

28,195,197 
84,187,205 
133,156,205 
21,220,221 
140,171,221 
60,221,229 
105,208,233 
120,209,241 
32,255,257 
23,264,265 
96,247,265 
69,260,269 
115,252,277 
160,231,281 
161,240,289 
68,285,293 
136,273,305 
207,224,305 
25,312,313 
75,308,317 
36,323,325 
204,253,325 
175,288,337 
180,299,349 
225,272,353 
27,364,365 
76,357,365 
252,275,373 
135,352,377 
152,345,377 
189,340,389 
228,325,397 
40,399,401 
120,391,409 
29,420,421 
87,416,425 
297,304,425 
145,408,433 
84,437,445 
203,396,445 
280,351,449 
168,425,457 
261,380,461 
31,480,481 
319,360,481 
44,483,485 
93,476,485 
132,475,493 
155,468,493 
217,456,505 
336,377,505 
220,459,509 
279,440,521 
92,525,533 
308,435,533 
341,420,541 
33,544,545 
184,513,545 
165,532,557 
276,493,565 
396,403,565 
231,520,569 
48,575,577 
368,465,593 
240,551,601 
35,612,613 
105,608,617 
336,527,625 
100, 621,629 
429,460,629 
200,609,641 
315,572,653 
300,589,661 
385,552,673 
52,675,677 
37,684,685 
156,667,685 
111,680,689 
400, 561, 689 

Starting to see nice runs with skips of twin primes 

AP 

On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 2:39:26 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
improved list //PPT-prime predictor--superior AP prime predictor, over that of the Ulam Prime Spiral 

Alright here is an improved list, longer and with no errors (I hope) 

On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 12:23:47 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
Now a more comprehensive list of PPT in order 

3, 5, 13, 17, 7, 29, 37, 41, 53, 11, 61, 73, 89, 97, 101, 109, 113, 137, 
149, 157, 173, 19, 181, 193, 

3,4,5 
5,12,13 
8,15,17 
7,24,25 
20,21,29 
12,35,37 
9,40,41 
28,45,53 
11,60,61   
16,63,65 
33,56,65 
48,55,73 
13,84,85 
36,77,85 
39,80,89 
65,72,97 
20,99,101 
60,91,109 
- show quoted text - 
120,391,409 
29,420,421 
87,416,425 
297,304,425 
145,408,433 
84,437,445 
203,396,445 
280,351,449 
168,425,457 
261,380,461 
31,480,481 
319,360,481 
44,483,485 
93,476,485 
132,475,493 
155,468,493 
217,456,505 
336,377,505 
220,459,509 
279,440,521 
92,525,533 
308,435,533 
341,420,541 
33,544,545 
184,513,545 
165,532,557 
276,493,565 
396,403,565 
231,520,569 
48,575,577 
368,465,593 
240,551,601 
35,612,613 
105,608,617 
336,527,625 
100, 621,629 
429,460,629 
200,609,641 
315,572,653 
300,589,661 
385,552,673 
52,675,677 
37,684,685 
156,667,685 
111,680,689 
400, 561, 689 

Alright now, let me do the list again only with Quadrapoles  A, B, C , A+B 

3,4,5 , 7 
5,12,13 , 17 
8,15,17 , 23 
7,24,25 , 31 
20,21,29 , 41 
12,35,37 , 47 
9,40,41  , 49 
28,45,53 , 73 
11,60,61  , 71 
16,63,65 , 79 
33,56,65 , 89 
48,55,73 , 103 
13,84,85 , 97 

Let me check that list to see if all the primes from 3 to 97 are present. If not, what I can do to get them all present before leaving 100. 


36,77,85 
39,80,89 
65,72,97 
20,99,101 
60,91,109 
15,112,113 
44,117,125 
88,105,137 
17,144,145 
24,143,145 
51,140,149 
85,132,157 
119,120,169 
52,165,173 
19,180,181 
57,176,185 
104,153,185 
95,168,193 
- show quoted text - 
120,391,409 
29,420,421 
87,416,425 
297,304,425 
145,408,433 
84,437,445 
203,396,445 
280,351,449 
168,425,457 
261,380,461 
31,480,481 
319,360,481 
44,483,485 
93,476,485 
132,475,493 
155,468,493 
217,456,505 
336,377,505 
220,459,509 
279,440,521 
92,525,533 
308,435,533 
341,420,541 
33,544,545 
184,513,545 
165,532,557 
276,493,565 
396,403,565 
231,520,569 
48,575,577 
368,465,593 
240,551,601 
35,612,613 
105,608,617 
336,527,625 
100, 621,629 
429,460,629 
200,609,641 
315,572,653 
300,589,661 
385,552,673 
52,675,677 
37,684,685 
156,667,685 
111,680,689 
400, 561, 689 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#424219 — Is this a spiral of triangles or a polygon box? Re: 1,3-Spiraling triangles of PPT Re: 1,2-AP's prime predictor-- superior to that of Ulam's Prime Spiral

Now I have not yet drawn this spiraling figure on graph paper, for it tends to expand rapidly.

I draw the first PPT 3,4,5 then compound onto that one with 5,12,13, a common shared side of 5

Next I look for another PPT with either a 12 or 13 side and the first available one is 12,35,37 so I add that new one to the 12 side of 5,12,13

Now I look for a 35 or 37 side and the nearest available one is 35,612,613

Now I really need to stop here and see what is being formed, is it some sort of spiral, or some sort of polygon box or what?

AP





On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 4:45:15 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> 1,3Newsgroups: sci.math
> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> Subject: Spiraling triangles of PPT Re: 1,2-AP's prime predictor-- superior to
>  that of Ulam's Prime Spiral
> From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
> Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 17:16:51 +0000
> 
> Spiraling triangles of PPT Re: 1,2-AP's prime predictor-- superior to that of Ulam's Prime Spiral
> 
> - show quoted text -
> Alright, a bit of an inspiration here. 
> 
> I notice that some primes are repeated such as 3,4,5 then 5,12,13 
> 
> Now if we stack the repeated primes one onto the other we have a four sided something with a right angle 
> 
> 3,4,12,13 
> 
> I have yet to work out the other diagonal, whence the first is obviously 5 
> 
> But I was thinking, is it possible that only ALL primes repeat, not composite odd such as 9, 15, 21, .... which although some of them repeat but not all odd composites repeat? I wonder-- 
> 
> And then, what is this 4 sided figure? 
> 
> Now, if every every PPT has a side that repeats, we can stack them, so, instead of a Ulam Prime Spiral begot from a spiraling of all the numbers, what the AP is going to do, is spiral out the right triangles of PPT 
> 
> So now I need the duplicate of 12 or 13 to continue to form a 5 sided figure then a 6 sided, then a 7 sided and see if that leads to something to predict future primes. 
> 
> Call these the Spiraling Triangles of PPT. 
> 
> AP
> 
> 
> 
> Newsgroups: sci.math 
> Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 17:20:30 -0700 (PDT) 
> 
> Subject: PPT-prime predictor--superior AP prime predictor, over that of the 
>  Ulam Prime Spiral 
> From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
> Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:20:31 +0000 
> 
> PPT-prime predictor--superior AP prime predictor, over that of the Ulam Prime Spiral 
> 
> PPT-Prime Predictor, by Archimedes Plutonium 
> 
> Alright as promised, I want to do a superior prime predictor than the current status of the Ulam Prime Spiral. No one has yet mentioned what Ulam's Sigma Error is, perhaps worse than AP's 20% sigma error on dense-composites. 
> 
> Now, from reading Wikipedia's description of Ulam's Prime Spiral was mentioned a Algebra formula that ensnares odd numbers, as the explanation for why so many primes are in the spiral. 
> 
> But taking a cue from that-- I am aware that if you take the list of perfect squares 
> 
> 1 
> 4 
> 9 
> 16 
> 25 
> 36 
> 49 
> 64 
> 81 
> 100 
> 121 
> . . 
> . . 
> . . 
> 
> Now subtract consecutive and you get every odd number. 
> 
> Why is that, would you think? Well no use in asking a math professor because all math professors of the world today believe a ellipse is a conic section, not that oval which it truly is, and so all math professors today are incompetent ignoramuses, for if they cannot see a ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic, why trust them on anything else in mathematics. 
> 
> So, what I plan on doing is finding some part or piece of the Primitive Pythagorean Triples that eliminates the composite odd numbers like 9, 15, 21, 25, 27, 33, etc etc 
> 
> So, I suspect the best Prime Predictor is all bundled up inside PPT, if only we unpack that understanding. Now the pattern that the PPT may unravel, may or may not predict future primes any easier than it is to compute the large number PPT. So, we wait and see, for it maybe the case that computing large number PPT is more difficult than just random picking a large number odd number and then go through the Eratosthenes Sieve to see if prime or composite. 
> 
> AP 
> 
> Newsgroups: sci.math 
> Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 18:38:01 -0700 (PDT) 
> 
> Subject: applying PPT quadrapole theory to separating out odd composite from 
>  odd prime Re: PPT-prime predictor--superior AP prime predictor, over that of 
>  the Ulam Prime Spiral 
> From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> 
> Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 01:38:02 +0000 
> 
> applying PPT quadrapole theory to separating out odd composite from odd prime Re: PPT-prime predictor--superior AP prime predictor, over that of the Ulam Prime Spiral 
> 
> On Sunday, September 23, 2018 at 7:20:39 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> > PPT-Prime Predictor, by Archimedes Plutonium 
> > 
> 
> 
> Alright, I am hopeful, for this is tough mathematics and no guarantee of any success. It is almost a written mantra in math-- primes have no pattern. But then if you subscribe to that idea, Ulam with his Prime Spiral knocked a dent into the mantra. There may not be a formula for all the primes, but there is a underlying pattern that although not 100% accurate, can be say 75% accurate. Math itself is "order" so those of us who play the game of mathematics do not want to hear-- there is no order in primes. There may not be 100% order, but there can be say 75% order. How much order did Ulam find? Is it say 50% or 75% order for primes from 0 to 100? 
> 
> What I am hoping to achieve is 90% order. 
> 
> And I think the best approach is PPT, Primitive Pythagorean Triples, for they contain all the primes. 
> 
> Now recently I was visiting this very same topic of PPT and came up with what I called Quadrapole theory, that of PPT, so we look at 3,4,5 and realize it is squares 9,16,25 and looking further we realize these are contained in a larger square of 3+4 = 7 and 7^2 = 49 so you can fit the 25 square inside of 49 and have remaining 24 area, and that 24 comes from the fact that you have 4 triangles each of area 6, so the 25 + 24 = 49 is involved in the proof of Pythagorean Theorem, and so the quadrapole is this 3,4,5,7. 
> 
> For 5,12,13, the quadrapole is 5,12,13, 17 for notice the four triangles involved in the proof of Pythagorean theorem is 1/2(5*12) = 30 and there are four of them 4*30 = 120 and notice that 13^2 + 120 = 17^2. 
> 
> So, what I am hoping for, with this new information on PPT, is a way of separating out odd composites from odds as prime. 
> 
> AP 
> 
> 
> On Sunday, September 23, 2018 at 10:29:56 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> Alright, if we order the PPT in their Natural Order, let us see where the primes pop-out 
> 
> 3,4,5 
> 5,12,13 
> 8,15,17 
> 7,24,25 
> 20,21,29 
> 12,35,37 
> 9,40,41 
> 28,45,53 
> 11,60,61 
> 16,63,65 
> 33,56,65 
> 48,55,73 
> 36,77,85 
> 20,99,101 
> 
> Now that order is in terms of magnitude of the hypotenuse 
> and let us peel away the appearance of primes from that order, and skipping any duplicates 
> 
> 3, 5, 13, 17, 7, 29, 37, 41, 53, 11, 61, 73, 101 
> 
> Now, my first thought is, I may have to use some sort of Conservation Equilibrium method I used earlier, because maybe the PPT order is a Natural Order of Primes. 
> 
> Observation-- a lack of primes ending in "9" digit. 
> 
> AP 
> 
> On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 12:23:47 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> Now a more comprehensive list of PPT in order 
> 
> 3, 5, 13, 17, 7, 29, 37, 41, 53, 11, 61, 73, 89, 97, 101, 109, 113, 137, 
> 149, 157, 173, 19, 181, 193, 
> 
> 3,4,5 
> 5,12,13 
> 8,15,17 
> 7,24,25 
> 20,21,29 
> 12,35,37 
> 9,40,41 
> 28,45,53 
> 11,60,61   
> 16,63,65 
> 33,56,65 
> 48,55,73 
> 13,84,85 
> 36,77,85 
> 39,80,89 
> 65,72,97 
> 20,99,101 
> 60,91,109 
> 15,112,113 
> 44,117,125 
> 88,105,137 
> 17,144,145 
> 24,143,145 
> 51,140,149 
> 85,132,157 
> 119,120,169 
> 52,165,173 
> 19,180,181 
> 57,176,185 
> 104,153,185 
> 95,168,193 
> 
> 197, 229, 233, 241, 257, 23, 269, 277, 281, 293, 313, 317, 337, 349, 353, 373, 389, 397, 401 
> 
> 28,195,197 
> 84,187,205 
> 133,156,205 
> 21,220,221 
> 140,171,221 
> 60,221,229 
> 105,208,233 
> 120,209,241 
> 32,255,257 
> 23,264,265 
> 96,247,265 
> 69,260,269 
> 115,252,277 
> 160,231,281 
> 161,240,289 
> 68,285,293 
> 136,273,305 
> 207,224,305 
> 25,312,313 
> 75,308,317 
> 36,323,325 
> 204,253,325 
> 175,288,337 
> 180,299,349 
> 225,272,353 
> 27,364,365 
> 76,357,365 
> 252,275,373 
> 135,352,377 
> 152,345,377 
> 189,340,389 
> 228,325,397 
> 40,399,401 
> 120,391,409 
> 29,420,421 
> 87,416,425 
> 297,304,425 
> 145,408,433 
> 84,437,445 
> 203,396,445 
> 280,351,449 
> 168,425,457 
> 261,380,461 
> 31,480,481 
> 319,360,481 
> 44,483,485 
> 93,476,485 
> 132,475,493 
> 155,468,493 
> 217,456,505 
> 336,377,505 
> 220,459,509 
> 279,440,521 
> 92,525,533 
> 308,435,533 
> 341,420,541 
> 33,544,545 
> 184,513,545 
> 165,532,557 
> 276,493,565 
> 396,403,565 
> 231,520,569 
> 48,575,577 
> 368,465,593 
> 240,551,601 
> 35,612,613 
> 105,608,617 
> 336,527,625 
> 100, 621,629 
> 429,460,629 
> 200,609,641 
> 315,572,653 
> 300,589,661 
> 385,552,673 
> 52,675,677 
> 37,684,685 
> 156,667,685 
> 111,680,689 
> 400, 561, 689 
> 
> Starting to see nice runs with skips of twin primes 
> 
> AP 
> 
> On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 2:39:26 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> improved list //PPT-prime predictor--superior AP prime predictor, over that of the Ulam Prime Spiral 
> 
> Alright here is an improved list, longer and with no errors (I hope) 
> 
> On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 12:23:47 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: 
> Now a more comprehensive list of PPT in order 
> 
> 3, 5, 13, 17, 7, 29, 37, 41, 53, 11, 61, 73, 89, 97, 101, 109, 113, 137, 
> 149, 157, 173, 19, 181, 193, 
> 
> 3,4,5 
> 5,12,13 
> 8,15,17 
> 7,24,25 
> 20,21,29 
> 12,35,37 
> 9,40,41 
> 28,45,53 
> 11,60,61   
> 16,63,65 
> 33,56,65 
> 48,55,73 
> 13,84,85 
> 36,77,85 
> 39,80,89 
> 65,72,97 
> 20,99,101 
> 60,91,109 
> - show quoted text - 
> 120,391,409 
> 29,420,421 
> 87,416,425 
> 297,304,425 
> 145,408,433 
> 84,437,445 
> 203,396,445 
> 280,351,449 
> 168,425,457 
> 261,380,461 
> 31,480,481 
> 319,360,481 
> 44,483,485 
> 93,476,485 
> 132,475,493 
> 155,468,493 
> 217,456,505 
> 336,377,505 
> 220,459,509 
> 279,440,521 
> 92,525,533 
> 308,435,533 
> 341,420,541 
> 33,544,545 
> 184,513,545 
> 165,532,557 
> 276,493,565 
> 396,403,565 
> 231,520,569 
> 48,575,577 
> 368,465,593 
> 240,551,601 
> 35,612,613 
> 105,608,617 
> 336,527,625 
> 100, 621,629 
> 429,460,629 
> 200,609,641 
> 315,572,653 
> 300,589,661 
> 385,552,673 
> 52,675,677 
> 37,684,685 
> 156,667,685 
> 111,680,689 
> 400, 561, 689 
> 
> Alright now, let me do the list again only with Quadrapoles  A, B, C , A+B 
> 
> 3,4,5 , 7 
> 5,12,13 , 17 
> 8,15,17 , 23 
> 7,24,25 , 31 
> 20,21,29 , 41 
> 12,35,37 , 47 
> 9,40,41  , 49 
> 28,45,53 , 73 
> 11,60,61  , 71 
> 16,63,65 , 79 
> 33,56,65 , 89 
> 48,55,73 , 103 
> 13,84,85 , 97 
> 
> Let me check that list to see if all the primes from 3 to 97 are present. If not, what I can do to get them all present before leaving 100. 
> 
> 
> 36,77,85 
> 39,80,89 
> 65,72,97 
> 20,99,101 
> 60,91,109 
> 15,112,113 
> 44,117,125 
> 88,105,137 
> 17,144,145 
> 24,143,145 
> 51,140,149 
> 85,132,157 
> 119,120,169 
> 52,165,173 
> 19,180,181 
> 57,176,185 
> 104,153,185 
> 95,168,193 
> - show quoted text - 
> 120,391,409 
> 29,420,421 
> 87,416,425 
> 297,304,425 
> 145,408,433 
> 84,437,445 
> 203,396,445 
> 280,351,449 
> 168,425,457 
> 261,380,461 
> 31,480,481 
> 319,360,481 
> 44,483,485 
> 93,476,485 
> 132,475,493 
> 155,468,493 
> 217,456,505 
> 336,377,505 
> 220,459,509 
> 279,440,521 
> 92,525,533 
> 308,435,533 
> 341,420,541 
> 33,544,545 
> 184,513,545 
> 165,532,557 
> 276,493,565 
> 396,403,565 
> 231,520,569 
> 48,575,577 
> 368,465,593 
> 240,551,601 
> 35,612,613 
> 105,608,617 
> 336,527,625 
> 100, 621,629 
> 429,460,629 
> 200,609,641 
> 315,572,653 
> 300,589,661 
> 385,552,673 
> 52,675,677 
> 37,684,685 
> 156,667,685 
> 111,680,689 
> 400, 561, 689

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#424227 — Re: Archimedes "village idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

> kibo-shein-stalkershitparade-Moroney loves AP's theory that Starpower is really

Still haven't figured out not to attack me, have you, Failure Plutonium.
You attack, I respond...

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.math

csiph-web