Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.math > #423701 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-16 14:27 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-09-22 02:25 +0000 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.math
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Sad, when math professors are racist liars about the truth-- Ken Ribet, American Mathematical Society of Charles Fefferman, Ron Graham, Daniel Mauldin Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 14:27 -0700
Re: Sad, when math professors are racist liars about the truth-- Ken Ribet, American Mathematical Society of Charles Fefferman, Ron Graham, Daniel Mauldin Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:50 -0700
Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-22 02:25 +0000
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-16 14:27 -0700 |
| Subject | Sad, when math professors are racist liars about the truth-- Ken Ribet, American Mathematical Society of Charles Fefferman, Ron Graham, Daniel Mauldin |
| Message-ID | <0edc933c-21d7-4867-b99b-b14d5700e431@googlegroups.com> |
Sad, when math professors are racist liars about the truth-- Ken Ribet, American Mathematical Society of Charles Fefferman, Ron Graham, Daniel Mauldin
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2018 03:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Defining— Racist Mathematician & Racist Scientist
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:05:44 +0000
Defining— Racist Mathematician & Racist Scientist
Racist Mathematician & Scientist definition— this is a person or group of people who reject a idea or proof or experiment on simply the grounds of who the person was that gave the idea, proof, or experiment. Hatred of the source. Racists ignore or deny the truth because they hate the source.
Most people think Racist Mathematicians are rare. But sci.math from 1993 to 2018 is proving that the majority of math professors are Racists, e.g. the AP proof ellipse is never a conic cut, but rather a cylinder cut.
AP
On Sunday, September 16, 2018 at 7:30:05 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> WARNING TO STUDENTS:
AP writes: Christensen is warning students that math professors are dishonest liars (worse than the morals of Donald Trump) when they cram down your throat that the ellipse is a conic when it never was, but rather instead a Cylinder section. And Christensen is warning all students that his crazy Logic of 2 OR 10 = 12, is as crazy as Dan Christensen is a crazy bully oaf of academics, for-- every student with a pinch of Logical Reasoning knows and feels in her/his bones, that the correct logic is 2 AND 10 = 12. So, be warned of insane stalkers like Dan Christensen in sci.math, that should have been kicked out of sci.math a decade ago.
John Conway, David Riley,Gordon Sinnamon, Justin Trudeau,Christensen says why teach correct math-- ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic section
Univ Western Ontario math dept
Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon
Amit Chakma (chem engr)
Univ. Western Ontario physics dept
Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel*, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang
Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong
Canadian Educ Ministers-- endorsing stalking hypocrites like Dan Christensen with his insane 2 OR 10 = 12 when even a Canadian 8 year old knows 2 AND 10 = 12. Endorsing the "perpetual stalking by Dan Christensen"
Sebastien Proulx
Jordan Brown
David Eggen
Gordon Wyant
Zach Churchill
Ian Wishart
Rob Fleming
/\-------/\
\::O:::O::/
(::_ ^ _::)
\_`-----'_/
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Ontario?
And, even though you-- professors of math who never want to fix and clean up error filled mathematics, your students deserve better, and you should quit teaching if you cannot come around to admitting a ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic section. For it is embarrassing to have students smarter than the math professor who by taking a cone, cylinder can and a round lid, can prove on the spot, in the classroom that the cone yields an oval, never an ellipse.
Proofs ellipse is never a conic, always a cylinder section by
Archimedes Plutonium
--------------------
- hide quoted text -
AP's proof the ellipse is never a Conic Section, always a Cylinder section, and how the proof works
Let us analyze AP's Proof
On Friday, September 14, 2018 at 6:57:36 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> Array:: Analytic Geometry proof that Cylinder section= Ellipse//Conic
> section = Oval, never ellipse
>
> Now I did 3 Experiments and 3 models of the problem, but it turns out
> that one model is superior over all the other models. One model is the
> best of all.
>
> That model is where you construct a cone and a cylinder and then
> implant a circle inside the cone and cylinder attached to a handle so
> that you can rotate the circle inside. Mine uses a long nail that I
> poked holes into the side of a cylinder and another one inside a cone
> made from heavy wax paper of magazine covers. And I used a Mason or
> Kerr used lid and I attached them to the nail by drilling two holes
> into each lid and running a wire as fastener. All of this done so I
> can rotate or pivot the circle inside the cylinder and cone. You need
> a long nail, for if you make the models too small or too skinny, you
> lose clarity.
>
> ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Cylinder Section is a Ellipse::
>
>
> E
> __
> .-' `-.
> .' `.
> / \
> ; ;
> | G c | H
> ; ;
> \ /
> `. .'
> `-. _____ .-'
> F
>
Alright, focus on the distance from c to F in the cone-cut compared to the distance from c to E
In a Cylinder cut, those two distances are the same because a cylinder has two axes of symmetry.
The side view of a cylinder is this
| |
| |
| |
That allows cE to be the same distance as cF
But the side view of the cone is
/\E
/c \
F / \
The distance c to E is shorter because the slant of the side walls of the cone are in the direction of shortening cE, whereas the slant opposite c in cF make that distance larger than cE
> The above is a view of a ellipse with center c and is produced by the
> Sectioning of a Cylinder as long as the cut is not perpendicular to
> the base, and as long as the cut involves two points not larger than
> the height of the cylinder walls. What we want to prove is that the
> cut is always a ellipse, which is a plane figure of two axes of
> symmetry with a Major Axis and Minor Axis and center at c.
>
> Side view of Cylinder EGFH above with entry point cut at E and exit
> point cut at F and where c denotes the central axis of the cylinder
> and where x denotes a circle at c parallel with the base-circle of
> cylinder
>
> | |
> | | E
> | |
> | |
> |x c |x
> | |
> | |
> | |
> |F |
> | |
> | |
> | |
>
>
So we can see that the distance cE = cF in cylinder for the walls are Parallel to one another, giving distance symmetry
But in the Cone, the walls are not parallel, shortening the distance cE compared to cF. Leaving only one axis of symmetry that of cx. The oval is the conic section of a cut at a slant, while the cylinder cut at a slant is a ellipse. The Oval has just one axis of symmetry.
> So, what is the proof that figure EGFH is always an ellipse in the
> cylinder section? The line segment GH is the diameter of the circle
> base of cylinder and the cylinder axis cuts this diameter in half such
> that Gc = cH. Now we only need to show that Fc = cE. This is done from
> the right triangles cxF and cxE, for we note that by Angle-Side-Angle
> these two right triangles are congruent and hence Fc = cE, our second
> axis of symmetry and thus figure EGFH is always an ellipse. QED
>
>
>
> Array proof:: Analytic Geometry proof that Conic section= Oval// never ellipse
>
> ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Conic Section is a Oval, never an ellipse::
>
>
> A
> ,'" "`.
> / \
> C | c | D
> \ /
> ` . ___ .'
> B
>
> The above is a view of a figure formed from the cut of a conic with
> center c as the axis of the cone and is produced by the Sectioning of
> a Cone as long as the cut is not perpendicular to the base, and as
> long as the cut is not a hyperbola, parabola or circle (nor line).
> What we want to prove is that this cut is always a oval, never an
> ellipse. An oval is defined as a plane figure of just one axis of
> symmetry and possessing a center, c, with a Major Diameter as the axis
> of symmetry and a Minor Diameter. In our diagram above, the major
> diameter is AB and minor diameter is CD.
>
> Alright, almost the same as with Cylinder section where we proved the
> center was half way between Major Axis and Minor Axis of cylinder,
> only in the case of the Conic, we find that the center is half way
> between CD the Minor Diameter, but the center is not halfway in
> between the Major Diameter, and all of that because of the reason the
> slanted walls of the cone cause the distance cA to be far smaller than
> the distance cB. In the diagram below we have the circle of x centered
> at c and parallel to base. The angle at cx is not 90 degrees as in
> cylinder. The angle of cAx is not the same as the angle cBx, as in the
> case of the cylinder, because the walls of the cone-for line segments-
> are slanted versus parallel in the cylinder. Triangles cAx and cBx are
> not congruent, and thus, the distance of cA is not equal to cB,
> leaving only one axis of symmetry AB, not CD.
>
> / \A
> x/ c \x
> B/ \
>
> Hence, every cut in the Cone, not a hyperbola, not a parabola, not a
> circle (not a line) is a Oval, never an ellipse.
>
> QED
>
> --Archimedes Plutonium
>
> Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH
> ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu
>
>
> ::\ ::|:: /::
> ::\::|::/::
> _ _
> (:Y:)
> - -
> ::/::|::\::
> ::/ ::|:: \::
> One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy.
> . \ . . | . /.
> . . \. . .|. . /. .
> ..\....|.../...
> ::\:::|::/::
> --------------- -------------
> --------------- (Y) -------------
> --------------- --------------
> ::/:::|::\::
> ../....|...\...
> . . /. . .|. . \. .
> . / . . | . \ .
>
>
> http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
>
> I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> Archimedes Plutonium
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-21 18:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8028f058-d826-4257-9ae0-4ff324e16280@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #423701 |
On Friday, September 21, 2018 at 8:12:36 AM UTC-5, konyberg wrote: > > All math professors would tell you that it converges to 1. And they would also know why. But you don't. > > KON The depressed Norwegian Konyberg, probably because the Norwegian sun goes down so fast, that KON wants to make everyone as depressed in knowledge as what KON is a stick in the mud intellect. So, KON, you think Tao knows why consecutive number as cubes when divided converges to 1, eg, 27/8 etc etc, when, in fact Tao is so stupid in math he still thinks a ellipse is a conic section when in fact it is a oval, and the ellipse is a cylinder section. Both KON and Tao are math failures on conics. > Sad, when math professors are racist liars about the truth-- Ken Ribet, American Mathematical Society of Charles Fefferman, Ron Graham, Daniel Mauldin > > Newsgroups: sci.math > Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2018 03:05:43 -0700 (PDT) > > Subject: Defining— Racist Mathematician & Racist Scientist > From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> > Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2018 10:05:44 +0000 > > Defining— Racist Mathematician & Racist Scientist > > Racist Mathematician & Scientist definition— this is a person or group of people who reject a idea or proof or experiment on simply the grounds of who the person was that gave the idea, proof, or experiment. Hatred of the source. Racists ignore or deny the truth because they hate the source. > > Most people think Racist Mathematicians are rare. But sci.math from 1993 to 2018 is proving that the majority of math professors are Racists, e.g. the AP proof ellipse is never a conic cut, but rather a cylinder cut. > > AP > > > > > On Sunday, September 16, 2018 at 7:30:05 AM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote: > > > > WARNING TO STUDENTS: > > AP writes: Christensen is warning students that math professors are dishonest liars (worse than the morals of Donald Trump) when they cram down your throat that the ellipse is a conic when it never was, but rather instead a Cylinder section. And Christensen is warning all students that his crazy Logic of 2 OR 10 = 12, is as crazy as Dan Christensen is a crazy bully oaf of academics, for-- every student with a pinch of Logical Reasoning knows and feels in her/his bones, that the correct logic is 2 AND 10 = 12. So, be warned of insane stalkers like Dan Christensen in sci.math, that should have been kicked out of sci.math a decade ago. > > John Conway, David Riley,Gordon Sinnamon, Justin Trudeau,Christensen says why teach correct math-- ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic section > > Univ Western Ontario math dept > Janusz Adamus, Tatyana Barron, Dan Christensen, Graham Denham, Ajneet Dhillon, Matthias Franz, John Jardine, Massoud Khalkhali, Nicole Lemire, Jan Mináč, Victoria Olds, Martin Pinsonnault, Lex Renner, David Riley, Rasul Shafikov, Gordon Sinnamon > > > Amit Chakma (chem engr) > > Univ. Western Ontario physics dept > Pauline Barmby, Shantanu Basu, Peter Brown, Alex Buchel*, Jan Cami, Margret Campbell-Brown, Blaine Chronik, Robert Cockcroft, John R. de Bruyn, Colin Denniston, Giovanni Fanchini, Sarah Gallagher, Lyudmila Goncharova, Wayne Hocking, Martin Houde, Jeffrey L. Hutter, Carol Jones, Stan Metchev, Silvia Mittler, Els Peeters, Robert Sica, Aaron Sigut, Peter Simpson, Mahi Singh, Paul Wiegert, Eugene Wong, Martin Zinke-Allmang > > Univ Toronto, physics, Gordon F. West, Michael B. Walker, Henry M. Van Driel, David J. Rowe, John W. Moffat, John F. Martin, Robert K. Logan, Albert E. Litherland, Roland List, Philipp Kronberg, James King, Anthony W. Key, Bob Holdom, Ron M. Farquhar, R. Nigel Edwards, David J. Dunlop, James Drummond, Tom E. Drake, R.Fraser Code, Richard C. Bailey, Robin Armstrong > > > Canadian Educ Ministers-- endorsing stalking hypocrites like Dan Christensen with his insane 2 OR 10 = 12 when even a Canadian 8 year old knows 2 AND 10 = 12. Endorsing the "perpetual stalking by Dan Christensen" > > Sebastien Proulx > Jordan Brown > David Eggen > Gordon Wyant > Zach Churchill > Ian Wishart > Rob Fleming > > > /\-------/\ > \::O:::O::/ > (::_ ^ _::) > \_`-----'_/ > You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Ontario? > And, even though you-- professors of math who never want to fix and clean up error filled mathematics, your students deserve better, and you should quit teaching if you cannot come around to admitting a ellipse is a cylinder section, never a conic section. For it is embarrassing to have students smarter than the math professor who by taking a cone, cylinder can and a round lid, can prove on the spot, in the classroom that the cone yields an oval, never an ellipse. > > Proofs ellipse is never a conic, always a cylinder section by > Archimedes Plutonium > -------------------- > - hide quoted text - > AP's proof the ellipse is never a Conic Section, always a Cylinder section, and how the proof works > > Let us analyze AP's Proof > > On Friday, September 14, 2018 at 6:57:36 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > > > > > Array:: Analytic Geometry proof that Cylinder section= Ellipse//Conic > > section = Oval, never ellipse > > > > Now I did 3 Experiments and 3 models of the problem, but it turns out > > that one model is superior over all the other models. One model is the > > best of all. > > > > That model is where you construct a cone and a cylinder and then > > implant a circle inside the cone and cylinder attached to a handle so > > that you can rotate the circle inside. Mine uses a long nail that I > > poked holes into the side of a cylinder and another one inside a cone > > made from heavy wax paper of magazine covers. And I used a Mason or > > Kerr used lid and I attached them to the nail by drilling two holes > > into each lid and running a wire as fastener. All of this done so I > > can rotate or pivot the circle inside the cylinder and cone. You need > > a long nail, for if you make the models too small or too skinny, you > > lose clarity. > > > > ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Cylinder Section is a Ellipse:: > > > > > > E > > __ > > .-' `-. > > .' `. > > / \ > > ; ; > > | G c | H > > ; ; > > \ / > > `. .' > > `-. _____ .-' > > F > > > > > Alright, focus on the distance from c to F in the cone-cut compared to the distance from c to E > > In a Cylinder cut, those two distances are the same because a cylinder has two axes of symmetry. > > The side view of a cylinder is this > > | | > | | > | | > > That allows cE to be the same distance as cF > > > But the side view of the cone is > > /\E > /c \ > F / \ > > > The distance c to E is shorter because the slant of the side walls of the cone are in the direction of shortening cE, whereas the slant opposite c in cF make that distance larger than cE > > > The above is a view of a ellipse with center c and is produced by the > > Sectioning of a Cylinder as long as the cut is not perpendicular to > > the base, and as long as the cut involves two points not larger than > > the height of the cylinder walls. What we want to prove is that the > > cut is always a ellipse, which is a plane figure of two axes of > > symmetry with a Major Axis and Minor Axis and center at c. > > > > Side view of Cylinder EGFH above with entry point cut at E and exit > > point cut at F and where c denotes the central axis of the cylinder > > and where x denotes a circle at c parallel with the base-circle of > > cylinder > > > > | | > > | | E > > | | > > | | > > |x c |x > > | | > > | | > > | | > > |F | > > | | > > | | > > | | > > > > > > So we can see that the distance cE = cF in cylinder for the walls are Parallel to one another, giving distance symmetry > > But in the Cone, the walls are not parallel, shortening the distance cE compared to cF. Leaving only one axis of symmetry that of cx. The oval is the conic section of a cut at a slant, while the cylinder cut at a slant is a ellipse. The Oval has just one axis of symmetry. > > > So, what is the proof that figure EGFH is always an ellipse in the > > cylinder section? The line segment GH is the diameter of the circle > > base of cylinder and the cylinder axis cuts this diameter in half such > > that Gc = cH. Now we only need to show that Fc = cE. This is done from > > the right triangles cxF and cxE, for we note that by Angle-Side-Angle > > these two right triangles are congruent and hence Fc = cE, our second > > axis of symmetry and thus figure EGFH is always an ellipse. QED > > > > > > > > Array proof:: Analytic Geometry proof that Conic section= Oval// never ellipse > > > > ARRAY, Analytic Geometry Proof, Conic Section is a Oval, never an ellipse:: > > > > > > A > > ,'" "`. > > / \ > > C | c | D > > \ / > > ` . ___ .' > > B > > > > The above is a view of a figure formed from the cut of a conic with > > center c as the axis of the cone and is produced by the Sectioning of > > a Cone as long as the cut is not perpendicular to the base, and as > > long as the cut is not a hyperbola, parabola or circle (nor line). > > What we want to prove is that this cut is always a oval, never an > > ellipse. An oval is defined as a plane figure of just one axis of > > symmetry and possessing a center, c, with a Major Diameter as the axis > > of symmetry and a Minor Diameter. In our diagram above, the major > > diameter is AB and minor diameter is CD. > > > > Alright, almost the same as with Cylinder section where we proved the > > center was half way between Major Axis and Minor Axis of cylinder, > > only in the case of the Conic, we find that the center is half way > > between CD the Minor Diameter, but the center is not halfway in > > between the Major Diameter, and all of that because of the reason the > > slanted walls of the cone cause the distance cA to be far smaller than > > the distance cB. In the diagram below we have the circle of x centered > > at c and parallel to base. The angle at cx is not 90 degrees as in > > cylinder. The angle of cAx is not the same as the angle cBx, as in the > > case of the cylinder, because the walls of the cone-for line segments- > > are slanted versus parallel in the cylinder. Triangles cAx and cBx are > > not congruent, and thus, the distance of cA is not equal to cB, > > leaving only one axis of symmetry AB, not CD. > > > > / \A > > x/ c \x > > B/ \ > > > > Hence, every cut in the Cone, not a hyperbola, not a parabola, not a > > circle (not a line) is a Oval, never an ellipse. > > > > QED > > > > --Archimedes Plutonium > > > > Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH > > ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu > > > > > > ::\ ::|:: /:: > > ::\::|::/:: > > _ _ > > (:Y:) > > - - > > ::/::|::\:: > > ::/ ::|:: \:: > > One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. > > . \ . . | . /. > > . . \. . .|. . /. . > > ..\....|.../... > > ::\:::|::/:: > > --------------- ------------- > > --------------- (Y) ------------- > > --------------- -------------- > > ::/:::|::\:: > > ../....|...\... > > . . /. . .|. . \. . > > . / . . | . \ . > > > > > > http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe > > Archimedes Plutonium
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 02:25 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <po4960$567$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #424006 |
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails: >Moroney's Gay B&B near Boston loves AP's theory that Real Proton = 840 >MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole. Does Archie, I am so glad that you finally asked me to discuss all your posts with you! We can start with discuss your sudden projections, where you accuse others of your own issues. Like in this very sentence, you accuse me of liking your stoopid proton=840 MeV/electron=muon nonsense because you like your own nonsense, you accuse me of being gay because you are gay. You also accuse Konyberg of being depressed and a math failure because you're depressed math failure. So let's talk about all your issues. First, you are projecting much more than you did before. Projection is a symptom of various forms of insanity. Secondly, what you project is quite relevant. So apparently you are a depressed gay math failure who likes your own false proofs. I do hope you see a professional who can help you with all your issues. >AP writes:: no, what I want is for you to be "banned from sci.math, >sci.physics" as an insane stalker-- This is something else we can discuss. For some strange reason you always thought discussing things in a discussion group was 'stalking' somehow. I am glad you finally asked me to discuss stuff with you! >Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- >MIT math dept. >Michael Artin, Martin Bazant, Bonnie Berger, Roman Bezrukavnikov, Alexei We can also discuss your stalker lists, in particular why you always post stalker lists. Is it really autism at work? It sure is stoopid and retarded!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.math
csiph-web