Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.math > #423942 > unrolled thread

Stuckelberger loves AP's theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole. Does Brigitta Wolff, Jurgen Habermass, Horst Stocker,Alex Kuronya, Martin Moller,Jakob Stix, love it also?

Started byArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
First post2018-09-20 14:02 -0700
Last post2018-09-20 23:10 +0000
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.math


Contents

  Stuckelberger loves AP's theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole. Does Brigitta Wolff, Jurgen Habermass, Horst Stocker,Alex Kuronya, Martin Moller,Jakob Stix, love it also? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 14:02 -0700
    Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-20 23:10 +0000

#423942 — Stuckelberger loves AP's theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole. Does Brigitta Wolff, Jurgen Habermass, Horst Stocker,Alex Kuronya, Martin Moller,Jakob Stix, love it also?

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-20 14:02 -0700
SubjectStuckelberger loves AP's theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole. Does Brigitta Wolff, Jurgen Habermass, Horst Stocker,Alex Kuronya, Martin Moller,Jakob Stix, love it also?
Message-ID<6705549a-6421-4954-8689-2956d1adafd2@googlegroups.com>
Stuckelberger loves AP's theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole. Does Brigitta Wolff, Jurgen Habermass, Horst Stocker,Alex Kuronya, Martin Moller,Jakob Stix, love it also?

On Thursday, September 20, 2018 at 10:56:17 AM UTC-5, Jens Stuckelberger wrote:

> 
> 	While your efforts are commendable, are you sure,,,,

AP writes:: hey hey hey, it is the Stuckelberger, stick in the mud failure of math and science. Why can not the Stuckelberger ever grow up, is it because science burnt out his tiny mind.

Goethe Universitat Physics dept

Brigitta Wolff president

Jurgen Habermass
Horst Stocker
Gerd Binnig
Horst Ludwig Stormer  
Peter Grunberg

math
Alex Kuronya
Martin Moller
Jakob Stix
Annette Werner
Andreas Bernig
Esther Cabezas-Rivas
Hans Crauel
Thomas Gerstner
Bastian von Harrach
Thomas Mettler
Tobias Weth
Amin Coja-Oghlan
Raman Sanyal
Thorsten Theobald
Yury Person            



   /\-------/\ 
   \::O:::O::/ 
  (::_  ^  _::) 
   \_`-----'_/ 
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Germany? 

And, even though you-- professors of math and physics, want to remain stupid in Physics, your students deserve better. 

Consider, then admit that the Covalent bond of chemistry cannot exist in the world if the electron is considered to be .5MeV for it has not enough Angular Momentum to keep a bond together. The true electron of all atoms has to be of a ratio of 105 MeV to proton of 840MeV in order to have a Covalent bonding in Chemistry.

AP

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#423951 — Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2018-09-20 23:10 +0000
SubjectRe: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
Message-ID<po19d6$hkf$2@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#423942
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>> While your efforts are commendable, are you sure,,,, [they are worth
>> the while? The individual that you are addressing has shown to be
>> thoroughly impervious to reason, probably because of an acute Dunning-
>> Kruger syndrome. ]

>AP writes:: hey hey hey, it is the Stuckelberger, stick in the mud failure
>of math and science. Why can not the Stuckelberger ever grow up, is it 
>because science burnt out his tiny mind.

Now who exactly is not grown up here, Failure Plutonium? It seems VERY,
VERY childish to respond to criticism with multiple posts of stalker lists
and your cubbyhole pet. Why not address the comments to those who try to
discuss things with you on this discussion group? Or is your autism acting
up again? Or is it part of your Dunning-Kruger syndrome?

Also, I am really curious, why do you always post the stalker lists? What
do you actually hope to accomplish by doing so?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.math


csiph-web