Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #423820 > unrolled thread

Malum loves AP's discovery that Starpower is 90% Faraday law on hydrogen & helium, turning Space in magnetic monopoles. Does Jouko Mickelsson, Anders Rosengren John Rundgren, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's starpower theory??

Back to article view | Back to sci.math

Contents

  Malum loves AP's discovery that Starpower is 90% Faraday law on hydrogen & helium, turning Space in magnetic monopoles. Does Jouko Mickelsson, Anders Rosengren  John Rundgren, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's starpower theory?? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 10:54 -0700
    Re: Malum loves AP's discovery that Starpower is 90% Faraday law on hydrogen & helium, turning Space in magnetic monopoles. Does Jouko Mickelsson, Anders Rosengren  John Rundgren, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's starpower theory?? Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 22:32 -0700
      Malum loves AP's discovery that Starpower is 90% Faraday law on hydrogen & helium, turning Space in magnetic monopoles. Does Bo Thide, Max Tegmark, Cecilia Jarlskog, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's starpower theory?? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 00:47 -0700
        Re: Malum loves AP's discovery that Starpower is 90% Faraday law on hydrogen & helium, turning Space in magnetic monopoles. Does Bo Thide, Max Tegmark, Cecilia Jarlskog, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's starpower theory?? Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 04:17 -0700
          Re: Malum loves AP's discovery that Starpower is 90% Faraday law on hydrogen & helium, turning Space in magnetic monopoles. Does Bo Thide, Max Tegmark, Cecilia Jarlskog, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's starpower theory?? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-20 12:56 +0000
            Re: Malum loves AP's discovery that Starpower is 90% Faraday law on hydrogen & helium, turning Space in magnetic monopoles. Does Bo Thide, Max Tegmark, Cecilia Jarlskog, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's starpower theory?? Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 06:18 -0700
              Re: Malum loves AP's discovery that Starpower is 90% Faraday law on hydrogen & helium, turning Space in magnetic monopoles. Does Bo Thide, Max Tegmark, Cecilia Jarlskog, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's starpower theory?? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-20 16:01 +0000
                Re: Malum loves AP's discovery that Starpower is 90% Faraday law on hydrogen & helium, turning Space in magnetic monopoles. Does Bo Thide, Max Tegmark, Cecilia Jarlskog, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's starpower theory?? Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 00:10 -0700
        Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-22 03:35 +0000

#423820 — Malum loves AP's discovery that Starpower is 90% Faraday law on hydrogen & helium, turning Space in magnetic monopoles. Does Jouko Mickelsson, Anders Rosengren John Rundgren, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's starpower theory??

Malum loves AP's discovery that Starpower is 90% Faraday law on hydrogen & helium, turning Space in magnetic monopoles. Does Jouko Mickelsson, Anders Rosengren 
John Rundgren, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's starpower theory?? 

Malum loves, loves AP theory of Starpower because, can you believe it-- AP discovered true Starpower is Faraday's Law inside of atoms in 2017- 2018, just as it was discovered that Jupiter had a permanent blue light Aurorae by Hubble Space telescope in 2016. The timing could not have been any more perfect of a timing.

On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 at 3:09:30 AM UTC-5, Zelos Malum wrote: 
> Definitionally, there are any amount of dimension you want. 

AP writes: yes, definitely as recent proof of AP's Starpower is that Jupiter has a permanent lit up pole of blue light Northern Lights, Aurora Borealis. So Jupiter is already a lit up star. 


Which is AP's 2nd and 3rd best theory? Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law of atoms where inside every atom, the muon is thrust through the proton producing magnetic monopoles and creating starpower. Or, AP's theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole. 

Stockholm University 
Math logic 
Per Martin-Lof, Erik Palmgren, Tom Britton, Pavel Kurasov 
Alexander Berglund, Jonas Bergstrom*, Rikard Bogvad 
Samuel Lundqvist, Annemarie Luger *, Erik Palmgren 
Torbjorn Tambour 

Stockholm Univ physics 
Tony Hansson, Markus Hennrich, Tommy Ohlsson, Paul Crutzen *, 

Swedish physics, et al 
Bo Thide, Max Tegmark, Cecilia Jarlskog *, Lars Bergstrom, Lars Samuelson 
Anders Flodstrom, Hans Ryde, Anders Barany, Gunnar von Heijne 
Claes-Goran Granqvist, Joakim Edsjo, Carl Falthammar, Sven Hansson, Arne Kaijser 
Pres. Sigbritt Karlsson (KTH) 


University Gothenburg 
Bernt Wennberg 
Aila Sarkka 

Univ Stockholm Physics dept 

Gunnar Benediktsson, Clas Blomberg, Bo Cartling 
Olle Edholm, Goran Grimvall, Goran Lindblad 
Hakan Snellman, Jouko Mickelsson, Anders Rosengren 
John Rundgren 


   /\-------/\ 
   \::O:::O::/ 
  (::_  ^  _::) 
   \_`-----'_/ 
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Stockholm? 

And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, starpower is only 10% fusion, 90% Faraday Law of its atoms. 


And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better.  Remain stupid in that the ellipse is never a conic but always a cylinder section. The oval is a conic section. 


Yes, there Malum, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion mixed with fission only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars. 

But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV. 

And of course, AP's greatest all time theory is 231Pu Atom Totality, the whole entire universe is just one big atom. 

What answer did they give? 


Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.      

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. 

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#423883

Reposting the same shit over and over does not make your position stronger, onyl weaker you crank.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423894 — Malum loves AP's discovery that Starpower is 90% Faraday law on hydrogen & helium, turning Space in magnetic monopoles. Does Bo Thide, Max Tegmark, Cecilia Jarlskog, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's starpower theory??

Malum loves AP's discovery that Starpower is 90% Faraday law on hydrogen & helium, turning Space in magnetic monopoles. Does Bo Thide, Max Tegmark, Cecilia Jarlskog, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's starpower theory?? 

Malum loves, loves AP theory of Starpower because, can you believe it-- AP discovered true Starpower is Faraday's Law inside of atoms in 2017- 2018, just as it was discovered that Jupiter had a permanent blue light Aurorae by Hubble Space telescope in 2016. The timing could not have been any more perfect of a timing. 

On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 at 3:09:30 AM UTC-5, Zelos Malum wrote: 
> Definitionally, there are any amount of dimension you want. 

AP writes: yes, definitely as recent proof of AP's Starpower is that Jupiter has a permanent lit up pole of blue light Northern Lights, Aurora Borealis. So Jupiter is already a lit up star. 


Which is AP's 2nd and 3rd best theory? Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law of atoms where inside every atom, the muon is thrust through the proton producing magnetic monopoles and creating starpower. Or, AP's theory that Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole. 

Stockholm University 
Math logic 
Per Martin-Lof, Erik Palmgren, Tom Britton, Pavel Kurasov 
Alexander Berglund, Jonas Bergstrom*, Rikard Bogvad 
Samuel Lundqvist, Annemarie Luger *, Erik Palmgren 
Torbjorn Tambour 

Stockholm Univ physics 
Tony Hansson, Markus Hennrich, Tommy Ohlsson, Paul Crutzen *, 

Swedish physics, et al 
Bo Thide, Max Tegmark, Cecilia Jarlskog *, Lars Bergstrom, Lars Samuelson 
Anders Flodstrom, Hans Ryde, Anders Barany, Gunnar von Heijne 
Claes-Goran Granqvist, Joakim Edsjo, Carl Falthammar, Sven Hansson, Arne Kaijser 
Pres. Sigbritt Karlsson (KTH) 


University Gothenburg 
Bernt Wennberg 
Aila Sarkka 

Univ Stockholm Physics dept 

Gunnar Benediktsson, Clas Blomberg, Bo Cartling 
Olle Edholm, Goran Grimvall, Goran Lindblad 
Hakan Snellman, Jouko Mickelsson, Anders Rosengren 
John Rundgren 


   /\-------/\ 
   \::O:::O::/ 
  (::_  ^  _::) 
   \_`-----'_/ 
You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in Stockholm? 

And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, starpower is only 10% fusion, 90% Faraday Law of its atoms. 


And, even though you-- professors of physics/math, want to remain silent and stupid in Real Electron = muon, and true real Calculus with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, your students deserve better.  Remain stupid in that the ellipse is never a conic but always a cylinder section. The oval is a conic section. 


Yes, there Malum, what did they say-- the power of Sun and stars is not really fusion but is the Faraday Law inside of atoms creating monopoles and turning Space into energy that fuels the Sun and stars. My rough estimate is that fusion mixed with fission only supplies 10% or less of Sun and stars. 

But of course, I could not have discovered the true starpower when under the idiotic idea that the electron was a mere .5MeV when it truly is 105 MeV. 

And of course, AP's greatest all time theory is 231Pu Atom Totality, the whole entire universe is just one big atom. 

What answer did they give? 


Very crude dot picture of 5f6, 94TH 
ELECTRON=muon DOT CLOUD of 231Pu 


                ::\ ::|:: /:: 
                 ::\::|::/:: 
                     _ _ 
                    (:Y:) 
                     - - 
                 ::/::|::\:: 
                ::/ ::|:: \:: 
One of those dots is the Milky Way galaxy. And each dot represents another galaxy. 
            . \ .  . | .   /. 
           . . \. . .|. . /. . 
              ..\....|.../... 
               ::\:::|::/:: 
---------------      ------------- 
--------------- (Y) ------------- 
---------------      -------------- 
               ::/:::|::\:: 
              ../....|...\... 
           . . /. . .|. . \. . 
            . / .  . | .   \ . 

  
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ 
whole entire Universe is just one big atom 
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies 

I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers.       

Read my recent posts in peace and quiet. 

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe         
Archimedes Plutonium

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423903 — Re: Malum loves AP's discovery that Starpower is 90% Faraday law on hydrogen & helium, turning Space in magnetic monopoles. Does Bo Thide, Max Tegmark, Cecilia Jarlskog, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's starpower theory??

Why do you always delete your first message?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423909 — Re: Malum loves AP's discovery that Starpower is 90% Faraday law on hydrogen & helium, turning Space in magnetic monopoles. Does Bo Thide, Max Tegmark, Cecilia Jarlskog, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's starpower theory??

Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> writes:

>Why do you always delete your first message?

Because Archie is a great big chicken. He cannot deal with the idea of
someone showing him that he is wrong and how he is wrong. He would
rather run away and (try to) delete his post instead.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423915 — Re: Malum loves AP's discovery that Starpower is 90% Faraday law on hydrogen & helium, turning Space in magnetic monopoles. Does Bo Thide, Max Tegmark, Cecilia Jarlskog, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's starpower theory??

Den torsdag 20 september 2018 kl. 14:56:21 UTC+2 skrev Michael Moroney:
> Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >Why do you always delete your first message?
> 
> Because Archie is a great big chicken. He cannot deal with the idea of
> someone showing him that he is wrong and how he is wrong. He would
> rather run away and (try to) delete his post instead.

How does that even work when people quote him and sees it then?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423932 — Re: Malum loves AP's discovery that Starpower is 90% Faraday law on hydrogen & helium, turning Space in magnetic monopoles. Does Bo Thide, Max Tegmark, Cecilia Jarlskog, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's starpower theory??

Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> writes:

>Den torsdag 20 september 2018 kl. 14:56:21 UTC+2 skrev Michael Moroney:
>> Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>> >Why do you always delete your first message?
>> 
>> Because Archie is a great big chicken. He cannot deal with the idea of
>> someone showing him that he is wrong and how he is wrong. He would
>> rather run away and (try to) delete his post instead.

>How does that even work when people quote him and sees it then?

I am not sure. He just isn't acting logically at all.

He does seem to think that Google runs Usenet, despite Usenet being older
than Google, and he apparently thinks when he deletes his posts from
Google, they are gone.  Outside of Google, however, his deletes are
ignored, and it just looks like he is spamming the same crap over and
over. He posts something, someone replies to it, he doesn't like the reply
so he 'deletes' it from Google (nothing happens outside Google) and he
reposts it, ad nauseum. So outside Google he is spamming the same topic
over and over.

Remember the bizarre "Let us thank AP for..." kookiness a month or two
back? It got up to something like 200 reposts, and my ISP (or its
upstream) actually started dropping his reposts (but not the replies to
them) as spewage.

He just doesn't get it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#423968 — Re: Malum loves AP's discovery that Starpower is 90% Faraday law on hydrogen & helium, turning Space in magnetic monopoles. Does Bo Thide, Max Tegmark, Cecilia Jarlskog, Carl XVI Gustaf, also love AP's starpower theory??

Den torsdag 20 september 2018 kl. 18:01:08 UTC+2 skrev Michael Moroney:
> Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >Den torsdag 20 september 2018 kl. 14:56:21 UTC+2 skrev Michael Moroney:
> >> Zelos Malum <zelos.malum@gmail.com> writes:
> >> 
> >> >Why do you always delete your first message?
> >> 
> >> Because Archie is a great big chicken. He cannot deal with the idea of
> >> someone showing him that he is wrong and how he is wrong. He would
> >> rather run away and (try to) delete his post instead.
> 
> >How does that even work when people quote him and sees it then?
> 
> I am not sure. He just isn't acting logically at all.
> 
> He does seem to think that Google runs Usenet, despite Usenet being older
> than Google, and he apparently thinks when he deletes his posts from
> Google, they are gone.  Outside of Google, however, his deletes are
> ignored, and it just looks like he is spamming the same crap over and
> over. He posts something, someone replies to it, he doesn't like the reply
> so he 'deletes' it from Google (nothing happens outside Google) and he
> reposts it, ad nauseum. So outside Google he is spamming the same topic
> over and over.
> 
> Remember the bizarre "Let us thank AP for..." kookiness a month or two
> back? It got up to something like 200 reposts, and my ISP (or its
> upstream) actually started dropping his reposts (but not the replies to
> them) as spewage.
> 
> He just doesn't get it.

I do remember those, I got one still on tabs for when he keeps going on so I can copy and paste my response cause his "proof against negative numbers" were so flawed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#424011 — Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

>Subject: Re: why Malum loves AP
>Subject: Re: 2-Futter loves AP
>Does Sven Hansson, Arne Kaijser, Sigbritt Karlsson, Carl XVI Gustaf, also 
>love AP
>Futter loves AP
>Malum loves, loves AP

Wow, Plutonium is really projecting his gayness onto Zelos and others.  I
guess Archie Pu is madly in love with them (Archie's gayness again) but he
proects it so they are all in love with him. Archie just cannot deal with
his own gayness, apparently, so he projects.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.math

csiph-web