Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.math > #423329 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-10 15:37 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-09-19 11:32 -0700 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.math
(2)-Cycloid-Parabola Function, replacing sine&cosine functions// Y = .87x Y = .22x Y = 4.45 - 2.19x Y = .157 -.05x Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 15:37 -0700
Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-09-11 03:00 +0000
Re: (2)-Cycloid-Parabola Function, replacing sine&cosine functions// Y = .87x Y = .22x Y = 4.45 - 2.19x Y = .157 -.05x konyberg <konyberg@online.no> - 2018-09-19 11:32 -0700
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-10 15:37 -0700 |
| Subject | (2)-Cycloid-Parabola Function, replacing sine&cosine functions// Y = .87x Y = .22x Y = 4.45 - 2.19x Y = .157 -.05x |
| Message-ID | <0b99cd2f-8fd0-4ff9-9989-a434ddc01ab0@googlegroups.com> |
Newsgroups: sci.math Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:30:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Cycloid-Parabola Function, replacing sine&cosine functions// Y = .87x Y = .22x Y = 4.45 - 2.19x Y = .157 -.05x From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 18:30:16 +0000 Cycloid-Parabola Function, replacing sine&cosine functions// Y = .87x Y = .22x Y = 4.45 - 2.19x Y = .157 -.05x Now, you remember how we do the AP Polynomial functions-- they are all straight line segments over intervals. So they are all Y = mx+ b and we can do most of these in our head without resorting to the formula, unless the coefficients are too much to carry in the head. For 2 coordinate points, (x0, y0) (x1, y1), we produce the 1st degree polynomial, a straightline or line segment P(x) = y0(x-x1) / (x0-x1) + y1(x-x0) / (x1-x0) uptick wave (0,0) (1, .87) (1.57, 1) So, from 0 to 1 our first interval line segment is Y = .87x for x=0 to x=1 next (1-.87)/1.57-1) = .13/.57 = slope of .22 Y = .22x for x=1.01 to x= 1.57 (note, we could not say x=1 for that was in the last interval so in 10 Grid we substitute 1.01) Now for the downtick portion of the Cycloid-Parabola Wave and the downswing or downtick portion taking the complement of .94 to be .06 (1.57, 1) (2, .06) (3.14, 0) P(x) = y0(x-x1) / (x0-x1) + y1(x-x0) / (x1-x0) So, from 1.57 to 2 interval (.06 - 1) / (2-1.57) = -.94/ .43 = -2.19 slope Y = 4.45 - 2.19x for x = 1.571 to x= 2 1(x-2)/(1.57 -2) + .06(x-1.57)/ (2-1.57) (x-2) / -.43 + .06(x-1.57) / .43 -2.32x + 4.65 + .13x - .20 Y = 4.45 - 2.19x close enough off by a little From 2.01 to 3.14 interval (0- .06) / (3.14 -2) = -.06/ 1.14 slope is -.05 Y = .157 -.05x close enough, off by a little So, putting together all four line segments we have Y = .87x Y = .22x Y = 4.45 - 2.19x Y = .157 -.05x Now, comparing that to the semicircle Now instead of sawtooth sine periodic, let us do a flattened top. so I go from (0,0) to (.5,1) then a flat line segment Y = 1 over interval x=.5 to x=1.5 then back to a downward slope from 1.5 to 2 Y = 2x for x from 0 to .5 Y = 1 for x from .5 to 1.5 Y = 4 - 2x for x from 1.5 to 2 Notice how the 4-2x matches up nicely with the 4.45 - 2.19x AP Newsgroups: sci.math Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Cycloid-Parabola and Semicircle-Semicircle Waves have vertices Re: Cycloid-Parabola Function, replacing sine&cosine functions From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 19:48:29 +0000 Cycloid-Parabola and Semicircle-Semicircle Waves have vertices Re: Cycloid-Parabola Function, replacing sine&cosine functions - show quoted text - Now I wish I could draw this into the post, but ascii art is limited. What I want to portray is the geometry of the wave of cycloid-parabola and where that wave is far superior to the semicircle wave or and sine wave. Superior in the sense that at the peak of the uptick we immediately do a downtick, and we could do this with a semicircle wave, only the downtick would be another semicircle inverted. And, if you flip a drawing of the Cycloid-Parabola Wave flip it over 180 degrees you have the same wave only the vertex points going in opposite directions. And one can nest two of these to form a rectangle that is interlocking. Something useful in Hund's rule as two electrons share a suborbital. But what is critically important, is that it appears the Cycloid-Parabola or the Semicircle-Semicircle Waves are the most simple of all waves-- even more simple than pure semicircle or any form of sine. And, one can take a Semicircle wave and assemble a SemiCircle-Semicircle Wave very similar to the Cycloid-Parabola, where the Semicircle-Semicircle vertex is more blunt and the Cycloid-Parabola vertex is more sharp, more hook like. Physics should love these new waves, for light waves and magnetic field waves are likely to be these type of waves. AP
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-11 03:00 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <pn7b4v$u64$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #423329 |
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails: > Cycloid-Parabola Function, replacing sine&cosine functions// Y = .87x > Y = .22x Y = 4.45 - 2.19x Y = .157 -.05x Have you decided whether the sine and cosine functions are a semicircle, a cycloid or a parabola yet? How about negative numbers? Do they exist or not? You really can't seem to make up your mind lately. You have been failing more and more. You post 8 stalker lists whenever you get all autistic and post one of your stupid attack posts. Get some help.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | konyberg <konyberg@online.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-19 11:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d33b9fcd-a427-445c-b9d4-377e0fc38e7a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #423329 |
tirsdag 11. september 2018 00.38.06 UTC+2 skrev Archimedes Plutonium følgende: > Newsgroups: sci.math > Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:30:16 -0700 (PDT) > > Subject: Cycloid-Parabola Function, replacing sine&cosine functions// Y = .87x > Y = .22x Y = 4.45 - 2.19x Y = .157 -.05x > From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> > Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 18:30:16 +0000 > > Cycloid-Parabola Function, replacing sine&cosine functions// Y = .87x Y = .22x Y = 4.45 - 2.19x Y = .157 -.05x > > Now, you remember how we do the AP Polynomial functions-- they are all straight line segments over intervals. So they are all Y = mx+ b and we can do most of these in our head without resorting to the formula, unless the coefficients are too much to carry in the head. > > > For 2 coordinate points, (x0, y0) (x1, y1), we produce the 1st degree polynomial, a straightline or line segment > > P(x) = y0(x-x1) / (x0-x1) > + y1(x-x0) / (x1-x0) > > uptick wave > (0,0) (1, .87) (1.57, 1) > > > So, from 0 to 1 our first interval line segment is > Y = .87x for x=0 to x=1 > next > (1-.87)/1.57-1) = .13/.57 = slope of .22 > Y = .22x for x=1.01 to x= 1.57 (note, we could not say x=1 for that was in the last interval so in 10 Grid we substitute 1.01) > > Now for the downtick portion of the Cycloid-Parabola Wave > > and the downswing or downtick portion taking the complement of .94 to be .06 > > (1.57, 1) (2, .06) (3.14, 0) > > P(x) = y0(x-x1) / (x0-x1) > + y1(x-x0) / (x1-x0) > > So, from 1.57 to 2 interval > (.06 - 1) / (2-1.57) = -.94/ .43 = -2.19 slope > Y = 4.45 - 2.19x for x = 1.571 to x= 2 > 1(x-2)/(1.57 -2) + .06(x-1.57)/ (2-1.57) > (x-2) / -.43 + .06(x-1.57) / .43 > -2.32x + 4.65 + .13x - .20 > Y = 4.45 - 2.19x close enough off by a little > > From 2.01 to 3.14 interval > (0- .06) / (3.14 -2) = -.06/ 1.14 slope is -.05 > > Y = .157 -.05x close enough, off by a little > > So, putting together all four line segments we have > > Y = .87x > Y = .22x > Y = 4.45 - 2.19x > Y = .157 -.05x > > Now, comparing that to the semicircle > Now instead of sawtooth sine periodic, let us do a flattened top. so I go from (0,0) to (.5,1) then a flat line segment Y = 1 over interval x=.5 to x=1.5 then back to a downward slope from 1.5 to 2 > > Y = 2x for x from 0 to .5 > Y = 1 for x from .5 to 1.5 > Y = 4 - 2x for x from 1.5 to 2 > > Notice how the 4-2x matches up nicely with the 4.45 - 2.19x > > AP > > Newsgroups: sci.math > Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:48:29 -0700 (PDT) > > Subject: Cycloid-Parabola and Semicircle-Semicircle Waves have vertices Re: > Cycloid-Parabola Function, replacing sine&cosine functions > From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> > Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 19:48:29 +0000 > > Cycloid-Parabola and Semicircle-Semicircle Waves have vertices Re: Cycloid-Parabola Function, replacing sine&cosine functions > > - show quoted text - > Now I wish I could draw this into the post, but ascii art is limited. What I want to portray is the geometry of the wave of cycloid-parabola and where that wave is far superior to the semicircle wave or and sine wave. > > Superior in the sense that at the peak of the uptick we immediately do a downtick, and we could do this with a semicircle wave, only the downtick would be another semicircle inverted. And, if you flip a drawing of the Cycloid-Parabola Wave flip it over 180 degrees you have the same wave only the vertex points going in opposite directions. And one can nest two of these to form a rectangle that is interlocking. Something useful in Hund's rule as two electrons share a suborbital. > > But what is critically important, is that it appears the Cycloid-Parabola or the Semicircle-Semicircle Waves are the most simple of all waves-- even more simple than pure semicircle or any form of sine. > > And, one can take a Semicircle wave and assemble a SemiCircle-Semicircle Wave very similar to the Cycloid-Parabola, where the Semicircle-Semicircle vertex is more blunt and the Cycloid-Parabola vertex is more sharp, more hook like. > > Physics should love these new waves, for light waves and magnetic field waves are likely to be these type of waves. > > AP Just for fun: https://xkcd.com/2048/ KON
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.math
csiph-web