Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.math > #422181 > unrolled thread

Let us hype and sensationalize Gay-Logic, as observed here in sci.math-- Dan Christensen, Mike Moroney, Univ Western Ontario, stalking, refusal to correct errors, Boole himself

Started byArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
First post2018-08-25 22:05 -0700
Last post2018-08-26 09:49 -0700
Articles 5 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.math


Contents

  Let us hype and sensationalize Gay-Logic, as observed here in sci.math-- Dan Christensen, Mike Moroney, Univ Western Ontario, stalking, refusal to correct errors, Boole himself Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-25 22:05 -0700
    Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-26 05:30 +0000
    Re: Let us hype and sensationalize Gay-Logic, as observed here in sci.math-- Dan Christensen, Mike Moroney, Univ Western Ontario, stalking, refusal to correct errors, Boole himself Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> - 2018-08-26 09:31 -0700
    WARNING TO STUDENTS: AP is a malicious prankster. Don't be a victim. Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> - 2018-08-26 09:32 -0700
    Re: Let us hype and sensationalize Gay-Logic, as observed here in sci.math-- Dan Christensen, Mike Moroney, Univ Western Ontario, stalking, refusal to correct errors, Boole himself bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-08-26 09:49 -0700

#422181 — Let us hype and sensationalize Gay-Logic, as observed here in sci.math-- Dan Christensen, Mike Moroney, Univ Western Ontario, stalking, refusal to correct errors, Boole himself

FromArchimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
Date2018-08-25 22:05 -0700
SubjectLet us hype and sensationalize Gay-Logic, as observed here in sci.math-- Dan Christensen, Mike Moroney, Univ Western Ontario, stalking, refusal to correct errors, Boole himself
Message-ID<e3366a4b-e126-4749-a61f-e721e3b81a9a@googlegroups.com>

Let us hype and sensationalize Gay-Logic, as observed here in sci.math-- Dan Christensen, Mike Moroney, Univ Western Ontario, stalking, refusal to correct errors, Boole himself

Let us start with the last-- Boole. Was Boole gay, in truth, and only married to hide the fact? And is the Boole thought that OR was add a Gay-impression of the world, rather than the real truth-- AND is Add. 

So then, such modern day idiot defenders of Boole like Dan Christensen would just eat up all of Boole, no matter how error filled, for to this very day, Dan Christensen still abides by the Boole error of 2 OR 10 = 12 when even a youngster knows 2 AND 10 = 12. 

So what is the Gay thinking of OR, that Dan abides by and has his idiotic logic website built around? 


OR to Boole and Christensen was a truth table of TTTF where the idiots used inclusive or-- meaning, they had a internal self contradiction that "either or or both" all at once. Now, a sane person of logic would argue-- how in hell can you mix either or and mix that with both simultaneously. For that is an outright oxymoron from the start. 

But, now, let us see what true AND should be-- for it should be the case that if you have a list of sentences and want to know if that list is true or false, well, all you need is one statement that is true for the whole to be true. That means the AND in Logic has a truth table of TTTF. 

So now, why would Gays choose the Christensen or Boole Logic, when it is packed with error? 

A       B        A or B 
T      T              T 
T     F               T 
F     T               T 
F     F               F 


Dan Christensen or Boole would likely, or perhaps see it as this below structure, because their sexual identity is so much an imprint of the way they think.

straight  or straight    is straight 

straight or gay            is straightd or bisexual 

gay or straight            is straight or bisexual 

gay or gay                  is gay

So, the reason that Boole and so many modern day followers of Boole accept this nonsense logic, utter nonsense for 2 OR 10 is not 12 but is rather instead 2 if you discard the 10 (subtract) or, 10 if you discard the 2 (subtract). 

That Gay logic sees Boole logic as OR is addition, for they see bisexual as a valid category. 

Whereas a Scientist who needs true logic, not some gay fobbed off piece of nonsense, true science sees OR as subtract never add. 

More later,,,,,, 

AP 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#422184 — Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test

Frommoroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Date2018-08-26 05:30 +0000
SubjectRe: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
Message-ID<pltduj$qnf$1@pcls7.std.com>
In reply to#422181
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:

> Let us hype and sensationalize Gay-Logic, as observed here in sci.math--

"Us", Gay Plutonium? You are the only one attempting to turn these groups
into a gay pickup bar and accusing everyone else of being gay, you and
nobody else! "Us" is plural, meaning more than one person, not just you!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#422202

FromDan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca>
Date2018-08-26 09:31 -0700
Message-ID<f4118ff1-4fa9-4802-b56b-8351da285969@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#422181
On Sunday, August 26, 2018 at 1:05:50 AM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Let us hype and sensationalize Gay-Logic, as observed here in sci.math-- Dan Christensen, Mike Moroney, Univ Western Ontario, stalking, refusal to correct errors, Boole himself
> 

Boole was right. You are, as always, WRONG, Archie Pu.

WARNING TO STUDENTS: AP is a malicious prankster. He wants nothing more than to create an entire generation of math and science failures just like him. He actually wants you to believe (even he seems to know better) that if A is true and B is false, then A AND B is true. He really, REALLY wants you to fail. Don't be a victim.


Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#422203 — WARNING TO STUDENTS: AP is a malicious prankster. Don't be a victim.

FromDan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca>
Date2018-08-26 09:32 -0700
SubjectWARNING TO STUDENTS: AP is a malicious prankster. Don't be a victim.
Message-ID<2c555de8-95ca-4cf2-af38-5ffd03eeae26@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#422181
On Sunday, August 26, 2018 at 1:05:50 AM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Let us hype and sensationalize Gay-Logic, as observed here in sci.math-- Dan Christensen, Mike Moroney, Univ Western Ontario, stalking, refusal to correct errors, Boole himself
> 

Boole was right. You are, as always, WRONG, Archie Pu.

WARNING TO STUDENTS: AP is a malicious prankster. He wants nothing more than to create an entire generation of math and science failures just like him. He actually wants you to believe (even he seems to know better) that if A is true and B is false, then A AND B is true. He really, REALLY wants you to fail. Don't be a victim.


Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#422204

Frombursejan@gmail.com
Date2018-08-26 09:49 -0700
Message-ID<53422bfc-2ae4-4ab7-8e79-164ff248316f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#422181
Ha Ha, AP brain gay farto

Am Sonntag, 26. August 2018 07:05:50 UTC+2 schrieb Archimedes Plutonium:
> Let us hype and sensationalize Gay-Logic, as observed here in sci.math-- Dan Christensen, Mike Moroney, Univ Western Ontario, stalking, refusal to correct errors, Boole himself
> 
> Let us start with the last-- Boole. Was Boole gay, in truth, and only married to hide the fact? And is the Boole thought that OR was add a Gay-impression of the world, rather than the real truth-- AND is Add. 
> 
> So then, such modern day idiot defenders of Boole like Dan Christensen would just eat up all of Boole, no matter how error filled, for to this very day, Dan Christensen still abides by the Boole error of 2 OR 10 = 12 when even a youngster knows 2 AND 10 = 12. 
> 
> So what is the Gay thinking of OR, that Dan abides by and has his idiotic logic website built around? 
> 
> 
> OR to Boole and Christensen was a truth table of TTTF where the idiots used inclusive or-- meaning, they had a internal self contradiction that "either or or both" all at once. Now, a sane person of logic would argue-- how in hell can you mix either or and mix that with both simultaneously. For that is an outright oxymoron from the start. 
> 
> But, now, let us see what true AND should be-- for it should be the case that if you have a list of sentences and want to know if that list is true or false, well, all you need is one statement that is true for the whole to be true. That means the AND in Logic has a truth table of TTTF. 
> 
> So now, why would Gays choose the Christensen or Boole Logic, when it is packed with error? 
> 
> A       B        A or B 
> T      T              T 
> T     F               T 
> F     T               T 
> F     F               F 
> 
> 
> Dan Christensen or Boole would likely, or perhaps see it as this below structure, because their sexual identity is so much an imprint of the way they think.
> 
> straight  or straight    is straight 
> 
> straight or gay            is straightd or bisexual 
> 
> gay or straight            is straight or bisexual 
> 
> gay or gay                  is gay
> 
> So, the reason that Boole and so many modern day followers of Boole accept this nonsense logic, utter nonsense for 2 OR 10 is not 12 but is rather instead 2 if you discard the 10 (subtract) or, 10 if you discard the 2 (subtract). 
> 
> That Gay logic sees Boole logic as OR is addition, for they see bisexual as a valid category. 
> 
> Whereas a Scientist who needs true logic, not some gay fobbed off piece of nonsense, true science sees OR as subtract never add. 
> 
> More later,,,,,, 
> 
> AP

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.math


csiph-web