Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.math > #421191 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-08-14 23:34 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-08-15 07:40 +0000 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.math
In theory of chemical bonding is two 1/2 tori joining to be 1 full torus// CO2 comes in 8 isomers Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-14 23:34 -0700
Re: In theory of chemical bonding is two 1/2 tori joining to be 1 full torus// CO2 comes in 8 isomers Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 00:03 -0700
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-15 07:27 +0000
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-08-15 07:40 +0000
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-14 23:34 -0700 |
| Subject | In theory of chemical bonding is two 1/2 tori joining to be 1 full torus// CO2 comes in 8 isomers |
| Message-ID | <5d875485-d27a-47d3-8a24-cc3a5df0a1ec@googlegroups.com> |
Newsgroups: sci.physics Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 23:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Subject: In theory of chemical bonding is two 1/2 tori joining to be 1 full torus// CO2 comes in 8 isomers From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 06:25:40 +0000 In theory of chemical bonding is two 1/2 tori joining to be 1 full torus// CO2 comes in 8 isomers Alright so far in experiments we have only a hint that CO2 comes in isomers, from experimental farms where extra CO2 was injected , albeit fire-CO2 and found that the plants did not do so well, as well as expected. But those experiments were all based on there being just one CO2, no isomers. And so we can expect that the humans who conducted the experiments were, every day walking and breathing out CO2 for the plants to nourish. What we need is an experiment where we actually eliminate all animal CO2 and have just fire CO2 and see if the plants in fact perish. So, now, the theory that Chemical Bonding is the actual joining of 1/2 toruses from unpaired muons to become a full torus sheds light on what CO2 bonding truly is. Now, nitrogen has three 1/2 tori with its 3 unpaired muons, so the N2 molecule is a fierce bonded covalent because it has 1/2 + 1/2 = 1 torus, and 1/2+1/2 = 1 torus, and finally 1/2 +1/2 = 1 torus. A fierce covalent muon bonding of making half tori into 3 full toruses. Now for the H2 molecule, covalent is simply 1/2 torus of one H add 1/2 torus of second H and you have H2 Now for O2 molecule, it has two unpaired muons one in P_y and one in P_z So if you have a second O atom, then the 1/2 + 1/2 = 1 and the 1/2 + 1/2 = 1 for both P_y and P_z. Now you have Carbon C and it has two unpaired muons ( we still obey Hund's Rule), and you have two oxygen atoms each with two unpaired muons. So, how do we combine those six altogether 1/2 tori in order to have three full 1 toruses? Well, we have to obey Hund's Rule, so we have three atoms, two of O and one of C depicted with their 1/2 tori as P below, so what is the total different permutations that obey Hund's Rule and make those 6 tori be three full 1 toruses? O1 = Py1 Pz1 O2 = Py2 Pz2 C = Px Py3 One isomer is Py1+Py2 with Pz1+Px with Pz2 + Py3 a Second isomer is Py1 + Pz2 with Py2 + Px with Pz1+ Py3 a Third isomer is Py1 + Px with Pz1 + Py2 with Pz1 + Py3 a Fourth isomer is Py1 + Py3 with Pz1 + Py2 with Pz2 + Px This would go faster if I numbered them as 1 2 3 4 5 6 so the possibilities using Hund's Rule is 1-3, 2-5, 4-6 1-4, 2-5, 3-6 1-5, 2-3, 4-6 1-6, 2-3, 4-5 2-4, 1-6, 3-5 2-4, 1-5, 3-6 2-6, 1-4, 3-5 2-6, 1-3, 4-5 Is that all? Is there 8 permutations possible and hence 8 isomers of CO2 possible. Then we have to consider the energy levels of each of these isomers, the animal CO2 should be the smallest amount of energy to bind the O,O,C atoms. The high temperature burning produced fire CO2 should be in those higher energy level CO2 molecules. AP
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-15 00:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <99747205-03aa-46f0-a37a-b4789683b231@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #421191 |
Newsgroups: sci.physics Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 23:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Subject: all three or more atom molecules are triangular shaped, never linear // CO2 comes in 8 isomers From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 06:56:40 +0000 all three or more atom molecules are triangular shaped, never linear // CO2 comes in 8 isomers - show quoted text - > Then we have to consider the energy levels of each of these isomers, the animal CO2 should be the smallest amount of energy to bind the O,O,C atoms. The high temperature burning produced fire CO2 should be in those higher energy level CO2 molecules. > Now in all bonding of Chemistry, covalent bonding, if my theory is correct and it probably is so, that it is impossible to have a linear bonded molecule which has 3 or more atoms. Linear bonding would only occur for two atoms, such as Nitrogen N2 or Oxygen O2 because in those bonded molecules the 1/2 torus of one atom binds with the 1/2 torus of the other atom. But then when you get to molecules of 3 or more atoms, you are going to form triangle shapes of molecules, so the CO2 was never a linear O-C-O but rather always a triangle of O C / O or C O / O So, now, I look into this D and L amino acid forms, to see if the CO2 isomers agree with amino acid isomers. If memory holds, I think only L amino acids are utilized by life. So, is there a connection to CO2 as having 8 isomers and L amino acids isomer? AP
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-15 07:27 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <pl0kkn$84g$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #421191 |
>L.Reif, Lisa Randall asked by Moroney/Volney Report which is AP's 2nd >greatest theory- Plutonium is insane. Thank you for requesting another Babble-o-meter Calculation! (still a work in progress) =E2=98=91 Archie reposts the same old, same old, yet again... =E2=98=91 ...and again and again... =E2=98=91 ...and again and again... =E2=98=91 ...and again and again... =E2=98=91 ...and again and again... =E2=98=91 ...posted enough times to be classified as spam... =E2=98=91 ...Post has no new content, in fact... =E2=98=90 ...Archie's spam complains about other spammers or babblers... =E2=98=91 ...Purpose of post is to remain #1 Front Page Hog... =E2=98=90 .....meanwhile, Archie complains of some other "Front Page Hog"... =E2=98=91 ...Post posted in the wrong topic... =E2=98=91 .....and to the wrong newsgroup... =E2=98=90 ...Author awards self Nobel Prize/claims he should be so awarded... =E2=98=90 .....Author rejects self-awarded Nobel, real awardees don't deserve it... =E2=98=90 ...Author sour grapes Nobel or other science/math prize... =E2=98=91 ...Post has science or math 100% made up from whole cloth... =E2=98=91 ...Post's science/math based on earlier whole cloth science/math... =E2=98=91 .....which was based on even earlier whole cloth science/math... =E2=98=91 .....which was, oh never mind... =E2=98=91 ...Post contains The Truth because Archie said it is true... =E2=98=90 ...Phrases such as "Old Science" (actual science) and "New Science (babbling of author)... =E2=98=91 ...One word: Logorrhea... =E2=98=91 ...Another word: Graphomania... =E2=98=90 ...Author thinks cutting up magazines disproves actual math proofs... =E2=98=91 ...Author thinks a bad dream is an excellent basis for physics... =E2=98=91 ...Archie doesn't understand Usenet, not even after 26+ years... =E2=98=90 ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... =E2=98=91 ...Archie even thinks Google runs Usenet... =E2=98=91 .....even though Archie used Usenet even before there even was a Google... =E2=98=91 ...Archie won't engage in discussion in a discussion group... =E2=98=90 ...Writes "Keep out of my threads!"... =E2=98=91 ...Archie demands professors resign for not teaching his broken math... =E2=98=91 ...Post includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors... =E2=98=90 ...Archie outwitted by someone too stoopid to come out of the rain AGAIN... =E2=98=90 ...Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages... =E2=98=91 ....he even still thinks 8.88 is "exactly" 9... =E2=98=90 ....and he thinks 16.81 is "spot on" 17... =E2=98=91 ...Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't... =E2=98=91 ...Post includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... =E2=98=90 ...Post contains ascii art of Archie's butthole... =E2=98=91 ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... =E2=98=91 ...Archie tries to involve totally uninvolved people... =E2=98=90 .....with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took... =E2=98=91 .....but has no clue they will never see his post... =E2=98=91 .....and has no clue they probably don't know what Usenet is... =E2=98=91 .....he expects them to have power/authority they simply don't... =E2=98=91 ...Too stoopid to realize attack posts just produce more posts like this... =E2=98=91 ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. Archie's Babbling Nonsense score: 35 plutoniums!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-15 07:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <pl0ld9$84g$6@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #421191 |
>Subject: Paul Schechter, James Young asked by Moroney-Report which is AP's 2nd greatest theory- Sun and Stars are powered by Faraday Law Thank you for requesting another Babble-o-meter Calculation! (still a work in progress) ☑ Archie reposts the same old, same old, yet again... ☑ ...and again and again... ☑ ...and again and again... ☑ ...and again and again... ☑ ...and again and again... ☑ ...and again and again... ☑ ...posted enough times to be classified as spam... ☑ ...Post has no new content, in fact... ☐ ...Archie's spam complains about other spammers or babblers... ☑ ...Purpose of post is to remain #1 Front Page Hog... ☐ .....meanwhile, Archie complains of some other "Front Page Hog"... ☑ ...Post posted in the wrong topic... ☑ .....and to the wrong newsgroup... ☐ ...Author awards self Nobel Prize/claims he should be so awarded... ☐ .....Author rejects self-awarded Nobel, real awardees don't deserve it... ☐ ...Author sour grapes Nobel or other science/math prize... ☑ ...Post has science or math 100% made up from whole cloth... ☑ ...Post's science/math based on earlier whole cloth science/math... ☑ .....which was based on even earlier whole cloth science/math... ☑ .....which was, oh never mind... ☑ ...Post contains The Truth because Archie said it is true... ☐ ...Phrases such as "Old Science" (actual science) and "New Science (babbling of author)... ☑ ...One word: Logorrhea... ☑ ...Another word: Graphomania... ☐ ...Author thinks cutting up magazines disproves actual math proofs... ☑ ...Author thinks a bad dream is an excellent basis for physics... ☑ ...Archie doesn't understand Usenet, not even after 26+ years... ☐ ...Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do... ☑ ...Archie even thinks Google runs Usenet... ☑ .....even though Archie used Usenet even before there even was a Google... ☑ ...Archie won't engage in discussion in a discussion group... ☐ ...Writes "Keep out of my threads!"... ☑ ...Archie demands professors resign for not teaching his broken math... ☑ ...Post includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors... ☐ ...Archie outwitted by someone too stoopid to come out of the rain AGAIN... ☐ ...Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages... ☑ ....he even still thinks 8.88 is "exactly" 9... ☐ ....and he thinks 16.81 is "spot on" 17... ☑ ...Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't... ☑ ...Post includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing... ☐ ...Post contains ascii art of Archie's butthole... ☑ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s... ☑ ...Archie tries to involve totally uninvolved people... ☐ .....with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took... ☑ .....but has no clue they will never see his post... ☑ .....and has no clue they probably don't know what Usenet is... ☑ .....he expects them to have power/authority they simply don't... ☑ ...Too stoopid to realize attack posts just produce more posts like this... ☑ ...Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said. Archie's Babbling Nonsense score: 35 plutoniums!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.math
csiph-web