Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #415578 > unrolled thread

2#56page How stars like our Sun really shine and where they get their energy-- not fusion but Faraday law// tossing out the fakery Bohr atom & Bethe solar fusion// TRUE CHEMISTRY 2018

Back to article view | Back to sci.math

Contents

  2#56page  How stars like our Sun really shine and where they get their  energy-- not fusion but Faraday law// tossing out the fakery Bohr atom &  Bethe solar fusion// TRUE CHEMISTRY 2018 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 12:06 -0700
    Re: 2#56page  How stars like our Sun really shine and where they get their  energy-- not fusion but Faraday law// tossing out the fakery Bohr atom &  Bethe solar fusion// TRUE CHEMISTRY 2018 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 12:30 -0700
      percent of hydrogen in stars is increasing not decreasing//How stars like our Sun really shine and where they get their  energy-- not fusion but Faraday law// tossing out the fakery Bohr atom &  Bethe solar fusion Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 13:09 -0700
    Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-15 20:54 +0000

#415578 — 2#56page How stars like our Sun really shine and where they get their energy-- not fusion but Faraday law// tossing out the fakery Bohr atom & Bethe solar fusion// TRUE CHEMISTRY 2018

#56page

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 11:22:50 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: #56page  How stars like our Sun really shine and where they get their
 energy-- not fusion but Faraday law// tossing out the fakery Bohr atom &
 Bethe solar fusion// TRUE CHEMISTRY 2018
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 18:22:50 +0000


How stars like our Sun really shine and where they get their energy-- not fusion but Faraday law// tossing out the fakery Bohr atom & Bethe solar fusion// TRUE CHEMISTRY 2018

I mounted this challenge of truth and logic of what makes stars shine with energy, before, but only now do I seem able to point to the details.

What I am doing is tossing out the complete Bohr model of the atom, especially the part where it says:

--- quoting Mortimer CHEMISTRY: A Conceptual Approach, 4th ed, 1979, page 33 ---

4. When an electron falls back to a lower level, it emits a definite amount of energy. The energy difference between the high energy state and the low energy state is emitted in the form of a quantum of light. The light quantum has a characteristic frequency (and wave-length) and produces a characteristic spectral line In spectral studies, many atoms are absorbing energy at the same time that many others are emitting it. Each spectral line corresponds to a different electron transition.

--- end quoting Mortimer ---

I am ready to tackle this problem. Perhaps one of my finest of all corrections in physics, other than Atom Totality, for what I am about to do is tell science how the Sun really works.

Until now, no-one was able to tell how the sun really works. And what we had was Bethe fusion idea. Which is utterly silly for a logical mind. The idea that the Sun shines energy because its atoms are fusing and thus releasing energy in the fusion process is 180 degrees counter opposite the idea that the Sun and stars are so hot that they ionize their atoms. Heat, high temperature plasma physics is counter opposite to fusion.

Analogy: think of water and its molecules. If you apply heat, you send the water molecules apart, not fusing them together, but separating them.

Ionization is making a substance to be plasma physics, not the physics of fusion.

So, how does the Sun and all stars really shine with energy. What is the energy source of our Sun and all stars?

Stars shine because its atoms are doing Faraday Law of thrusting bar magnets of its muons inside the proton as a coil, yielding magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles are electricity. And in normal cool environment like Earth or planets, these monopoles inside atoms produced by the muon thrusting through protons are stored inside neutrons as capacitors. But in a star like our Sun, the environment is a hot plasma environment and the storage of the newly created monopole is not stored at all but is emitted as spectral line energy.

Stars shine with energy, not by fusion of its atoms.

Stars shine with energy, due to the Faraday Law that its atoms are converting Space in which their muons thrust through the space of a proton coil and produce monopoles, which are radiated into Space exterior of the star. 

Do not get me wrong, there is a tiny tiny amount of fusion going on in stars, but the predominant outpouring of energy from stars is that of Faraday Law producing monopoles and because the environment of stars is so extremely hot, and ionizing environment, that the atoms of stars just cannot storage their monopole production and thus, radiate that energy to make stars shine.

PROOF: If the Sun were shining due to fusion, then the energy emitted would be the Bohr electron falling back to a lower energy level-- Contradiction-- for the atoms are already ionized due to high temperatures, so the atoms cannot emit energy from electrons falling into lower energy level.

So, that leaves just one plausible logical explanation. The spectral lines are created from Faraday Law producing monopoles inside of atoms of stars, and instead of storing the monopoles in neutrons, they are quickly radiated outward from the star into space.

AP

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#415586

There is no doubt that the Sun is plasma physics, no doubt at all.

So, how can you have electrons falling back into a lower orbital and emit radiation of spectral lines. Fusion cannot explain that for fusion is nuclear based, not orbital based.

So the answer as to how the Sun shines, is not electrons falling back, but rather, the electrons are muons which do not ionize, and remain with their attendant proton in each atom, doing the Faraday Law, by creating new Magnetic Monopoles. And since the Sun is a plasma physics it does not allow these newly created monopoles to aggregate inside of neutrons but rather, radiate those monopoles as photon light and the star shines.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#415594 — percent of hydrogen in stars is increasing not decreasing//How stars like our Sun really shine and where they get their energy-- not fusion but Faraday law// tossing out the fakery Bohr atom & Bethe solar fusion

No-one in the 20th century had a Logical mind in science. A logical mind to say, wait a minute-- the Sun is about 5 billion years old and is 75% hydrogen 22% helium and because fusion is the source of Sun's shining, how can you have 75% hydrogen over 5 billion years. Should it not be 50% hydrogen after 5 billion years.

And rather than the hydrogen getting smaller in quantity, we see Sun and Stars becoming more hydrogen percentage.

If you base stars shining on fusion, then the percent of hydrogen should decrease in the Cosmos, not increase.

AP

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#415596 — Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test

Back to attacking, I see...not very smart....

Archimedes Plutonium fails:

>I have please asked Google to engineer a delete key to original authors of 
>threads-- so they can delete rabid stalkers like Burse, Moroney

>Google, please give original authors of a thread the power to delete any 
>followup post to that thread. Moroney is a 26 year long stalker, whose 
>only message is I hate your guts and say anything to oppose you.

>Please engineer a delete key to make sci.math a level playing field, where 
>original authors can develop their ideas in one thread, not be hassled and 
>bullied by gangs of stalkers whose only game is ad hominem and get you 
>kicked out or run away. And if you have a crazy like Moroney, let him 
>start his own thread and poop all over the walls there.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.math

csiph-web