Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.math > #414325 > unrolled thread
| Started by | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-31 21:24 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-05-31 21:24 +0000 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to sci.math
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-05-31 21:24 +0000
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 21:24 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test |
| Message-ID | <pepp5g$b9m$2@pcls7.std.com> |
Archimedes Plutonium fails: >Here is an example from the Internet in sci.math of Ad Hominem of a writer >who hates the person he is talking to, and no matter what the topic is, >the message is always the same-- I hate your guts. >On Monday, May 28, 2018 at 2:00:46 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >> But can you tell us what is wrong with the following proof that the >> ellipse is a conic section? After all, you say the ellipse is not a >> conic section and what Archimedes Plutonium says is true is true, right? <several other ad hominems by Archie snipped> Still haven't learned not to attack me?
Back to top | Article view | sci.math
csiph-web