Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #603111 > unrolled thread

.999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence

Started by"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
First post2023-06-23 19:37 -0700
Last post2023-06-26 10:14 -0700
Articles 11 on this page of 151 — 36 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.math

Contents

  .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-23 19:37 -0700
    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Brennan Otten <nnna@nebnrnea.ea> - 2023-06-24 19:20 +0000
      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 14:59 -0700
        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Hoang Kouman <gago@hhngnaoa.om> - 2023-06-24 22:22 +0000
          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 15:28 -0700
            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Bennett Sniders <rtne@etnnneis.bn> - 2023-06-24 23:28 +0000
              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 16:53 -0700
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 16:58 -0700
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 09:30 -0700
                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:35 -0700
                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:59 -0700
                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 13:07 -0700
                        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-26 16:41 -0400
                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Deandre Romijnsen <dsrm@nnrderee.ds> - 2023-06-26 21:36 +0000
                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-26 16:31 -0400
                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 13:34 -0700
                        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 13:35 -0700
              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 16:57 -0700
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Bernard Bueren <buur@enbeebdn.ru> - 2023-06-25 08:00 +0000
                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Vlademire Ramaker <arde@rekeadem.ae> - 2023-06-25 19:18 +0000
                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 12:29 -0700
                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-25 17:54 -0400
                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Nikki Cann <nika@kinianka.ka> - 2023-06-25 22:06 +0000
                        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 15:15 -0700
                        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-25 18:30 -0400
                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Shan Kloeten <ntne@ntnnstke.sn> - 2023-06-26 06:45 +0000
                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely Barton Houtem <otub@ahutnaee.eb> - 2023-06-26 06:58 +0000
                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 12:47 -0700
                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Buddy Oorschot <ocuo@codhudoh.to> - 2023-06-25 20:22 +0000
                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 14:20 -0700
                        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Geosvani Peter <ogtv@asvsegtg.vp> - 2023-06-25 21:30 +0000
                          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 14:51 -0700
                            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Dustan Rademaker <mdrn@eurttrrn.de> - 2023-06-25 22:16 +0000
                              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 15:18 -0700
                                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Lemuel Marqueringh <argr@hqqgugqi.lr> - 2023-06-25 22:57 +0000
                                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-26 00:19 -0400
                                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Markeen Schenck <ecme@kckhhkkc.kn> - 2023-06-26 07:09 +0000
                                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Germaine Breda <eraa@gmeenmad.dr> - 2023-06-26 22:37 +0000
                                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Morris Offermans <oeoe@ssoaanmf.sr> - 2023-06-26 07:22 +0000
                                  A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-06-26 14:23 -0500
                                    Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence) Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2023-06-26 12:57 -0700
                                    Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating Foster Smeets <fste@sstffsem.ee> - 2023-06-26 21:14 +0000
                                    Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely Connor Maas <naoa@nnsamoss.co> - 2023-06-26 21:27 +0000
                                    Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating) Valery Schuyler <evrl@leerrael.hc> - 2023-06-27 11:48 +0000
                                      Re: A Little Insight (was Re: .999 repeating) Houston Beek <nnoo@bbookeon.ub> - 2023-06-27 22:23 +0000
                              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 15:20 -0700
                        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-25 18:26 -0400
                          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 15:29 -0700
                          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ezra Venn <rene@nvanarvz.vn> - 2023-06-25 22:49 +0000
                        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-26 00:14 +0100
                          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 16:19 -0700
                            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 16:23 -0700
                              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-26 00:42 +0100
                                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 16:59 -0700
                                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 17:03 -0700
                                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 17:03 -0700
                                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-26 02:20 +0100
                                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 19:31 -0700
                                        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-26 14:57 +0100
                                          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:39 -0700
                                            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 12:20 -0700
                                              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 15:07 -0700
                                              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-28 02:38 +0100
                                                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 20:21 -0700
                                                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-28 14:51 +0100
                                                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 12:55 -0700
                                                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 12:56 -0700
                                                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-28 15:00 -0700
                                                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 10:39 -0700
                                                        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 14:41 -0700
                                                          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-29 21:18 -0700
                                                            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-30 09:57 -0700
                                          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 15:08 -0700
                                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-26 02:13 +0100
                                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 19:33 -0700
                                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-26 05:53 -0400
                                        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:30 -0700
                                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-26 14:55 +0100
                                        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:27 -0700
                                          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 13:09 -0700
                                            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 13:13 -0700
                                              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 13:15 -0700
                                              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 13:21 -0700
                                          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-26 23:04 +0100
                                            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 15:09 -0700
                                              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 15:12 -0700
                                                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-26 23:20 +0100
                                                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 15:33 -0700
                                                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 15:36 -0700
                                                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-26 19:32 -0400
                                                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 16:49 -0700
                                                        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 20:31 -0700
                                                          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-27 16:15 +0100
                                                            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 14:32 -0700
                                                              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-28 02:32 +0100
                                                        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 12:03 -0700
                                                          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 13:11 -0700
                                                            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 13:27 -0700
                                                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 15:37 -0700
                                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 10:11 -0700
                                        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:28 -0700
                                          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:57 -0700
                                            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 13:05 -0700
                                              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 13:17 -0700
                                                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 13:29 -0700
                                                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 14:32 -0700
                                                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 14:47 -0700
                                                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 14:56 -0700
                                                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 15:01 -0700
                                                        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 15:06 -0700
                                                          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 15:15 -0700
                                                            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 15:19 -0700
                                                              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 15:20 -0700
                                                              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 15:24 -0700
                                                                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 15:32 -0700
                                                              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Maron Andel <nado@eredlemn.rl> - 2023-06-26 22:25 +0000
                                                                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 15:33 -0700
                                                                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 15:59 -0700
                                                                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-06-26 22:36 -0400
                                                                      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-27 12:07 -0700
                                              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-26 17:15 -0400
                                                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 14:27 -0700
                                                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-26 17:30 -0400
                                                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 14:39 -0700
                                                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 15:13 -0700
                              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 10:02 -0700
                                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Duncan Antwerp <anec@cnancrwp.ca> - 2023-06-26 22:20 +0000
                                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 15:28 -0700
                                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-26 19:43 -0400
                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 09:18 -0700
                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Devoise Kool <ovve@sdodevlv.el> - 2023-06-28 21:56 +0000
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 09:38 -0700
                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 12:33 -0700
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Fritz Feldhase <franz.fritschee.ff@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 09:42 -0700
            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-24 20:05 -0400
              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 17:08 -0700
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 17:10 -0700
                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 17:20 -0700
                    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 17:25 -0700
                  Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-24 20:32 -0400
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-06-24 20:20 -0400
              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Maxie Snider <eida@esxnnrxd.is> - 2023-06-25 08:06 +0000
            Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-25 23:53 +0100
              Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 15:59 -0700
                Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-06-26 00:32 +0100
    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 01:39 -0700
      Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 10:05 -0700
        Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-06-25 14:05 -0700
          Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2023-07-02 10:30 -0700
    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence "zelos...@gmail.com" <zelos.malum@gmail.com> - 2023-06-26 00:25 -0700
    Re: .999 repeating is almost an infinitely large sequence W <wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaa@hotmail.com> - 2023-06-26 10:14 -0700

Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]

#603178

FromFromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org>
Date2023-06-24 20:20 -0400
Message-ID<u78190$86na$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#603173
Chris M. Thomasson explained :
> On 6/24/2023 5:05 PM, FromTheRafters wrote:
>> Chris M. Thomasson laid this down on his screen :
>>> On 6/24/2023 3:22 PM, Hoang Kouman wrote:
>>>> mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> it has nothing to do with unity.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unity and one are the first integer.
>>>>> They are built by an infinite sequence of the infinitesimal.
>>>>
>>>> no. Your 0.(9) is *_never_* an integer. It stays in the description.
>>>
>>> .999... is not an integer, however it has a limit of one.
>> 
>> Yes it is an integer. It is an integer as embedded in the reals.
>
> 1/9 = .111... in base ten, its just the way it represents it. Okay, fine. 
> However, we all know that 1/9 * 9 = 1. No big deal, its just base ten 
> representations. ;^)

Yes, 1/9 symbolizes a member of Q (ordered pair (1,9)) and 0.111... is 
the symbol for the same value as embedded in the reals using base ten 
representation.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#603195

FromMaxie Snider <eida@esxnnrxd.is>
Date2023-06-25 08:06 +0000
Message-ID<u78shk$278hj$1@paganini.bofh.team>
In reply to#603172
FromTheRafters wrote:

>>> no. Your 0.(9) is *_never_* an integer. It stays in the description.
>>
>> .999... is not an integer, however it has a limit of one.
> 
> Yes it is an integer. It is an integer as embedded in the reals.

yet another fucking imbecile, not knowing what an integer is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#603270

FromBen Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>
Date2023-06-25 23:53 +0100
Message-ID<871qhz6tmi.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
In reply to#603165
"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> writes:

> .999... is not an integer,

Yes it is.  (Well, there are questions of whether ℤ is a subset of ℝ or
simply that some reals have the same values as the elements of ℤ, but
you are not talking about that sort of thing.)

> however it has a limit of one.

"It" (the sequence of symbols ".999...") denotes a number.  That number
can also be written 1.  It can also be written 1.000...

I wish we all wrote it .(9).  All these ...s make everyone who's a
programmer thing that .999... refers to some process rather than a
well-defined single value.

-- 
Ben.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#603273

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Date2023-06-25 15:59 -0700
Message-ID<u7agrv$kd9v$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#603270
On 6/25/2023 3:53 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> .999... is not an integer,


i[n] = (floor(1/9 * 10^n) / 10^n) * 9
_____________________________
i[0] = (floor(1/9 * 10^0) / 10^0) * 9 = 0
i[1] = (floor(1/9 * 10^1) / 10^1) * 9 = .9
i[2] = (floor(1/9 * 10^2) / 10^2) * 9 = .99
i[3] = (floor(1/9 * 10^3) / 10^3) * 9 = .999
...
_____________________________

None of its iterates are integers. However, when n is taken to infinity, 
then it equals .(9), which is how base 10 can represent one. One is an 
integer. Therefore, when n is taken to infinity:

i[n] = (floor(1/9 * 10^n) / 10^n) * 9 = .(9) = 1

fair enough?

> 
> Yes it is.  (Well, there are questions of whether ℤ is a subset of ℝ or
> simply that some reals have the same values as the elements of ℤ, but
> you are not talking about that sort of thing.)
> 
>> however it has a limit of one.
> 
> "It" (the sequence of symbols ".999...") denotes a number.  That number
> can also be written 1.  It can also be written 1.000...
> 
> I wish we all wrote it .(9).  All these ...s make everyone who's a
> programmer thing that .999... refers to some process rather than a
> well-defined single value.
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#603285

FromBen Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>
Date2023-06-26 00:32 +0100
Message-ID<87pm5j5d9t.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
In reply to#603273
"Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> writes:

> On 6/25/2023 3:53 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> .999... is not an integer,
>
>
> i[n] = (floor(1/9 * 10^n) / 10^n) * 9
> _____________________________
> i[0] = (floor(1/9 * 10^0) / 10^0) * 9 = 0
> i[1] = (floor(1/9 * 10^1) / 10^1) * 9 = .9
> i[2] = (floor(1/9 * 10^2) / 10^2) * 9 = .99
> i[3] = (floor(1/9 * 10^3) / 10^3) * 9 = .999
> ...

Why not something simpler like  i_n = 1 - 10^-n ?

> None of its iterates are integers. However, when n is taken to infinity,
> then it equals .(9), which is how base 10 can represent one. One is an
> integer. Therefore, when n is taken to infinity:

That's not how this would be stated by a mathematician.

> i[n] = (floor(1/9 * 10^n) / 10^n) * 9 = .(9) = 1

No mathematician would write this.  It looks like an equation, but there
is no n in ℕ which satisfies it.

> fair enough?

In what sense?  Can you get behind the fact that .(9) = 1?  It seems so
as you've stated it above.  You could explain why .(9) = 1, but who
would benefit from that?

-- 
Ben.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#603197

FromRoss Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date2023-06-25 01:39 -0700
Message-ID<4d5185a4-d319-4851-b998-dd79b0ee136cn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#603111
On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 7:37:37 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> it is an infinite sequence minus one. 
> Unity is an actual infinity of the infinitesimal. 
> Einstein loved the continuum hypothesis.

.999 is two different notions, in two models of reals.

Dual representation in field-reals is a thing, also, 
line-reals and field-reals are two different things, 
two different models of reals, where it _does_ make 
sense to think about either the dual representation 
of members of the equivalence classes of sequences 
that are Cauchy with repeating termini, OR, a difference 
from a representation of 1.0 by an iota-value as less or .999.

Then, all you need to do is figure out how to sweep that 
through all foundations for a modern mathematics.

It's pretty easy after that, though, ....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#603230

From"mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
Date2023-06-25 10:05 -0700
Message-ID<d7e89259-d1f2-42ea-8b06-f6463b4c648dn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#603197
On Sunday, June 25, 2023 at 1:39:37 AM UTC-7, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 7:37:37 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > it is an infinite sequence minus one. 
> > Unity is an actual infinity of the infinitesimal. 
> > Einstein loved the continuum hypothesis.
> .999 is two different notions, in two models of reals. 
> 

.999 repeating is its own quantity. one comes after...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#603248

FromRoss Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date2023-06-25 14:05 -0700
Message-ID<82417d82-5e86-47ef-8d98-273167731d3fn@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#603230
On Sunday, June 25, 2023 at 10:05:32 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, June 25, 2023 at 1:39:37 AM UTC-7, Ross Finlayson wrote: 
> > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 7:37:37 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > it is an infinite sequence minus one. 
> > > Unity is an actual infinity of the infinitesimal. 
> > > Einstein loved the continuum hypothesis. 
> > .999 is two different notions, in two models of reals. 
> >
> .999 repeating is its own quantity. one comes after...

It's part of pre-calculus, where limits are introduced, 
why?:  because that way the years of instruction that 
follow are a linear, self-contained curriculum.

That the _fuller_ more _replete_ curriculum is to include 
Aristotle's continuum, and "real Zeno", and line-reals and 
after modern mathematics and foundations my slates, 
is a thing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#603824

FromRoss Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date2023-07-02 10:30 -0700
Message-ID<0112ad93-fa69-4a33-bfd0-058a2f566944n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#603248
On Sunday, June 25, 2023 at 2:05:38 PM UTC-7, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On Sunday, June 25, 2023 at 10:05:32 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > On Sunday, June 25, 2023 at 1:39:37 AM UTC-7, Ross Finlayson wrote: 
> > > On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 7:37:37 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: 
> > > > it is an infinite sequence minus one. 
> > > > Unity is an actual infinity of the infinitesimal. 
> > > > Einstein loved the continuum hypothesis. 
> > > .999 is two different notions, in two models of reals. 
> > > 
> > .999 repeating is its own quantity. one comes after...
> It's part of pre-calculus, where limits are introduced, 
> why?: because that way the years of instruction that 
> follow are a linear, self-contained curriculum. 
> 
> That the _fuller_ more _replete_ curriculum is to include 
> Aristotle's continuum, and "real Zeno", and line-reals and 
> after modern mathematics and foundations my slates, 
> is a thing.

In fact, it's quite relevant to mathematics, that a continuum 
is a most central object, and it's really a thing, that 
more replete definitions of continuous domains, basically 
make for apologetics for modern mathematics, that result 
more and better mathematics, and more for less.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#603322

From"zelos...@gmail.com" <zelos.malum@gmail.com>
Date2023-06-26 00:25 -0700
Message-ID<fac2c152-7883-48b9-83e4-835ed803c290n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#603111
lördag 24 juni 2023 kl. 04:37:37 UTC+2 skrev mitchr...@gmail.com:
> it is an infinite sequence minus one. 
> Unity is an actual infinity of the infinitesimal. 
> Einstein loved the continuum hypothesis.
There are no infinitesimals in real numbers you retard.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#603356

FromW <wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaa@hotmail.com>
Date2023-06-26 10:14 -0700
Message-ID<eaf3ccc1-84d6-4277-919c-e1a6e7364b52n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#603111
Come check out:
groups.google.com/g/world/c/JuMNPF8pCao

♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️
♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️
♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️
♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️
♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️
♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️♦️

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]

Back to top | Article view | sci.math

csiph-web