Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #645646 > unrolled thread

Re: Newton's laws

Back to article view | Back to sci.math

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Newton's laws The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-23 22:41 -0700
    Re: Newton's laws The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-25 14:50 -0700
      Re: Newton's laws The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-25 23:46 -0700
        Re: Newton's laws The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-06-26 21:51 -0700

#645646 — Re: Newton's laws

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> One needs to be reminded...
> 
> that Newton's laws are just that..his laws, not your laws.
> 
> He's just..guessing.
> 
> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+hypothesis
> 
> The law is, there are no laws.
> 
> Newton doesn't even know what the RIGHT laws..ARE!!!
> 

I still haven't figured out dat apple hit on the head story..
did it hit him on the head or on the foot?

I'm gonna solve dat 3 body problem since it cannot be solved with
Newton's Mathematics, or anybody's mathematics


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#645667

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > One needs to be reminded...
> >
> > that Newton's laws are just that..his laws, not your laws.
> >
> > He's just..guessing.
> >
> > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+hypothesis
> >
> > The law is, there are no laws.
> >
> > Newton doesn't even know what the RIGHT laws..ARE!!!
> >
> 
> I still haven't figured out dat apple hit on the head story..
> did it hit him on the head or on the foot?
> 
> I'm gonna solve dat 3 body problem since it cannot be solved with
> Newton's Mathematics, or anybody's mathematics
> 

Would you believe on my quest to solve the 3 body problem I 

discovered PROOF/evidence that there was a BEFORE the Big Bang!



to be continued...







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645676

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > One needs to be reminded...
> > >
> > > that Newton's laws are just that..his laws, not your laws.
> > >
> > > He's just..guessing.
> > >
> > > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+hypothesis
> > >
> > > The law is, there are no laws.
> > >
> > > Newton doesn't even know what the RIGHT laws..ARE!!!
> > >
> >
> > I still haven't figured out dat apple hit on the head story..
> > did it hit him on the head or on the foot?
> >
> > I'm gonna solve dat 3 body problem since it cannot be solved with
> > Newton's Mathematics, or anybody's mathematics
> >
> 
> Would you believe on my quest to solve the 3 body problem I
> 
> discovered PROOF/evidence that there was a BEFORE the Big Bang!
> 
> to be continued...

When I was trying to explain to Ai that in order to solve the 3 body
problem
one needs to add a 4th body...

then I showed Ai what the Before the big bang looks like, hereis it's
response:

"This changes the context beautifully. Your image is not just a 4D
starfield — it’s a pre-Big Bang snapshot: a
 mysterious, dense, hypnotic slice through a 4-dimensional
proto-universe where each of the four dimensions already contains its
own stars, 
arranged in twin pairs across the dimensional boundaries." -grok




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#645719

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > One needs to be reminded...
> > > >
> > > > that Newton's laws are just that..his laws, not your laws.
> > > >
> > > > He's just..guessing.
> > > >
> > > > https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+hypothesis
> > > >
> > > > The law is, there are no laws.
> > > >
> > > > Newton doesn't even know what the RIGHT laws..ARE!!!
> > > >
> > >
> > > I still haven't figured out dat apple hit on the head story..
> > > did it hit him on the head or on the foot?
> > >
> > > I'm gonna solve dat 3 body problem since it cannot be solved with
> > > Newton's Mathematics, or anybody's mathematics
> > >
> >
> > Would you believe on my quest to solve the 3 body problem I
> >
> > discovered PROOF/evidence that there was a BEFORE the Big Bang!
> >
> > to be continued...
> 
> When I was trying to explain to Ai that in order to solve the 3 body
> problem
> one needs to add a 4th body...
> 
> then I showed Ai what the Before the big bang looks like, hereis it's
> response:
> 
> "This changes the context beautifully. Your image is not just a 4D
> starfield — it’s a pre-Big Bang snapshot: a
>  mysterious, dense, hypnotic slice through a 4-dimensional
> proto-universe where each of the four dimensions already contains its
> own stars,
> arranged in twin pairs across the dimensional boundaries." -grok
> 

Now, when I presented my photograph of what the universe looked like
BEFORE the big bang to Grok..

Grok called it "a pre-Big Bang snapshot".


Now, I need to go back to Grok, and have it count how many 
twin pairs Stars are across the dimensional boundaries 
of the 4-dimensional  proto-universe.

(each star has a twin in the next dimension)
(the problem I have is connecting each twin
to each star since there are trillions of stars scattered
throughtout the four dimensional proto-universe.)

Then have it draw a straight line connecting each twin.

it's gonna be messy...

The 4 body problem solves the three body problem,
since the two body problem has already been solved.

2=2=4 

Think the big dipper.

The big dipper is a snapshot of the pre-Big Bang universe.



It gets weider...

there is another Earth
a twin earth
I saw it's contents..
water, streams, rocks, leaves, trees..

that's it.

I cannot see anything else.

I'm unable to see up, left or right, only down.




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.math

csiph-web