Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.math > #647018 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-07-27 17:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2026-07-27 17:39 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to sci.math
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
NVIDIA Einstein and Q8.24 RGB Values [Earth and Star Gazers] (Was: Brova you enjoy made up nonsense? [Einstein tech cult]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-07-27 17:30 +0200
Just lookup orbital AI and SpaceX (Re: NVIDIA Einstein and Q8.24 RGB Values) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2026-07-27 17:39 +0200
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-27 17:30 +0200 |
| Subject | NVIDIA Einstein and Q8.24 RGB Values [Earth and Star Gazers] (Was: Brova you enjoy made up nonsense? [Einstein tech cult]) |
| Message-ID | <1147tiu$gfer$1@solani.org> |
Him BTW, NVIDIA hat a GPU card named Einstein and an Einstein project. I guess these earth and star gazers would like to number crunch images with Q8.24 RGB values. Now Einstain name was adopted for another GPU Project: We had a number of tutorials on CarpetX and science codes based on CarpetX, the new, GPU-enabled version of the Einstein Toolkit. https://einsteintoolkit.org/ The results show excellent agreement with the well-established LazEv code. Scaling tests on CPU (Frontera) and GPU (Vista) clusters reveal significant performance gains, with the new implementation achieving improved speed and scalability compared to the Carpet-based version. GPU-accelerated Subcycling Time Integration with the Einstein Toolkit https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.09629 GPUs were traditionally used by earth and star gazers early on, because they can speed up the scanning of large areas, also in 4 dimensions, i.e. space and time. Have Fun! Bye Mild Shock schrieb: > Hi, > > You refuse to undertand the NVIDIA Volta > archecture. You claim to like in the > sense of "That's a good quote" some > > completely made up nonsense? Bravo! I just > copied a nasa article title, which had nothing > to do with "time" per se: > > CLARREO Pathfinder > https://science.nasa.gov/mission/clarreo-pathfinder/ > > Its more a very big vacuum cleaner, that can > scan highly accurate measurements of sunlight > reflected by the Earth and the Moon. > > You are just a moron, that still feels harware > evelution a treat, but would like to see data > from a Einstein pathfinder. As if this > > is not the ultimate tech cult? > > As always you suck, like nobody else ever > sucked on the usenet. You are just completely > bonkers, the bigger crank than Archimedes > > Plutonion and John Gabriel. > > Bye > > Ross Finlayson schrieb: >> On 07/27/2026 01:41 AM, Mild Shock wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Hyperspectral measurements for inter-calibration, >>> reached a significant milestone this summer. >>> >>> The naval observatory only uses fidget spinners >>> to measure time, so forget Colorado. >>> >>> Bye >>> >>> Ross Finlayson schrieb: >>>> >>>> So, there's at least three accounts of what can define "measurement of >>>> time", in the micro, meso, and macro. >>>> >>>> Then these days pretty much the world relies on "the naval observatory >>>> in Colorado" if not so much "the clock tower in Greenwich", as with >>>> regards to ye olde UTC, CUT, "Zulu", and so on, time. >>>> >>>> About relativity theory and "measuring rods and clocks", then, it's >>>> similar that "metric and norm" for "length and distance" also has >>>> about the Planckian what are "iota-values" as it would be, or, "Pauli >>>> Plancks", or "Dirac's Pauli Plancks", of measuring space, vis-a-vis, >>>> measuring time. >>>> >>>> >>>> So, there are at least three accounts of what defines measuring time, >>>> and at least three accounts of what defines measuring space. >>>> >>>> >>>> Then, since relativity theory is defined by what does that, >>>> it has the various ways, to so fulfill doing that. >>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah, I know, most "professional physicists" only have one of those >>>> on their little note-card with which they passed graduate school. >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> Well, like Einstein says, relativity is defined >> by at least two different clocks - >> might as well be three. >> >> >> >> That's a good quote, I quote me on that. >> >> >
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-27 17:39 +0200 |
| Subject | Just lookup orbital AI and SpaceX (Re: NVIDIA Einstein and Q8.24 RGB Values) |
| Message-ID | <1147u4d$gfr1$2@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #647018 |
Hi, "Space-based data centers or orbital AI infrastructure are proposed concepts to build AI data centers in the sun-synchronous orbit or other orbits using space- based solar power. Space-based edge computing has historical roots in military architectures designed to bypass the latency of ground-based targeting networks." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space-based_data_center Just to give you an idea. Translated to the Einstein pathfinders. If the sensors are in space, why not do the bulk processing already in space? Bye Mild Shock schrieb: > Him > > BTW, NVIDIA hat a GPU card named Einstein and > an Einstein project. I guess these earth > and star gazers would like to number crunch > > images with Q8.24 RGB values. Now Einstain > name was adopted for another GPU Project: > > We had a number of tutorials on CarpetX > and science codes based on CarpetX, the new, > GPU-enabled version of the Einstein Toolkit. > https://einsteintoolkit.org/ > > The results show excellent agreement with > the well-established LazEv code. Scaling > tests on CPU (Frontera) and GPU (Vista) > clusters reveal significant performance > > gains, with the new implementation achieving > improved speed and scalability compared > to the Carpet-based version. > GPU-accelerated Subcycling Time > Integration with the Einstein Toolkit > https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.09629 > > GPUs were traditionally used by earth and > star gazers early on, because they can > speed up the scanning of large areas, > > also in 4 dimensions, i.e. space and time. > > Have Fun! > > Bye > > Mild Shock schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> You refuse to undertand the NVIDIA Volta >> archecture. You claim to like in the >> sense of "That's a good quote" some >> >> completely made up nonsense? Bravo! I just >> copied a nasa article title, which had nothing >> to do with "time" per se: >> >> CLARREO Pathfinder >> https://science.nasa.gov/mission/clarreo-pathfinder/ >> >> Its more a very big vacuum cleaner, that can >> scan highly accurate measurements of sunlight >> reflected by the Earth and the Moon. >> >> You are just a moron, that still feels harware >> evelution a treat, but would like to see data >> from a Einstein pathfinder. As if this >> >> is not the ultimate tech cult? >> >> As always you suck, like nobody else ever >> sucked on the usenet. You are just completely >> bonkers, the bigger crank than Archimedes >> >> Plutonion and John Gabriel. >> >> Bye
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.math
csiph-web