Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.math > #640539 > unrolled thread

Re: A House of Dynamite (2025)

Started byThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
First post2025-10-29 00:24 -0700
Last post2025-11-15 08:14 -0800
Articles 20 on this page of 71 — 13 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.math

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-29 00:24 -0700
    Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-29 23:48 -0700
      Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-30 09:59 -0700
        Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-31 22:24 -0700
          Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-01 13:13 -0700
            Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-04 23:58 -0800
              Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-05 00:00 -0800
    Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-10-31 22:33 -0700
      Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-01 15:01 -0700
        Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-02 11:35 -0800
          Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-04 23:39 -0800
            Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-06 21:41 -0800
              Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-10 15:36 -0800
                Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-11 08:45 +0100
                  Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-11 00:04 -0800
                    Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-11-11 16:25 -0500
                    Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-12 08:43 +0100
                      Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-11-12 08:49 +0000
                      Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-12 01:28 -0800
                        Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-13 09:05 +0100
                          Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Daven Babadzhanov <dan@av.ru> - 2025-11-13 12:45 +0000
                        Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-14 11:19 -0800
                          Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-14 11:54 -0800
                            Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-14 20:28 -0800
                            Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-16 12:25 -0800
                              Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-17 09:03 -0800
                      Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-12 09:28 -0800
                        Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-12 11:20 -0800
                          Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-13 09:44 +0100
                            Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-13 10:20 -0800
                        Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-11-13 07:35 +0000
                          Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-13 10:03 +0100
                            Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-11-13 16:55 +0000
                              Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-17 09:17 +0100
                                Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2025-11-23 20:57 +0000
                                  Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-23 13:13 -0800
                                    Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-23 15:51 -0800
                                      Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 15:05 -0500
                                        Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-11-25 08:56 -0500
                                  Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-23 14:27 -0800
                                    Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-24 10:09 -0800
                            Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-13 10:41 -0800
                              Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-17 09:36 +0100
                                Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2025-11-17 11:17 -0500
                                  Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-17 09:36 -0800
                                    Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2025-11-18 08:24 -0800
                                  Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-18 11:20 +0100
                          Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-13 09:15 -0800
                            Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-17 09:33 +0100
                              Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-17 00:38 -0800
                              Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-17 00:51 -0800
                                Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-18 11:10 +0100
                                  Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-18 09:33 -0800
                                    Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-21 11:42 +0100
                              Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Yony Königsmann <nmn@imn.de> - 2025-11-17 11:54 +0000
                        Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-13 09:30 +0100
                        Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2025-11-13 09:08 -0800
                          Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-17 09:25 +0100
                  Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2025-11-11 08:31 -0800
                    Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-11-11 09:44 -0800
                      Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) "chine.bleu" <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2025-11-11 18:18 -0800
                    Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> - 2025-11-12 14:11 +1300
                    Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-12 08:48 +0100
                      Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2025-11-12 08:29 -0800
                        Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2025-11-12 17:24 +0000
                          Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2025-11-13 08:43 -0800
                            Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2025-11-13 17:14 +0000
                              Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2025-11-14 08:47 -0800
                                Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-11-14 17:35 +0000
                                  Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-14 10:55 -0800
                                  Re: A House of Dynamite (2025) Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2025-11-15 08:14 -0800

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →


#640539 — Re: A House of Dynamite (2025)

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2025-10-29 00:24 -0700
SubjectRe: A House of Dynamite (2025)
Message-ID<r5g3gkllbb5dqkthnrvh0lj5a2f0fbnj0a@4ax.com>
On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:21:12 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 20:48:04 -0700, The Starmaker
><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:21:37 -0700, The Starmaker
>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:52:17 -0700, The Starmaker
>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 12:37:15 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:28:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:36:36 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In the 1940's
>>>>>>>the department of war
>>>>>>>the military,
>>>>>>>had the same problem...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>they sat around a table
>>>>>>>they had a conference
>>>>>>>and their solution was...
>>>>>>>Albert Einstein.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>First I have to tell you the background
>>>>>>of how Einstein and I became acquainted.
>>>>>>At the time of Pearl Harbor, I was a re-
>>>>>>search chemist in the U. S. Department
>>>>>>of Agriculture. Soon after that, I applied
>>>>>>for a commission in the Navy. After a
>>>>>>long drawn-out fight with the Navy,
>>>>>>which included one rejection, I won the
>>>>>>fight, and received my commission as a
>>>>>>full lieutenant (equivalent to a captain
>>>>>>in the Army) on September 2, 1942.
>>>>>>After that it took more than a month until
>>>>>>I located a billet in the Bureau of Ord-
>>>>>>nance and was called in for active duty.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Mr. Clark, following Gamow’s book,
>>>>>>wrote about the “Division of High Ex-
>>>>>>plosives” in the Bureau of Ordnance,
>>>>>>but there was no such thing. The Bureau
>>>>>>had a “Research and Development Divi-
>>>>>>sion (Re),"" the ision had a section
>>>>>>called “Ammunition and Explosives
>>>>>>(Re2)", and the section had a subsec-
>>>>>>tion called “High Explosives and Propel-
>>>>>>lants (Re2c)."” I was assigned to Re2c.
>>>>>>It had two other reserve officers in it
>>>>>>when I joined, and we divided the work
>>>>>>among ourselves. One became head of
>>>>>>propellant research, I became head of
>>>>>>high explosives research, and the third,
>>>>>>who was a lieutenant j.g., became my
>>>>>>assistant and deputy. I was, on the basis
>>>>>>of my broad experience in the field, ex-
>>>>>>cellently qualified for my assignment. I
>>>>>>knew the names of two high explosives:
>>>>>>TNT and dynamite. With that knowl-
>>>>>>edge, I became head of high explosives
>>>>>>research and development for the world’s
>>>>>>largest Navy!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>But I was young and learned fast;
>>>>>>furthermore, the staff kept on growing as.
>>>>>>the war progressed. I acquired two
>>>>>>groups of civilian scientists; one headed
>>>>>>by one of the speakers at this meeting,
>>>>>>Raymond J. Seeger; another of tonight's
>>>>>>speakers, Harry Polachek, was in this
>>>>>>group; the other group was headed by
>>>>>>Gregory Hartmann, who eventually be-
>>>>>>came Technical Director of the post-
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>permission to visit him in Princeton. The
>>>>>>gracious consent came by return mail.
>>>>>>The visit took place on May 16. After
>>>>>>the pleasant preliminaries, I asked Ein-
>>>>>>stein whether he would be willing to be-
>>>>>>come a consultant for the Navy in general,
>>>>>>and for me, in the field of high explo-
>>>>>>sives research, in particular. Einstein was
>>>>>>tremendously pleased about the offer,
>>>>>>and very happily gave his consent. He
>>>>>>felt very bad about being neglected. He
>>>>>>had not been approached by anyone to
>>>>>>do any war work since the United States
>>>>>>entered the war. He said to me, “People
>>>>>>think that I am interested only in theory,
>>>>>>and not in anything practical. This is not
>>>>>>true. I was working in the Patent Office
>>>>>>in Zurich, and I participated in the de-
>>>>>>velopment of many inventions. The gyro-
>>>>>>scope too.”’ I said, “That's fine. You are
>>>>>>hired.”
>>>>>
>>>>>Here is a short explaination of why they hired Albert Einstein:
>>>>>
>>>>>" Calvert served on the Jack under Lt. Comdr. Tommy Dykers, and here
>>>>>is how he describes his sub’s first experience with the Mark 6
>>>>>exploder: “We worked into an excellent position and fired three
>>>>>torpedoes—the Jack ’s first war shots of her career. Short of the
>>>>>predicted torpedo run time, we heard a tremendous explosion. That
>>>>>should finish him, I thought.
>>>>>
>>>>>“‘ Damn those exploders … damn them all to hell! ’ said Dykers as he
>>>>>looked through the scope.
>>>>>
>>>>>“‘The first torpedo prematured … just before it got to the MOT [middle
>>>>>of the target] … and I don’t know whether the other two passed under
>>>>>without exploding, or missed. Son of a bitch from Baghdad !’ came the
>>>>>bitter exclamation from the skipper.” (Despite continuing torpedo
>>>>>trouble, Jack ’s later forays were considerably more successful.)"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Einstein soved the problem...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"If I were asked to state what specific
>>>>>contributions were made by Einstein to
>>>>>our high explosives research, I would
>>>>>have to say this. New and more effec-
>>>>>tive high explosives were developed dur-
>>>>>ing the war, and they were used by the
>>>>>Navy and the Army (which then included
>>>>>the Air Force) against Germany, Japan
>>>>>and their allies. (I found out later that at
>>>>>least the underwater explosives, possibly
>>>>>others, were also used in the Korean and
>>>>>the Vietnam War.) But these develop-
>>>>>ments were the results of the efforts of
>>>>>large groups of people, including Ein-
>>>>>stein."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Einstein is da bomb!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>https://archive.navalsubleague.org/1986/dr-einstein-s-torpedo-letter
>>>
>>>
>>>Now, Albert Einstein got paid by the military $25.00 a day for his
>>>work...
>>>
>>>In the movie "A House of Dynamite" (2025) it cost $50 billon
>>>dollars(and missed the target).
>>>
>>>Einstein shouda asked for more money...
>>
>>Les not forget..Einstein dropped TWO atomic bombs on Japan! He had
>>yellow fever.
>>
>>'the yellow peril' :(the political or military threat regarded as
>>being posed by the Chinese or by the peoples of Southeast Asia.)
>>
>>Albert Einstein referred to Chinese as 'industrious, filthy, obtuse
>>people'
>>
>>“a peculiar herd-like nation… often more like automatons than people”,
>>adding: “Even the children are spiritless and look lethargic.”
>>“bandit-like filthy Levantines”
>>
>>https://www.the-independent.com/news/science/albert-einstein-racism-travel-diaries-china-japan-zeev-rosenkranz-a8397226.html
>>
>>http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s11234.pdf
>>
>>
>>
>>Don't shoot till you see the slant of ther eyes...
>
>I'm surprised Einstein didn't write a book called..."Origin of the
>Chinks"


Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”

So, what color is Albert  Einstein? Purple?? 


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#640547

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2025-10-29 23:48 -0700
Message-ID<j626gk1eiqfhf15qgbvpl4v35rao65h01d@4ax.com>
In reply to#640539
On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:24:58 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:21:12 -0700, The Starmaker
><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 20:48:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:21:37 -0700, The Starmaker
>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:52:17 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 12:37:15 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:28:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:36:36 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In the 1940's
>>>>>>>>the department of war
>>>>>>>>the military,
>>>>>>>>had the same problem...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>they sat around a table
>>>>>>>>they had a conference
>>>>>>>>and their solution was...
>>>>>>>>Albert Einstein.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>First I have to tell you the background
>>>>>>>of how Einstein and I became acquainted.
>>>>>>>At the time of Pearl Harbor, I was a re-
>>>>>>>search chemist in the U. S. Department
>>>>>>>of Agriculture. Soon after that, I applied
>>>>>>>for a commission in the Navy. After a
>>>>>>>long drawn-out fight with the Navy,
>>>>>>>which included one rejection, I won the
>>>>>>>fight, and received my commission as a
>>>>>>>full lieutenant (equivalent to a captain
>>>>>>>in the Army) on September 2, 1942.
>>>>>>>After that it took more than a month until
>>>>>>>I located a billet in the Bureau of Ord-
>>>>>>>nance and was called in for active duty.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Mr. Clark, following Gamow’s book,
>>>>>>>wrote about the “Division of High Ex-
>>>>>>>plosives” in the Bureau of Ordnance,
>>>>>>>but there was no such thing. The Bureau
>>>>>>>had a “Research and Development Divi-
>>>>>>>sion (Re),"" the ision had a section
>>>>>>>called “Ammunition and Explosives
>>>>>>>(Re2)", and the section had a subsec-
>>>>>>>tion called “High Explosives and Propel-
>>>>>>>lants (Re2c)."” I was assigned to Re2c.
>>>>>>>It had two other reserve officers in it
>>>>>>>when I joined, and we divided the work
>>>>>>>among ourselves. One became head of
>>>>>>>propellant research, I became head of
>>>>>>>high explosives research, and the third,
>>>>>>>who was a lieutenant j.g., became my
>>>>>>>assistant and deputy. I was, on the basis
>>>>>>>of my broad experience in the field, ex-
>>>>>>>cellently qualified for my assignment. I
>>>>>>>knew the names of two high explosives:
>>>>>>>TNT and dynamite. With that knowl-
>>>>>>>edge, I became head of high explosives
>>>>>>>research and development for the world’s
>>>>>>>largest Navy!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But I was young and learned fast;
>>>>>>>furthermore, the staff kept on growing as.
>>>>>>>the war progressed. I acquired two
>>>>>>>groups of civilian scientists; one headed
>>>>>>>by one of the speakers at this meeting,
>>>>>>>Raymond J. Seeger; another of tonight's
>>>>>>>speakers, Harry Polachek, was in this
>>>>>>>group; the other group was headed by
>>>>>>>Gregory Hartmann, who eventually be-
>>>>>>>came Technical Director of the post-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>permission to visit him in Princeton. The
>>>>>>>gracious consent came by return mail.
>>>>>>>The visit took place on May 16. After
>>>>>>>the pleasant preliminaries, I asked Ein-
>>>>>>>stein whether he would be willing to be-
>>>>>>>come a consultant for the Navy in general,
>>>>>>>and for me, in the field of high explo-
>>>>>>>sives research, in particular. Einstein was
>>>>>>>tremendously pleased about the offer,
>>>>>>>and very happily gave his consent. He
>>>>>>>felt very bad about being neglected. He
>>>>>>>had not been approached by anyone to
>>>>>>>do any war work since the United States
>>>>>>>entered the war. He said to me, “People
>>>>>>>think that I am interested only in theory,
>>>>>>>and not in anything practical. This is not
>>>>>>>true. I was working in the Patent Office
>>>>>>>in Zurich, and I participated in the de-
>>>>>>>velopment of many inventions. The gyro-
>>>>>>>scope too.”’ I said, “That's fine. You are
>>>>>>>hired.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Here is a short explaination of why they hired Albert Einstein:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>" Calvert served on the Jack under Lt. Comdr. Tommy Dykers, and here
>>>>>>is how he describes his sub’s first experience with the Mark 6
>>>>>>exploder: “We worked into an excellent position and fired three
>>>>>>torpedoes—the Jack ’s first war shots of her career. Short of the
>>>>>>predicted torpedo run time, we heard a tremendous explosion. That
>>>>>>should finish him, I thought.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>“‘ Damn those exploders … damn them all to hell! ’ said Dykers as he
>>>>>>looked through the scope.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>“‘The first torpedo prematured … just before it got to the MOT [middle
>>>>>>of the target] … and I don’t know whether the other two passed under
>>>>>>without exploding, or missed. Son of a bitch from Baghdad !’ came the
>>>>>>bitter exclamation from the skipper.” (Despite continuing torpedo
>>>>>>trouble, Jack ’s later forays were considerably more successful.)"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Einstein soved the problem...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"If I were asked to state what specific
>>>>>>contributions were made by Einstein to
>>>>>>our high explosives research, I would
>>>>>>have to say this. New and more effec-
>>>>>>tive high explosives were developed dur-
>>>>>>ing the war, and they were used by the
>>>>>>Navy and the Army (which then included
>>>>>>the Air Force) against Germany, Japan
>>>>>>and their allies. (I found out later that at
>>>>>>least the underwater explosives, possibly
>>>>>>others, were also used in the Korean and
>>>>>>the Vietnam War.) But these develop-
>>>>>>ments were the results of the efforts of
>>>>>>large groups of people, including Ein-
>>>>>>stein."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Einstein is da bomb!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>https://archive.navalsubleague.org/1986/dr-einstein-s-torpedo-letter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Now, Albert Einstein got paid by the military $25.00 a day for his
>>>>work...
>>>>
>>>>In the movie "A House of Dynamite" (2025) it cost $50 billon
>>>>dollars(and missed the target).
>>>>
>>>>Einstein shouda asked for more money...
>>>
>>>Les not forget..Einstein dropped TWO atomic bombs on Japan! He had
>>>yellow fever.
>>>
>>>'the yellow peril' :(the political or military threat regarded as
>>>being posed by the Chinese or by the peoples of Southeast Asia.)
>>>
>>>Albert Einstein referred to Chinese as 'industrious, filthy, obtuse
>>>people'
>>>
>>>“a peculiar herd-like nation… often more like automatons than people”,
>>>adding: “Even the children are spiritless and look lethargic.”
>>>“bandit-like filthy Levantines”
>>>
>>>https://www.the-independent.com/news/science/albert-einstein-racism-travel-diaries-china-japan-zeev-rosenkranz-a8397226.html
>>>
>>>http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s11234.pdf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Don't shoot till you see the slant of ther eyes...
>>
>>I'm surprised Einstein didn't write a book called..."Origin of the
>>Chinks"
>
>
>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>
>So, what color is Albert  Einstein? Purple?? 


Now, if you ask your favorite AI platform the same question...

Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”

So, what color is Albert  Einstein?  

You will notice a pause, then a quick juggling of words
and differculty trying to answer that question...
eventually it will spit out it's own definiton of WHITE PEOPLE.




[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#640555

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2025-10-30 09:59 -0700
Message-ID<pg57gk1d53rdrea5t0fvdic1kksb3tfmbd@4ax.com>
In reply to#640547
On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 23:48:18 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:24:58 -0700, The Starmaker
><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:21:12 -0700, The Starmaker
>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 20:48:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:21:37 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:52:17 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 12:37:15 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:28:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:36:36 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In the 1940's
>>>>>>>>>the department of war
>>>>>>>>>the military,
>>>>>>>>>had the same problem...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>they sat around a table
>>>>>>>>>they had a conference
>>>>>>>>>and their solution was...
>>>>>>>>>Albert Einstein.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>First I have to tell you the background
>>>>>>>>of how Einstein and I became acquainted.
>>>>>>>>At the time of Pearl Harbor, I was a re-
>>>>>>>>search chemist in the U. S. Department
>>>>>>>>of Agriculture. Soon after that, I applied
>>>>>>>>for a commission in the Navy. After a
>>>>>>>>long drawn-out fight with the Navy,
>>>>>>>>which included one rejection, I won the
>>>>>>>>fight, and received my commission as a
>>>>>>>>full lieutenant (equivalent to a captain
>>>>>>>>in the Army) on September 2, 1942.
>>>>>>>>After that it took more than a month until
>>>>>>>>I located a billet in the Bureau of Ord-
>>>>>>>>nance and was called in for active duty.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Mr. Clark, following Gamow’s book,
>>>>>>>>wrote about the “Division of High Ex-
>>>>>>>>plosives” in the Bureau of Ordnance,
>>>>>>>>but there was no such thing. The Bureau
>>>>>>>>had a “Research and Development Divi-
>>>>>>>>sion (Re),"" the ision had a section
>>>>>>>>called “Ammunition and Explosives
>>>>>>>>(Re2)", and the section had a subsec-
>>>>>>>>tion called “High Explosives and Propel-
>>>>>>>>lants (Re2c)."” I was assigned to Re2c.
>>>>>>>>It had two other reserve officers in it
>>>>>>>>when I joined, and we divided the work
>>>>>>>>among ourselves. One became head of
>>>>>>>>propellant research, I became head of
>>>>>>>>high explosives research, and the third,
>>>>>>>>who was a lieutenant j.g., became my
>>>>>>>>assistant and deputy. I was, on the basis
>>>>>>>>of my broad experience in the field, ex-
>>>>>>>>cellently qualified for my assignment. I
>>>>>>>>knew the names of two high explosives:
>>>>>>>>TNT and dynamite. With that knowl-
>>>>>>>>edge, I became head of high explosives
>>>>>>>>research and development for the world’s
>>>>>>>>largest Navy!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>But I was young and learned fast;
>>>>>>>>furthermore, the staff kept on growing as.
>>>>>>>>the war progressed. I acquired two
>>>>>>>>groups of civilian scientists; one headed
>>>>>>>>by one of the speakers at this meeting,
>>>>>>>>Raymond J. Seeger; another of tonight's
>>>>>>>>speakers, Harry Polachek, was in this
>>>>>>>>group; the other group was headed by
>>>>>>>>Gregory Hartmann, who eventually be-
>>>>>>>>came Technical Director of the post-
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>permission to visit him in Princeton. The
>>>>>>>>gracious consent came by return mail.
>>>>>>>>The visit took place on May 16. After
>>>>>>>>the pleasant preliminaries, I asked Ein-
>>>>>>>>stein whether he would be willing to be-
>>>>>>>>come a consultant for the Navy in general,
>>>>>>>>and for me, in the field of high explo-
>>>>>>>>sives research, in particular. Einstein was
>>>>>>>>tremendously pleased about the offer,
>>>>>>>>and very happily gave his consent. He
>>>>>>>>felt very bad about being neglected. He
>>>>>>>>had not been approached by anyone to
>>>>>>>>do any war work since the United States
>>>>>>>>entered the war. He said to me, “People
>>>>>>>>think that I am interested only in theory,
>>>>>>>>and not in anything practical. This is not
>>>>>>>>true. I was working in the Patent Office
>>>>>>>>in Zurich, and I participated in the de-
>>>>>>>>velopment of many inventions. The gyro-
>>>>>>>>scope too.”’ I said, “That's fine. You are
>>>>>>>>hired.”
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Here is a short explaination of why they hired Albert Einstein:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>" Calvert served on the Jack under Lt. Comdr. Tommy Dykers, and here
>>>>>>>is how he describes his sub’s first experience with the Mark 6
>>>>>>>exploder: “We worked into an excellent position and fired three
>>>>>>>torpedoes—the Jack ’s first war shots of her career. Short of the
>>>>>>>predicted torpedo run time, we heard a tremendous explosion. That
>>>>>>>should finish him, I thought.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>“‘ Damn those exploders … damn them all to hell! ’ said Dykers as he
>>>>>>>looked through the scope.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>“‘The first torpedo prematured … just before it got to the MOT [middle
>>>>>>>of the target] … and I don’t know whether the other two passed under
>>>>>>>without exploding, or missed. Son of a bitch from Baghdad !’ came the
>>>>>>>bitter exclamation from the skipper.” (Despite continuing torpedo
>>>>>>>trouble, Jack ’s later forays were considerably more successful.)"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Einstein soved the problem...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"If I were asked to state what specific
>>>>>>>contributions were made by Einstein to
>>>>>>>our high explosives research, I would
>>>>>>>have to say this. New and more effec-
>>>>>>>tive high explosives were developed dur-
>>>>>>>ing the war, and they were used by the
>>>>>>>Navy and the Army (which then included
>>>>>>>the Air Force) against Germany, Japan
>>>>>>>and their allies. (I found out later that at
>>>>>>>least the underwater explosives, possibly
>>>>>>>others, were also used in the Korean and
>>>>>>>the Vietnam War.) But these develop-
>>>>>>>ments were the results of the efforts of
>>>>>>>large groups of people, including Ein-
>>>>>>>stein."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Einstein is da bomb!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>https://archive.navalsubleague.org/1986/dr-einstein-s-torpedo-letter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Now, Albert Einstein got paid by the military $25.00 a day for his
>>>>>work...
>>>>>
>>>>>In the movie "A House of Dynamite" (2025) it cost $50 billon
>>>>>dollars(and missed the target).
>>>>>
>>>>>Einstein shouda asked for more money...
>>>>
>>>>Les not forget..Einstein dropped TWO atomic bombs on Japan! He had
>>>>yellow fever.
>>>>
>>>>'the yellow peril' :(the political or military threat regarded as
>>>>being posed by the Chinese or by the peoples of Southeast Asia.)
>>>>
>>>>Albert Einstein referred to Chinese as 'industrious, filthy, obtuse
>>>>people'
>>>>
>>>>“a peculiar herd-like nation… often more like automatons than people”,
>>>>adding: “Even the children are spiritless and look lethargic.”
>>>>“bandit-like filthy Levantines”
>>>>
>>>>https://www.the-independent.com/news/science/albert-einstein-racism-travel-diaries-china-japan-zeev-rosenkranz-a8397226.html
>>>>
>>>>http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s11234.pdf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Don't shoot till you see the slant of ther eyes...
>>>
>>>I'm surprised Einstein didn't write a book called..."Origin of the
>>>Chinks"
>>
>>
>>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>>
>>So, what color is Albert  Einstein? Purple?? 
>
>
>Now, if you ask your favorite AI platform the same question...
>
>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>
>So, what color is Albert  Einstein?  
>
>You will notice a pause, then a quick juggling of words
>and differculty trying to answer that question...
>eventually it will spit out it's own definiton of WHITE PEOPLE.
>
>
>
>

You know how 'these science guys' are...
if the facts don't fit the theory...they change the facts!

For example, they taught in science class to billions of students,
that there are 9 planets in our solar system...

when they decided to 'wanna' change it to 8 planets, they changed the
definition of the word 'Planets' to fit their theory!!

Bill Gates now claims there is no Climate Change...great, Bill Gates
is now on the Weather Channel!! 

and he ain't got no boobs!

What happen to Fausi? did the chinks eat him??


Those “bandit-like filthy Levantines” eat anything...

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#640569

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2025-10-31 22:24 -0700
Message-ID<q06bgkl3ns4nqt4vg2nmnpnunqg27am4vu@4ax.com>
In reply to#640555
On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 09:59:55 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 23:48:18 -0700, The Starmaker
><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:24:58 -0700, The Starmaker
>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:21:12 -0700, The Starmaker
>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 20:48:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:21:37 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:52:17 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 12:37:15 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:28:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:36:36 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>In the 1940's
>>>>>>>>>>the department of war
>>>>>>>>>>the military,
>>>>>>>>>>had the same problem...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>they sat around a table
>>>>>>>>>>they had a conference
>>>>>>>>>>and their solution was...
>>>>>>>>>>Albert Einstein.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>First I have to tell you the background
>>>>>>>>>of how Einstein and I became acquainted.
>>>>>>>>>At the time of Pearl Harbor, I was a re-
>>>>>>>>>search chemist in the U. S. Department
>>>>>>>>>of Agriculture. Soon after that, I applied
>>>>>>>>>for a commission in the Navy. After a
>>>>>>>>>long drawn-out fight with the Navy,
>>>>>>>>>which included one rejection, I won the
>>>>>>>>>fight, and received my commission as a
>>>>>>>>>full lieutenant (equivalent to a captain
>>>>>>>>>in the Army) on September 2, 1942.
>>>>>>>>>After that it took more than a month until
>>>>>>>>>I located a billet in the Bureau of Ord-
>>>>>>>>>nance and was called in for active duty.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Mr. Clark, following Gamow’s book,
>>>>>>>>>wrote about the “Division of High Ex-
>>>>>>>>>plosives” in the Bureau of Ordnance,
>>>>>>>>>but there was no such thing. The Bureau
>>>>>>>>>had a “Research and Development Divi-
>>>>>>>>>sion (Re),"" the ision had a section
>>>>>>>>>called “Ammunition and Explosives
>>>>>>>>>(Re2)", and the section had a subsec-
>>>>>>>>>tion called “High Explosives and Propel-
>>>>>>>>>lants (Re2c)."” I was assigned to Re2c.
>>>>>>>>>It had two other reserve officers in it
>>>>>>>>>when I joined, and we divided the work
>>>>>>>>>among ourselves. One became head of
>>>>>>>>>propellant research, I became head of
>>>>>>>>>high explosives research, and the third,
>>>>>>>>>who was a lieutenant j.g., became my
>>>>>>>>>assistant and deputy. I was, on the basis
>>>>>>>>>of my broad experience in the field, ex-
>>>>>>>>>cellently qualified for my assignment. I
>>>>>>>>>knew the names of two high explosives:
>>>>>>>>>TNT and dynamite. With that knowl-
>>>>>>>>>edge, I became head of high explosives
>>>>>>>>>research and development for the world’s
>>>>>>>>>largest Navy!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>But I was young and learned fast;
>>>>>>>>>furthermore, the staff kept on growing as.
>>>>>>>>>the war progressed. I acquired two
>>>>>>>>>groups of civilian scientists; one headed
>>>>>>>>>by one of the speakers at this meeting,
>>>>>>>>>Raymond J. Seeger; another of tonight's
>>>>>>>>>speakers, Harry Polachek, was in this
>>>>>>>>>group; the other group was headed by
>>>>>>>>>Gregory Hartmann, who eventually be-
>>>>>>>>>came Technical Director of the post-
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>permission to visit him in Princeton. The
>>>>>>>>>gracious consent came by return mail.
>>>>>>>>>The visit took place on May 16. After
>>>>>>>>>the pleasant preliminaries, I asked Ein-
>>>>>>>>>stein whether he would be willing to be-
>>>>>>>>>come a consultant for the Navy in general,
>>>>>>>>>and for me, in the field of high explo-
>>>>>>>>>sives research, in particular. Einstein was
>>>>>>>>>tremendously pleased about the offer,
>>>>>>>>>and very happily gave his consent. He
>>>>>>>>>felt very bad about being neglected. He
>>>>>>>>>had not been approached by anyone to
>>>>>>>>>do any war work since the United States
>>>>>>>>>entered the war. He said to me, “People
>>>>>>>>>think that I am interested only in theory,
>>>>>>>>>and not in anything practical. This is not
>>>>>>>>>true. I was working in the Patent Office
>>>>>>>>>in Zurich, and I participated in the de-
>>>>>>>>>velopment of many inventions. The gyro-
>>>>>>>>>scope too.”’ I said, “That's fine. You are
>>>>>>>>>hired.”
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Here is a short explaination of why they hired Albert Einstein:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>" Calvert served on the Jack under Lt. Comdr. Tommy Dykers, and here
>>>>>>>>is how he describes his sub’s first experience with the Mark 6
>>>>>>>>exploder: “We worked into an excellent position and fired three
>>>>>>>>torpedoes—the Jack ’s first war shots of her career. Short of the
>>>>>>>>predicted torpedo run time, we heard a tremendous explosion. That
>>>>>>>>should finish him, I thought.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>“‘ Damn those exploders … damn them all to hell! ’ said Dykers as he
>>>>>>>>looked through the scope.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>“‘The first torpedo prematured … just before it got to the MOT [middle
>>>>>>>>of the target] … and I don’t know whether the other two passed under
>>>>>>>>without exploding, or missed. Son of a bitch from Baghdad !’ came the
>>>>>>>>bitter exclamation from the skipper.” (Despite continuing torpedo
>>>>>>>>trouble, Jack ’s later forays were considerably more successful.)"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Einstein soved the problem...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"If I were asked to state what specific
>>>>>>>>contributions were made by Einstein to
>>>>>>>>our high explosives research, I would
>>>>>>>>have to say this. New and more effec-
>>>>>>>>tive high explosives were developed dur-
>>>>>>>>ing the war, and they were used by the
>>>>>>>>Navy and the Army (which then included
>>>>>>>>the Air Force) against Germany, Japan
>>>>>>>>and their allies. (I found out later that at
>>>>>>>>least the underwater explosives, possibly
>>>>>>>>others, were also used in the Korean and
>>>>>>>>the Vietnam War.) But these develop-
>>>>>>>>ments were the results of the efforts of
>>>>>>>>large groups of people, including Ein-
>>>>>>>>stein."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Einstein is da bomb!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>https://archive.navalsubleague.org/1986/dr-einstein-s-torpedo-letter
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Now, Albert Einstein got paid by the military $25.00 a day for his
>>>>>>work...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>In the movie "A House of Dynamite" (2025) it cost $50 billon
>>>>>>dollars(and missed the target).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Einstein shouda asked for more money...
>>>>>
>>>>>Les not forget..Einstein dropped TWO atomic bombs on Japan! He had
>>>>>yellow fever.
>>>>>
>>>>>'the yellow peril' :(the political or military threat regarded as
>>>>>being posed by the Chinese or by the peoples of Southeast Asia.)
>>>>>
>>>>>Albert Einstein referred to Chinese as 'industrious, filthy, obtuse
>>>>>people'
>>>>>
>>>>>“a peculiar herd-like nation… often more like automatons than people”,
>>>>>adding: “Even the children are spiritless and look lethargic.”
>>>>>“bandit-like filthy Levantines”
>>>>>
>>>>>https://www.the-independent.com/news/science/albert-einstein-racism-travel-diaries-china-japan-zeev-rosenkranz-a8397226.html
>>>>>
>>>>>http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s11234.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Don't shoot till you see the slant of ther eyes...
>>>>
>>>>I'm surprised Einstein didn't write a book called..."Origin of the
>>>>Chinks"
>>>
>>>
>>>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>>>
>>>So, what color is Albert  Einstein? Purple?? 
>>
>>
>>Now, if you ask your favorite AI platform the same question...
>>
>>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>>
>>So, what color is Albert  Einstein?  
>>
>>You will notice a pause, then a quick juggling of words
>>and differculty trying to answer that question...
>>eventually it will spit out it's own definiton of WHITE PEOPLE.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>You know how 'these science guys' are...
>if the facts don't fit the theory...they change the facts!
>
>For example, they taught in science class to billions of students,
>that there are 9 planets in our solar system...
>
>when they decided to 'wanna' change it to 8 planets, they changed the
>definition of the word 'Planets' to fit their theory!!

In other words, for 'them' to change the number from 9 planets to 8
planets...'they' had to change the definition of the word Planets
to 'fit' the number 8. The TRUTH was 'they' didn't want to add
the number 10...so they change the facts to fit it to number 8.


How much is 2 plus 2 equal? What ever da fuck you wanna it to be!

dats sci.math

FRAUDS!


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#640572

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2025-11-01 13:13 -0700
Message-ID<76qcgktete57eugmqvdkvbhulhrdq551a2@4ax.com>
In reply to#640569
On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 22:24:21 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 09:59:55 -0700, The Starmaker
><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 23:48:18 -0700, The Starmaker
>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:24:58 -0700, The Starmaker
>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:21:12 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 20:48:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:21:37 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:52:17 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 12:37:15 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:28:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:36:36 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In the 1940's
>>>>>>>>>>>the department of war
>>>>>>>>>>>the military,
>>>>>>>>>>>had the same problem...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>they sat around a table
>>>>>>>>>>>they had a conference
>>>>>>>>>>>and their solution was...
>>>>>>>>>>>Albert Einstein.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>First I have to tell you the background
>>>>>>>>>>of how Einstein and I became acquainted.
>>>>>>>>>>At the time of Pearl Harbor, I was a re-
>>>>>>>>>>search chemist in the U. S. Department
>>>>>>>>>>of Agriculture. Soon after that, I applied
>>>>>>>>>>for a commission in the Navy. After a
>>>>>>>>>>long drawn-out fight with the Navy,
>>>>>>>>>>which included one rejection, I won the
>>>>>>>>>>fight, and received my commission as a
>>>>>>>>>>full lieutenant (equivalent to a captain
>>>>>>>>>>in the Army) on September 2, 1942.
>>>>>>>>>>After that it took more than a month until
>>>>>>>>>>I located a billet in the Bureau of Ord-
>>>>>>>>>>nance and was called in for active duty.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Mr. Clark, following Gamow’s book,
>>>>>>>>>>wrote about the “Division of High Ex-
>>>>>>>>>>plosives” in the Bureau of Ordnance,
>>>>>>>>>>but there was no such thing. The Bureau
>>>>>>>>>>had a “Research and Development Divi-
>>>>>>>>>>sion (Re),"" the ision had a section
>>>>>>>>>>called “Ammunition and Explosives
>>>>>>>>>>(Re2)", and the section had a subsec-
>>>>>>>>>>tion called “High Explosives and Propel-
>>>>>>>>>>lants (Re2c)."” I was assigned to Re2c.
>>>>>>>>>>It had two other reserve officers in it
>>>>>>>>>>when I joined, and we divided the work
>>>>>>>>>>among ourselves. One became head of
>>>>>>>>>>propellant research, I became head of
>>>>>>>>>>high explosives research, and the third,
>>>>>>>>>>who was a lieutenant j.g., became my
>>>>>>>>>>assistant and deputy. I was, on the basis
>>>>>>>>>>of my broad experience in the field, ex-
>>>>>>>>>>cellently qualified for my assignment. I
>>>>>>>>>>knew the names of two high explosives:
>>>>>>>>>>TNT and dynamite. With that knowl-
>>>>>>>>>>edge, I became head of high explosives
>>>>>>>>>>research and development for the world’s
>>>>>>>>>>largest Navy!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>But I was young and learned fast;
>>>>>>>>>>furthermore, the staff kept on growing as.
>>>>>>>>>>the war progressed. I acquired two
>>>>>>>>>>groups of civilian scientists; one headed
>>>>>>>>>>by one of the speakers at this meeting,
>>>>>>>>>>Raymond J. Seeger; another of tonight's
>>>>>>>>>>speakers, Harry Polachek, was in this
>>>>>>>>>>group; the other group was headed by
>>>>>>>>>>Gregory Hartmann, who eventually be-
>>>>>>>>>>came Technical Director of the post-
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>permission to visit him in Princeton. The
>>>>>>>>>>gracious consent came by return mail.
>>>>>>>>>>The visit took place on May 16. After
>>>>>>>>>>the pleasant preliminaries, I asked Ein-
>>>>>>>>>>stein whether he would be willing to be-
>>>>>>>>>>come a consultant for the Navy in general,
>>>>>>>>>>and for me, in the field of high explo-
>>>>>>>>>>sives research, in particular. Einstein was
>>>>>>>>>>tremendously pleased about the offer,
>>>>>>>>>>and very happily gave his consent. He
>>>>>>>>>>felt very bad about being neglected. He
>>>>>>>>>>had not been approached by anyone to
>>>>>>>>>>do any war work since the United States
>>>>>>>>>>entered the war. He said to me, “People
>>>>>>>>>>think that I am interested only in theory,
>>>>>>>>>>and not in anything practical. This is not
>>>>>>>>>>true. I was working in the Patent Office
>>>>>>>>>>in Zurich, and I participated in the de-
>>>>>>>>>>velopment of many inventions. The gyro-
>>>>>>>>>>scope too.”’ I said, “That's fine. You are
>>>>>>>>>>hired.”
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Here is a short explaination of why they hired Albert Einstein:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>" Calvert served on the Jack under Lt. Comdr. Tommy Dykers, and here
>>>>>>>>>is how he describes his sub’s first experience with the Mark 6
>>>>>>>>>exploder: “We worked into an excellent position and fired three
>>>>>>>>>torpedoes—the Jack ’s first war shots of her career. Short of the
>>>>>>>>>predicted torpedo run time, we heard a tremendous explosion. That
>>>>>>>>>should finish him, I thought.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>“‘ Damn those exploders … damn them all to hell! ’ said Dykers as he
>>>>>>>>>looked through the scope.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>“‘The first torpedo prematured … just before it got to the MOT [middle
>>>>>>>>>of the target] … and I don’t know whether the other two passed under
>>>>>>>>>without exploding, or missed. Son of a bitch from Baghdad !’ came the
>>>>>>>>>bitter exclamation from the skipper.” (Despite continuing torpedo
>>>>>>>>>trouble, Jack ’s later forays were considerably more successful.)"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Einstein soved the problem...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"If I were asked to state what specific
>>>>>>>>>contributions were made by Einstein to
>>>>>>>>>our high explosives research, I would
>>>>>>>>>have to say this. New and more effec-
>>>>>>>>>tive high explosives were developed dur-
>>>>>>>>>ing the war, and they were used by the
>>>>>>>>>Navy and the Army (which then included
>>>>>>>>>the Air Force) against Germany, Japan
>>>>>>>>>and their allies. (I found out later that at
>>>>>>>>>least the underwater explosives, possibly
>>>>>>>>>others, were also used in the Korean and
>>>>>>>>>the Vietnam War.) But these develop-
>>>>>>>>>ments were the results of the efforts of
>>>>>>>>>large groups of people, including Ein-
>>>>>>>>>stein."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Einstein is da bomb!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>https://archive.navalsubleague.org/1986/dr-einstein-s-torpedo-letter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Now, Albert Einstein got paid by the military $25.00 a day for his
>>>>>>>work...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In the movie "A House of Dynamite" (2025) it cost $50 billon
>>>>>>>dollars(and missed the target).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Einstein shouda asked for more money...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Les not forget..Einstein dropped TWO atomic bombs on Japan! He had
>>>>>>yellow fever.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>'the yellow peril' :(the political or military threat regarded as
>>>>>>being posed by the Chinese or by the peoples of Southeast Asia.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Albert Einstein referred to Chinese as 'industrious, filthy, obtuse
>>>>>>people'
>>>>>>
>>>>>>“a peculiar herd-like nation… often more like automatons than people”,
>>>>>>adding: “Even the children are spiritless and look lethargic.”
>>>>>>“bandit-like filthy Levantines”
>>>>>>
>>>>>>https://www.the-independent.com/news/science/albert-einstein-racism-travel-diaries-china-japan-zeev-rosenkranz-a8397226.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s11234.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Don't shoot till you see the slant of ther eyes...
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm surprised Einstein didn't write a book called..."Origin of the
>>>>>Chinks"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>>>>
>>>>So, what color is Albert  Einstein? Purple?? 
>>>
>>>
>>>Now, if you ask your favorite AI platform the same question...
>>>
>>>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>>>
>>>So, what color is Albert  Einstein?  
>>>
>>>You will notice a pause, then a quick juggling of words
>>>and differculty trying to answer that question...
>>>eventually it will spit out it's own definiton of WHITE PEOPLE.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>You know how 'these science guys' are...
>>if the facts don't fit the theory...they change the facts!
>>
>>For example, they taught in science class to billions of students,
>>that there are 9 planets in our solar system...
>>
>>when they decided to 'wanna' change it to 8 planets, they changed the
>>definition of the word 'Planets' to fit their theory!!
>
>In other words, for 'them' to change the number from 9 planets to 8
>planets...'they' had to change the definition of the word Planets
>to 'fit' the number 8. The TRUTH was 'they' didn't want to add
>the number 10...so they change the facts to fit it to number 8.
>
>
>How much is 2 plus 2 equal? What ever da fuck you wanna it to be!
>
>dats sci.math
>
>FRAUDS!
>
>

Here is what happen...

these guys got into a closed room

and the leader sez... "We gotta change this number from 9 to 8!"


and one guys sez..."Why?"


the leader sez, "Because some motherfucker found a 10th planet and

he's not even a fuckin member of our club, dats embarrassing!"

he sez, "I'm not going to let dis motherfucker get the credit."

So, who's got an idea How To change 9 to 8?

After many stupid suggestions they agree on one stupid idea...


A planet is a large celestial body that orbits a star, is massive
enough for its own gravity to pull it into a nearly round shape, and
has "cleared the neighborhood" around its orbit.

https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/planets/what-is-a-planet/


FUCK THOSE MOTHERFUCKERS International Astronomical Union (IAU) - A
BUNCH OF PUSSIES!


aRE YOU A MEMBER OF THE IAU? you are a fucking pussy..



The Moon used to be called a planet...who changed it???

Monday.
-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#640584

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2025-11-04 23:58 -0800
Message-ID<cd0mgkpvk26n4nkps0m23gv5p6sh0noaun@4ax.com>
In reply to#640572
On Sat, 01 Nov 2025 13:13:23 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 22:24:21 -0700, The Starmaker
><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 09:59:55 -0700, The Starmaker
>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 23:48:18 -0700, The Starmaker
>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:24:58 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:21:12 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 20:48:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:21:37 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:52:17 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 12:37:15 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:28:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:36:36 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>In the 1940's
>>>>>>>>>>>>the department of war
>>>>>>>>>>>>the military,
>>>>>>>>>>>>had the same problem...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>they sat around a table
>>>>>>>>>>>>they had a conference
>>>>>>>>>>>>and their solution was...
>>>>>>>>>>>>Albert Einstein.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>First I have to tell you the background
>>>>>>>>>>>of how Einstein and I became acquainted.
>>>>>>>>>>>At the time of Pearl Harbor, I was a re-
>>>>>>>>>>>search chemist in the U. S. Department
>>>>>>>>>>>of Agriculture. Soon after that, I applied
>>>>>>>>>>>for a commission in the Navy. After a
>>>>>>>>>>>long drawn-out fight with the Navy,
>>>>>>>>>>>which included one rejection, I won the
>>>>>>>>>>>fight, and received my commission as a
>>>>>>>>>>>full lieutenant (equivalent to a captain
>>>>>>>>>>>in the Army) on September 2, 1942.
>>>>>>>>>>>After that it took more than a month until
>>>>>>>>>>>I located a billet in the Bureau of Ord-
>>>>>>>>>>>nance and was called in for active duty.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Mr. Clark, following Gamow’s book,
>>>>>>>>>>>wrote about the “Division of High Ex-
>>>>>>>>>>>plosives” in the Bureau of Ordnance,
>>>>>>>>>>>but there was no such thing. The Bureau
>>>>>>>>>>>had a “Research and Development Divi-
>>>>>>>>>>>sion (Re),"" the ision had a section
>>>>>>>>>>>called “Ammunition and Explosives
>>>>>>>>>>>(Re2)", and the section had a subsec-
>>>>>>>>>>>tion called “High Explosives and Propel-
>>>>>>>>>>>lants (Re2c)."” I was assigned to Re2c.
>>>>>>>>>>>It had two other reserve officers in it
>>>>>>>>>>>when I joined, and we divided the work
>>>>>>>>>>>among ourselves. One became head of
>>>>>>>>>>>propellant research, I became head of
>>>>>>>>>>>high explosives research, and the third,
>>>>>>>>>>>who was a lieutenant j.g., became my
>>>>>>>>>>>assistant and deputy. I was, on the basis
>>>>>>>>>>>of my broad experience in the field, ex-
>>>>>>>>>>>cellently qualified for my assignment. I
>>>>>>>>>>>knew the names of two high explosives:
>>>>>>>>>>>TNT and dynamite. With that knowl-
>>>>>>>>>>>edge, I became head of high explosives
>>>>>>>>>>>research and development for the world’s
>>>>>>>>>>>largest Navy!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>But I was young and learned fast;
>>>>>>>>>>>furthermore, the staff kept on growing as.
>>>>>>>>>>>the war progressed. I acquired two
>>>>>>>>>>>groups of civilian scientists; one headed
>>>>>>>>>>>by one of the speakers at this meeting,
>>>>>>>>>>>Raymond J. Seeger; another of tonight's
>>>>>>>>>>>speakers, Harry Polachek, was in this
>>>>>>>>>>>group; the other group was headed by
>>>>>>>>>>>Gregory Hartmann, who eventually be-
>>>>>>>>>>>came Technical Director of the post-
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>permission to visit him in Princeton. The
>>>>>>>>>>>gracious consent came by return mail.
>>>>>>>>>>>The visit took place on May 16. After
>>>>>>>>>>>the pleasant preliminaries, I asked Ein-
>>>>>>>>>>>stein whether he would be willing to be-
>>>>>>>>>>>come a consultant for the Navy in general,
>>>>>>>>>>>and for me, in the field of high explo-
>>>>>>>>>>>sives research, in particular. Einstein was
>>>>>>>>>>>tremendously pleased about the offer,
>>>>>>>>>>>and very happily gave his consent. He
>>>>>>>>>>>felt very bad about being neglected. He
>>>>>>>>>>>had not been approached by anyone to
>>>>>>>>>>>do any war work since the United States
>>>>>>>>>>>entered the war. He said to me, “People
>>>>>>>>>>>think that I am interested only in theory,
>>>>>>>>>>>and not in anything practical. This is not
>>>>>>>>>>>true. I was working in the Patent Office
>>>>>>>>>>>in Zurich, and I participated in the de-
>>>>>>>>>>>velopment of many inventions. The gyro-
>>>>>>>>>>>scope too.”’ I said, “That's fine. You are
>>>>>>>>>>>hired.”
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Here is a short explaination of why they hired Albert Einstein:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>" Calvert served on the Jack under Lt. Comdr. Tommy Dykers, and here
>>>>>>>>>>is how he describes his sub’s first experience with the Mark 6
>>>>>>>>>>exploder: “We worked into an excellent position and fired three
>>>>>>>>>>torpedoes—the Jack ’s first war shots of her career. Short of the
>>>>>>>>>>predicted torpedo run time, we heard a tremendous explosion. That
>>>>>>>>>>should finish him, I thought.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>“‘ Damn those exploders … damn them all to hell! ’ said Dykers as he
>>>>>>>>>>looked through the scope.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>“‘The first torpedo prematured … just before it got to the MOT [middle
>>>>>>>>>>of the target] … and I don’t know whether the other two passed under
>>>>>>>>>>without exploding, or missed. Son of a bitch from Baghdad !’ came the
>>>>>>>>>>bitter exclamation from the skipper.” (Despite continuing torpedo
>>>>>>>>>>trouble, Jack ’s later forays were considerably more successful.)"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Einstein soved the problem...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"If I were asked to state what specific
>>>>>>>>>>contributions were made by Einstein to
>>>>>>>>>>our high explosives research, I would
>>>>>>>>>>have to say this. New and more effec-
>>>>>>>>>>tive high explosives were developed dur-
>>>>>>>>>>ing the war, and they were used by the
>>>>>>>>>>Navy and the Army (which then included
>>>>>>>>>>the Air Force) against Germany, Japan
>>>>>>>>>>and their allies. (I found out later that at
>>>>>>>>>>least the underwater explosives, possibly
>>>>>>>>>>others, were also used in the Korean and
>>>>>>>>>>the Vietnam War.) But these develop-
>>>>>>>>>>ments were the results of the efforts of
>>>>>>>>>>large groups of people, including Ein-
>>>>>>>>>>stein."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Einstein is da bomb!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>https://archive.navalsubleague.org/1986/dr-einstein-s-torpedo-letter
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Now, Albert Einstein got paid by the military $25.00 a day for his
>>>>>>>>work...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In the movie "A House of Dynamite" (2025) it cost $50 billon
>>>>>>>>dollars(and missed the target).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Einstein shouda asked for more money...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Les not forget..Einstein dropped TWO atomic bombs on Japan! He had
>>>>>>>yellow fever.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>'the yellow peril' :(the political or military threat regarded as
>>>>>>>being posed by the Chinese or by the peoples of Southeast Asia.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Albert Einstein referred to Chinese as 'industrious, filthy, obtuse
>>>>>>>people'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>“a peculiar herd-like nation… often more like automatons than people”,
>>>>>>>adding: “Even the children are spiritless and look lethargic.”
>>>>>>>“bandit-like filthy Levantines”
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>https://www.the-independent.com/news/science/albert-einstein-racism-travel-diaries-china-japan-zeev-rosenkranz-a8397226.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s11234.pdf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Don't shoot till you see the slant of ther eyes...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'm surprised Einstein didn't write a book called..."Origin of the
>>>>>>Chinks"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>>>>>
>>>>>So, what color is Albert  Einstein? Purple?? 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Now, if you ask your favorite AI platform the same question...
>>>>
>>>>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>>>>
>>>>So, what color is Albert  Einstein?  
>>>>
>>>>You will notice a pause, then a quick juggling of words
>>>>and differculty trying to answer that question...
>>>>eventually it will spit out it's own definiton of WHITE PEOPLE.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>You know how 'these science guys' are...
>>>if the facts don't fit the theory...they change the facts!
>>>
>>>For example, they taught in science class to billions of students,
>>>that there are 9 planets in our solar system...
>>>
>>>when they decided to 'wanna' change it to 8 planets, they changed the
>>>definition of the word 'Planets' to fit their theory!!
>>
>>In other words, for 'them' to change the number from 9 planets to 8
>>planets...'they' had to change the definition of the word Planets
>>to 'fit' the number 8. The TRUTH was 'they' didn't want to add
>>the number 10...so they change the facts to fit it to number 8.
>>
>>
>>How much is 2 plus 2 equal? What ever da fuck you wanna it to be!
>>
>>dats sci.math
>>
>>FRAUDS!
>>
>>
>
>Here is what happen...
>
>these guys got into a closed room
>
>and the leader sez... "We gotta change this number from 9 to 8!"
>
>
>and one guys sez..."Why?"
>
>
>the leader sez, "Because some motherfucker found a 10th planet and
>
>he's not even a fuckin member of our club, dats embarrassing!"
>
>he sez, "I'm not going to let dis motherfucker get the credit."
>
>So, who's got an idea How To change 9 to 8?
>
>After many stupid suggestions they agree on one stupid idea...
>
>
>A planet is a large celestial body that orbits a star, is massive
>enough for its own gravity to pull it into a nearly round shape, and
>has "cleared the neighborhood" around its orbit.
>
>https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/planets/what-is-a-planet/
>
>
>FUCK THOSE MOTHERFUCKERS International Astronomical Union (IAU) - A
>BUNCH OF PUSSIES!
>
>
>aRE YOU A MEMBER OF THE IAU? you are a fucking pussy..
>
>
>
>The Moon used to be called a planet...who changed it???
>
>Monday.

Monday means Moonday/Lunaday named after the planet Moon. That's a
fact!


Of course everybody knows the Moon/our Moon is a planetary object that
Revolves aound our Sun.

Sunday
Monday

What came first, the moon or the earth?

How come there is no Earthday? 

It should be somewhere near Monday and Sunday before Tuesday...



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#640585

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2025-11-05 00:00 -0800
Message-ID<pv0mgkh2ghp570o17fm4emhpj6r896p6ni@4ax.com>
In reply to#640584
On Tue, 04 Nov 2025 23:58:13 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 01 Nov 2025 13:13:23 -0700, The Starmaker
><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 22:24:21 -0700, The Starmaker
>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 09:59:55 -0700, The Starmaker
>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 23:48:18 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:24:58 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:21:12 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 20:48:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:21:37 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:52:17 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 12:37:15 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:28:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:36:36 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>In the 1940's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>the department of war
>>>>>>>>>>>>>the military,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>had the same problem...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>they sat around a table
>>>>>>>>>>>>>they had a conference
>>>>>>>>>>>>>and their solution was...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Albert Einstein.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>First I have to tell you the background
>>>>>>>>>>>>of how Einstein and I became acquainted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>At the time of Pearl Harbor, I was a re-
>>>>>>>>>>>>search chemist in the U. S. Department
>>>>>>>>>>>>of Agriculture. Soon after that, I applied
>>>>>>>>>>>>for a commission in the Navy. After a
>>>>>>>>>>>>long drawn-out fight with the Navy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>which included one rejection, I won the
>>>>>>>>>>>>fight, and received my commission as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>full lieutenant (equivalent to a captain
>>>>>>>>>>>>in the Army) on September 2, 1942.
>>>>>>>>>>>>After that it took more than a month until
>>>>>>>>>>>>I located a billet in the Bureau of Ord-
>>>>>>>>>>>>nance and was called in for active duty.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Mr. Clark, following Gamow’s book,
>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote about the “Division of High Ex-
>>>>>>>>>>>>plosives” in the Bureau of Ordnance,
>>>>>>>>>>>>but there was no such thing. The Bureau
>>>>>>>>>>>>had a “Research and Development Divi-
>>>>>>>>>>>>sion (Re),"" the ision had a section
>>>>>>>>>>>>called “Ammunition and Explosives
>>>>>>>>>>>>(Re2)", and the section had a subsec-
>>>>>>>>>>>>tion called “High Explosives and Propel-
>>>>>>>>>>>>lants (Re2c)."” I was assigned to Re2c.
>>>>>>>>>>>>It had two other reserve officers in it
>>>>>>>>>>>>when I joined, and we divided the work
>>>>>>>>>>>>among ourselves. One became head of
>>>>>>>>>>>>propellant research, I became head of
>>>>>>>>>>>>high explosives research, and the third,
>>>>>>>>>>>>who was a lieutenant j.g., became my
>>>>>>>>>>>>assistant and deputy. I was, on the basis
>>>>>>>>>>>>of my broad experience in the field, ex-
>>>>>>>>>>>>cellently qualified for my assignment. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>knew the names of two high explosives:
>>>>>>>>>>>>TNT and dynamite. With that knowl-
>>>>>>>>>>>>edge, I became head of high explosives
>>>>>>>>>>>>research and development for the world’s
>>>>>>>>>>>>largest Navy!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>But I was young and learned fast;
>>>>>>>>>>>>furthermore, the staff kept on growing as.
>>>>>>>>>>>>the war progressed. I acquired two
>>>>>>>>>>>>groups of civilian scientists; one headed
>>>>>>>>>>>>by one of the speakers at this meeting,
>>>>>>>>>>>>Raymond J. Seeger; another of tonight's
>>>>>>>>>>>>speakers, Harry Polachek, was in this
>>>>>>>>>>>>group; the other group was headed by
>>>>>>>>>>>>Gregory Hartmann, who eventually be-
>>>>>>>>>>>>came Technical Director of the post-
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>permission to visit him in Princeton. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>gracious consent came by return mail.
>>>>>>>>>>>>The visit took place on May 16. After
>>>>>>>>>>>>the pleasant preliminaries, I asked Ein-
>>>>>>>>>>>>stein whether he would be willing to be-
>>>>>>>>>>>>come a consultant for the Navy in general,
>>>>>>>>>>>>and for me, in the field of high explo-
>>>>>>>>>>>>sives research, in particular. Einstein was
>>>>>>>>>>>>tremendously pleased about the offer,
>>>>>>>>>>>>and very happily gave his consent. He
>>>>>>>>>>>>felt very bad about being neglected. He
>>>>>>>>>>>>had not been approached by anyone to
>>>>>>>>>>>>do any war work since the United States
>>>>>>>>>>>>entered the war. He said to me, “People
>>>>>>>>>>>>think that I am interested only in theory,
>>>>>>>>>>>>and not in anything practical. This is not
>>>>>>>>>>>>true. I was working in the Patent Office
>>>>>>>>>>>>in Zurich, and I participated in the de-
>>>>>>>>>>>>velopment of many inventions. The gyro-
>>>>>>>>>>>>scope too.”’ I said, “That's fine. You are
>>>>>>>>>>>>hired.”
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Here is a short explaination of why they hired Albert Einstein:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>" Calvert served on the Jack under Lt. Comdr. Tommy Dykers, and here
>>>>>>>>>>>is how he describes his sub’s first experience with the Mark 6
>>>>>>>>>>>exploder: “We worked into an excellent position and fired three
>>>>>>>>>>>torpedoes—the Jack ’s first war shots of her career. Short of the
>>>>>>>>>>>predicted torpedo run time, we heard a tremendous explosion. That
>>>>>>>>>>>should finish him, I thought.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>“‘ Damn those exploders … damn them all to hell! ’ said Dykers as he
>>>>>>>>>>>looked through the scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>“‘The first torpedo prematured … just before it got to the MOT [middle
>>>>>>>>>>>of the target] … and I don’t know whether the other two passed under
>>>>>>>>>>>without exploding, or missed. Son of a bitch from Baghdad !’ came the
>>>>>>>>>>>bitter exclamation from the skipper.” (Despite continuing torpedo
>>>>>>>>>>>trouble, Jack ’s later forays were considerably more successful.)"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Einstein soved the problem...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>"If I were asked to state what specific
>>>>>>>>>>>contributions were made by Einstein to
>>>>>>>>>>>our high explosives research, I would
>>>>>>>>>>>have to say this. New and more effec-
>>>>>>>>>>>tive high explosives were developed dur-
>>>>>>>>>>>ing the war, and they were used by the
>>>>>>>>>>>Navy and the Army (which then included
>>>>>>>>>>>the Air Force) against Germany, Japan
>>>>>>>>>>>and their allies. (I found out later that at
>>>>>>>>>>>least the underwater explosives, possibly
>>>>>>>>>>>others, were also used in the Korean and
>>>>>>>>>>>the Vietnam War.) But these develop-
>>>>>>>>>>>ments were the results of the efforts of
>>>>>>>>>>>large groups of people, including Ein-
>>>>>>>>>>>stein."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Einstein is da bomb!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>https://archive.navalsubleague.org/1986/dr-einstein-s-torpedo-letter
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Now, Albert Einstein got paid by the military $25.00 a day for his
>>>>>>>>>work...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In the movie "A House of Dynamite" (2025) it cost $50 billon
>>>>>>>>>dollars(and missed the target).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Einstein shouda asked for more money...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Les not forget..Einstein dropped TWO atomic bombs on Japan! He had
>>>>>>>>yellow fever.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>'the yellow peril' :(the political or military threat regarded as
>>>>>>>>being posed by the Chinese or by the peoples of Southeast Asia.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Albert Einstein referred to Chinese as 'industrious, filthy, obtuse
>>>>>>>>people'
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>“a peculiar herd-like nation… often more like automatons than people”,
>>>>>>>>adding: “Even the children are spiritless and look lethargic.”
>>>>>>>>“bandit-like filthy Levantines”
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>https://www.the-independent.com/news/science/albert-einstein-racism-travel-diaries-china-japan-zeev-rosenkranz-a8397226.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s11234.pdf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Don't shoot till you see the slant of ther eyes...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I'm surprised Einstein didn't write a book called..."Origin of the
>>>>>>>Chinks"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So, what color is Albert  Einstein? Purple?? 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Now, if you ask your favorite AI platform the same question...
>>>>>
>>>>>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>>>>>
>>>>>So, what color is Albert  Einstein?  
>>>>>
>>>>>You will notice a pause, then a quick juggling of words
>>>>>and differculty trying to answer that question...
>>>>>eventually it will spit out it's own definiton of WHITE PEOPLE.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You know how 'these science guys' are...
>>>>if the facts don't fit the theory...they change the facts!
>>>>
>>>>For example, they taught in science class to billions of students,
>>>>that there are 9 planets in our solar system...
>>>>
>>>>when they decided to 'wanna' change it to 8 planets, they changed the
>>>>definition of the word 'Planets' to fit their theory!!
>>>
>>>In other words, for 'them' to change the number from 9 planets to 8
>>>planets...'they' had to change the definition of the word Planets
>>>to 'fit' the number 8. The TRUTH was 'they' didn't want to add
>>>the number 10...so they change the facts to fit it to number 8.
>>>
>>>
>>>How much is 2 plus 2 equal? What ever da fuck you wanna it to be!
>>>
>>>dats sci.math
>>>
>>>FRAUDS!
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Here is what happen...
>>
>>these guys got into a closed room
>>
>>and the leader sez... "We gotta change this number from 9 to 8!"
>>
>>
>>and one guys sez..."Why?"
>>
>>
>>the leader sez, "Because some motherfucker found a 10th planet and
>>
>>he's not even a fuckin member of our club, dats embarrassing!"
>>
>>he sez, "I'm not going to let dis motherfucker get the credit."
>>
>>So, who's got an idea How To change 9 to 8?
>>
>>After many stupid suggestions they agree on one stupid idea...
>>
>>
>>A planet is a large celestial body that orbits a star, is massive
>>enough for its own gravity to pull it into a nearly round shape, and
>>has "cleared the neighborhood" around its orbit.
>>
>>https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/planets/what-is-a-planet/
>>
>>
>>FUCK THOSE MOTHERFUCKERS International Astronomical Union (IAU) - A
>>BUNCH OF PUSSIES!
>>
>>
>>aRE YOU A MEMBER OF THE IAU? you are a fucking pussy..
>>
>>
>>
>>The Moon used to be called a planet...who changed it???
>>
>>Monday.
>
>Monday means Moonday/Lunaday named after the planet Moon. That's a
>fact!
>
>
>Of course everybody knows the Moon/our Moon is a planetary object that
>Revolves aound our Sun.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon#:~:text=the%20Moon%20is%20a%20planetary%2Dmass%20object


>
>Sunday
>Monday
>
>What came first, the moon or the earth?
>
>How come there is no Earthday? 
>
>It should be somewhere near Monday and Sunday before Tuesday...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#640570

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2025-10-31 22:33 -0700
Message-ID<qd6bgkpeoq9mgip1njn283b98qgv4pd9re@4ax.com>
In reply to#640539
On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:24:58 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:21:12 -0700, The Starmaker
><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 20:48:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:21:37 -0700, The Starmaker
>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:52:17 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 12:37:15 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:28:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:36:36 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In the 1940's
>>>>>>>>the department of war
>>>>>>>>the military,
>>>>>>>>had the same problem...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>they sat around a table
>>>>>>>>they had a conference
>>>>>>>>and their solution was...
>>>>>>>>Albert Einstein.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>First I have to tell you the background
>>>>>>>of how Einstein and I became acquainted.
>>>>>>>At the time of Pearl Harbor, I was a re-
>>>>>>>search chemist in the U. S. Department
>>>>>>>of Agriculture. Soon after that, I applied
>>>>>>>for a commission in the Navy. After a
>>>>>>>long drawn-out fight with the Navy,
>>>>>>>which included one rejection, I won the
>>>>>>>fight, and received my commission as a
>>>>>>>full lieutenant (equivalent to a captain
>>>>>>>in the Army) on September 2, 1942.
>>>>>>>After that it took more than a month until
>>>>>>>I located a billet in the Bureau of Ord-
>>>>>>>nance and was called in for active duty.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Mr. Clark, following Gamow’s book,
>>>>>>>wrote about the “Division of High Ex-
>>>>>>>plosives” in the Bureau of Ordnance,
>>>>>>>but there was no such thing. The Bureau
>>>>>>>had a “Research and Development Divi-
>>>>>>>sion (Re),"" the ision had a section
>>>>>>>called “Ammunition and Explosives
>>>>>>>(Re2)", and the section had a subsec-
>>>>>>>tion called “High Explosives and Propel-
>>>>>>>lants (Re2c)."” I was assigned to Re2c.
>>>>>>>It had two other reserve officers in it
>>>>>>>when I joined, and we divided the work
>>>>>>>among ourselves. One became head of
>>>>>>>propellant research, I became head of
>>>>>>>high explosives research, and the third,
>>>>>>>who was a lieutenant j.g., became my
>>>>>>>assistant and deputy. I was, on the basis
>>>>>>>of my broad experience in the field, ex-
>>>>>>>cellently qualified for my assignment. I
>>>>>>>knew the names of two high explosives:
>>>>>>>TNT and dynamite. With that knowl-
>>>>>>>edge, I became head of high explosives
>>>>>>>research and development for the world’s
>>>>>>>largest Navy!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But I was young and learned fast;
>>>>>>>furthermore, the staff kept on growing as.
>>>>>>>the war progressed. I acquired two
>>>>>>>groups of civilian scientists; one headed
>>>>>>>by one of the speakers at this meeting,
>>>>>>>Raymond J. Seeger; another of tonight's
>>>>>>>speakers, Harry Polachek, was in this
>>>>>>>group; the other group was headed by
>>>>>>>Gregory Hartmann, who eventually be-
>>>>>>>came Technical Director of the post-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>permission to visit him in Princeton. The
>>>>>>>gracious consent came by return mail.
>>>>>>>The visit took place on May 16. After
>>>>>>>the pleasant preliminaries, I asked Ein-
>>>>>>>stein whether he would be willing to be-
>>>>>>>come a consultant for the Navy in general,
>>>>>>>and for me, in the field of high explo-
>>>>>>>sives research, in particular. Einstein was
>>>>>>>tremendously pleased about the offer,
>>>>>>>and very happily gave his consent. He
>>>>>>>felt very bad about being neglected. He
>>>>>>>had not been approached by anyone to
>>>>>>>do any war work since the United States
>>>>>>>entered the war. He said to me, “People
>>>>>>>think that I am interested only in theory,
>>>>>>>and not in anything practical. This is not
>>>>>>>true. I was working in the Patent Office
>>>>>>>in Zurich, and I participated in the de-
>>>>>>>velopment of many inventions. The gyro-
>>>>>>>scope too.”’ I said, “That's fine. You are
>>>>>>>hired.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Here is a short explaination of why they hired Albert Einstein:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>" Calvert served on the Jack under Lt. Comdr. Tommy Dykers, and here
>>>>>>is how he describes his sub’s first experience with the Mark 6
>>>>>>exploder: “We worked into an excellent position and fired three
>>>>>>torpedoes—the Jack ’s first war shots of her career. Short of the
>>>>>>predicted torpedo run time, we heard a tremendous explosion. That
>>>>>>should finish him, I thought.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>“‘ Damn those exploders … damn them all to hell! ’ said Dykers as he
>>>>>>looked through the scope.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>“‘The first torpedo prematured … just before it got to the MOT [middle
>>>>>>of the target] … and I don’t know whether the other two passed under
>>>>>>without exploding, or missed. Son of a bitch from Baghdad !’ came the
>>>>>>bitter exclamation from the skipper.” (Despite continuing torpedo
>>>>>>trouble, Jack ’s later forays were considerably more successful.)"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Einstein soved the problem...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"If I were asked to state what specific
>>>>>>contributions were made by Einstein to
>>>>>>our high explosives research, I would
>>>>>>have to say this. New and more effec-
>>>>>>tive high explosives were developed dur-
>>>>>>ing the war, and they were used by the
>>>>>>Navy and the Army (which then included
>>>>>>the Air Force) against Germany, Japan
>>>>>>and their allies. (I found out later that at
>>>>>>least the underwater explosives, possibly
>>>>>>others, were also used in the Korean and
>>>>>>the Vietnam War.) But these develop-
>>>>>>ments were the results of the efforts of
>>>>>>large groups of people, including Ein-
>>>>>>stein."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Einstein is da bomb!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>https://archive.navalsubleague.org/1986/dr-einstein-s-torpedo-letter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Now, Albert Einstein got paid by the military $25.00 a day for his
>>>>work...
>>>>
>>>>In the movie "A House of Dynamite" (2025) it cost $50 billon
>>>>dollars(and missed the target).
>>>>
>>>>Einstein shouda asked for more money...
>>>
>>>Les not forget..Einstein dropped TWO atomic bombs on Japan! He had
>>>yellow fever.
>>>
>>>'the yellow peril' :(the political or military threat regarded as
>>>being posed by the Chinese or by the peoples of Southeast Asia.)
>>>
>>>Albert Einstein referred to Chinese as 'industrious, filthy, obtuse
>>>people'
>>>
>>>“a peculiar herd-like nation… often more like automatons than people”,
>>>adding: “Even the children are spiritless and look lethargic.”
>>>“bandit-like filthy Levantines”
>>>
>>>https://www.the-independent.com/news/science/albert-einstein-racism-travel-diaries-china-japan-zeev-rosenkranz-a8397226.html
>>>
>>>http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s11234.pdf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Don't shoot till you see the slant of ther eyes...
>>
>>I'm surprised Einstein didn't write a book called..."Origin of the
>>Chinks"
>
>
>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>
>So, what color is Albert  Einstein? Purple?? 

I wrote Purple for a good reason..

Obvisouly, Albert Einstein doesn't consider himself to be a "white
people" oe a white person.

So what color does Albert Einstein thinks he is? Certaintly not
Yellow!

Black? Red?? one of the Brown people??

Well, if you have a Jewish  best friend, ask him, "What color are
you?"

He might respond (unfriendly) "What do you mean what color am I??"

You say, "Are you a White person?"

If he's a honest person he'll say..."I'm not White!"


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#640573

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2025-11-01 15:01 -0700
Message-ID<480dgkp4ev44ielid6s0ckmgp5e4ikhivs@4ax.com>
In reply to#640570
On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 22:33:57 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:24:58 -0700, The Starmaker
><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:21:12 -0700, The Starmaker
>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 20:48:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:21:37 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:52:17 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 12:37:15 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:28:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:36:36 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In the 1940's
>>>>>>>>>the department of war
>>>>>>>>>the military,
>>>>>>>>>had the same problem...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>they sat around a table
>>>>>>>>>they had a conference
>>>>>>>>>and their solution was...
>>>>>>>>>Albert Einstein.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>First I have to tell you the background
>>>>>>>>of how Einstein and I became acquainted.
>>>>>>>>At the time of Pearl Harbor, I was a re-
>>>>>>>>search chemist in the U. S. Department
>>>>>>>>of Agriculture. Soon after that, I applied
>>>>>>>>for a commission in the Navy. After a
>>>>>>>>long drawn-out fight with the Navy,
>>>>>>>>which included one rejection, I won the
>>>>>>>>fight, and received my commission as a
>>>>>>>>full lieutenant (equivalent to a captain
>>>>>>>>in the Army) on September 2, 1942.
>>>>>>>>After that it took more than a month until
>>>>>>>>I located a billet in the Bureau of Ord-
>>>>>>>>nance and was called in for active duty.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Mr. Clark, following Gamow’s book,
>>>>>>>>wrote about the “Division of High Ex-
>>>>>>>>plosives” in the Bureau of Ordnance,
>>>>>>>>but there was no such thing. The Bureau
>>>>>>>>had a “Research and Development Divi-
>>>>>>>>sion (Re),"" the ision had a section
>>>>>>>>called “Ammunition and Explosives
>>>>>>>>(Re2)", and the section had a subsec-
>>>>>>>>tion called “High Explosives and Propel-
>>>>>>>>lants (Re2c)."” I was assigned to Re2c.
>>>>>>>>It had two other reserve officers in it
>>>>>>>>when I joined, and we divided the work
>>>>>>>>among ourselves. One became head of
>>>>>>>>propellant research, I became head of
>>>>>>>>high explosives research, and the third,
>>>>>>>>who was a lieutenant j.g., became my
>>>>>>>>assistant and deputy. I was, on the basis
>>>>>>>>of my broad experience in the field, ex-
>>>>>>>>cellently qualified for my assignment. I
>>>>>>>>knew the names of two high explosives:
>>>>>>>>TNT and dynamite. With that knowl-
>>>>>>>>edge, I became head of high explosives
>>>>>>>>research and development for the world’s
>>>>>>>>largest Navy!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>But I was young and learned fast;
>>>>>>>>furthermore, the staff kept on growing as.
>>>>>>>>the war progressed. I acquired two
>>>>>>>>groups of civilian scientists; one headed
>>>>>>>>by one of the speakers at this meeting,
>>>>>>>>Raymond J. Seeger; another of tonight's
>>>>>>>>speakers, Harry Polachek, was in this
>>>>>>>>group; the other group was headed by
>>>>>>>>Gregory Hartmann, who eventually be-
>>>>>>>>came Technical Director of the post-
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>permission to visit him in Princeton. The
>>>>>>>>gracious consent came by return mail.
>>>>>>>>The visit took place on May 16. After
>>>>>>>>the pleasant preliminaries, I asked Ein-
>>>>>>>>stein whether he would be willing to be-
>>>>>>>>come a consultant for the Navy in general,
>>>>>>>>and for me, in the field of high explo-
>>>>>>>>sives research, in particular. Einstein was
>>>>>>>>tremendously pleased about the offer,
>>>>>>>>and very happily gave his consent. He
>>>>>>>>felt very bad about being neglected. He
>>>>>>>>had not been approached by anyone to
>>>>>>>>do any war work since the United States
>>>>>>>>entered the war. He said to me, “People
>>>>>>>>think that I am interested only in theory,
>>>>>>>>and not in anything practical. This is not
>>>>>>>>true. I was working in the Patent Office
>>>>>>>>in Zurich, and I participated in the de-
>>>>>>>>velopment of many inventions. The gyro-
>>>>>>>>scope too.”’ I said, “That's fine. You are
>>>>>>>>hired.”
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Here is a short explaination of why they hired Albert Einstein:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>" Calvert served on the Jack under Lt. Comdr. Tommy Dykers, and here
>>>>>>>is how he describes his sub’s first experience with the Mark 6
>>>>>>>exploder: “We worked into an excellent position and fired three
>>>>>>>torpedoes—the Jack ’s first war shots of her career. Short of the
>>>>>>>predicted torpedo run time, we heard a tremendous explosion. That
>>>>>>>should finish him, I thought.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>“‘ Damn those exploders … damn them all to hell! ’ said Dykers as he
>>>>>>>looked through the scope.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>“‘The first torpedo prematured … just before it got to the MOT [middle
>>>>>>>of the target] … and I don’t know whether the other two passed under
>>>>>>>without exploding, or missed. Son of a bitch from Baghdad !’ came the
>>>>>>>bitter exclamation from the skipper.” (Despite continuing torpedo
>>>>>>>trouble, Jack ’s later forays were considerably more successful.)"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Einstein soved the problem...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"If I were asked to state what specific
>>>>>>>contributions were made by Einstein to
>>>>>>>our high explosives research, I would
>>>>>>>have to say this. New and more effec-
>>>>>>>tive high explosives were developed dur-
>>>>>>>ing the war, and they were used by the
>>>>>>>Navy and the Army (which then included
>>>>>>>the Air Force) against Germany, Japan
>>>>>>>and their allies. (I found out later that at
>>>>>>>least the underwater explosives, possibly
>>>>>>>others, were also used in the Korean and
>>>>>>>the Vietnam War.) But these develop-
>>>>>>>ments were the results of the efforts of
>>>>>>>large groups of people, including Ein-
>>>>>>>stein."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Einstein is da bomb!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>https://archive.navalsubleague.org/1986/dr-einstein-s-torpedo-letter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Now, Albert Einstein got paid by the military $25.00 a day for his
>>>>>work...
>>>>>
>>>>>In the movie "A House of Dynamite" (2025) it cost $50 billon
>>>>>dollars(and missed the target).
>>>>>
>>>>>Einstein shouda asked for more money...
>>>>
>>>>Les not forget..Einstein dropped TWO atomic bombs on Japan! He had
>>>>yellow fever.
>>>>
>>>>'the yellow peril' :(the political or military threat regarded as
>>>>being posed by the Chinese or by the peoples of Southeast Asia.)
>>>>
>>>>Albert Einstein referred to Chinese as 'industrious, filthy, obtuse
>>>>people'
>>>>
>>>>“a peculiar herd-like nation… often more like automatons than people”,
>>>>adding: “Even the children are spiritless and look lethargic.”
>>>>“bandit-like filthy Levantines”
>>>>
>>>>https://www.the-independent.com/news/science/albert-einstein-racism-travel-diaries-china-japan-zeev-rosenkranz-a8397226.html
>>>>
>>>>http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s11234.pdf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Don't shoot till you see the slant of ther eyes...
>>>
>>>I'm surprised Einstein didn't write a book called..."Origin of the
>>>Chinks"
>>
>>
>>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>>
>>So, what color is Albert  Einstein? Purple?? 
>
>I wrote Purple for a good reason..
>
>Obvisouly, Albert Einstein doesn't consider himself to be a "white
>people" oe a white person.
>
>So what color does Albert Einstein thinks he is? Certaintly not
>Yellow!
>
>Black? Red?? one of the Brown people??
>
>Well, if you have a Jewish  best friend, ask him, "What color are
>you?"
>
>He might respond (unfriendly) "What do you mean what color am I??"
>
>You say, "Are you a White person?"
>
>If he's a honest person he'll say..."I'm not White!"

Now, what did Albert Einstein think of about the people from India?

Indians, Einstein seemed to have believed, were "biologically
inferior" and were hampered by the subcontinent's climate that
"prevented them from thinking backward or forward by more than a
quarter of an hour."


"prevented them from thinking backward or forward by more than a
quarter of an hour." ????

WHAT DA HELL DOES THAT EVEN MEAN???


Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”


What does Albert Einstein think about...'women'?


" thinking backward or forward by more than a quarter of an hour.."




How does one think backwards????


after 15 minutes my head hurts!










[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#640577

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2025-11-02 11:35 -0800
Message-ID<6uafgkda8f33ib0odjumsu6hsqs2s3h7pq@4ax.com>
In reply to#640573
On Sat, 01 Nov 2025 15:01:21 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 22:33:57 -0700, The Starmaker
><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:24:58 -0700, The Starmaker
>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:21:12 -0700, The Starmaker
>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 20:48:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:21:37 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:52:17 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 12:37:15 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:28:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:36:36 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>In the 1940's
>>>>>>>>>>the department of war
>>>>>>>>>>the military,
>>>>>>>>>>had the same problem...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>they sat around a table
>>>>>>>>>>they had a conference
>>>>>>>>>>and their solution was...
>>>>>>>>>>Albert Einstein.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>First I have to tell you the background
>>>>>>>>>of how Einstein and I became acquainted.
>>>>>>>>>At the time of Pearl Harbor, I was a re-
>>>>>>>>>search chemist in the U. S. Department
>>>>>>>>>of Agriculture. Soon after that, I applied
>>>>>>>>>for a commission in the Navy. After a
>>>>>>>>>long drawn-out fight with the Navy,
>>>>>>>>>which included one rejection, I won the
>>>>>>>>>fight, and received my commission as a
>>>>>>>>>full lieutenant (equivalent to a captain
>>>>>>>>>in the Army) on September 2, 1942.
>>>>>>>>>After that it took more than a month until
>>>>>>>>>I located a billet in the Bureau of Ord-
>>>>>>>>>nance and was called in for active duty.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Mr. Clark, following Gamow’s book,
>>>>>>>>>wrote about the “Division of High Ex-
>>>>>>>>>plosives” in the Bureau of Ordnance,
>>>>>>>>>but there was no such thing. The Bureau
>>>>>>>>>had a “Research and Development Divi-
>>>>>>>>>sion (Re),"" the ision had a section
>>>>>>>>>called “Ammunition and Explosives
>>>>>>>>>(Re2)", and the section had a subsec-
>>>>>>>>>tion called “High Explosives and Propel-
>>>>>>>>>lants (Re2c)."” I was assigned to Re2c.
>>>>>>>>>It had two other reserve officers in it
>>>>>>>>>when I joined, and we divided the work
>>>>>>>>>among ourselves. One became head of
>>>>>>>>>propellant research, I became head of
>>>>>>>>>high explosives research, and the third,
>>>>>>>>>who was a lieutenant j.g., became my
>>>>>>>>>assistant and deputy. I was, on the basis
>>>>>>>>>of my broad experience in the field, ex-
>>>>>>>>>cellently qualified for my assignment. I
>>>>>>>>>knew the names of two high explosives:
>>>>>>>>>TNT and dynamite. With that knowl-
>>>>>>>>>edge, I became head of high explosives
>>>>>>>>>research and development for the world’s
>>>>>>>>>largest Navy!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>But I was young and learned fast;
>>>>>>>>>furthermore, the staff kept on growing as.
>>>>>>>>>the war progressed. I acquired two
>>>>>>>>>groups of civilian scientists; one headed
>>>>>>>>>by one of the speakers at this meeting,
>>>>>>>>>Raymond J. Seeger; another of tonight's
>>>>>>>>>speakers, Harry Polachek, was in this
>>>>>>>>>group; the other group was headed by
>>>>>>>>>Gregory Hartmann, who eventually be-
>>>>>>>>>came Technical Director of the post-
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>permission to visit him in Princeton. The
>>>>>>>>>gracious consent came by return mail.
>>>>>>>>>The visit took place on May 16. After
>>>>>>>>>the pleasant preliminaries, I asked Ein-
>>>>>>>>>stein whether he would be willing to be-
>>>>>>>>>come a consultant for the Navy in general,
>>>>>>>>>and for me, in the field of high explo-
>>>>>>>>>sives research, in particular. Einstein was
>>>>>>>>>tremendously pleased about the offer,
>>>>>>>>>and very happily gave his consent. He
>>>>>>>>>felt very bad about being neglected. He
>>>>>>>>>had not been approached by anyone to
>>>>>>>>>do any war work since the United States
>>>>>>>>>entered the war. He said to me, “People
>>>>>>>>>think that I am interested only in theory,
>>>>>>>>>and not in anything practical. This is not
>>>>>>>>>true. I was working in the Patent Office
>>>>>>>>>in Zurich, and I participated in the de-
>>>>>>>>>velopment of many inventions. The gyro-
>>>>>>>>>scope too.”’ I said, “That's fine. You are
>>>>>>>>>hired.”
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Here is a short explaination of why they hired Albert Einstein:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>" Calvert served on the Jack under Lt. Comdr. Tommy Dykers, and here
>>>>>>>>is how he describes his sub’s first experience with the Mark 6
>>>>>>>>exploder: “We worked into an excellent position and fired three
>>>>>>>>torpedoes—the Jack ’s first war shots of her career. Short of the
>>>>>>>>predicted torpedo run time, we heard a tremendous explosion. That
>>>>>>>>should finish him, I thought.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>“‘ Damn those exploders … damn them all to hell! ’ said Dykers as he
>>>>>>>>looked through the scope.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>“‘The first torpedo prematured … just before it got to the MOT [middle
>>>>>>>>of the target] … and I don’t know whether the other two passed under
>>>>>>>>without exploding, or missed. Son of a bitch from Baghdad !’ came the
>>>>>>>>bitter exclamation from the skipper.” (Despite continuing torpedo
>>>>>>>>trouble, Jack ’s later forays were considerably more successful.)"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Einstein soved the problem...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"If I were asked to state what specific
>>>>>>>>contributions were made by Einstein to
>>>>>>>>our high explosives research, I would
>>>>>>>>have to say this. New and more effec-
>>>>>>>>tive high explosives were developed dur-
>>>>>>>>ing the war, and they were used by the
>>>>>>>>Navy and the Army (which then included
>>>>>>>>the Air Force) against Germany, Japan
>>>>>>>>and their allies. (I found out later that at
>>>>>>>>least the underwater explosives, possibly
>>>>>>>>others, were also used in the Korean and
>>>>>>>>the Vietnam War.) But these develop-
>>>>>>>>ments were the results of the efforts of
>>>>>>>>large groups of people, including Ein-
>>>>>>>>stein."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Einstein is da bomb!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>https://archive.navalsubleague.org/1986/dr-einstein-s-torpedo-letter
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Now, Albert Einstein got paid by the military $25.00 a day for his
>>>>>>work...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>In the movie "A House of Dynamite" (2025) it cost $50 billon
>>>>>>dollars(and missed the target).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Einstein shouda asked for more money...
>>>>>
>>>>>Les not forget..Einstein dropped TWO atomic bombs on Japan! He had
>>>>>yellow fever.
>>>>>
>>>>>'the yellow peril' :(the political or military threat regarded as
>>>>>being posed by the Chinese or by the peoples of Southeast Asia.)
>>>>>
>>>>>Albert Einstein referred to Chinese as 'industrious, filthy, obtuse
>>>>>people'
>>>>>
>>>>>“a peculiar herd-like nation… often more like automatons than people”,
>>>>>adding: “Even the children are spiritless and look lethargic.”
>>>>>“bandit-like filthy Levantines”
>>>>>
>>>>>https://www.the-independent.com/news/science/albert-einstein-racism-travel-diaries-china-japan-zeev-rosenkranz-a8397226.html
>>>>>
>>>>>http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s11234.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Don't shoot till you see the slant of ther eyes...
>>>>
>>>>I'm surprised Einstein didn't write a book called..."Origin of the
>>>>Chinks"
>>>
>>>
>>>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>>>
>>>So, what color is Albert  Einstein? Purple?? 
>>
>>I wrote Purple for a good reason..
>>
>>Obvisouly, Albert Einstein doesn't consider himself to be a "white
>>people" oe a white person.
>>
>>So what color does Albert Einstein thinks he is? Certaintly not
>>Yellow!
>>
>>Black? Red?? one of the Brown people??
>>
>>Well, if you have a Jewish  best friend, ask him, "What color are
>>you?"
>>
>>He might respond (unfriendly) "What do you mean what color am I??"
>>
>>You say, "Are you a White person?"
>>
>>If he's a honest person he'll say..."I'm not White!"
>
>Now, what did Albert Einstein think of about the people from India?
>
>Indians, Einstein seemed to have believed, were "biologically
>inferior" and were hampered by the subcontinent's climate that
>"prevented them from thinking backward or forward by more than a
>quarter of an hour."
>
>
>"prevented them from thinking backward or forward by more than a
>quarter of an hour." ????
>
>WHAT DA HELL DOES THAT EVEN MEAN???
>
>
>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>
>
>What does Albert Einstein think about...'women'?
>
>
>" thinking backward or forward by more than a quarter of an hour.."
>
>
>
>
>How does one think backwards????
>
>
>after 15 minutes my head hurts!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


According to Albert Einstein he see's the whole entire human race as
being biologically inferior...
I guess to him.


Do you know WHY he stuck his tongue out in that famous photo?
https://allthatsinteresting.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/einstein-picture-cropped-closeup.jpg

cause he views the entire human race as a bunch of fucking lizards.

i look in the mirror and i don't see any resemblance of a lizard so i
don't get it.

i'm no einstein.

i can understand why einstein and people like him want to blow up the
whole earth.

btw, I heard something..
This is suppose to be a secret
You are not suppose to know this..
But there are scientists today
planing to build a rocketship
to Mars, and colonize it with 'their people'
and blow up the earth by remote control. ..
push a button, start WW5, and trigger nucluer bombs
everywhere on earth...
then when the air is clear
they will back to earth...
and Take Over.

Start again...something like that.
https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1719429262778990909/photo/1

sounds like a good idea...

I know there is going to be  a room
where someone seated is
going to push the button...
and if you look out the window..
you can see the Earth from Mars.




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#640583

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2025-11-04 23:39 -0800
Message-ID<ckvlgk1qkhok8fag96n55p6rueg4rqpk2d@4ax.com>
In reply to#640577
Einstein seems to see the Japanese as less than fully human—he
definitely perceives their individuality as not fully developed. His
first recorded impression of Japanese women is almost caricature-like:
he describes them as “crawling about [on deck] with children. They
look ornate and bewildered, almost as if stylized. Black-eyed,
black-haired, large-headed, scurrying.”  After three weeks on board,
Einstein does not seem to have penetrated the mysterious nature of his
fellow Japanese passengers: “Japanese very devout. Weird fellows whose
state is at the same time their religion.”  His first encounters with
Japanese music add to his sense of alienation: he finds their music
“very foreign” and their singing made him “dizzy.” 


So, a penquin walks into a bar and ask
the bartender, "Have you seen my brother"?

the bartender sez, "What does he look like?"




On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 11:35:53 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 01 Nov 2025 15:01:21 -0700, The Starmaker
><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 22:33:57 -0700, The Starmaker
>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:24:58 -0700, The Starmaker
>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:21:12 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 20:48:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:21:37 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:52:17 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 12:37:15 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:28:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:36:36 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In the 1940's
>>>>>>>>>>>the department of war
>>>>>>>>>>>the military,
>>>>>>>>>>>had the same problem...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>they sat around a table
>>>>>>>>>>>they had a conference
>>>>>>>>>>>and their solution was...
>>>>>>>>>>>Albert Einstein.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>First I have to tell you the background
>>>>>>>>>>of how Einstein and I became acquainted.
>>>>>>>>>>At the time of Pearl Harbor, I was a re-
>>>>>>>>>>search chemist in the U. S. Department
>>>>>>>>>>of Agriculture. Soon after that, I applied
>>>>>>>>>>for a commission in the Navy. After a
>>>>>>>>>>long drawn-out fight with the Navy,
>>>>>>>>>>which included one rejection, I won the
>>>>>>>>>>fight, and received my commission as a
>>>>>>>>>>full lieutenant (equivalent to a captain
>>>>>>>>>>in the Army) on September 2, 1942.
>>>>>>>>>>After that it took more than a month until
>>>>>>>>>>I located a billet in the Bureau of Ord-
>>>>>>>>>>nance and was called in for active duty.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Mr. Clark, following Gamow’s book,
>>>>>>>>>>wrote about the “Division of High Ex-
>>>>>>>>>>plosives” in the Bureau of Ordnance,
>>>>>>>>>>but there was no such thing. The Bureau
>>>>>>>>>>had a “Research and Development Divi-
>>>>>>>>>>sion (Re),"" the ision had a section
>>>>>>>>>>called “Ammunition and Explosives
>>>>>>>>>>(Re2)", and the section had a subsec-
>>>>>>>>>>tion called “High Explosives and Propel-
>>>>>>>>>>lants (Re2c)."” I was assigned to Re2c.
>>>>>>>>>>It had two other reserve officers in it
>>>>>>>>>>when I joined, and we divided the work
>>>>>>>>>>among ourselves. One became head of
>>>>>>>>>>propellant research, I became head of
>>>>>>>>>>high explosives research, and the third,
>>>>>>>>>>who was a lieutenant j.g., became my
>>>>>>>>>>assistant and deputy. I was, on the basis
>>>>>>>>>>of my broad experience in the field, ex-
>>>>>>>>>>cellently qualified for my assignment. I
>>>>>>>>>>knew the names of two high explosives:
>>>>>>>>>>TNT and dynamite. With that knowl-
>>>>>>>>>>edge, I became head of high explosives
>>>>>>>>>>research and development for the world’s
>>>>>>>>>>largest Navy!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>But I was young and learned fast;
>>>>>>>>>>furthermore, the staff kept on growing as.
>>>>>>>>>>the war progressed. I acquired two
>>>>>>>>>>groups of civilian scientists; one headed
>>>>>>>>>>by one of the speakers at this meeting,
>>>>>>>>>>Raymond J. Seeger; another of tonight's
>>>>>>>>>>speakers, Harry Polachek, was in this
>>>>>>>>>>group; the other group was headed by
>>>>>>>>>>Gregory Hartmann, who eventually be-
>>>>>>>>>>came Technical Director of the post-
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>permission to visit him in Princeton. The
>>>>>>>>>>gracious consent came by return mail.
>>>>>>>>>>The visit took place on May 16. After
>>>>>>>>>>the pleasant preliminaries, I asked Ein-
>>>>>>>>>>stein whether he would be willing to be-
>>>>>>>>>>come a consultant for the Navy in general,
>>>>>>>>>>and for me, in the field of high explo-
>>>>>>>>>>sives research, in particular. Einstein was
>>>>>>>>>>tremendously pleased about the offer,
>>>>>>>>>>and very happily gave his consent. He
>>>>>>>>>>felt very bad about being neglected. He
>>>>>>>>>>had not been approached by anyone to
>>>>>>>>>>do any war work since the United States
>>>>>>>>>>entered the war. He said to me, “People
>>>>>>>>>>think that I am interested only in theory,
>>>>>>>>>>and not in anything practical. This is not
>>>>>>>>>>true. I was working in the Patent Office
>>>>>>>>>>in Zurich, and I participated in the de-
>>>>>>>>>>velopment of many inventions. The gyro-
>>>>>>>>>>scope too.”’ I said, “That's fine. You are
>>>>>>>>>>hired.”
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Here is a short explaination of why they hired Albert Einstein:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>" Calvert served on the Jack under Lt. Comdr. Tommy Dykers, and here
>>>>>>>>>is how he describes his sub’s first experience with the Mark 6
>>>>>>>>>exploder: “We worked into an excellent position and fired three
>>>>>>>>>torpedoes—the Jack ’s first war shots of her career. Short of the
>>>>>>>>>predicted torpedo run time, we heard a tremendous explosion. That
>>>>>>>>>should finish him, I thought.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>“‘ Damn those exploders … damn them all to hell! ’ said Dykers as he
>>>>>>>>>looked through the scope.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>“‘The first torpedo prematured … just before it got to the MOT [middle
>>>>>>>>>of the target] … and I don’t know whether the other two passed under
>>>>>>>>>without exploding, or missed. Son of a bitch from Baghdad !’ came the
>>>>>>>>>bitter exclamation from the skipper.” (Despite continuing torpedo
>>>>>>>>>trouble, Jack ’s later forays were considerably more successful.)"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Einstein soved the problem...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"If I were asked to state what specific
>>>>>>>>>contributions were made by Einstein to
>>>>>>>>>our high explosives research, I would
>>>>>>>>>have to say this. New and more effec-
>>>>>>>>>tive high explosives were developed dur-
>>>>>>>>>ing the war, and they were used by the
>>>>>>>>>Navy and the Army (which then included
>>>>>>>>>the Air Force) against Germany, Japan
>>>>>>>>>and their allies. (I found out later that at
>>>>>>>>>least the underwater explosives, possibly
>>>>>>>>>others, were also used in the Korean and
>>>>>>>>>the Vietnam War.) But these develop-
>>>>>>>>>ments were the results of the efforts of
>>>>>>>>>large groups of people, including Ein-
>>>>>>>>>stein."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Einstein is da bomb!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>https://archive.navalsubleague.org/1986/dr-einstein-s-torpedo-letter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Now, Albert Einstein got paid by the military $25.00 a day for his
>>>>>>>work...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In the movie "A House of Dynamite" (2025) it cost $50 billon
>>>>>>>dollars(and missed the target).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Einstein shouda asked for more money...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Les not forget..Einstein dropped TWO atomic bombs on Japan! He had
>>>>>>yellow fever.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>'the yellow peril' :(the political or military threat regarded as
>>>>>>being posed by the Chinese or by the peoples of Southeast Asia.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Albert Einstein referred to Chinese as 'industrious, filthy, obtuse
>>>>>>people'
>>>>>>
>>>>>>“a peculiar herd-like nation… often more like automatons than people”,
>>>>>>adding: “Even the children are spiritless and look lethargic.”
>>>>>>“bandit-like filthy Levantines”
>>>>>>
>>>>>>https://www.the-independent.com/news/science/albert-einstein-racism-travel-diaries-china-japan-zeev-rosenkranz-a8397226.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s11234.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Don't shoot till you see the slant of ther eyes...
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm surprised Einstein didn't write a book called..."Origin of the
>>>>>Chinks"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>>>>
>>>>So, what color is Albert  Einstein? Purple?? 
>>>
>>>I wrote Purple for a good reason..
>>>
>>>Obvisouly, Albert Einstein doesn't consider himself to be a "white
>>>people" oe a white person.
>>>
>>>So what color does Albert Einstein thinks he is? Certaintly not
>>>Yellow!
>>>
>>>Black? Red?? one of the Brown people??
>>>
>>>Well, if you have a Jewish  best friend, ask him, "What color are
>>>you?"
>>>
>>>He might respond (unfriendly) "What do you mean what color am I??"
>>>
>>>You say, "Are you a White person?"
>>>
>>>If he's a honest person he'll say..."I'm not White!"
>>
>>Now, what did Albert Einstein think of about the people from India?
>>
>>Indians, Einstein seemed to have believed, were "biologically
>>inferior" and were hampered by the subcontinent's climate that
>>"prevented them from thinking backward or forward by more than a
>>quarter of an hour."
>>
>>
>>"prevented them from thinking backward or forward by more than a
>>quarter of an hour." ????
>>
>>WHAT DA HELL DOES THAT EVEN MEAN???
>>
>>
>>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>>
>>
>>What does Albert Einstein think about...'women'?
>>
>>
>>" thinking backward or forward by more than a quarter of an hour.."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>How does one think backwards????
>>
>>
>>after 15 minutes my head hurts!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>According to Albert Einstein he see's the whole entire human race as
>being biologically inferior...
>I guess to him.
>
>
>Do you know WHY he stuck his tongue out in that famous photo?
>https://allthatsinteresting.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/einstein-picture-cropped-closeup.jpg
>
>cause he views the entire human race as a bunch of fucking lizards.
>
>i look in the mirror and i don't see any resemblance of a lizard so i
>don't get it.
>
>i'm no einstein.
>
>i can understand why einstein and people like him want to blow up the
>whole earth.
>
>btw, I heard something..
>This is suppose to be a secret
>You are not suppose to know this..
>But there are scientists today
>planing to build a rocketship
>to Mars, and colonize it with 'their people'
>and blow up the earth by remote control. ..
>push a button, start WW5, and trigger nucluer bombs
>everywhere on earth...
>then when the air is clear
>they will back to earth...
>and Take Over.
>
>Start again...something like that.
>https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1719429262778990909/photo/1
>
>sounds like a good idea...
>
>I know there is going to be  a room
>where someone seated is
>going to push the button...
>and if you look out the window..
>you can see the Earth from Mars.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#640605

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2025-11-06 21:41 -0800
Message-ID<ki1rgklu51321vqner92jugv4g57b9lfnf@4ax.com>
In reply to#640583
"This morning at 7 a.m. we went on land and, together with the Du
Plâtres, viewed the Hindu quarter of Colombo and a Buddhist temple.20
We drove in individual little carts that were drawn on the double by
Herculean
and yet so refined people. I was very much ashamed of myself for being
complicit in such despicable treatment of human beings
but couldn’t change anything. Because these beggars in the form of
kings descend in droves on any foreigner until he has surrendered to
them. They know how to implore and to beg until one’s heart is shaken
up. On the streets of the indigenous quarter one can see how these
fine people spend their primitive lives.21 For all their fineness,
they give the impression that the climate prevents them from thinking
backward or forward by more than a quarter of an hour. They live in
great filth and considerable stench down on the ground, do little, and
need little. Simple economic cycle of life. Far too penned up to allow
any distinct existence for the individual. Half-naked, they reveal
their fine and yet powerful bodies and their fine, patient faces.
Nowhere
shouting like the Levantines in Port Said. No brutality, no market
crying existence, but quiet, acquiescent drifting along, albeit not
lacking in a certain lightheartedness. Once you take a proper look at
these people, you can hardly take pleasure in the Europeans anymore,
because they are more effete and more brutal and look so much cruder
and greedier—and therein unfortunately lies their practical
superiority, their ability to take on grand things and carry them out.
Wouldn’t we too, in this climate, become like the Indians?" -Albert
Einstein




On Tue, 04 Nov 2025 23:39:47 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>Einstein seems to see the Japanese as less than fully human—he
>definitely perceives their individuality as not fully developed. His
>first recorded impression of Japanese women is almost caricature-like:
>he describes them as “crawling about [on deck] with children. They
>look ornate and bewildered, almost as if stylized. Black-eyed,
>black-haired, large-headed, scurrying.”  After three weeks on board,
>Einstein does not seem to have penetrated the mysterious nature of his
>fellow Japanese passengers: “Japanese very devout. Weird fellows whose
>state is at the same time their religion.”  His first encounters with
>Japanese music add to his sense of alienation: he finds their music
>“very foreign” and their singing made him “dizzy.” 
>
>
>So, a penquin walks into a bar and ask
>the bartender, "Have you seen my brother"?
>
>the bartender sez, "What does he look like?"
>
>
>
>
>On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 11:35:53 -0800, The Starmaker
><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 01 Nov 2025 15:01:21 -0700, The Starmaker
>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 22:33:57 -0700, The Starmaker
>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:24:58 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:21:12 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 20:48:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:21:37 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:52:17 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 12:37:15 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:28:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:36:36 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>In the 1940's
>>>>>>>>>>>>the department of war
>>>>>>>>>>>>the military,
>>>>>>>>>>>>had the same problem...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>they sat around a table
>>>>>>>>>>>>they had a conference
>>>>>>>>>>>>and their solution was...
>>>>>>>>>>>>Albert Einstein.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>First I have to tell you the background
>>>>>>>>>>>of how Einstein and I became acquainted.
>>>>>>>>>>>At the time of Pearl Harbor, I was a re-
>>>>>>>>>>>search chemist in the U. S. Department
>>>>>>>>>>>of Agriculture. Soon after that, I applied
>>>>>>>>>>>for a commission in the Navy. After a
>>>>>>>>>>>long drawn-out fight with the Navy,
>>>>>>>>>>>which included one rejection, I won the
>>>>>>>>>>>fight, and received my commission as a
>>>>>>>>>>>full lieutenant (equivalent to a captain
>>>>>>>>>>>in the Army) on September 2, 1942.
>>>>>>>>>>>After that it took more than a month until
>>>>>>>>>>>I located a billet in the Bureau of Ord-
>>>>>>>>>>>nance and was called in for active duty.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Mr. Clark, following Gamow’s book,
>>>>>>>>>>>wrote about the “Division of High Ex-
>>>>>>>>>>>plosives” in the Bureau of Ordnance,
>>>>>>>>>>>but there was no such thing. The Bureau
>>>>>>>>>>>had a “Research and Development Divi-
>>>>>>>>>>>sion (Re),"" the ision had a section
>>>>>>>>>>>called “Ammunition and Explosives
>>>>>>>>>>>(Re2)", and the section had a subsec-
>>>>>>>>>>>tion called “High Explosives and Propel-
>>>>>>>>>>>lants (Re2c)."” I was assigned to Re2c.
>>>>>>>>>>>It had two other reserve officers in it
>>>>>>>>>>>when I joined, and we divided the work
>>>>>>>>>>>among ourselves. One became head of
>>>>>>>>>>>propellant research, I became head of
>>>>>>>>>>>high explosives research, and the third,
>>>>>>>>>>>who was a lieutenant j.g., became my
>>>>>>>>>>>assistant and deputy. I was, on the basis
>>>>>>>>>>>of my broad experience in the field, ex-
>>>>>>>>>>>cellently qualified for my assignment. I
>>>>>>>>>>>knew the names of two high explosives:
>>>>>>>>>>>TNT and dynamite. With that knowl-
>>>>>>>>>>>edge, I became head of high explosives
>>>>>>>>>>>research and development for the world’s
>>>>>>>>>>>largest Navy!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>But I was young and learned fast;
>>>>>>>>>>>furthermore, the staff kept on growing as.
>>>>>>>>>>>the war progressed. I acquired two
>>>>>>>>>>>groups of civilian scientists; one headed
>>>>>>>>>>>by one of the speakers at this meeting,
>>>>>>>>>>>Raymond J. Seeger; another of tonight's
>>>>>>>>>>>speakers, Harry Polachek, was in this
>>>>>>>>>>>group; the other group was headed by
>>>>>>>>>>>Gregory Hartmann, who eventually be-
>>>>>>>>>>>came Technical Director of the post-
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>permission to visit him in Princeton. The
>>>>>>>>>>>gracious consent came by return mail.
>>>>>>>>>>>The visit took place on May 16. After
>>>>>>>>>>>the pleasant preliminaries, I asked Ein-
>>>>>>>>>>>stein whether he would be willing to be-
>>>>>>>>>>>come a consultant for the Navy in general,
>>>>>>>>>>>and for me, in the field of high explo-
>>>>>>>>>>>sives research, in particular. Einstein was
>>>>>>>>>>>tremendously pleased about the offer,
>>>>>>>>>>>and very happily gave his consent. He
>>>>>>>>>>>felt very bad about being neglected. He
>>>>>>>>>>>had not been approached by anyone to
>>>>>>>>>>>do any war work since the United States
>>>>>>>>>>>entered the war. He said to me, “People
>>>>>>>>>>>think that I am interested only in theory,
>>>>>>>>>>>and not in anything practical. This is not
>>>>>>>>>>>true. I was working in the Patent Office
>>>>>>>>>>>in Zurich, and I participated in the de-
>>>>>>>>>>>velopment of many inventions. The gyro-
>>>>>>>>>>>scope too.”’ I said, “That's fine. You are
>>>>>>>>>>>hired.”
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Here is a short explaination of why they hired Albert Einstein:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>" Calvert served on the Jack under Lt. Comdr. Tommy Dykers, and here
>>>>>>>>>>is how he describes his sub’s first experience with the Mark 6
>>>>>>>>>>exploder: “We worked into an excellent position and fired three
>>>>>>>>>>torpedoes—the Jack ’s first war shots of her career. Short of the
>>>>>>>>>>predicted torpedo run time, we heard a tremendous explosion. That
>>>>>>>>>>should finish him, I thought.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>“‘ Damn those exploders … damn them all to hell! ’ said Dykers as he
>>>>>>>>>>looked through the scope.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>“‘The first torpedo prematured … just before it got to the MOT [middle
>>>>>>>>>>of the target] … and I don’t know whether the other two passed under
>>>>>>>>>>without exploding, or missed. Son of a bitch from Baghdad !’ came the
>>>>>>>>>>bitter exclamation from the skipper.” (Despite continuing torpedo
>>>>>>>>>>trouble, Jack ’s later forays were considerably more successful.)"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Einstein soved the problem...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"If I were asked to state what specific
>>>>>>>>>>contributions were made by Einstein to
>>>>>>>>>>our high explosives research, I would
>>>>>>>>>>have to say this. New and more effec-
>>>>>>>>>>tive high explosives were developed dur-
>>>>>>>>>>ing the war, and they were used by the
>>>>>>>>>>Navy and the Army (which then included
>>>>>>>>>>the Air Force) against Germany, Japan
>>>>>>>>>>and their allies. (I found out later that at
>>>>>>>>>>least the underwater explosives, possibly
>>>>>>>>>>others, were also used in the Korean and
>>>>>>>>>>the Vietnam War.) But these develop-
>>>>>>>>>>ments were the results of the efforts of
>>>>>>>>>>large groups of people, including Ein-
>>>>>>>>>>stein."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Einstein is da bomb!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>https://archive.navalsubleague.org/1986/dr-einstein-s-torpedo-letter
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Now, Albert Einstein got paid by the military $25.00 a day for his
>>>>>>>>work...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In the movie "A House of Dynamite" (2025) it cost $50 billon
>>>>>>>>dollars(and missed the target).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Einstein shouda asked for more money...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Les not forget..Einstein dropped TWO atomic bombs on Japan! He had
>>>>>>>yellow fever.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>'the yellow peril' :(the political or military threat regarded as
>>>>>>>being posed by the Chinese or by the peoples of Southeast Asia.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Albert Einstein referred to Chinese as 'industrious, filthy, obtuse
>>>>>>>people'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>“a peculiar herd-like nation… often more like automatons than people”,
>>>>>>>adding: “Even the children are spiritless and look lethargic.”
>>>>>>>“bandit-like filthy Levantines”
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>https://www.the-independent.com/news/science/albert-einstein-racism-travel-diaries-china-japan-zeev-rosenkranz-a8397226.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s11234.pdf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Don't shoot till you see the slant of ther eyes...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'm surprised Einstein didn't write a book called..."Origin of the
>>>>>>Chinks"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>>>>>
>>>>>So, what color is Albert  Einstein? Purple?? 
>>>>
>>>>I wrote Purple for a good reason..
>>>>
>>>>Obvisouly, Albert Einstein doesn't consider himself to be a "white
>>>>people" oe a white person.
>>>>
>>>>So what color does Albert Einstein thinks he is? Certaintly not
>>>>Yellow!
>>>>
>>>>Black? Red?? one of the Brown people??
>>>>
>>>>Well, if you have a Jewish  best friend, ask him, "What color are
>>>>you?"
>>>>
>>>>He might respond (unfriendly) "What do you mean what color am I??"
>>>>
>>>>You say, "Are you a White person?"
>>>>
>>>>If he's a honest person he'll say..."I'm not White!"
>>>
>>>Now, what did Albert Einstein think of about the people from India?
>>>
>>>Indians, Einstein seemed to have believed, were "biologically
>>>inferior" and were hampered by the subcontinent's climate that
>>>"prevented them from thinking backward or forward by more than a
>>>quarter of an hour."
>>>
>>>
>>>"prevented them from thinking backward or forward by more than a
>>>quarter of an hour." ????
>>>
>>>WHAT DA HELL DOES THAT EVEN MEAN???
>>>
>>>
>>>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>>>
>>>
>>>What does Albert Einstein think about...'women'?
>>>
>>>
>>>" thinking backward or forward by more than a quarter of an hour.."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>How does one think backwards????
>>>
>>>
>>>after 15 minutes my head hurts!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>According to Albert Einstein he see's the whole entire human race as
>>being biologically inferior...
>>I guess to him.
>>
>>
>>Do you know WHY he stuck his tongue out in that famous photo?
>>https://allthatsinteresting.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/einstein-picture-cropped-closeup.jpg
>>
>>cause he views the entire human race as a bunch of fucking lizards.
>>
>>i look in the mirror and i don't see any resemblance of a lizard so i
>>don't get it.
>>
>>i'm no einstein.
>>
>>i can understand why einstein and people like him want to blow up the
>>whole earth.
>>
>>btw, I heard something..
>>This is suppose to be a secret
>>You are not suppose to know this..
>>But there are scientists today
>>planing to build a rocketship
>>to Mars, and colonize it with 'their people'
>>and blow up the earth by remote control. ..
>>push a button, start WW5, and trigger nucluer bombs
>>everywhere on earth...
>>then when the air is clear
>>they will back to earth...
>>and Take Over.
>>
>>Start again...something like that.
>>https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1719429262778990909/photo/1
>>
>>sounds like a good idea...
>>
>>I know there is going to be  a room
>>where someone seated is
>>going to push the button...
>>and if you look out the window..
>>you can see the Earth from Mars.
-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#640650

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2025-11-10 15:36 -0800
Message-ID<3ft4hklcpf15727k123ahfobeamipus245@4ax.com>
In reply to#640605
Now, Albert Einstein also mentions "Europeans"...
but I'm from Brooklyn New York so I have no idea what he means
by "Europeans"!

Are French people "Europeans"??? Is French a language or a Race????

Like for example, is Spanish a Race or a language?

"Europeans", wat the hell is dat??

What color are they?

Albert Einstein seems to think he is better than everyone else...

what color is he?


On Thu, 06 Nov 2025 21:41:05 -0800, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>"This morning at 7 a.m. we went on land and, together with the Du
>Plâtres, viewed the Hindu quarter of Colombo and a Buddhist temple.20
>We drove in individual little carts that were drawn on the double by
>Herculean
>and yet so refined people. I was very much ashamed of myself for being
>complicit in such despicable treatment of human beings
>but couldn’t change anything. Because these beggars in the form of
>kings descend in droves on any foreigner until he has surrendered to
>them. They know how to implore and to beg until one’s heart is shaken
>up. On the streets of the indigenous quarter one can see how these
>fine people spend their primitive lives.21 For all their fineness,
>they give the impression that the climate prevents them from thinking
>backward or forward by more than a quarter of an hour. They live in
>great filth and considerable stench down on the ground, do little, and
>need little. Simple economic cycle of life. Far too penned up to allow
>any distinct existence for the individual. Half-naked, they reveal
>their fine and yet powerful bodies and their fine, patient faces.
>Nowhere
>shouting like the Levantines in Port Said. No brutality, no market
>crying existence, but quiet, acquiescent drifting along, albeit not
>lacking in a certain lightheartedness. Once you take a proper look at
>these people, you can hardly take pleasure in the Europeans anymore,
>because they are more effete and more brutal and look so much cruder
>and greedier—and therein unfortunately lies their practical
>superiority, their ability to take on grand things and carry them out.
>Wouldn’t we too, in this climate, become like the Indians?" -Albert
>Einstein
>
>
>
>
>On Tue, 04 Nov 2025 23:39:47 -0800, The Starmaker
><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>>Einstein seems to see the Japanese as less than fully human—he
>>definitely perceives their individuality as not fully developed. His
>>first recorded impression of Japanese women is almost caricature-like:
>>he describes them as “crawling about [on deck] with children. They
>>look ornate and bewildered, almost as if stylized. Black-eyed,
>>black-haired, large-headed, scurrying.”  After three weeks on board,
>>Einstein does not seem to have penetrated the mysterious nature of his
>>fellow Japanese passengers: “Japanese very devout. Weird fellows whose
>>state is at the same time their religion.”  His first encounters with
>>Japanese music add to his sense of alienation: he finds their music
>>“very foreign” and their singing made him “dizzy.” 
>>
>>
>>So, a penquin walks into a bar and ask
>>the bartender, "Have you seen my brother"?
>>
>>the bartender sez, "What does he look like?"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Sun, 02 Nov 2025 11:35:53 -0800, The Starmaker
>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 01 Nov 2025 15:01:21 -0700, The Starmaker
>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 22:33:57 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:24:58 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 00:21:12 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 20:48:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 20:21:37 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:52:17 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 12:37:15 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 11:28:04 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 25 Oct 2025 11:36:36 -0700, The Starmaker
>>>>>>>>>>>><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>In the 1940's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>the department of war
>>>>>>>>>>>>>the military,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>had the same problem...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>they sat around a table
>>>>>>>>>>>>>they had a conference
>>>>>>>>>>>>>and their solution was...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Albert Einstein.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>First I have to tell you the background
>>>>>>>>>>>>of how Einstein and I became acquainted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>At the time of Pearl Harbor, I was a re-
>>>>>>>>>>>>search chemist in the U. S. Department
>>>>>>>>>>>>of Agriculture. Soon after that, I applied
>>>>>>>>>>>>for a commission in the Navy. After a
>>>>>>>>>>>>long drawn-out fight with the Navy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>which included one rejection, I won the
>>>>>>>>>>>>fight, and received my commission as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>full lieutenant (equivalent to a captain
>>>>>>>>>>>>in the Army) on September 2, 1942.
>>>>>>>>>>>>After that it took more than a month until
>>>>>>>>>>>>I located a billet in the Bureau of Ord-
>>>>>>>>>>>>nance and was called in for active duty.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Mr. Clark, following Gamow’s book,
>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote about the “Division of High Ex-
>>>>>>>>>>>>plosives” in the Bureau of Ordnance,
>>>>>>>>>>>>but there was no such thing. The Bureau
>>>>>>>>>>>>had a “Research and Development Divi-
>>>>>>>>>>>>sion (Re),"" the ision had a section
>>>>>>>>>>>>called “Ammunition and Explosives
>>>>>>>>>>>>(Re2)", and the section had a subsec-
>>>>>>>>>>>>tion called “High Explosives and Propel-
>>>>>>>>>>>>lants (Re2c)."” I was assigned to Re2c.
>>>>>>>>>>>>It had two other reserve officers in it
>>>>>>>>>>>>when I joined, and we divided the work
>>>>>>>>>>>>among ourselves. One became head of
>>>>>>>>>>>>propellant research, I became head of
>>>>>>>>>>>>high explosives research, and the third,
>>>>>>>>>>>>who was a lieutenant j.g., became my
>>>>>>>>>>>>assistant and deputy. I was, on the basis
>>>>>>>>>>>>of my broad experience in the field, ex-
>>>>>>>>>>>>cellently qualified for my assignment. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>knew the names of two high explosives:
>>>>>>>>>>>>TNT and dynamite. With that knowl-
>>>>>>>>>>>>edge, I became head of high explosives
>>>>>>>>>>>>research and development for the world’s
>>>>>>>>>>>>largest Navy!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>But I was young and learned fast;
>>>>>>>>>>>>furthermore, the staff kept on growing as.
>>>>>>>>>>>>the war progressed. I acquired two
>>>>>>>>>>>>groups of civilian scientists; one headed
>>>>>>>>>>>>by one of the speakers at this meeting,
>>>>>>>>>>>>Raymond J. Seeger; another of tonight's
>>>>>>>>>>>>speakers, Harry Polachek, was in this
>>>>>>>>>>>>group; the other group was headed by
>>>>>>>>>>>>Gregory Hartmann, who eventually be-
>>>>>>>>>>>>came Technical Director of the post-
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>permission to visit him in Princeton. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>gracious consent came by return mail.
>>>>>>>>>>>>The visit took place on May 16. After
>>>>>>>>>>>>the pleasant preliminaries, I asked Ein-
>>>>>>>>>>>>stein whether he would be willing to be-
>>>>>>>>>>>>come a consultant for the Navy in general,
>>>>>>>>>>>>and for me, in the field of high explo-
>>>>>>>>>>>>sives research, in particular. Einstein was
>>>>>>>>>>>>tremendously pleased about the offer,
>>>>>>>>>>>>and very happily gave his consent. He
>>>>>>>>>>>>felt very bad about being neglected. He
>>>>>>>>>>>>had not been approached by anyone to
>>>>>>>>>>>>do any war work since the United States
>>>>>>>>>>>>entered the war. He said to me, “People
>>>>>>>>>>>>think that I am interested only in theory,
>>>>>>>>>>>>and not in anything practical. This is not
>>>>>>>>>>>>true. I was working in the Patent Office
>>>>>>>>>>>>in Zurich, and I participated in the de-
>>>>>>>>>>>>velopment of many inventions. The gyro-
>>>>>>>>>>>>scope too.”’ I said, “That's fine. You are
>>>>>>>>>>>>hired.”
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Here is a short explaination of why they hired Albert Einstein:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>" Calvert served on the Jack under Lt. Comdr. Tommy Dykers, and here
>>>>>>>>>>>is how he describes his sub’s first experience with the Mark 6
>>>>>>>>>>>exploder: “We worked into an excellent position and fired three
>>>>>>>>>>>torpedoes—the Jack ’s first war shots of her career. Short of the
>>>>>>>>>>>predicted torpedo run time, we heard a tremendous explosion. That
>>>>>>>>>>>should finish him, I thought.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>“‘ Damn those exploders … damn them all to hell! ’ said Dykers as he
>>>>>>>>>>>looked through the scope.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>“‘The first torpedo prematured … just before it got to the MOT [middle
>>>>>>>>>>>of the target] … and I don’t know whether the other two passed under
>>>>>>>>>>>without exploding, or missed. Son of a bitch from Baghdad !’ came the
>>>>>>>>>>>bitter exclamation from the skipper.” (Despite continuing torpedo
>>>>>>>>>>>trouble, Jack ’s later forays were considerably more successful.)"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Einstein soved the problem...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>"If I were asked to state what specific
>>>>>>>>>>>contributions were made by Einstein to
>>>>>>>>>>>our high explosives research, I would
>>>>>>>>>>>have to say this. New and more effec-
>>>>>>>>>>>tive high explosives were developed dur-
>>>>>>>>>>>ing the war, and they were used by the
>>>>>>>>>>>Navy and the Army (which then included
>>>>>>>>>>>the Air Force) against Germany, Japan
>>>>>>>>>>>and their allies. (I found out later that at
>>>>>>>>>>>least the underwater explosives, possibly
>>>>>>>>>>>others, were also used in the Korean and
>>>>>>>>>>>the Vietnam War.) But these develop-
>>>>>>>>>>>ments were the results of the efforts of
>>>>>>>>>>>large groups of people, including Ein-
>>>>>>>>>>>stein."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Einstein is da bomb!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>https://archive.navalsubleague.org/1986/dr-einstein-s-torpedo-letter
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Now, Albert Einstein got paid by the military $25.00 a day for his
>>>>>>>>>work...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In the movie "A House of Dynamite" (2025) it cost $50 billon
>>>>>>>>>dollars(and missed the target).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Einstein shouda asked for more money...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Les not forget..Einstein dropped TWO atomic bombs on Japan! He had
>>>>>>>>yellow fever.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>'the yellow peril' :(the political or military threat regarded as
>>>>>>>>being posed by the Chinese or by the peoples of Southeast Asia.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Albert Einstein referred to Chinese as 'industrious, filthy, obtuse
>>>>>>>>people'
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>“a peculiar herd-like nation… often more like automatons than people”,
>>>>>>>>adding: “Even the children are spiritless and look lethargic.”
>>>>>>>>“bandit-like filthy Levantines”
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>https://www.the-independent.com/news/science/albert-einstein-racism-travel-diaries-china-japan-zeev-rosenkranz-a8397226.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s11234.pdf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Don't shoot till you see the slant of ther eyes...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I'm surprised Einstein didn't write a book called..."Origin of the
>>>>>>>Chinks"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So, what color is Albert  Einstein? Purple?? 
>>>>>
>>>>>I wrote Purple for a good reason..
>>>>>
>>>>>Obvisouly, Albert Einstein doesn't consider himself to be a "white
>>>>>people" oe a white person.
>>>>>
>>>>>So what color does Albert Einstein thinks he is? Certaintly not
>>>>>Yellow!
>>>>>
>>>>>Black? Red?? one of the Brown people??
>>>>>
>>>>>Well, if you have a Jewish  best friend, ask him, "What color are
>>>>>you?"
>>>>>
>>>>>He might respond (unfriendly) "What do you mean what color am I??"
>>>>>
>>>>>You say, "Are you a White person?"
>>>>>
>>>>>If he's a honest person he'll say..."I'm not White!"
>>>>
>>>>Now, what did Albert Einstein think of about the people from India?
>>>>
>>>>Indians, Einstein seemed to have believed, were "biologically
>>>>inferior" and were hampered by the subcontinent's climate that
>>>>"prevented them from thinking backward or forward by more than a
>>>>quarter of an hour."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"prevented them from thinking backward or forward by more than a
>>>>quarter of an hour." ????
>>>>
>>>>WHAT DA HELL DOES THAT EVEN MEAN???
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Albert Einstein said: “Racism is a disease of white people.”
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>What does Albert Einstein think about...'women'?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>" thinking backward or forward by more than a quarter of an hour.."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>How does one think backwards????
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>after 15 minutes my head hurts!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>According to Albert Einstein he see's the whole entire human race as
>>>being biologically inferior...
>>>I guess to him.
>>>
>>>
>>>Do you know WHY he stuck his tongue out in that famous photo?
>>>https://allthatsinteresting.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/einstein-picture-cropped-closeup.jpg
>>>
>>>cause he views the entire human race as a bunch of fucking lizards.
>>>
>>>i look in the mirror and i don't see any resemblance of a lizard so i
>>>don't get it.
>>>
>>>i'm no einstein.
>>>
>>>i can understand why einstein and people like him want to blow up the
>>>whole earth.
>>>
>>>btw, I heard something..
>>>This is suppose to be a secret
>>>You are not suppose to know this..
>>>But there are scientists today
>>>planing to build a rocketship
>>>to Mars, and colonize it with 'their people'
>>>and blow up the earth by remote control. ..
>>>push a button, start WW5, and trigger nucluer bombs
>>>everywhere on earth...
>>>then when the air is clear
>>>they will back to earth...
>>>and Take Over.
>>>
>>>Start again...something like that.
>>>https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1719429262778990909/photo/1
>>>
>>>sounds like a good idea...
>>>
>>>I know there is going to be  a room
>>>where someone seated is
>>>going to push the button...
>>>and if you look out the window..
>>>you can see the Earth from Mars.
-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#640654

FromThomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date2025-11-11 08:45 +0100
Message-ID<mng7i1FouopU3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#640650
Am Dienstag000011, 11.11.2025 um 00:36 schrieb The Starmaker:
> Now, Albert Einstein also mentions "Europeans"...
> but I'm from Brooklyn New York so I have no idea what he means
> by "Europeans"!
> 
> Are French people "Europeans"??? Is French a language or a Race????

Actually 'French' is the name of a certain dressing.

> 
> Like for example, is Spanish a Race or a language?

It was also the name of a very dangerous flu.

Actually 'spanish' is quite a useful word and could address all sorts of 
things, like e.g. wines, cheese and oranges, which stem mainly from the 
county 'Spain'.


That country is mainly located in Europe (partly in Africa).

The citizens of Spain are called 'Spaniards'.

Most of them use the language 'Spanish', but not all, because some speak 
Catalan, Mallorquin or Bask.


...

TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#640655

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2025-11-11 00:04 -0800
Message-ID<qer5hk13v3h6j1lms4cji0orvdm7bndjn0@4ax.com>
In reply to#640654
On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 08:45:27 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
wrote:

>Am Dienstag000011, 11.11.2025 um 00:36 schrieb The Starmaker:
>> Now, Albert Einstein also mentions "Europeans"...
>> but I'm from Brooklyn New York so I have no idea what he means
>> by "Europeans"!
>> 
>> Are French people "Europeans"??? Is French a language or a Race????
>
>Actually 'French' is the name of a certain dressing.
>
>> 
>> Like for example, is Spanish a Race or a language?
>
>It was also the name of a very dangerous flu.
>
>Actually 'spanish' is quite a useful word and could address all sorts of 
>things, like e.g. wines, cheese and oranges, which stem mainly from the 
>county 'Spain'.
>
>
>That country is mainly located in Europe (partly in Africa).
>
>The citizens of Spain are called 'Spaniards'.
>
>Most of them use the language 'Spanish', but not all, because some speak 
>Catalan, Mallorquin or Bask.
>
>
>...
>
>TH

So, you're German...is dat a language or a race?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#640662

Fromkludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Date2025-11-11 16:25 -0500
Message-ID<10f09kl$6dn$1@panix2.panix.com>
In reply to#640655
The Starmaker  <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>So, you're German...is dat a language or a race?

"I'm not German, I'm Prussian."
    --- my college roommate



-- 
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#640671

FromThomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date2025-11-12 08:43 +0100
Message-ID<mnirr6F7reuU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#640655
Am Dienstag000011, 11.11.2025 um 09:04 schrieb The Starmaker:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 08:45:27 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
> wrote:
> 
>> Am Dienstag000011, 11.11.2025 um 00:36 schrieb The Starmaker:
>>> Now, Albert Einstein also mentions "Europeans"...
>>> but I'm from Brooklyn New York so I have no idea what he means
>>> by "Europeans"!
>>>
>>> Are French people "Europeans"??? Is French a language or a Race????
>>
>> Actually 'French' is the name of a certain dressing.
>>
>>>
>>> Like for example, is Spanish a Race or a language?
>>
>> It was also the name of a very dangerous flu.
>>
>> Actually 'spanish' is quite a useful word and could address all sorts of
>> things, like e.g. wines, cheese and oranges, which stem mainly from the
>> county 'Spain'.
>>
>>
>> That country is mainly located in Europe (partly in Africa).
>>
>> The citizens of Spain are called 'Spaniards'.
>>
>> Most of them use the language 'Spanish', but not all, because some speak
>> Catalan, Mallorquin or Bask.
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>> TH
> 
> So, you're German...is dat a language or a race?
'German' is mainly a language. But it means also a country named 
'Germany', where the citizens are called 'German'.

These Germans are not what is called a race. This term stems from a 
British named 'Charles Darwin', who actually invented racism.

He wrote a novel, which was called 'On the Origin of Species by Means of 
Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle 
for Life'.

(With 'favoured races' he meant actually the British aristocracy.)

The Nazis were direct offspring of these Britisch shitheads, because a 
follower of Darwin was a Thomas Henry Huxley ('Darwin's Bulldog').

He had a friend named Arthur de Gobineau, who actually invented the 
'Arian race'.

The Arians were not exactly Germans or even related. But anyhow...

Gobineau had a follower, who later became the head of the early Nazis in 
Munich, Germany. His name was Houston Steward Chamberlain.

He wrote a couple of very racist books. The financier and writer of the 
forewords was a Lord Redesdale.

That guy owned a goldmine in Swastika, Canada. That goldmine used the 
Nazi-logo already in 1913 on their share.

Redesdale was therefore the real inventor of the Nazi logo.

He was also grandfather of Hitler's girlfried Unity Valkyrie Mitford 
(who was born in Swastika).

But not only that: he was also the father of Clementine Hozier and that 
the wife of Winston Churchill.

(Houston Steward Chamberlain happened to be a nephew of the British 
prime minister Neville Chamberlain).

There exists also a book by Greg Hallet, who claimed, that Hitler was a 
British agent.

I would agree and found, that Noel Trevenen Huxley could have eventually 
been that spy and came to Germany already in 1913 (to Isolde Beidler in 
Munich) and stayed there as 'sleeper' (later as lease holder of the same 
apartment).

And to answer your question:

Germans are (with a small number of exceptions) not Arians.

Germans have actually too many different roots to call them a race.

It's more a mixture of all kinds of people, who once in the past had 
sent soldiers there or came as settlers, merchants or even tourists.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#640676

FromThomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Date2025-11-12 08:49 +0000
Message-ID<10f1hml$1aga3$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#640671
Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> schrieb:
> Am Dienstag000011, 11.11.2025 um 09:04 schrieb The Starmaker:
>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 08:45:27 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Am Dienstag000011, 11.11.2025 um 00:36 schrieb The Starmaker:
>>>> Now, Albert Einstein also mentions "Europeans"...
>>>> but I'm from Brooklyn New York so I have no idea what he means
>>>> by "Europeans"!
>>>>
>>>> Are French people "Europeans"??? Is French a language or a Race????
>>>
>>> Actually 'French' is the name of a certain dressing.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Like for example, is Spanish a Race or a language?
>>>
>>> It was also the name of a very dangerous flu.
>>>
>>> Actually 'spanish' is quite a useful word and could address all sorts of
>>> things, like e.g. wines, cheese and oranges, which stem mainly from the
>>> county 'Spain'.
>>>
>>>
>>> That country is mainly located in Europe (partly in Africa).
>>>
>>> The citizens of Spain are called 'Spaniards'.
>>>
>>> Most of them use the language 'Spanish', but not all, because some speak
>>> Catalan, Mallorquin or Bask.
>>>
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> TH
>> 
>> So, you're German...is dat a language or a race?
> 'German' is mainly a language. But it means also a country named 
> 'Germany', where the citizens are called 'German'.

If you want to be pedantic, the country is called "Deutschland",
which means literally "Land of the people".  The people are called
"Deutsche".  It is not by chance that this sounds very similar to
the English word for the Netherlands, "Dutch".

> These Germans are not what is called a race.

Certainly not.

-- 
This USENET posting was made without artificial intelligence,
artificial impertinence, artificial arrogance, artificial stupidity,
artificial flavorings or artificial colorants.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#640677

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2025-11-12 01:28 -0800
Message-ID<0kk8hk5jjrsp9vpffq4lfr00jqca4eh9gi@4ax.com>
In reply to#640671
On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 08:43:58 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
wrote:

>Am Dienstag000011, 11.11.2025 um 09:04 schrieb The Starmaker:
>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 08:45:27 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Am Dienstag000011, 11.11.2025 um 00:36 schrieb The Starmaker:
>>>> Now, Albert Einstein also mentions "Europeans"...
>>>> but I'm from Brooklyn New York so I have no idea what he means
>>>> by "Europeans"!
>>>>
>>>> Are French people "Europeans"??? Is French a language or a Race????
>>>
>>> Actually 'French' is the name of a certain dressing.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Like for example, is Spanish a Race or a language?
>>>
>>> It was also the name of a very dangerous flu.
>>>
>>> Actually 'spanish' is quite a useful word and could address all sorts of
>>> things, like e.g. wines, cheese and oranges, which stem mainly from the
>>> county 'Spain'.
>>>
>>>
>>> That country is mainly located in Europe (partly in Africa).
>>>
>>> The citizens of Spain are called 'Spaniards'.
>>>
>>> Most of them use the language 'Spanish', but not all, because some speak
>>> Catalan, Mallorquin or Bask.
>>>
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> TH
>> 
>> So, you're German...is dat a language or a race?
>'German' is mainly a language. But it means also a country named 
>'Germany', where the citizens are called 'German'.
>
>These Germans are not what is called a race. This term stems from a 
>British named 'Charles Darwin', who actually invented racism.
>
>He wrote a novel, which was called 'On the Origin of Species by Means of 
>Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle 
>for Life'.
>
>(With 'favoured races' he meant actually the British aristocracy.)
>
>The Nazis were direct offspring of these Britisch shitheads, because a 
>follower of Darwin was a Thomas Henry Huxley ('Darwin's Bulldog').
>
>He had a friend named Arthur de Gobineau, who actually invented the 
>'Arian race'.
>
>The Arians were not exactly Germans or even related. But anyhow...
>
>Gobineau had a follower, who later became the head of the early Nazis in 
>Munich, Germany. His name was Houston Steward Chamberlain.
>
>He wrote a couple of very racist books. The financier and writer of the 
>forewords was a Lord Redesdale.
>
>That guy owned a goldmine in Swastika, Canada. That goldmine used the 
>Nazi-logo already in 1913 on their share.
>
>Redesdale was therefore the real inventor of the Nazi logo.
>
>He was also grandfather of Hitler's girlfried Unity Valkyrie Mitford 
>(who was born in Swastika).
>
>But not only that: he was also the father of Clementine Hozier and that 
>the wife of Winston Churchill.
>
>(Houston Steward Chamberlain happened to be a nephew of the British 
>prime minister Neville Chamberlain).
>
>There exists also a book by Greg Hallet, who claimed, that Hitler was a 
>British agent.
>
>I would agree and found, that Noel Trevenen Huxley could have eventually 
>been that spy and came to Germany already in 1913 (to Isolde Beidler in 
>Munich) and stayed there as 'sleeper' (later as lease holder of the same 
>apartment).
>
>And to answer your question:
>
>Germans are (with a small number of exceptions) not Arians.
>
>Germans have actually too many different roots to call them a race.
>
>It's more a mixture of all kinds of people, who once in the past had 
>sent soldiers there or came as settlers, merchants or even tourists.
>
>
>TH


In May 1987 the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision
that Jews are a "race" for purposes of the Civil Rights Act of 1866.


There are people, even famous people who claim to be...half-Jewish.


Who is the Master Race? (besides me)






[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#640707

FromThomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Date2025-11-13 09:05 +0100
Message-ID<mnlhevFlrnaU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#640677
Am Mittwoch000012, 12.11.2025 um 10:28 schrieb The Starmaker:
...
>> And to answer your question:
>>
>> Germans are (with a small number of exceptions) not Arians.
>>
>> Germans have actually too many different roots to call them a race.
>>
>> It's more a mixture of all kinds of people, who once in the past had
>> sent soldiers there or came as settlers, merchants or even tourists.
>>
>>
>> TH
> 
> 
> In May 1987 the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision
> that Jews are a "race" for purposes of the Civil Rights Act of 1866.
> 
> 
> There are people, even famous people who claim to be...half-Jewish.
> 
> 
> Who is the Master Race? (besides me)
> 

The English word 'race' means actually 'set of items, that have 
something in common'.

'All red socks' for instance are a race (in that meaning).

Today we often use other meanings, which are related to ethnic 
connections of a large amount of people (or other living beings).

But 'race' can actually group non-living things, too.

Therefore, Jews build in fact a race. That is the race of all human 
beings believing in the God of the Tora.


TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.math


csiph-web