Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.math > #458782

Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test

From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups sci.math
Subject Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
Date 2019-09-19 03:06 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <qlurc8$iom$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References <1bd83e31-ec7f-4348-9b61-a7f5c2ddf0d0@googlegroups.com> <qlljg4$u3p$4@gioia.aioe.org> <f2f00539-1b8b-4f5e-84ee-62c19b951be8@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Minnow of Math and Runt of Physics Archimedes Plutonium

>Subject: Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton�0MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming


>On Sunday, September 15, 2019 at 9:57:15 AM UTC-5, Dingus Dirtbag McGee wrote:
>> Shut up idiot.

>On Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 9:24:28 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>> Minnow of Math and Runt of Physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

>


Thank you for requesting another Babble-o-meter Calculation!

☑ Archie responds to criticism but refuses to discuss the issue...
☑ ...he would rather run away by trying to delete his posts...
☑ ...he actually believes deleting something on Google actually deletes it from Usenet...
☑ Archie considers attempts of actual discussion to be 'stalking'...
☐ ...Giggle Groups screenshot cut and pasted...
☑ Archie's response posted in the wrong topic...
☑ Archie reposts the same old, same old, yet again...
☑ ...with zero new content...
☑ ...multiple times...
☑ ...again and again...
☑ ...and again and again...
☑ ...enough times to be classified as spam...
☑ ...Post has no new content, in fact...
☑ Archie posted in a topic/topics explicitly created by him for doing so...
☐ ...with a subject about flunking a nonexistent test no one ever took...
☐ ...and posted to the wrong newsgroup...
☐ ...and Archie even whines about (other) spammers in his spam...
☑ Purpose of Archie's post is to remain #1 Front Page Hog...
☐ .....meanwhile, Archie complains of some other "Front Page Hog(s)"...
☐ Archie's post mentions totally uninvolved people...
☐ ...who are university math or physics professors...
☐ ...at a university supposedly near the person criticizing Archie...
☐ ...but Archie got the location (and university) completely wrong...
☐ ...and Archie demands they resign for not teaching his broken math...
☐ ....no, Archie demands they be fired for not teaching his broken math...
☐ ....Archie demands they shut down an entire university for not teaching his broken math...
☐ ....heck, Archie demands they shut down HARVARD for not teaching his broken math...
☐ ...and he includes a stalker list of physics and/or math professors...
☑ ...and STILL can't answer 'why post stalker lists of uninvolved profs'...
☑ ...maybe he thinks these professors do a Kibo and will respond here just by mentioning their names...
☑ ...even though those profs have never heard of him and never will...
☑ ...speaking of Kibo, mentions Kibo (how last century!)
☑ .....and Archie can't even tell the difference between Kibo and me...
☐ ...Archie's actual response is completely unrelated to the topic...
☐ Archie even reposts something from 1994 to show he was a failure way back then, too!...
☐ A critic's comment has embarrassing (to AP) portion removed...
☐ ...to the extent the comment is no longer recognizable...
☑ Archie's post includes random snippets by other critics, spammers or babblers...
☐ ...which are attributed to yet other critics, spammers or babblers...
☐ ...followed by yet another repost of the "12 Failures of Plutonium"...
☐ Archie actually claims that anyone who believe the ellipse is a conic section is stupid...
☐ ...followed by yet another repost of his long-discredited ellipse/conic section non-proof...
☐ Archie includes the dumb ascii art cat/owl thing...
☐ ...and that whatever-it-is ascii art...
☐ ...as well as ascii art of Archie's butthole...
☑ ...and Archie doesn't realize ascii art is so 1980s...
☑ Archie still can't answer Dan C's easy 4 question math test...
☐ Archie brings up a "mistake" (in his view) from months ago...
☐ ...which, of course, is not actually a mistake...
☐ ...and Archie invents yet more "mistakes" (that are not mistakes)...
☐ Archie really wears out the "a beer short of a 6 pack" joke...
☑ ...but he still doesn't realize he's about 5 beers short...
☐ Archie awards self Nobel Prize/claims he should be so awarded...
☐ ...then rejects self-awarded Nobel, real awardees don't deserve it...
☐ ...and sour grapes Nobel or other science/math prize...
☐ Archie says something really dumb and stoopid, but realizes how dumb it is, so he accuses another poster of saying it...
☐ Archie doesn't know the definition of "racism", so calls anyone who points out all the flaws in his claims are "racist"...
☐ Archie roots for cockroaches in the Law of the Jungle...
☐ Archie can't tell the difference between Boolean AND/OR and arithmetic addition/subtraction...
☐ Archie doesn't even know the 'rules' of Boolean logic...
☐ ...in particular, doesn't know the difference between AND/OR and addition/subtraction...
☐ Archie whines about iPhone's self-protection feature rather than heat his trailer in the winter...
☐ Archie outsmarted by someone too stupid to come out of the rain AGAIN...
☐ Clay County Sheriff, be on lookout for someone in T-shirt&sandals walking along road during blizzard...
☐ Archie thinks he is the very first person in the history of the world to disbelieve in negative and imaginary numbers...
☐ ...and demands credit from anyone else who also disbelieves in them...
☐ Archie can't get over the shame of messing up percentages...
☐ ...and Archie is envious that I weighed the electron and he didn't...
☐ Archie asks Google Groups to do something they can't do...
☑ Archie is too stoopid to realize attack posts just produce more posts like this...
☑ Google Groups poster. 'Nuf said.
☑ ...because he's too stoopid to configure a newsreader with killfile...

Archie's Babbling Nonsense score:  26 plutoniums!
(The plutonium is the new SI unit of failure)


x-no-archive: yes

Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Lu,Martin Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-09-15 06:21 -0700
  Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Lu,Martin Dingus Dirtbag McGee <invalideye@ezampleaeze.com> - 2019-09-15 07:57 -0700
    Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-09-18 12:21 -0700
      Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-09-24 17:01 -0700
    Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-09-18 19:46 -0700
      Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-09-19 03:06 +0000
        kibo Parry Moroney, 27 year long stalker shithead of sci.math-- never any math, never any physics Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-09-23 09:19 -0700
    Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-09-22 15:41 -0700
      Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-09-22 22:53 +0000
    Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-09-23 19:05 -0700
      Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Antonio Man-Bun <invalide@nowhere.net> - 2019-09-23 20:55 -0700
        Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-09-24 13:34 -0700
          Re: Archimedes "Total Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-09-24 20:45 +0000

csiph-web