Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #436541

Re: AP's 2014 incorrect proof of Generalized FLT Fermat's Last Theorem and proof of Regular FLT as a corollary thereof//updated 2019 for more clarity

Show all headers | View raw

eastside.erik@gmail.com writes:

>On Wednesday, March 6, 2019 at 9:45:17 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

>> Now in the proof of Generalized FLT solutions of A + B = C require a common divisor. 
>> 
>> 2^3 + 2^3 = 2^4 with prime divisor 2 
>> 3^3 + 6^3 = 3^5 with prime divisor 3 
>> 7^3 + 7^4 = 14^3 with prime divisor 7 
>> 
>> Here in FLT, we need not even worry about exponents because all solutions to Generalized FLT encompass exponents so that if these were FLT solutions: 
>> 
>> 2^? + 2^? = 2^? with prime divisor 2 
>> 3^? + 6^? = 3^? with prime divisor 3 
>> 7^? + 7^? = 14^? with prime divisor 7 
>> 
>> So in that construction of a solution to FLT there is a common divisor and so now we divide the equation by the common divisor, and we get this: 
>> 
>> 1^y + 1^y = 1^y 
>> 1^z + 2^z = 1^z 
>> 1^w + 1^w = 2^w 
>> 

>No, Archie, you did it again!  2^4 / 2 is NOT EQUAL to 1^4.  You don't
>understand how exponents work at all.  In this case, it's just successive
>multiplication:  2^4 = 2*2*2*2, so 2^4 / 2 = 2^3 = 8.

>Actually 8 is the common divisor of 2^3 + 2^3 = 2^4, it gives 1 + 1 = 2
>Does that look familiar?  If not, you've forgotten how to add as well.

Eric is right, Archie, and you are a fool for attacking him in other
topics for correcting you.  Exponentiation does not obey the associative
or communative laws, so (A/A)^N is not equal to (A^N)/A. So (2^4)/2 is not
1^4. This is obvious if you think about it: 2^4=16, so (2^4)/2 is 16/2=8,
but 1^4=1.

Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

AP's 2014 proof of Generalized FLT Fermat's Last Theorem and proof of Regular FLT as a corollary thereof//updated 2019 for more clarity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-06 21:45 -0800
  Re: AP's 2014 proof of Generalized FLT Fermat's Last Theorem and proof of Regular FLT as a corollary thereof//updated 2019 for more clarity eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-07 08:16 -0800
    Re: AP's 2014 incorrect proof of Generalized FLT Fermat's Last Theorem and proof of Regular FLT as a corollary thereof//updated 2019 for more clarity moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-07 18:41 +0000
  Re: AP's 2014 proof of Generalized FLT Fermat's Last Theorem and proof of Regular FLT as a corollary thereof//updated 2019 for more clarity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-07 14:21 -0800
    My 1993 basis vector pure algebra proof of Regular FLT Re: AP's 2014 proof of Generalized FLT Fermat's Last Theorem and proof of Regular FLT as a corollary thereof//updated 2019 for more clarity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-08 21:32 -0800
      AP's original proof of FLT back in 1993 is a true pure algebra proof of FLT --basis vector or additive-multiplicative-identity //updated 2019 for more clarity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-09 12:39 -0800
        AP's original proof of FLT back in 1993 is a true pure algebra proof of FLT --basis vector or additive-multiplicative-identity //updated 2019 for more clarity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-09 18:59 -0800
          Re: AP's original proof of FLT back in 1993 is a true pure algebra proof of FLT --basis vector or additive-multiplicative-identity //updated 2019 for more clarity eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-09 20:16 -0800
          a pure algebra proof of Generalized FLT Re: AP's original proof of FLT back in 1993 is a true pure algebra proof of FLT --basis vector or additive-multiplicative-identity //updated 2019 for more clarity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-09 22:41 -0800
            a pure algebra proof of Generalized FLT Re: AP's original proof of FLT back in 1993 is a true pure algebra proof of FLT --basis vector or additive-multiplicative-identity //updated 2019 for more clarity Mike Hart <gmoralesor@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 03:35 -0700
              Re: a pure algebra proof of Generalized FLT Re: AP's original proof of FLT back in 1993 is a true pure algebra proof of FLT --basis vector or additive-multiplicative-identity //updated 2019 for more clarity Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2019-03-10 13:11 +0000
                Yes, integers form a vector space as do all Grid Number systems //updated 2019 for more clarity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 13:01 -0700
                Re: Yes, integers form a vector space as do all Grid Number systems //updated 2019 for more clarity Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2019-03-11 16:59 +0000
              in Generalized we need only FACTOR, not prime factor Re: AP's original proof of FLT back in 1993 is a true pure algebra proof of FLT --basis vector or additive-multiplicative-identity //updated 2019 for more clarity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 12:45 -0700
                Re: in Generalized we need only FACTOR, not prime factor Re: AP's original proof of FLT back in 1993 is a true pure algebra proof of FLT --basis vector or additive-multiplicative-identity //updated 2019 for more clarity Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2019-03-10 22:30 +0000
                Re: in Generalized we need only FACTOR, not prime factor Re: AP's original proof of FLT back in 1993 is a true pure algebra proof of FLT --basis vector or additive-multiplicative-identity //updated 2019 for more clarity eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-10 15:39 -0700
                Eastside suggests ignorant fools of math who cannot understand AP's proof ellipse is never a conic (see below) Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Stanford Univ Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 16:45 -0700
            Re: a pure algebra proof of Generalized FLT Re: AP's original proof of FLT back in 1993 is a true pure algebra proof of FLT --basis vector or additive-multiplicative-identity //updated 2019 for more clarity Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 15:04 -0700
              proving both Pythagorean theorem along with Generalized FLT all from pure algebra of 2^1 + 2^1 = 2^2 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 22:23 -0700
                proving both Pythagorean theorem along with Generalized FLT all from pure algebra of 2^1 + 2^1 = 2^2 Mike Hart <gmoralesor@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 23:00 -0700
                proving both Pythagorean theorem along with Generalized FLT all from pure algebra of 2^1 + 2^1 = 2^2 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-10 23:32 -0700
                Re: proving both Pythagorean theorem along with Generalized FLT all from pure algebra of 2^1 + 2^1 = 2^2 Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2019-03-11 09:53 +0000
                Re: proving both Pythagorean theorem along with Generalized FLT all from pure algebra of 2^1 + 2^1 = 2^2 eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-11 10:02 -0700
                Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu, of Stanford Univ, are you as stupid as Eastside to never understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole// ellipse is never a conic (see proof below) Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-11 19:32 -0700
                Re: proving both Pythagorean theorem along with Generalized FLT all from pure algebra of 2^1 + 2^1 = 2^2 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-11 20:24 -0700
                Re: proving both Pythagorean theorem along with Generalized FLT all from pure algebra of 2^1 + 2^1 = 2^2 Mike Hart <gmoralesor@gmail.com> - 2019-03-12 05:44 -0700
                Re: proving both Pythagorean theorem along with Generalized FLT all from pure algebra of 2^1 + 2^1 = 2^2 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-12 12:01 -0700
                Re: proving both Pythagorean theorem along with Generalized FLT all from pure algebra of 2^1 + 2^1 = 2^2 Mike Hart <gmoralesor@gmail.com> - 2019-03-12 12:11 -0700
                Re: proving both Pythagorean theorem along with Generalized FLT all from pure algebra of 2^1 + 2^1 = 2^2 eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-12 12:14 -0700
                Re: proving both Pythagorean theorem along with Generalized FLT all from pure algebra of 2^1 + 2^1 = 2^2 Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-03-12 12:30 -0700
                Re: proving both Pythagorean theorem along with Generalized FLT all from pure algebra of 2^1 + 2^1 = 2^2 Mike Hart <gmoralesor@gmail.com> - 2019-03-12 13:50 -0700
                Re: proving both Pythagorean theorem along with Generalized FLT all from pure algebra of 2^1 + 2^1 = 2^2 eastside.erik@gmail.com - 2019-03-12 15:40 -0700
        Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-03-10 17:08 +0000
  Re: AP's 2014 proof of Generalized FLT Fermat's Last Theorem and proof of Regular FLT as a corollary thereof//updated 2019 for more clarity j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2019-03-10 21:00 +0100
  Re: AP's 2014 proof of Generalized FLT Fermat's Last Theorem and proof of Regular FLT as a corollary thereof//updated 2019 for more clarity j4n bur53 <bursejan@gmail.com> - 2019-03-17 12:31 -0700

csiph-web