Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.math |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test |
| Date | 2019-01-07 02:21 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <q0ud2v$60f$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | <0914dfe7-6632-42c6-b03a-c47804bd7454@googlegroups.com> <2df0eb7d-6d46-43f6-9efd-6124ca07f511@googlegroups.com> <cdedda8b-67cc-4244-b708-990c482d0a0d@googlegroups.com> <e08808d9-a0a4-400c-877f-0fda3a470a6f@googlegroups.com> <eaad23a2-407d-4976-be9d-c62dd2768ab1@googlegroups.com> |
Math Failure Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails:
>Subject: Re: You say you want to master physics? Well, you have to master the ellipse first!!
> I keep harping back to the idea-- to master physics you need to master Angular
> Momentum, and to master Angular Momentum you need to master the Ellipse
> in every aspect of the ellipse.
And one of the interesting things about the ellipse is how it is a conic
section, although at first glance it appears it can't be. An excellent
proof that the ellipse is a conic section is the Dandelin Spheres proof.
Another excellent proof follows:
Some preliminaries:
Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
in the proof:
^ x
|
-+- <= x=h
.' | `.
. | .
| | |
' | '
`. | .'
y <----------+ <= x=0
Cone (side view):
.
/|\
/ | \
/b | \
/---+---' <= x = h
/ |' \
/ ' | \
/ ' | \
x = 0 => '-------+-------\
/ a | \
Proof:
r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
qed
Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
AP's thoughts as of 6JAN2019//radioactivity wholescale revision//directrix of ellipse Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 14:21 -0800
universal ellipse percentage formulas Re: AP's thoughts as of 6JAN2019//radioactivity wholescale revision//directrix of ellipse Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 14:45 -0800
my first universal ellipse percentage formula, Square area = 30% Directrix area Re: AP's thoughts as of 6JAN2019//radioactivity wholescale revision//directrix of ellipse Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:23 -0800
safe to say that the Internal Square perimeter of the Ellipse is 50% of the Directrix Rectangle perimeter, for all Ellipses Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:34 -0800
You say you want to master physics? Well, you have to master the ellipse first!! Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 17:59 -0800
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-07 02:21 +0000
.0072 a correction factor? Re: You say you want to master physics? Well, you have to master the ellipse first!! Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 19:58 -0800
.007299 an angle issue ?Re: .007299 a correction factor? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 22:20 -0800
old post of mine in 2015 on 1/137 Re: .007299 an angle issue ?Re: .007299 a correction factor? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-06 22:25 -0800
Heath Brown Moroz constant Re: old post of mine in 2015 on 1/137 Re: .007299 an angle issue ?Re: .007299 a correction factor? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 00:04 -0800
Heath Brown Moroz constant Re: old post of mine in 2015 on 1/137 Re: .007299 an angle issue ?Re: .007299 a correction factor? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 00:19 -0800
.00131 and .007299 Re: Heath Brown Moroz constant Re: old post of mine in 2015 on 1/137 Re: .007299 an angle issue ?Re: .007299 a correction factor? Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2019-01-07 00:45 -0800
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-07 14:21 +0000
Re: .00131 and .007299 Re: AP moves on from word salad to number salad. alouatta.coibensis@gmail.com - 2019-01-07 08:15 -0800
Re: Archimedes "Village Idiot" Plutonium flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2019-01-07 00:01 +0000
csiph-web