Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.math, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test |
| Date | 2018-06-03 17:51 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <pf19rk$p8u$4@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | <e76b9e47-3fc9-4eda-902a-25ae6c436288@googlegroups.com> <4dddabf8-9ce3-4d42-bf17-ab93fa7afdce@googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Archimedes Plutonium fails: >Here is an example from the Internet in sci.math of Ad Hominem of a writer >who hates the person he is talking to, and no matter what the topic is, >the message is always the same-- I hate your guts. >On Monday, May 28, 2018 at 2:00:46 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >> But can you tell us what is wrong with the following proof that the >> ellipse is a conic section? After all, you say the ellipse is not a >> conic section and what Archimedes Plutonium says is true is true, right? <several other ad hominems by Archie snipped> Still haven't learned not to attack me?
Back to sci.math | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Archimedes "just not bolted down too tight in the first place" Plutonium flunked the physics lifetime-generation test moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-06-03 17:51 +0000
csiph-web