Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? |
| Date | Fri, 7 Aug 2026 19:13:39 +0200 |
| Lines | 43 |
| Message-ID | <ndmi1qFrgapU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <10qhdbr$3mfl8$1@dont-email.me> <videos-20260731120335@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <C3GdnRppMsKZJfH3nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> <nd5ib6FsberU1@mid.individual.net> <114ku54$3pu7t$1@news.nntp4.net> <ndajmjFm2t1U1@mid.individual.net> <114pvvg$2e49$1@news.nntp4.net> <ndfvijFhh0aU2@mid.individual.net> <11521nf$g130$1@news.nntp4.net> <ndld6lFl8tjU9@mid.individual.net> <1154ba8$jtrc$1@news.nntp4.net> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net 3QVo0jascQ2yz8ClzwhfgQmatXaOHgUGyQTuchOqRwQfCiyLnj |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:tKJbQ9luVpmDeEh/e5Mm58u+5yk= sha256:YN3v8/79vKCUDPlWg1NG7BI/sf+i/Zn5gIEGzfdjQdI= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla Thunderbird |
| Content-Language | de-DE, en-US |
| In-Reply-To | <1154ba8$jtrc$1@news.nntp4.net> |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:671878 sci.math:647181 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Am Freitag000007, 07.08.2026 um 12:16 schrieb Victo Babahanov: > Thomas Heger wrote: > >> Since these rules have very littel to act upon, they cannot be that >> complicated. >> >> Now you only need to 'scan' for possible candidates and investigate, >> whether or not you are able to build a world with them. >> >> My best find was: >> >> "Bi-quaternion fields as physical foundation of a spacetime, which had >> an internal structure" > > sorry, my bad, i can see now you are an idiot. You cannot just put complex > numbers in nature where none exists. In Nature, the imaginary part is > there where it exists, as measurable quantity. Well, I can do whatever I like. My assumption was: spacetime is real and behaves like a quaternion field. What we see and call 'universe' is only our local impression. The idea behind this concept: it would allow a very simple connection between GR and QM. If we start with spacetime as primordial entity, we have GR already incorporated into our theory, but without even touching a single book about relativity. Then we only need to make particles (and fields) out of spacetime and are actually done. That's what my 'book' is about: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing TH
Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Hayden Maksimov <mmivy@eh.ru> - 2026-08-01 14:00 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-03 06:28 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Brooks Mikhaltsov <oov@vhitsair.ru> - 2026-08-03 12:01 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-05 07:21 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Toney Zolotenkov <ennv@nkt.ru> - 2026-08-06 13:20 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-06 06:51 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Rondell Martzenkov <dank@lona.ru> - 2026-08-06 13:57 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-06 07:09 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Yves Bilbasov <say@aee.ru> - 2026-08-06 18:01 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-06 11:30 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Cole Baharev <bae@avoa.ru> - 2026-08-06 20:01 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-07 05:02 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-07 18:53 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-07 08:44 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Victo Babahanov <biti@nia.ru> - 2026-08-07 10:16 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-07 08:12 -0600
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Presley Elepov <epse@eeveele.ru> - 2026-08-07 17:41 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-07 12:06 -0600
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Wilfredo Dogadaev <adaddw@wi.ru> - 2026-08-07 18:38 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-08 08:09 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-08 09:25 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-07 19:13 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-06 05:33 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-05 21:48 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-06 01:13 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-07 08:32 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Leslie Ruzimatov <lzoiev@smr.ru> - 2026-08-07 10:19 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-07 08:35 -0600
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-08 07:59 +0200
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Delbert Lohanov <hebh@rdooe.ru> - 2026-08-08 15:29 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Lane W <cactus_DAC@yahoo.com> - 2026-08-08 10:57 -0600
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Latane Tulebaev <eebet@tvaa.ru> - 2026-08-08 18:38 +0000
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-08 18:04 -0700
Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Mercury Abdrahmanoff <frm@rbrh.ru> - 2026-08-06 13:51 +0000
csiph-web