Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply?

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.math
Subject	Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply?
Date	Wed, 5 Aug 2026 07:21:29 +0200
Lines	22
Message-ID	<ndfvijFhh0aU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<10qhdbr$3mfl8$1@dont-email.me> <videos-20260731120335@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <C3GdnRppMsKZJfH3nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> <nd5ib6FsberU1@mid.individual.net> <114ku54$3pu7t$1@news.nntp4.net> <ndajmjFm2t1U1@mid.individual.net> <114pvvg$2e49$1@news.nntp4.net>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net CU/4NSPrfMNAQGJnPc7Lwgu+30v+RD5eFrvPqAM9nKZJRFFrMD
Cancel-Lock	sha1:JHH2n0+SOxiYXSKq3R1x+mhMS8k= sha256:0GXAWFpije+4T3LzZjFz3A3hwL82hBW7e1cj4/O92Rs=
User-Agent	Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language	de-DE
In-Reply-To	<114pvvg$2e49$1@news.nntp4.net>
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:671842 sci.math:647153

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Am Montag000003, 03.08.2026 um 14:01 schrieb Brooks Mikhaltsov:
> Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
>> I compare spacetime diagrams with Argand diagrams and find similarities.
>>
>> That's why I thought, that spacetime of GR is real and has complex
>> valued components.
> 
> The z-plane is a discrete-time version of the s-plane, where z-transforms
> are used instead of the Laplace transformation.

That is your view.

My oppinion is quite different, because your 'World' isn't symmetric enough.

I have written this 'book' about what I think is true:


https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing


TH

Thread

Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Hayden Maksimov <mmivy@eh.ru> - 2026-08-01 14:00 +0000
  Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-03 06:28 +0200
    Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Brooks Mikhaltsov <oov@vhitsair.ru> - 2026-08-03 12:01 +0000
      Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-05 07:21 +0200
        Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Toney Zolotenkov <ennv@nkt.ru> - 2026-08-06 13:20 +0000
          Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-06 06:51 -0700
            Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Rondell Martzenkov <dank@lona.ru> - 2026-08-06 13:57 +0000
              Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-06 07:09 -0700
      Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-08-06 05:33 +0200
        Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-05 21:48 -0700
          Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-08-06 01:13 -0700
        Re: What amount of acceleration involved is too high for SR to apply? Mercury Abdrahmanoff <frm@rbrh.ru> - 2026-08-06 13:51 +0000

csiph-web