Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.math, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Junk Science |
| Date | 2015-08-11 19:13 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <mqe330$5ob$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <55C8ED6D.45BB@ix.netcom.com> <mqb2mr$vb$1@speranza.aioe.org> <55C9440E.33BA@ix.netcom.com> <mqbn4a$ehd$3@speranza.aioe.org> <55C97F7F.649B@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 8/10/2015 11:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > gilber34 wrote: >> >> On 8/10/2015 7:38 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> gilber34 wrote: >>>> >>>> On 8/10/2015 1:29 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>> Joe Pfeiffer wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) writes: >>>>> f nobody ever responded to the Starmaker? >>>>>>> Then I wouldn't see his silly posts at all. >> >>>> the media, reporters who cannot understand basic science, because >>>> the reporters failed science and math courses and had to take a >>>> lower path into journalism, where subject knowledge is not needed. >>> >>> >>> "basic science"??? >>> >>> https://www.google.com/#q=define+basic+science >>> >>> You don't acutally believe members of the 'scientific community' >>> understand...."basic science"???? >>> >>> >>> Definition of BASIC SCIENCE. : any one of the sciences (such as >>> anatomy, physiology, bacteriology, pathology, or biochemistry) >>> fundamental to the study of medicine. >>> >>> >>> >>> Why are you bring up ....the study of medicine??? >> >> ...... but thats' what druggies do too, study meds, >> >> REM Google is recording all the sites you visit and redirects your >> search to what THEY think you want > > > Google is not in the search engine business, they are in the advertising business. True. they are into Junk Searches > > >> >>> >>> >>> Maybe You don't understand...basic science. >> >> I understand advanced science, but not "basic" science, the stuff >> written in the BASIC programming language, >> > > BASIC is not advanced programing. BASIC is DOA. > > >> REM - it gives me a headace. >> >>> >>> >>> And certaintly 'science journalist' don't understand...any science! >> >> they, science journalists, are only required to have previously reported >> on something that may have looked scientific, or someone told them it >> was sciency like, or if it was in a movie, or could have been.
Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 10:26 -0700
Re: Junk Science Alan Baker <email@domain.com> - 2015-08-10 10:30 -0700
Re: Junk Science djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) - 2015-08-10 17:45 +0000
Re: Junk Science Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2015-08-10 12:18 -0600
Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 11:29 -0700
Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-10 15:48 -0500
Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 17:38 -0700
Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-10 21:36 -0500
Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 21:52 -0700
Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-11 19:13 -0500
Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 11:21 -0700
Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 11:15 -0700
Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-10 22:39 -0500
Re: Junk Science The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-10 22:16 -0700
Re: Junk Science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-11 17:23 -0500
Re: Junk Science Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> - 2015-08-10 11:27 -0700
csiph-web