Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.math |
| Subject | Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right |
| Date | 2025-11-27 08:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <moqbemFs0bkU9@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <0j24ik5npn29o98upbeag0j1c8nkkfo3mi@4ax.com> <mog14cF6cf2U1@mid.individual.net> <dkm6ik1503reiap3mlfi8ljl3362om6cjl@4ax.com> <moim1kFjg6cU5@mid.individual.net> <injaikp0b3e1q1e898civnqoc2ipk2jd60@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Am Dienstag000025, 25.11.2025 um 07:45 schrieb The Starmaker: > On Mon, 24 Nov 2025 10:21:33 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> > wrote: > >> Am Sonntag000023, 23.11.2025 um 20:05 schrieb The Starmaker: >>> On Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:12:20 +0100, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Am Samstag000022, 22.11.2025 um 20:10 schrieb The Starmaker: >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Both these theories of physics give precise predictions >>>>>>>>>>> for what will be measured in well defined experiments. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Do you dispute this? >>>>>>>>>>> ==================== >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I distinguish between a model and the part of nature, which that >>>>>>>>>> model attempts to model. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This distinction is extremly important and by no meas disputable. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If you equate a model with the real world, you would conduct >>>>>>>>>> something extremely stupid. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That is like eating the menu in a restaurant instead of the meal. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Again, your opinion of SR/GR is irrelevant. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is an indisputable fact that SR and GR give precise >>>>>>>>> predictions for what will be measured in well defined experiments. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Again: you are a hopeless case! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Says the one who didn't understand a single word of Einstein's paper on SR. >>>>>> >>>>>> I can almost sing the entire paper and absolutely understand every >>>>>> single word or equation in it. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have spent a lot of time upon that particular paper. And now you could >>>>>> ask me everthing about it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Okay, which part did his wife wrote? >>>> >>>> Elsa Einstein looked like a male in a dress. >>>> >>>> Don't know if 'she' wrote anything significant. >>>> >>>> His former wife looked nicer and was certainly smarter. >>>> >>>> But I don't know, which part of Einstein's papers she had actually written. >>>> >>>> TH >>> >>> She co-authord the 1905 paper. How is it possible you don't know >>> that??? >>> >> >> I knew, of course, that Mileva Maric wrote some parts of that article. >> >> But actually I don't know, which parts she wrote. > > > It's very simple...he is a word person, she is a number person. > > >> >> I personally thought, that Einstein didn't write any of those papers or >> articles, which bear his name. >> >> The reason to think so: >> >> Einstein wrote simply way too much in 1905 to be technically possible >> for a single person. >> >> He wrote actually four groundbraking articles in 1905 alone, from which >> one won him a Nobel Price. >> >> Besides of that and working fulltime at the Swiss patent office in Bern, >> he also wrote 20 reviews for 'Annalen der Physik'. > > goofing off fulltime at the Swiss patent office... > > he's a goof off. > >> >> That's more than a person could possibly do, even if he had no familily >> to care for (as Einstein had). >> >> So, my guess: 'Q' provided the papers and Einstein his smile. > > I don't recal Einstein smiling... Well, that's a point for you. My guess was, that Einstein was actually kind of (disinformation) agent. For instance I found, that his biography didn't make sense. For me Einstein wasn't a German, but a Swiss citizen from birth and possibly not even a Jew. More likely he was actually a Swiss Jesuit and belonged to the fraternity, commonly called the 'CIA of the vatican'. Therefore a few thigs didn't add up in his life, because these were actually lies. E.g. he was left behind alone in Munich, Germany, after his family moved to Pavia, Italy. There he lived next door to a Jesuit facility, but didn't go to school. Then he went alone to Aarau in Switzerland and attend school there. But since when have the Swiss allowed this? And then he went to ETH in Zurich, even if was allegedly stateless alien. Miraculusly he got Swiss citizenship later and subsequently a job in one of the few Swiss institutions, where secrecy is mandatory. This story is nonsense from start to finish, hence we need a proper assumption, which would make more sense. TH
Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Tyler Bukoski <iuvyk@rsttyoyuj.pl> - 2025-11-10 17:36 +0000
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-11 08:34 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-11-11 20:58 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Colomer Kalakos <rkmo@krmklra.gr> - 2025-11-12 00:34 +0000
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-12 09:13 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Raymon Raimanov <oay@ormmao.ru> - 2025-11-12 18:37 +0000
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-11-12 21:12 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-13 10:01 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-11-13 21:38 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-14 07:42 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-11-14 13:08 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-14 13:39 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Stetson Sówka <ktt@ewshr.pl> - 2025-11-14 18:14 +0000
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Wendyl Agelakos <na@las.gr> - 2025-11-16 13:30 +0000
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-17 09:37 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-23 11:12 -0800
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-23 11:16 -0800
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-23 11:26 -0800
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-23 11:28 -0800
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-23 11:33 -0800
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-23 11:41 -0800
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-23 12:06 -0800
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-24 22:45 -0800
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-11-27 08:09 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Efrain Ślusarski <iiiar@fesl.pl> - 2025-11-28 12:48 +0000
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-12 18:13 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-11-12 21:56 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-12 22:31 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-11-13 12:10 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-13 13:16 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-11-13 22:56 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-14 07:48 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-11-14 12:15 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Cleveland Balabaev <aave@nnal.ru> - 2025-11-14 11:36 +0000
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-14 13:37 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-11-15 15:27 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-15 16:05 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-11-15 21:09 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-11-15 21:25 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Jerrell Kántor <ktl@rrkojh.hu> - 2025-11-16 13:21 +0000
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-11-16 14:27 +0100
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-16 09:43 -0800
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-11-16 12:11 -0800
Re: No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right Erin Schuhmacher <irre@ms.de> - 2025-11-12 00:30 +0000
csiph-web