Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.math > #360608

Fermat's Theorem and Relativity

Show key headers only | View raw

Hi, all,

IMO, the idea that Fermat's Theorem has not been proven since the 1700's is either a scam or a Jedi mind trick.

For me, the proof is obvious (almost by inspection) from the Binomial Expansion, with the understanding that the two integer are independent (a,b).

However, the deeper version is a proof by Special Relativity, where two integers (a,b) are related by scaling factors t and t' with the vectors space given by (at,bt') and so covers all possibilities of the relationship.

The complete proof is a pdf on my website (where I also examine the many other topics that are proven, from Goedel's theorem to the Pauli/Dirac equations to Wittgenstein's remarks on private languages and infinite sets (and truth tables)

Anyway, the paper is at:

www.flamencochuck.com/files/Misc/RCUCircle.pdf

I would appreciate it if someone could give it a fair reading and discuss the consequences with me...

(It is especially relevant to GTR and Quantum Field Theory, and is perhaps the foundation for "Quantum Triviality"  (Google it... :)

Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Fermat's Theorem and Relativity Charles Keyser <BuleriaChk@aol.com> - 2017-01-11 11:03 -0500
  Re: Fermat's Theorem and Relativity abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com - 2017-01-11 11:34 -0800
  Re: Fermat's Theorem and Relativity Simon Roberts <retenshun@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 20:04 -0800
  Re: Fermat's Theorem and Relativity "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2017-01-11 20:41 -0800
    stop i.t abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com - 2017-01-12 00:04 -0800
  Re: Fermat's Theorem and Relativity Pfsszxt <Pfsszxt@aol.com> - 2017-01-12 09:12 -0600
    Re: Fermat's Theorem and Relativity richard miller <richard@microscitech.com> - 2017-01-12 10:33 -0800
      oh, blah thugstyle103@gmail.com - 2017-01-13 02:42 -0800
        Re: oh, blah richard miller <richard@microscitech.com> - 2017-01-13 10:50 -0800
          Re: oh, blah James Waldby <not@valid.invalid> - 2017-01-14 00:30 +0000
          kill-filers synomonous thugstyle103@gmail.com - 2017-01-14 08:28 -0800
            Re: kill-filers synomonous thugstyle103@gmail.com - 2017-01-14 08:30 -0800
            and the secondpowers of the speeds of lites abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com - 2017-01-15 18:06 -0800
              Re: and the secondpowers of the speeds of lites richard miller <richard@microscitech.com> - 2017-01-16 10:05 -0800
                Re: and the secondpowers of the speeds of lites richard miller <richard@microscitech.com> - 2017-01-16 11:06 -0800
    Re: Fermat's Theorem and Relativity John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-16 10:41 -0800
      joke> abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com - 2017-01-17 11:42 -0800
        h-mmm abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com - 2017-01-20 05:15 -0800
          !NoRoM abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com - 2017-01-20 11:03 -0800
          Re: h-mmm abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com - 2017-01-23 22:16 -0800
  Re: Fermat's Theorem and Relativity John Gabriel <thenewcalculus@gmail.com> - 2017-01-16 10:34 -0800
    Fermat's little theorem ... yet an other thing that j.g doesn't know, that he didn't know abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com - 2017-01-31 18:33 -0800
      Re: Fermat's little theorem ... yet an other thing that j.g doesn't know, that he didn't know "George Gabriel" <abu.cunt_face@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 18:43 -0800

csiph-web