Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.math > #639384

I guess your brain was "overheating" (Re: The End of Deutsch-Schorr-Waite [cycle_detection.rs])

From Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups sci.math
Subject I guess your brain was "overheating" (Re: The End of Deutsch-Schorr-Waite [cycle_detection.rs])
Date 2025-07-28 17:17 +0200
Message-ID <106849u$2ucmn$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References <105vtcp$2r2g0$4@solani.org> <1067dn5$2tsqp$3@solani.org> <1067s13$3gi9t$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


I guess your brain was "overheating".

LoL

The problem of L1, L2, L3, cache trashing through
writes,  is not overheating, but it gets awfully slow,
creating an overhead not overheating.

Cache trashing (or cache thrashing) in the context
of L1, L2, and L3 CPU caches is a performance issue,
not a thermal one.

Jordon Molokovsky schrieb:
> Mild Shock wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> Assume that we live in a world where we have excess memory. So we can
>> afford stacks! And then make the crucial observation,
>>
>> we can use the stack of the Prolog engine,
>> no need to create an artificial stack in C,
>> or use the native stack of C.
>>
>> I guess SWI-Prolog has already groked the first we can "afford stacks".
>> But did anybody already grok the "100% Prolog" idea?
>>
>> Well we are not yet there 100% Prolog has still an overhead. Here is a
>> little test acyclic_term/2:
>>
>> /* SWI-Prolog 9.3.26, C Stacks and/or Agendas */ ?-
>> time((between(1,30,_), acyclic2, fail; true)).
>> % 330,150 inferences, 0.016 CPU in 0.023 seconds (69% CPU, 21129600
>> Lips) true.
> 
> you assume too much. The 'overheat' is merely based on the size of memory
> required, and the number of instructions sent to the CPU's decoder,
> together with data, occupying the bus, through the pipeline, ignoring the
> pipeline etc. Not directly related to time. And 'stacks' ARE memory, not
> something to 'afford as excess' fucking stoopid.
> 

Back to sci.math | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Novacore goes Bisimulation: Scryer Prolog is Slow! Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-25 14:30 +0200
  Is Mild Shock going rogue? (Re: Novacore goes Bisimulation: Scryer Prolog is Slow!) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-25 14:32 +0200
    Is Mostowski Collapse a professional mathematician (Re: Is Mild Shock going rogue?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-25 14:32 +0200
      New Project Name: NovaCore becomes VibeCore (Re: Is Mostowski Collapse a professional mathematician) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-25 14:43 +0200
  The End of Deutsch-Schorr-Waite [cycle_detection.rs] (Re: Novacore goes Bisimulation: Scryer Prolog is Slow!) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-28 10:51 +0200
    Backtracking Branching Association List (Was: The End of Deutsch-Schorr-Waite [cycle_detection.rs]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-28 10:57 +0200
      Do it like in acyclic_decompose/3 (Was: Backtracking Branching Association List) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-28 11:39 +0200
        Cache-Trashing vs Cache-Friendly [Code Example] (Re: Do it like in acyclic_decompose/3) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-28 17:27 +0200
    Re: The End of Deutsch-Schorr-Waite [cycle_detection.rs] (Re: Novacore goes Bisimulation: Scryer Prolog is Slow!) Jordon Molokovsky <ovm@lorr.ru> - 2025-07-28 12:56 +0000
      I guess your brain was "overheating" (Re: The End of Deutsch-Schorr-Waite [cycle_detection.rs]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-28 17:17 +0200
        Re: I guess your brain was "overheating" (Re: The End of Deutsch-Schorr-Waite [cycle_detection.rs]) Alton Grammatakakis <kl@aaasi.gr> - 2025-07-28 16:09 +0000
          The difference is only in one letter "t" or "d" (Was: I guess your brain was "overheating") Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-28 21:17 +0200
          Re: You literally wrote "overheat" (Re: I guess your brain was "overheating" (Re: The End of Deutsch-Schorr-Waite [cycle_detection.rs]) Neury Valetov <ntt@uovrav.ru> - 2025-07-28 19:44 +0000
            Don't put large memory in your computer it might "overheat" (Re: You literally wrote "overheat") Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-29 15:57 +0200
            Re: Don't put large memory in your computer it might "overheat" (Was: You literally wrote "overheat") Mizraim Zelenenkov <iall@zm.ru> - 2025-07-29 16:00 +0000
              Why Russ Bots Again: Micro Penis? (Was: Don't put large memory in your computer it might "overheat" ) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-29 23:16 +0200
      Re: I guess your brain was "overheating" (Re: The End of Deutsch-Schorr-Waite [cycle_detection.rs]) Emile Paduchev <mcc@clleeeme.ru> - 2025-07-28 15:53 +0000
        You literally wrote "overheat" (Was: I guess your brain was "overheating") Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-28 21:19 +0200
    Entering the Age of Rational Trees (2025) (Re: The End of Deutsch-Schorr-Waite [cycle_detection.rs]) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-08-16 13:05 +0200
  The pairs are nasty, otherwise not always slow! (Re: Novacore goes Bisimulation: Scryer Prolog is Slow!) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-30 14:44 +0200
  It was painful for my GC, but fixed now (Was: The pairs are nasty, otherwise not always slow!) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-30 14:49 +0200

csiph-web