Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.image.processing > #4066 > unrolled thread

ICC terminology?

Started byDale <dale@dalekelly.org>
First post2015-12-02 22:34 -0500
Last post2015-12-03 22:27 -0500
Articles 2 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to sci.image.processing


Contents

  ICC terminology? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-12-02 22:34 -0500
    Re: ICC terminology? Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-12-03 22:27 -0500

#4066 — ICC terminology?

FromDale <dale@dalekelly.org>
Date2015-12-02 22:34 -0500
SubjectICC terminology?
Message-ID<8vl2q0.ojo.17.1@news.alt.net>
if I am right, ICC profiles have the following rendering intents

1) absolute colorimetry
2) relative colorimetry
3) hold saturation
4) perceptual

I would use the following replacements

1) measurement match
2) appearance match
3) abstract match
4) proof match

abstract profiles can define other moves besides hold-sat

proof can be different than PRMG related

relative colorimetric intent could include something like CIECAM02

-- 
Dale
http://www.dalekelly.org

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#4067

FromDale <dale@dalekelly.org>
Date2015-12-03 22:27 -0500
Message-ID<8vnmoh.v3b.17.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to#4066
Dale wrote:

> if I am right, ICC profiles have the following rendering intents
> 
> 1) absolute colorimetry
> 2) relative colorimetry
> 3) hold saturation
> 4) perceptual
> 
> I would use the following replacements
> 
> 1) measurement match
> 2) appearance match
> 3) abstract match

could also have

3) abstract match 1
3) abstract match 2
3) abstract match 3
etc.



> 4) proof match
> 
> abstract profiles can define other moves besides hold-sat
> 
> proof can be different than PRMG related
> 
> relative colorimetric intent could include something like CIECAM02
> 
-- 
Dale
http://www.dalekelly.org

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | sci.image.processing


csiph-web