Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.image.processing > #4025 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Hitendra Kumar <hitendrak565@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-05 01:29 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-09-16 17:04 -0400 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.image.processing
Gra Level Co-occurence Matrix Hitendra Kumar <hitendrak565@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 01:29 -0700
Re: Gra Level Co-occurence Matrix Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-09-16 17:04 -0400
| From | Hitendra Kumar <hitendrak565@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-05 01:29 -0700 |
| Subject | Gra Level Co-occurence Matrix |
| Message-ID | <472791d9-9f2e-43dd-9bf9-4ecf1aabe178@googlegroups.com> |
I am trying to find out how statistics derived from GLCM vary with different pixel distance. For this I am using an image with short and discontinuous vertical stripes. Following are the steps: 1. consider one row -> obtain GLCM -> calculate contrast, correlation and energy statistics. 2. loop through all the rows. 3. change pixel distance and repeat 1 & 2. The plots of correlation and energy have a exponential decay trend. I am not able to figure out: 1. Why do they decay exponentially? 2. In case of correlation, I should get a peak whenever the pixel distance is equal to stripe widths. Why is this not evident in plots?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 17:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <8p9b1b.f6j.19.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #4025 |
On 09/05/2015 04:29 AM, Hitendra Kumar wrote: > I am trying to find out how statistics derived from GLCM vary with different pixel distance. > For this I am using an image with short and discontinuous vertical stripes. > Following are the steps: > 1. consider one row -> obtain GLCM -> calculate contrast, correlation and energy statistics. > 2. loop through all the rows. > 3. change pixel distance and repeat 1 & 2. > > The plots of correlation and energy have a exponential decay trend. > I am not able to figure out: > 1. Why do they decay exponentially? > 2. In case of correlation, I should get a peak whenever the pixel distance is equal to stripe widths. Why is this not evident in plots? > gamma is an exponential function? what does a linear gamma do? -- Dale http://www.dalekelly.org
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.image.processing
csiph-web