Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.image.processing > #4486
| From | Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital, sci.engr.color, sci.image.processing |
| Subject | Re: spectral cameras |
| Date | 2020-04-09 08:42 +0100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <r6mjl1$19jg$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <d2f8ea.nlu.19.1@news.alt.net> <MPG.38f6fe4558ef051d98d0cb@news.supernews.com> <d2ffna.40s.19.1@news.alt.net> <d2gcnq.6hm.17.1@news.alt.net> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 08/04/2020 06:24, dale wrote: > On 4/7/2020 5:09 PM, dale wrote: >> On 4/7/2020 4:17 PM, Alfred Molon wrote: >>> In article <d2f8ea.nlu.19.1@news.alt.net>, dale@dalekelly.org >>> says... >>>> >>>> RGB color cameras has proved to be good on smart phones for consumers. >>>> >>>> Is sensor resolution nearing the point to measure spectral visible >>>> wavelengths instead of tricolor and is there a market for >>>> professional use? >>> >>> That doesn't depend on the sensor resolution. But you could make >>> a sensor cell which is capable to measure light of (a limited >>> number of) different wavelengths. Foveon is one example and the >>> organic, multiple layer sensor design of Panasonic another one. >>> >> >> kinda figured it wasn't a unique idea > > back to resolution ... > > the visible spectrum > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_spectrum > > is from 380nm-720nm wavelengths > > if you sample that in 10nm increments, that a low end spectrometer 20 > some years ago for approx $10K would do ... Here is how they actually do serious spectroscopy with plenty of light. https://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/html/im0609.html Its a low dispersion prism and a high resolution grating combo to illuminate a conventional 2D CCD with the entire stellar spectrum. The other technology uses fibre optics to route positions on the sky onto a line at the input to a classic high dispersion spectrometer so that individual targets of interest can be done simultaneously. You would gain very little useful improvement by sampling at 10nm since most LED emitters (apart from spot frequency lasers) have FWHM of 50nm and dyes and pigments are considerably worse. -- Regards, Martin Brown
Back to sci.image.processing | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
spectral cameras dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2020-04-07 15:05 -0400
Re: spectral cameras Alfred Molon <alfred_molon@yahoo.com> - 2020-04-07 22:17 +0200
Re: spectral cameras dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2020-04-07 17:09 -0400
Re: spectral cameras dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2020-04-08 01:24 -0400
Re: spectral cameras Alfred Molon <alfred_molon@yahoo.com> - 2020-04-08 19:28 +0200
Re: spectral cameras dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2020-04-12 20:29 -0400
Re: spectral cameras geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> - 2020-04-13 13:16 +1200
Re: spectral cameras Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-04-13 17:01 -0400
Re: spectral cameras dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2020-04-13 17:24 -0400
Re: spectral cameras Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> - 2020-04-13 18:58 -0400
Re: spectral cameras Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2020-04-09 08:42 +0100
Re: spectral cameras Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2020-04-08 07:51 +0100
csiph-web