Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.image.processing > #4424
| From | dale <dale@dalekelly.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.image.processing |
| Subject | Re: image density, log exposure (-target density) and pixel level |
| Date | 2019-02-05 18:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bv9r72.1sr.19.1@news.alt.net> (permalink) |
| References | <51c0a60e-9498-4d22-9f3d-3a63b85c12b0@googlegroups.com> <buf8ef.irj.19.1@news.alt.net> |
On 1/26/2019 4:19 PM, dale wrote: > On 1/26/2019 3:34 AM, imran.kanjoo@gmail.com wrote: >> Hello, every body. I want to find the pixel level of the image. The >> image contains 6 gray scale squares with different intensity in each >> patch. I know the pixel level is given by >> >> pixel level = 255 * (10–density/1.01)(1/2.2) >> >> but I do not know how to find out the density. Finally I need to have >> a graph pixel level vs log exposure (-target density). Can any body >> also explain how can I find the log exposure (-target density). Thank >> you. >> > > The pixel level you described (exposure) is an approximation of a gamma > 2.2 level system, closest to L* (Lightness), but not Lightness > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightness > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightness> > > see gamma ..., > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_correction > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_correction> > > Kinda depends on what you are working with ... calibration or > characterization? sometimes calibration is "good enough" > characterization ... > > to answer your second question it looks like you already know the > exposure (pixel density discussed above) ... invert equation for density > > to answer you first question ... How do I find density? ... unless it is > linear with exposure, or you have beforehand design knowledge of the > system, you will have most likely have to measure > > > apologies gamma 1.8 instead of gamma 2.2 might be closer to L* with white point of 5000K -- dale - https://www.dalekelly.org/ Not a professional opinion unless specified.
Back to sci.image.processing | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
image density, log exposure (-target density) and pixel level imran.kanjoo@gmail.com - 2019-01-26 00:34 -0800
Re: image density, log exposure (-target density) and pixel level dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-01-26 16:19 -0500
Re: image density, log exposure (-target density) and pixel level dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2019-02-05 18:19 -0500
csiph-web