Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.environment > #102457 > unrolled thread

a small but significant win

Back to article view | Back to sci.environment

Contents

  a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-07 03:19 +0000
    Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-12 12:57 -0600
      Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 09:23 +1100
        Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 09:50 +1100
          Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 13:51 +1100
          Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-13 09:46 -0600
        Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-13 09:41 -0600
        Re: a small but significant win Jeremiah Jones <jj@j.j> - 2026-10-13 21:19 -0700
          Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 16:02 +1100
            Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 19:11 +1100
              Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 19:42 +1100
          Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 16:18 +1100
            Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 07:29 +0000
              Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 19:38 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 03:08 +1100
                  Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 17:02 +0000
                    Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-14 14:35 -0600
                    Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 14:48 +1100
                      Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 15:56 +1100
                        Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 16:02 +1100
                  Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-14 14:36 -0600
                    Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:04 +1100
                      Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:01 +1100
                      Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 10:41 -0600
                      Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-16 20:38 +1100
                    Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:39 +1100
                      Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 11:03 -0600
                        Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:32 +1100
                  Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 07:38 +1100
                    Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-14 14:42 -0600
                      Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:24 +1100
                        Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:10 +1100
                        Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 10:44 -0600
                          Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 05:43 +1100
                            Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 13:00 -0600
                            Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:48 +1100
                              Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-16 03:06 +0000
                      Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 09:38 +1100
                    Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:11 +1100
                      Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:26 +1100
                      Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 10:42 -0600
                        Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:15 +1100
              Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-14 20:34 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 09:54 +0000
                  Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 08:01 +1100
                    Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-15 22:09 +1100
                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-15 07:52 +1100
                  Re: a small but significant win Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-10-15 23:49 +1100
                    Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 03:25 +1100
                      Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:10 +1100
                        Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:00 +1100
                          Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:15 +1100
                            Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:45 +1100
                              Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 07:51 +1100
                                Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 08:06 +1100
                                  Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 08:34 +1100
                                    Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 09:31 +1100
                                      Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 11:07 +1100
                                        Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 14:32 +1100
                                          Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 15:39 +1100
                                            Re: a small but significant win Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 16:03 +1100
          Re: a small but significant win 000-666 <8-0-15@never.invalid> - 2026-10-14 21:50 +0000
            Re: a small but significant win multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-15 11:01 -0600
              Re: a small but significant win "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-16 06:30 +1100

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

#102529

On 10/14/26 3:11 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
> most likely they were photographed
> by someone when the ballots were counted by someone
> involved in the counting or the scrutineering AFTER the
> polling stations had closed

Why "most likely"?

Where's your ranked likelihood list?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102539

multistrada <ab@in.valid> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote

>> most likely they were photographed
>> by someone when the ballots were counted by someone
>> involved in the counting or the scrutineering AFTER the
>> polling stations had closed

> Why "most likely"?

I was forgetting pre polling day voting in person

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102504

On 14/10/2026 6:29 pm, R Kym Horsell wrote:
> Man. What a  confusing mess. Dont tell me they dont let you vote coz
> you're still a foreign national...
> 
> |Jeremiah Jones <jj@j.j> wrote |> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote: |>>
> In Australia it is compulsory to vote, |>> Right now done by
> preferential system where you must vote in order of |>> preference 1
> for party A, 2 for B, 3 for C and so on a minimum of 16 |>> times to
> be counted, OR just put one in the box for your party choice |>> This
> has designed prefences decided by the party box you tick |>> And this
> is what happens |> So you're forced to vote, |Yes
> 
> No. You are not forced to vote. If you are registered to vote then 
> you are expected to get "marked off" at election time. Or you can
> pay the fine. You dont need to actually vote. If you attend a polling
> booth then you are issued marked ballots.

Correct ..... you could probably even leave the ballot papers sitting on
the Issuing table if you wanted .... or put them (unmarked) in the
Ballot Boxes .... or walk out of The Polling Place with them .... or
give them to someone standing in line, maybe.

But *YOU MUST GET YOUR NAME MARKED OFF* or wear the Fine!

> You can walk right and and put these right in the boxes without
> marking them. Or you can mail in an empty envelope if you have
> arranged a mail-in vote. Notoriously, people mail in all kinds of
> non-votes if you ask any of the volunteers that have to open them
> up.
> 
Having worked several Federal and State elections, I can't recall there
having been anything untoward in any of the Ballot Boxes!!
-- 
Daniel70

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102505

|Correct ..... you could probably even leave the ballot papers sitting on
|the Issuing table if you wanted .... or put them (unmarked) in the
|Ballot Boxes .... or walk out of The Polling Place with them .... or
|give them to someone standing in line, maybe.
|But *YOU MUST GET YOUR NAME MARKED OFF* or wear the Fine!

I've never pushed how little it is that avoids attracting unwanted attention.

|> You can walk right and and put these right in the boxes without
|> marking them. Or you can mail in an empty envelope if you have
|> arranged a mail-in vote. Notoriously, people mail in all kinds of
|> non-votes if you ask any of the volunteers that have to open them
|> up.
|> 
|Having worked several Federal and State elections, I can't recall there
|having been anything untoward in any of the Ballot Boxes!!
|Daniel70

Well it was for mail-in where the odd condom (used) or square of TP (used) 
turns up every now and then.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102515

On Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:54:14 -0000 (UTC), R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org>
wrote:

>|Correct ..... you could probably even leave the ballot papers sitting on
>|the Issuing table if you wanted .... or put them (unmarked) in the
>|Ballot Boxes .... or walk out of The Polling Place with them .... or
>|give them to someone standing in line, maybe.
>|But *YOU MUST GET YOUR NAME MARKED OFF* or wear the Fine!
>
>I've never pushed how little it is that avoids attracting unwanted attention.
>
>|> You can walk right and and put these right in the boxes without
>|> marking them. Or you can mail in an empty envelope if you have
>|> arranged a mail-in vote. Notoriously, people mail in all kinds of
>|> non-votes if you ask any of the volunteers that have to open them
>|> up.
>|> 
>|Having worked several Federal and State elections, I can't recall there
>|having been anything untoward in any of the Ballot Boxes!!
>|Daniel70
>
>Well it was for mail-in where the odd condom (used) or square of TP (used) 
>turns up every now and then.
>
Don't step in Rod Speed BS.
 Rod speed a egotistical self appointed know-all who knows nothing
The link to article but is paywalled so copied a bit
   https://tinyurl.com/2wsahp9h  
The Sunday Telegraph
TikTok linked to controversial mosque posted video of multiple ballots
backing Labor MP
A popular TikTok account linked to a controversial Melbourne mosque –
which was handed a $670,000 taxpayer-funded grant by Labor MP Julian
Hill before last year’s federal election – posted a video from within
a voting centre of multiple ballot papers backing Mr Hill a week
before polling day
  ******************
All six ballot papers displayed in the video show first preference
votes for Mr Hill, with either the Liberal candidate or One Nation
candidate preferenced last.

They, the HoR ballot paper laid out in 6, is because that is all you
can fit on the cardboard bench inside the small cardboard ballot box,
They, the voter then put down the next 6 and did the same.
The process had to  videoed in order to be paid for multiple voting!
One of these videos ended up on Tik-Tok.
>
Just to quell Rod Speed's normal BS reply, had AI take a look and it
concluded are real multiple HoR ballot papers.
https://share.google/aimode/39pCTtSJFS230fmma

Have to wonder if "Albanese Labor" are even a legitly elected House of
Representees (HoR) government?
-- 
Petzl

Our Australian commonwealth has survived numerous recessions, one
major depression, and two world wars. 
Doubt if it will survive under a Albanese Labor Government.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102525

On 15/10/2026 8:01 am, Petzl wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:54:14 -0000 (UTC), R Kym Horsell
> <kym@sdf.org> wrote:
> 
>> |Correct ..... you could probably even leave the ballot papers
>> sitting on |the Issuing table if you wanted .... or put them
>> (unmarked) in the |Ballot Boxes .... or walk out of The Polling
>> Place with them .... or |give them to someone standing in line,
>> maybe. |But *YOU MUST GET YOUR NAME MARKED OFF* or wear the Fine!
>> 
>> I've never pushed how little it is that avoids attracting unwanted
>> attention.
>> 
>> |> You can walk right and and put these right in the boxes without 
>> |> marking them. Or you can mail in an empty envelope if you have 
>> |> arranged a mail-in vote. Notoriously, people mail in all kinds
>> of |> non-votes if you ask any of the volunteers that have to open
>> them |> up. |> |Having worked several Federal and State elections,
>> I can't recall there |having been anything untoward in any of the
>> Ballot Boxes!! |Daniel70
>> 
>> Well it was for mail-in where the odd condom (used) or square of TP
>> (used) turns up every now and then.
>> 
> Don't step in Rod Speed BS. Rod speed a egotistical self appointed
> know-all who knows nothing

And what are YOU, Petzl??
-- 
Daniel70

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102514

On Wed, 14 Oct 2026 20:34:00 +1100, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>On 14/10/2026 6:29 pm, R Kym Horsell wrote:
>> Man. What a  confusing mess. Dont tell me they dont let you vote coz
>> you're still a foreign national...
>> 
>> |Jeremiah Jones <jj@j.j> wrote |> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote: |>>
>> In Australia it is compulsory to vote, |>> Right now done by
>> preferential system where you must vote in order of |>> preference 1
>> for party A, 2 for B, 3 for C and so on a minimum of 16 |>> times to
>> be counted, OR just put one in the box for your party choice |>> This
>> has designed prefences decided by the party box you tick |>> And this
>> is what happens |> So you're forced to vote, |Yes
>> 
>> No. You are not forced to vote. If you are registered to vote then 
>> you are expected to get "marked off" at election time. Or you can
>> pay the fine. You dont need to actually vote. If you attend a polling
>> booth then you are issued marked ballots.
>
>Correct ..... you could probably even leave the ballot papers sitting on
>the Issuing table if you wanted .... or put them (unmarked) in the
>Ballot Boxes .... or walk out of The Polling Place with them .... or
>give them to someone standing in line, maybe.
>
>But *YOU MUST GET YOUR NAME MARKED OFF* or wear the Fine!
>
>> You can walk right and and put these right in the boxes without
>> marking them. Or you can mail in an empty envelope if you have
>> arranged a mail-in vote. Notoriously, people mail in all kinds of
>> non-votes if you ask any of the volunteers that have to open them
>> up.
>> 
>Having worked several Federal and State elections, I can't recall there
>having been anything untoward in any of the Ballot Boxes!!
>
   https://tinyurl.com/2wsahp9h  
The Sunday Telegraph
TikTok linked to controversial mosque posted video of multiple ballots
backing Labor MP
A popular TikTok account linked to a controversial Melbourne mosque –
which was handed a $670,000 taxpayer-funded grant by Labor MP Julian
Hill before last year’s federal election – posted a video from within
a voting centre of multiple ballot papers backing Mr Hill a week
before polling day
  ******************

All six ballot papers displayed in the video show first preference
votes for Mr Hill, with either the Liberal candidate or One Nation
candidate preferenced last.

They, the HoR ballot paper laid out in 6, is because that is all you
can fit on the cardboard bench inside the small cardboard ballot box,
They, the voter then put down the next 6 and did the same.
The process had to  videoed in order to be paid for multiple voting!
One of these videos ended up on Tik-Tok.
>
Just to quell Rod Speed's normal BS reply had AI take a look and it
concluded are real multiple HoR ballot papers.
https://share.google/aimode/39pCTtSJFS230fmma

-- 
<https://www.perplexity.ai/search/rod-speed-usenet-troll-iBra.u6iSuy..0dwUJuvhQ#0>
     https://tinyurl.com/z5hh3shh  
Rod Speed is known in Usenet communities as a notorious 
argumentative figure often labeled a troll.

So says Rod speed a egotistical self appointed know-all who knows nothing
Rod has been on newgroups since the 80's and still the same

Rod Speed a annoying  Australian can type faster than you can talk
Best to ignore or he will continue to bait you
Rod speed a egotistical self appointed know-all who knows nothing
Rod has been on newgroups since the 80's and still the same

When he starts short vulgar bursts just stop replying--

If you want to practice talking to his idiot responses Australia has a
bot to practice with or he white ants you overtime you post!
"The Rod Speed Bot"
https://www.sensationbot.com/jschat.php?db=rodspeed
 
ROD SPEED A SELF APPOINTED EGOTISTICAL KNOW-ALL WHO KNOWS NOTHING    
   JUST FULL OF
         R
          O
           D
           
            S
             P
              E
               E
                D

           B
            U
             L
              L
               S
                H
                 I
                  T
   DON'T STEP IN IT!

IT DOESN'T MATTER IF ROD SPEED'S HEART IS IN THE RIGHT PLACE, 
HIS HEAD IS UP HIS OWN ARSE, ALWAYS FARTING EYLASHES!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102526

On 15/10/2026 7:52 am, Petzl wrote:

<Snip>

> All six ballot papers displayed in the video show first preference
> votes for Mr Hill, with either the Liberal candidate or One Nation
> candidate preferenced last.
> 
> They, the HoR ballot paper laid out in 6, is because that is all you
> can fit on the cardboard bench inside the small cardboard ballot box,

Well, the link you provided, Petzl, does not show anything like a Ballot 
Paper, Petzl, but you could just about fit 6 HoR Ballot Papers on a 
sheet of A4 paper and there would be plenty of room for a sheet of A4 on 
the cardboard bench inside the small cardboard ballot booth that I've 
used in the last thirty years or so.

Maybe, being from a big Metropolis, you might get more than the usual 
eight to ten candidates that I usually see on Ballot Papers but I still 
doubt that there would be any difficulty about fitting 6 HoR Ballot 
Papers across a normal small cardboard ballot booth.

> They, the voter then put down the next 6 and did the same.
> The process had to videoed in order to be paid for multiple voting!
> One of these videos ended up on Tik-Tok.

Paid by whom, Petzl??

> Just to quell Rod Speed's normal BS reply had AI take a look and it
> concluded are real multiple HoR ballot papers.
> https://share.google/aimode/39pCTtSJFS230fmma
> 
Useless link, Petzl.
-- 
Daniel70

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102527

On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 23:49:19 +1100, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:

>On 15/10/2026 7:52 am, Petzl wrote:
>
><Snip>
>
>> All six ballot papers displayed in the video show first preference
>> votes for Mr Hill, with either the Liberal candidate or One Nation
>> candidate preferenced last.
>> 
>> They, the HoR ballot paper laid out in 6, is because that is all you
>> can fit on the cardboard bench inside the small cardboard ballot box,
>
>Well, the link you provided, Petzl, does not show anything like a Ballot 
>Paper, Petzl, but you could just about fit 6 HoR Ballot Papers on a 
>sheet of A4 paper and there would be plenty of room for a sheet of A4 on 
>the cardboard bench inside the small cardboard ballot booth that I've 
>used in the last thirty years or so.
>
>Maybe, being from a big Metropolis, you might get more than the usual 
>eight to ten candidates that I usually see on Ballot Papers but I still 
>doubt that there would be any difficulty about fitting 6 HoR Ballot 
>Papers across a normal small cardboard ballot booth.
>
>> They, the voter then put down the next 6 and did the same.
>> The process had to videoed in order to be paid for multiple voting!
>> One of these videos ended up on Tik-Tok.
>
>Paid by whom, Petzl??
>
Don't forget to put on your spell police hat again, 
you have been done like a dinner again.

Paid by Labor probably? 
But as usual and always, you know this "Daniel70". 
A TikTok account linked to a mosque – which was handed a $670,000
taxpayer-funded grant by Labor MP Julian Hill, 
another non-Labor, Labor party member on Albanese "Labor" cabinet.
https://tinyurl.com/2wsahp9h

>> Just to quell Rod Speed's normal BS reply had AI take a look and it
>> concluded are real multiple HoR ballot papers.
>> https://share.google/aimode/39pCTtSJFS230fmma
>> 
>Useless link, Petzl.
>
Try taking your head out of your own arse, looking for once.

Rod Speed never enrolled to vote, means he has never voted,
 like you high on Rod Speed BS, this ploy was once used to stop being
called up for the Vietnam War.

I have voted in person at every election since turning 18
My neighbor now uses postal ballots they are identical to other ones I
get when I turn up to vote at my polling place
I checked with AI and sent the telegraph picture of ballots filled out
To eradicate Rod Speeds BS I asked Google AI.
Sent this Telegraph image, it comes from a TiK-TOK video where to get
paid for ballot fraud they layout 6 HoR ballots fill them out and
repeat.

They video all ballots they mark as evidence so that they get paid for
doing it.

This is where/what I don't get, my ballot place always have someone
standing by the return HoR  Box which should catch someone stuffing
box with fake box?
So yes this could be a beat-up? 
 
https://ibb.co/LXDRnVpR  image of Ballot fraud using actual HoR
ballots.
Asked Google AI, and sent it
https://share.google/aimode/39pCTtSJFS230fmma
question is, Could these ballot papers be HOW TO VOTES? in image
provided?
  Reply
No, these are official, legal ballot papers rather than political
"How-to-Vote" cards.
  *************************
The article - Daily Mail has similar story goggle it

dailytelegraph.com.au is a pay site
<https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/tik-tok-linked-to-controversial-mosque-posted-video-of-multiple-ballots-backing-labor-mp/news-story/bff839a43e73de24aa2df4f92e05697a>
     https://tinyurl.com/2wsahp9h
TikTok linked to controversial mosque posted video of multiple ballots
backing Labor MP
A TikTok account linked to a mosque – which was handed a $670,000
taxpayer-funded grant by Labor MP Julian Hill before last year’s
federal election – posted a video from within a voting centre of
multiple ballot papers backing Mr Hill a week before polling day.
sample/image copied from paper
https://ibb.co/LXDRnVpR

Islamic groups under the guise of multiculturalism 
<https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/multicultural-grants-jump-to-325m-as-data-reveals-vast-majority-flow-to-labor-electorates/news-story/77d7c167904243865e6e30fb8d91cc67>
        https://tinyurl.com/r3s3cyw4
Multicultural grants jump to $325m as data reveals vast majority flow
to Labor electorates

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102538

Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote

> Rod Speed never enrolled to vote,

Wrong, as always and trivial to check, the electorates were Canberra and  
Griffith NSW

> means he has never voted,

Wrong, as always

> this ploy was once used to stop being   called up for the Vietnam War.

Not by me

> They video all ballots they mark as evidenceso that they get paid for    
> doing it.

How odd that the journo just has 6 ballots

> This is where/what I don't get, my ballot place alwayshave someone    
> standing by the return HoR  Box whichshould catch someone stuffing   box  
> with fake box?

Never had that with any of mine and nothing to stop
those in the photo being postal ballots, fuckwit

> So yes this could be a beat-up?

Corse it is given that its a murdoch shit rag

> https://ibb.co/LXDRnVpR  image of Ballot fraud using actual HoR
> ballots.

No evidence that it actually is anything like that

> The article - Daily Mail has similar story goggle it

Those shit rags swap steaming turds

> TikTok linked to controversial mosque posted video of multiple ballots
> backing Labor MP
> A TikTok account linked to a mosque – which was handed a $670,000
> taxpayer-funded grant by Labor MP Julian Hill before last year’s
> federal election – posted a video from within a voting centre of
> multiple ballot papers backing Mr Hill a week before polling day.
> sample/image copied from paper
> https://ibb.co/LXDRnVpR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102543

On Fri, 16 Oct 2026 06:10:01 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

>Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>
>> Rod Speed never enrolled to vote,
>
>Wrong, as always and trivial to check, the electorates were Canberra and  
>Griffith NSW
>
no one Cannot look up another's registration and you know that.

A great many years ago it was. but wrong types of people were looking
others up with criminal intent so that's not been available since it
being stopped/blocked last millennium
>
>> means he has never voted,
>
>Wrong, as always
>
You used to brag about your advantages of not registering on
Australian  Electoral roll

The idea that keeping off the voting registry could save a young man
from the draft was a strategy pushed by political activists.

-- 
<https://www.perplexity.ai/search/rod-speed-usenet-troll-iBra.u6iSuy..0dwUJuvhQ#0>
     https://tinyurl.com/z5hh3shh  
Rod Speed is known in Usenet communities as a notorious 
argumentative figure often labeled a troll.

So says Rod speed a egotistical self appointed know-all who knows nothing
Rod has been on newgroups since the 80's and still the same

Rod Speed a annoying  Australian can type faster than you can talk
Best to ignore or he will continue to bait you
Rod speed a egotistical self appointed know-all who knows nothing
Rod has been on newgroups since the 80's and still the same

When he starts short vulgar bursts just stop replying--

If you want to practice talking to his idiot responses Australia has a
bot to practice with or he white ants you overtime you post!
"The Rod Speed Bot"
https://www.sensationbot.com/jschat.php?db=rodspeed
 
ROD SPEED A SELF APPOINTED EGOTISTICAL KNOW-ALL WHO KNOWS NOTHING    
   JUST FULL OF
         R
          O
           D
           
            S
             P
              E
               E
                D

           B
            U
             L
              L
               S
                H
                 I
                  T
   DON'T STEP IN IT!

IT DOESN'T MATTER IF ROD SPEED'S HEART IS IN THE RIGHT PLACE, 
HIS HEAD IS UP HIS OWN ARSE, ALWAYS FARTING EYLASHES!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102544

Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed never enrolled to vote,

>> Wrong, as always and trivial to check, theelectorates were Canberra  
>> and   Griffith NSW

> no one Cannot look up another's registration and you know that.

Wrong as always

Its trivial to check physical electoral rolls

In spades with those that old

> A great many years ago it was.

Still is

> but wrong types of people were looking
> others up with criminal intent so that's not been available since it
> being stopped/blocked last millennium

Those of mine were last millennium, fuckwit

>>> means he has never voted,

>> Wrong, as always

> You used to brag about your advantages of not registering on
> Australian  Electoral roll

I actually said that I am NO LONGER on the electoral roll

> The idea that keeping off the voting registry could save a young man
> from the draft was a strategy pushed by political activists.

Irrelevant given I was on the electoral roll at that time

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102545

On Fri, 16 Oct 2026 07:15:25 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

>> You used to brag about your advantages of not registering on
>> Australian  Electoral roll
>
>I actually said that I am NO LONGER on the electoral roll
>
>> The idea that keeping off the voting registry could save a young man
>> from the draft was a strategy pushed by political activists.
>
>Irrelevant given I was on the electoral roll at that time
>
So how you know what a HoR voting form looks like
Clearly you don't here are six of them taken by Screen capture of
Tik-Tok video 
https://ibb.co/LXDRnVpR
-- 
Petzl

Our Australian commonwealth has survived numerous recessions, one
major depression, and two world wars. 
Doubt if it will survive under a Albanese Labor Government.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102546

Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote

>>> You used to brag about your advantages of not registering on
>>> Australian  Electoral roll

>> I actually said that I am NO LONGER on the electoral roll

>>> The idea that keeping off the voting registry could save a young man
>>> from the draft was a strategy pushed by political activists.

>> Irrelevant given I was on the electoral roll at that time

> So how you know what a HoR voting form looks like

I get real radical and look it up because I care about
the order of the candidates in a particular election

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102547

On Fri, 16 Oct 2026 07:51:25 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

>Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>
>>>> You used to brag about your advantages of not registering on
>>>> Australian  Electoral roll
>
>>> I actually said that I am NO LONGER on the electoral roll
>
>>>> The idea that keeping off the voting registry could save a young man
>>>> from the draft was a strategy pushed by political activists.
>
>>> Irrelevant given I was on the electoral roll at that time
>
>> So how you know what a HoR voting form looks like
>
>I get real radical and look it up because I care about
>the order of the candidates in a particular election
?
You feeding on BS gain
you snipped a exact picture of what tgey look like
Pasted back
Clearly you don't here are six of them taken by Screen capture of
Tik-Tok video 
https://ibb.co/LXDRnVpR
-- 
Petzl 
It's hard to win an argument with a smart person but it's damn near impossible to win
an argument with a stupid person

When you're dead, you don't know you're dead. 
The pain is felt by others.

The same thing happens when you're stupid

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102548

Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote

>>>>> You used to brag about your advantages of not registering on
>>>>> Australian  Electoral roll

>>>> I actually said that I am NO LONGER on the electoral roll

>>> So how you know what a HoR voting form looks like

>> I get real radical and look it up because I care about
>> the order of the candidates in a particular election

> ?

You deaf as well as blind ?

That comment was about the Farrer byelection
where I cared about the actually ballot paper to
see who would benefit from the donkey vote

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102549

On Fri, 16 Oct 2026 08:34:20 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>> So how you know what a HoR voting form looks like
>
>>> I get real radical and look it up because I care about
>>> the order of the candidates in a particular election
>
>> ?
>
>You deaf as well as blind ?
>
>That comment was about the Farrer byelection
>where I cared about the actually ballot paper to
>see who would benefit from the donkey vote
>
No one mentioned Farrer till you did now?
One Nation won?
After 30 years of trying, One Nation finally won a lower house seat in
its own right

-- 
<https://www.perplexity.ai/search/rod-speed-usenet-troll-iBra.u6iSuy..0dwUJuvhQ#0>
     https://tinyurl.com/z5hh3shh  
Rod Speed is known in Usenet communities as a notorious 
argumentative figure often labeled a troll.

So says Rod speed a egotistical self appointed know-all who knows nothing
Rod has been on newgroups since the 80's and still the same

Rod Speed a annoying  Australian can type faster than you can talk
Best to ignore or he will continue to bait you
Rod speed a egotistical self appointed know-all who knows nothing
Rod has been on newgroups since the 80's and still the same

When he starts short vulgar bursts just stop replying--

If you want to practice talking to his idiot responses Australia has a
bot to practice with or he white ants you overtime you post!
"The Rod Speed Bot"
https://www.sensationbot.com/jschat.php?db=rodspeed
 
ROD SPEED A SELF APPOINTED EGOTISTICAL KNOW-ALL WHO KNOWS NOTHING    
   JUST FULL OF
         R
          O
           D
           
            S
             P
              E
               E
                D

           B
            U
             L
              L
               S
                H
                 I
                  T
   DON'T STEP IN IT!

IT DOESN'T MATTER IF ROD SPEED'S HEART IS IN THE RIGHT PLACE, 
HIS HEAD IS UP HIS OWN ARSE, ALWAYS FARTING EYLASHES!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102550

Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

>>>>> So how you know what a HoR voting form looks like

>>>> I get real radical and look it up because I care about
>>>> the order of the candidates in a particular election

>>> ?

>> You deaf as well as blind ?

>> That comment was about the Farrer byelection
>> where I cared about the actually ballot paper to
>> see who would benefit from the donkey vote

> No one mentioned Farrer till you did now?

That was when I got real radical and looked up the ballot form

> One Nation won?

Yep

> After 30 years of trying, One Nation finallywon a lower house seat in    
> its own right

And it remains to be seen how long before he jumps
ship given that he doesnt agree with Hanson's stupid
policy on work visas

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102552

On Fri, 16 Oct 2026 11:07:23 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

>Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>
>>>>>> So how you know what a HoR voting form looks like
>
>>>>> I get real radical and look it up because I care about
>>>>> the order of the candidates in a particular election
>
>>>> ?
>
>>> You deaf as well as blind ?
>
>>> That comment was about the Farrer byelection
>>> where I cared about the actually ballot paper to
>>> see who would benefit from the donkey vote
>
>> No one mentioned Farrer till you did now?
>
>That was when I got real radical and looked up the ballot form
>
>> One Nation won?
>
>Yep
>
>> After 30 years of trying, One Nation finallywon a lower house seat in    
>> its own right
>
>And it remains to be seen how long before he jumps
>ship given that he doesnt agree with Hanson's stupid
>policy on work visas
>
Suckered into replying to Rod Speed BS bait
>
From Wiki sounds like a real snout and trotters in trough career
politician, who just wants the grab and greed no matter what side you
are on you the thieving and lying is great.
Labor has such a big majority doubt if Albanese Labor needs to bother
with another lying thieving politician to have to deal with,
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Farley_(politician)#Politics>
Farley was a member of the New South Wales National Party from 2015 to
2020. In 2019, he applied to fill a vacancy in the New South Wales
Legislative Council, but was rejected.[1] In 2020, he applied to join
the Australian Labor Party, and filled out a form expressing interest
in running as a NSW Labor candidate.[1] His application for membership
was rejected

Along comes Barnaby he won't be getting any perks from coalition
either, in fact he stupid if he would be safe from anyone if he don't
toe the line he will end up in court paying big $200k a day legal
bills at least.

Doubt if Albanese Labor will have to wait 2028 for next election.
IF the GG has any stomach to get Australia out of Albanese Labor's
"Green" Fantasia mess she better act fast.
Australia probably is not even going to survive  from now.
-- 
Petzl

Our Australian commonwealth has survived numerous recessions, one
major depression, and two world wars. 
Doubt if it will survive under a Albanese Labor Government.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102554

Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

>>>> That comment was about the Farrer byelection
>>>> where I cared about the actually ballot paper to
>>>> see who would benefit from the donkey vote

>>> No one mentioned Farrer till you did now?

>> That was when I got real radical and looked up the ballot form

>>> One Nation won?

>> Yep

>>> After 30 years of trying, One Nation finally
>>> won a lower house seat in   its own right

>> And it remains to be seen how long before he jumps
>> ship given that he doesnt agree with Hanson's stupid
>> policy on work visas

> From Wiki sounds like a real snout and trotters in trough

Then you need a new hearing aid or your first hearing aid

He is in fact quite a wealthy agricultural small business
man who got that way thru his own business activity and
who now owns a number of income producing asseets

> career   politician,

Nothiing even remotely like that

> who just wants the grab and greed

Hasn't grabbed or greeded anything
and given that one notion has no
chance of being in govt, there is
no way a one notion MP can grab
and greed anything

> no matter what side you   are onyou the thieving and lying is great.

More of your mindless pig ignorant bullshit

> Labor has such a big majority doubt if Albanese Labor needs tobother    
> with another lying thieving politician to have to deal with,

Corse he doesn't. in spades given that seat has
NEVER had a labor MP ever since federation

> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Farley_(politician)#Politics>
> Farley was a member of the New South Wales National Party from 2015to    
> 2020. In 2019, he applied to fill a vacancy in the New South Wales
> Legislative Council, but was rejected.[1] In 2020, he applied to join
> the Australian Labor Party, and filled out a form expressing interest
> in running as a NSW Labor candidate.[1] His application for membership
> was rejected

Yes, he doesn't care which party he joins and realised that
he could well get one notion to have him as their candidate
and I bet he decided that once he got elected he would jump
ship from one notion as soon as it suited him to do that

> Along comes Barnaby he won't be getting any perks from coalition
> either, in fact he stupid if he would be safe from anyone if he don't
> toe the line he will end up in court paying big $200k a day legal
> bills at least.

Try that again in english when not completely blotto and drug crazed

There is no possibility of ending up in court

> Doubt if Albanese Labor will have to wait 2028 for next election.

Can't see why he wouldn't do that given his immense majority
and the fact that the coalition still hasn't got its act into gear
and it remain to be seen if one notiion implodes spectacularly
like they did in Qld in 1999 and with their one elected federal
MP jumping ship, as he is guaranteed to do given how much
he hates Hanson's stupid working visa policy which could
well make lose his seat in the federal election given how
important that is for the voters in his electorate

> IF the GG has any stomach to get Australia out of AlbaneseLabor's    
> "Green" Fantasia mess she better act fast.

She doesn't have the legal capacity to do that

> Australia probably is not even going to survive  from now.

Even sillier than you usually manage and that's saying something

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.environment

csiph-web