Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.environment > #102405 > unrolled thread

Re: Sunday night dinner

Back to article view | Back to sci.environment

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Sunday night dinner % <peescent@qmail.net> - 2026-09-28 12:09 -0400
    Re: Sunday night dinner multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-09-28 16:07 -0600
    Re: Sunday night dinner Scott Gilbert <sapguru@schmegegge.net> - 2026-09-30 03:55 -0400
      Re: Sunday night dinner R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-01 18:12 +0000
        Re: Sunday night dinner multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-12 13:22 -0600
          another self-inflicted wound R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-12 20:29 +0000
            Re: another self-inflicted wound Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 08:57 +1100
              Re: another self-inflicted wound multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-13 09:29 -0600
                Re: another self-inflicted wound Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 05:52 +1100
            Re: another self-inflicted wound multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-13 09:24 -0600
          Re: Sunday night dinner Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 09:39 +1100
            Re: Sunday night dinner "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 10:20 +1100
              Re: Sunday night dinner multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-13 09:47 -0600
            Re: Sunday night dinner multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-13 09:43 -0600
          Re: Sunday night dinner R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-13 04:31 +0000
            Re: Sunday night dinner "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-13 16:04 +1100
              Re: Sunday night dinner multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-13 11:42 -0600
                Re: Sunday night dinner Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 05:16 +1100
                  Re: Sunday night dinner multistrada <ab@in.valid> - 2026-10-13 14:11 -0600
                    Re: Sunday night dinner R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-13 22:18 +0000
                      Re: Sunday night dinner "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 10:16 +1100
                      Re: Sunday night dinner Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 12:21 +1100
              Re: Sunday night dinner "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 10:19 +1100
                Re: Sunday night dinner R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-13 23:52 +0000
                  Re: Sunday night dinner "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 11:19 +1100
                    Re: Sunday night dinner R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> - 2026-10-14 00:44 +0000
                      Re: Sunday night dinner "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2026-10-14 13:02 +1100

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#102490

R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> wrote
> Petzl wrote

>> Rod Speed a annoying  Australian he can literally type faster than you
>> can talk, let alone type!

>> Best to ignore or he will continue to bait you with his BS droppings.
>> Rarely goes with a constructive flow

> Rod may be only 1% aware of his surroundings incl self-aware

Mindless bullshit

> but some comment on aus.pol or s.c.a back in the 90s has led by
> one way or another to some of today's AI tools.

Mindless bullshit

<reams of your silly shit flushed where it belongs>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102495

On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 22:18:42 -0000 (UTC), R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org>
wrote:

>|> Rod Speed a annoying  Australian he can literally type faster than you
>|> can talk, let alone type!
>|Indeed.
>|> Best to ignore or he will continue to bait you with his BS droppings.
>|> Rarely goes with a constructive flow
>|He craves conflict and argumentation, and little more, true.
>
>Rod may be only 1% aware of his surroundings incl self-aware
>but some comment on aus.pol or s.c.a back in the 90s has led by
>one way or another to some of today's AI tools.
>
>Back then someone complained there should be a "rodbot" that
>followed his guiding 90/10 principle -- 90% of his output is one of
>his 10 favourite sayings -- and that let to the (in some circles)
>infamous "rodbot", that let in turn to "MrPostingRobot" that ran
>out of La Trobe's EE for some years entertaining aus.pol and some other
>groups with what some people characterised as "socialist drivel",
>and that seems to have led to some other chatbots that follow the
>same kind of methodology, namely convert whatever they are fed into
>a google search, cull through the answers with a scoring function
>created by ML techniques, edit the best results lightly, and spit them 
>back out.
>
If you want to practice talking to his idiot responses Australia has a
bot to practice with or he white ants you overtime you post!
"The Rod Speed Bot"
https://www.sensationbot.com/jschat.php?db=rodspeed
-- 
Petzl
An evil enemy will from within, 
will burn his own nation to then rule over the ashes.
   Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu 
   (author of The Art of War), 5th century BC.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102491

Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
> R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> wrote

>> |> The diff between states like Maine with little red meat per wk
>> |> and OK where every other meal is red meat is about 20% for
>> |> stroke rates (equiv to 1.8y loss of left exp).

>> |AI Overview
>> |Australians consume an average of 29.4 kg of red meat per person each
>> |year (broken down as about 22.4 kg of beef and 7 kg of sheepmeat).
>
>> |Key Consumption Facts
>> |??? Daily Intake: On average, Australian men eat about 64.3g of red  
>> meat
>> |per day, and women eat about 47.8g per day.
>> |??? Household Reach: Beef is purchased or eaten by more than 90% of
>> |Australian households, and lamb by around 70% to 72%.
>> |??? Dietary Recommendations: The Australian Dietary Guidelines suggest
>> |eating up to 455g of cooked lean red meat per week (roughly 3 to 4  
>> meals).

>> |??? Global Standing: Australia remains one of the highest per-capita
>> consumers of red meat in the world, sitting well above global averages.

>> As numerous lawyers and Whitehouse internets are learning.

>> AI is not a substitute for knowing something or knowing how to find it  
>> out.

Clearly not something you can manage given your fuckups below

> Bullshit

>> Australia has one of if not *the* highest pet ownership rates in the  
>> world.

> Nothing even remotely like the highest

>> There are in round numbers 25 million people, 15 million cats and a
>> similar number of dogs.

> More ignorant bullshit on the number of cats and dogs
> https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_a887ab3d-f4e5-440a-844b-bd60896a88a0

>> The recommended daily intake for cats -- hyper carnivores -- is
>> around 1/4 kg per day. I.e. a household with a cat already has committed
>> to buy 90+ kg of some kind of meat to feed to their pet per year.

>> From what I can see from the neighbours they aren't content to feed
>> "recycled meat" aka catfood to their pet, it's prime beef mince. :)

> Then you need new glasses

>> From the numbers quoted we can determine the annual "household  
>> consumption"
>> of meat in Aus is around 3*30 == 90 kg from which it seems 45 kg goes
>> to the avg .5 household cat.

> That last number is complete fiction too

>> Already it seems "household consumption" is not a great measure
>> for actual "number of meat meals eaten (by a human)".

>> And we're not even looking at the dogs that likely account for another
>> 20 kg per HH/y.

> More bullshit numbers

>> The AI in the business is blameless. I know him personally.
>> But the person prompting it is a known nitwit try-hard that has
>> never right about anything, not even a little bit.

>> Finally, we can sanity check the numbers so far by checking the
>> stroke rate. Australian deaths from stroke ran around 32 per 100k in  
>> '24.

> The actual number is 29

>> I.e. around the rate for Arizona or Nebraska that are ranked around 40th
>> in stroke rates for the US.

>> Seems like the "household meat consumption" going by AI prompting is --
>> as they say in Australia -- a furphy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102492

}Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
}> R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> wrote
}>> |> The diff between states like Maine with little red meat per wk
}>> |> and OK where every other meal is red meat is about 20% for
}>> |> stroke rates (equiv to 1.8y loss of left exp).

Did I accidentally reply to you or are you talking to 
yourself again?

From the repeat "op" ref sounds like the latter.

-- 
[Rod on Rod #130:]
$ No need to ask if you're a terminal fuckwit.
--  "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com>,  Wed, 19 Mar 2003

[Speed v. Mirror #125:]
$ And even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should be able to grasp
$ that the only thing that matters is the original poster, cretin wanker.
--  "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com>,  Mon, 8 Dec 2003 15:32:48 +1100

[Speed v. Speed #16:]
$ Typical hillbilly, cant even manage to get the simplest stuff right.
--  "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com>, 19 Nov 2002 

[RodBot v. shaving mirror #124:]
$ Even you should be able to bullshit your way out of your
$ predicament better than that pathetic effort, fuckwit.
--  "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com>,  Mon, 8 Dec 2003 15:32:48 +1100

[Speed on Speed #128:]
$ Probably best to visit the dunny before hanging yourself.
--  "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com>,  Mon, 10 Feb 2003

[1100 more the same]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102493

R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

> Did I accidentally reply to you or are you talking to
> yourself again?

I added a comment to your original stupidity

> From the repeat "op" ref sounds like the latter.

Then you need a new hearing aid

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102494

|I added a comment to your original stupidity

Sorry I missed it.
I'm sure it was up to your usual 30y standard of barking mad nco.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#102496

R Kym Horsell <kym@sdf.org> wrote

>> I added a comment to your original stupidity

> Sorry I missed it.

You never could bullshit and lie your way out of a wet paper bag

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.environment

csiph-web