Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.environment > #98238 > unrolled thread
| Started by | 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-07-12 08:40 +0000 |
| Last post | 2017-07-12 12:54 +0000 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to sci.environment
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
A zillion fake hockey sticks 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2017-07-12 08:40 +0000
Re: A zillion fake hockey sticks 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2017-07-12 12:54 +0000
| From | 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-12 08:40 +0000 |
| Subject | A zillion fake hockey sticks |
| Message-ID | <esm5jqFcm46U1@mid.individual.net> |
MrPostingRobot@kymhorsell.com wrote: > R.e. the just-published database of ~700 paleo temp recons by PAGES. > > <https://strangeweather.wordpress.com/2017/07/11/ > the-hockey-stick-is-alive-long-live-the-hockey-stick/> > > The Hockey Stick is Alive; long live the Hockey Stick > > ... > > For those who've been sleeping, the Hockey Stick is the famous graph, > published in 1999 by Mann, Bradley and Hughes (MBH) and reproduced > below. You only need a passing knowledge of climate science to know > that it was pretty big news at the time, especially when, in 2001, it > was featured in the summary for policy-makers of the Third Assessment > Report of the IPCC. The graph was hailed as definitive proof of the > human influence on climate by some, and disparaged as a "misguided and > illegitimate investigation" by the ever-so-unbiased Joe Barton. Fake news. No proof was given - the data was fraudulently withheld as being 'personal intellectual property' from scrutiny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! http://principia-scientific.org/breaking-fatal-courtroom-act-ruins-michael-hockey-stick-mann/ How glow ball wamming fraudsters use malpractice to adjust data --------------------------------------------------------------- There two methods that glow ball wammers and their data fiddle methods follow. It has been repeated enough to be noticed. 1. First part of the fraud is to adjust older data to make it appear cooler and then draw the graph. Recent data is left untouched otherwise you will spot the fraud. So when the graph is plotted, every years is now the hottest year on record. The utter fscking asssholes!! 2. The second part of the fiddle is to claim that the data they used is personal intellectual data and cannot be revealed which may wash in Amerikkka, but it is fraud in any other country, particularly if the research is paid for by the tax payer. Hiding your fraudulent data converts all Amerikkkan researchers into fraudsters and they should not be allowed to publish whilst they claim all their fraudulent data is personal intellectual data - because it has not been peer reviewed. A professional scientific peer review process relies on reviewing the data for checks and balances, like an accountant relies on the books to check sample invoices to match up numbers to detect fraud. So any scientific peer reviewed publisher is now obligated to check the original data, and if there has been a fiddle, decline publishing, and if the data is being withheld, then the publisher MUST indicate that the data has been withheld, the reason must be given, and offer to publish with caveat to the readers that the entire data set has NOT BEEN CHECKED, so that that paper did not pass the usual quality checks needed to be a work of scientific merit that has been fully peer reviewed. Whooosh! All this malpractice is making be feel baked! Climate change now accelerated to 1 degree per HOUR!!!! As the Sun cums up, the earth's temperature goes up average 1 degree per hour. And when then Sun cums down, the globe cools 1 degree per hour. Climate is changing every hour! Awe noooo! This is making me crispy and toasted. Can I have a bacon sandwich to top it all off?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-07-12 12:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <esmh0hFfbseU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #98238 |
Bret Cahill wrote: >> Fake news. >> >> No proof was given - the data was fraudulently withheld > > It's a conspiraCEEEEEE! There are planets around nearly every star as it formed from debris left behind from star formation. There is flowing water on Mars. On Venus it rains metal as revealed by radar reflections. Europa has a watery ocean under its ice as revealed by magnetometers. Did NASA land on the Moon? Imagine if NASA scientists doesn't release any of the data for it claiming its all personal intellectual property. They would be laughed out of court. So why is NASA's glow ball wamming Hanson being laughed out of court? http://principia-scientific.org/breaking-fatal-courtroom-act-ruins-michael-hockey-stick-mann/ Come to think of it, why did Hadly Crew also get laughed out of court? And everyone else participating in the glow ball wamming bowel movement? How glow ball wamming fraudsters use malpractice to adjust data --------------------------------------------------------------- There two methods that glow ball wammers and their data fiddle methods follow. It has been repeated enough to be noticed. 1. First part of the fraud is to adjust older data to make it appear cooler and then draw the graph. Recent data is left untouched otherwise you will spot the fraud. So when the graph is plotted, every new year is now the hottest year on record. The utter fscking asssholes!! 2. The second part of the fiddle is to claim that the data they used is personal intellectual data and cannot be revealed which may wash in Amerikkka, but it is fraud in any other country, particularly if the research is paid for by the tax payer. Hiding your fraudulent data converts all Amerikkkan researchers into fraudsters and they should not be allowed to publish whilst they claim all their fraudulent data is personal intellectual data - because it has not been peer reviewed. A professional scientific peer review process relies on reviewing the data for checks and balances, like an accountant relies on the books to check sample invoices to match up numbers to detect fraud. So any scientific peer reviewed publisher is now obligated to check the original data, and if there has been a fiddle, decline publishing, and if the data is being withheld, then the publisher MUST indicate that the data has been withheld, the reason must be given, and offer to publish with caveat to the readers that the entire data set has NOT BEEN CHECKED, so that that paper did not pass the usual quality checks needed to be a work of scientific merit that has been fully peer reviewed. Whooosh! All this malpractice is making be feel baked! Climate change now accelerated to 1 degree per HOUR!!!! As the Sun cums up, the earth's temperature goes up average 1 degree per hour. And when then Sun cums down, the globe cools 1 degree per hour. Climate is changing every hour! Awe noooo! This is making me crispy and toasted. Can I have a bacon sandwich to top it all off?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | sci.environment
csiph-web