Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.environment > #98247

Re: 2017 The Hootiest Year on Record (THYoR)

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Followups directed to: uk.politics.misc, uk.misc, sci.environment, alt.global-warming

Show all headers | View raw

facist 'new' labour rules the world wrote:

> 
> On 14 Jul 2017 02:48 PM ,7 <7@enemygadgets.com> wrote:
>> 2017 The Hootiest Year on Record (THYoR)
>> ----------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>> I plotted Amerikkka's hootiest climate trolls cum scientits, and produced
>> a graph that shows 2017 is the most hootiest climate change year
>> of all years.
>> 
>> I cannot reveal the numbers because it is personal intellectual property
>> like this NASA scientit
>> 
>> http://principia-scientific.org/breaking-fatal-courtroom-act-ruins-michael-hockey-stick-mann/
>> 
>> even though I was funded by the tax payer to do this work.
>> In Amerikkka, the land of the free,
>> I can commit any kind of fraudulent research and round it off by
>> fabricating data, and claim it is personal intellectual
>> property without anyone peer reviewing the data of
>> my work until it is published in some official looking Hoot mongering
>> journal with my fabricated data hidden from peer review process.
>> 
>> My work involved secretly lowering Hooting levels of climate workers
>> on various pretext pre-1969 so that you can't obviously go back and
>> check the data, and so when you plot the graph now, every year is now
>> the most Hootiest climate change year on record!
>> 
>> $$$!! Mission accomplished!
>> 
> 
> Did you end up explaining away this graph of global temperatures?
> 
> https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/HadCRUT4.png
> 
> If so, could you describe how this is fraudulent and temperatures pre-1969
> prove this?


I feel as though someone has fondled my hooter.

http://admin.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2017-07/199081_5_.gif

"The peer-reviewed study by two scientists and a veteran statistician 
 looked at the global average temperature datasets (GAST) which are used by 
 climate alarmists to argue that recent years have been "the hottest evah" 
 and that the warming of the last 120 years has been dramatic and 
 unprecedented.

 What they found is that these readings are "totally inconsistent with 
 published and credible U.S. and other temperature data."

 That is, the adjusted data used by alarmist organizations like NASA, NOAA, 
 and the UK Met Office differs so markedly from the original raw data that 
 it cannot be trusted.

 This chart gives you a good idea of the direction of the adjustments."

The graph of changes made to raw data (blue = reductions,
red = amplification)


There is nothing like fiddling your data to make up fraudulent
claims and prevent access to it by pretending
its personal intellectual property in Amrikkkaa.
Because such malpractice is common in the USA,
there is no science coming out of USA that can ever be trusted.
All US journal collections that practice this con should be
sent for recycling and their subscriptions terminated.



>> Amrikkkan fsckwit researchers and NASA glow ball wamming trolls
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
>> 
>> None of the organizations mentioned from NASA to these below:
>> 
>>  American Association for the Advancement of Science
>>  American Chemical Society
>>  American Geophysical Union
>>  American Medical Association
>>  American Meteorological Society
>>  American Physical Society
>>  The Geological Society of America
>>  U.S. National Academy of Sciences
>>  U.S. Global Change Research Program
>>  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
>> 
>> have seen Hanson's fake data used to fabricate
>> glow ball wamming - so if they did not see
>> Hanson's data, these Amerikkkan institutes are fakers
>> without seeing any data from Hanson troll to back them up.
>> 
>> The judge wanted to see it:
>> 
>> http://principia-scientific.org/breaking-fatal-courtroom-act-ruins-michael-hockey-stick-mann/
>> 
>> But the fcktard refused claiming it is personal intellectual property.
>> 
>> There is no such thing as personal intellectual property
>> when science is funded by the public purse, and
>> at the very least it is dishonest to take such a position,
>> which means all the *FSCKING* AMERIKKKAN institutes
>> who supported Hanson have *NEVER* seen Hanson's data
>> and fraudulently support fake science which they
>> themselves have not peer reviewed!!!!!
>> 
>> What a fscking result for Amrikkkan fraud science
>> and the glow ball wamming meme!!
>> 
>> Glow ball wammers are desperate to keep their meme alive
>> so they then engage in utterly stuupppidd malpractice
>> to deceive the public.
>> 
>> 
>> How glow ball wamming fraudsters use malpractice to adjust data
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> There two patterns that glow ball wammers and their
>> data fiddle methods follow.
>> 
>> It has been repeated enough to be noticed.
>> 
>> 1. First part of the fraud is to
>>    adjust older data to make it appear cooler
>>    and then draw the graph. Recent data is left
>>    untouched otherwise you will spot the fraud.
>>    So when the graph is plotted, every years is
>>    now the hottest year on record.
>> 
>>    The utter fscking asssholes!!
>> 
>> 2. The second part of the fiddle is to claim that
>>    the data they used is personal intellectual
>>    data and cannot be revealed
>>    which may wash in Amerikkka, but it is
>>    fraud in any other country, particularly if
>>    the research is paid for by the tax payer.
>> 
>>    Hiding your fraudulent data converts all Amerikkkan
>>    researchers into fraudsters and they should not
>>    be allowed to publish whilst they claim all
>>    their fraudulent data is personal intellectual
>>    data - because it has not been peer reviewed.
>>    
>>    A professional scientific peer review process
>>    relies on reviewing the data for checks and balances,
>>    like an accountant relies on the books to check
>>    sample invoices to match up numbers to detect fraud.
>>    
>>    So any scientific peer reviewed publisher
>>    is now obligated to check the original data, and
>>    if there has been a fiddle, decline publishing,
>>    and if the data is being withheld, then the
>>    publisher MUST indicate that the data has been
>>    withheld, the reason must be given, and offer
>>    to publish with caveat to the readers that the
>>    entire data set has NOT BEEN CHECKED, so that that
>>    paper did not pass the usual quality checks
>>    needed to be a work of scientific merit that has
>>    been fully peer reviewed.
>> 
>> 
>> All this hooting malpractice is making me feel baked!
>> 
>> Climate change now accelerated to 1 degree per HOUR!!!!
>> 
>> As the Sun cums up, the earth's temperature goes up
>> average 1 degree per hour. And when then Sun cums
>> down, the globe cools 1 degree per hour.
>> 
>> Climate is changing every hour!
>> 
>> Awe noooo! This is making me crispy and toasted.
>> 
>> Can I have a bacon sandwich to top it all off?
>> 
> 
> 

Back to sci.environment | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

2017 The Hootiest Year on Record (THYoR) 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2017-07-14 13:48 +0000
  Re: 2017 The Hootiest Year on Record (THYoR) "facist 'new' labour rules the world" <ssos@abelard.com> - 2017-07-15 09:48 -0500
    Re: 2017 The Hootiest Year on Record (THYoR) 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2017-07-15 21:55 +0000

csiph-web