How glow ball wamming fraudsters use malpractice to adjust data

From	7 <7@enemygadgets.com>
Newsgroups	alt.global-warming, uk.misc, uk.politics.misc, sci.environment
Subject	How glow ball wamming fraudsters use malpractice to adjust data
Followup-To	alt.global-warming, uk.misc, uk.politics.misc, sci.environment
Date	2017-07-11 21:50 +0000
Organization	enemygadgets.com
Message-ID	<eskvhfF4sq6U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Followups directed to: alt.global-warming, uk.misc, uk.politics.misc, sci.environment

Show all headers | View raw

How glow ball wamming fraudsters use malpractice to adjust data
---------------------------------------------------------------

There two methods that glow ball wammers and their
data fiddle methods follow.

It has been repeated enough to be noticed.

1. First part of the fraud is to
   adjust older data to make it appear cooler
   and then draw the graph. Recent data is left
   untouched otherwise you will spot the fraud.
   So when the graph is plotted, every years is
   now the hottest year on record. 

   The utter fscking asssholes!!

2. The second part of the fiddle is to claim that
   the data they used is personal intellectual
   data and cannot be revealed 
   which may wash in Amerikkka, but it is
   fraud in any other country, particularly if
   the research is paid for by the tax payer.

   Hiding your fraudulent data converts all Amerikkkan
   researchers into fraudsters and they should not
   be allowed to publish whilst they claim all
   their fraudulent data is personal intellectual
   data - because it has not been peer reviewed.
   
   A professional scientific peer review process
   relies on reviewing the data for checks and balances,
   like an accountant relies on the books to check
   sample invoices to match up numbers to detect fraud.
   
   So any scientific peer reviewed publisher
   is now obligated to check the original data, and
   if there has been a fiddle, decline publishing,
   and if the data is being withheld, then the
   publisher MUST indicate that the data has been
   withheld, the reason must be given, and offer
   to publish with caveat to the readers that the
   entire data set has NOT BEEN CHECKED, so that that
   paper did not pass the usual quality checks
   needed to be a work of scientific merit that has
   been fully peer reviewed.



Whooosh! All this malpractice is making be feel baked!

Climate change now accelerated to 1 degree per HOUR!!!!

As the Sun cums up, the earth's temperature goes up
average 1 degree per hour. And when then Sun cums
down, the globe cools 1 degree per hour.

Climate is changing every hour!

Awe noooo! This is making me crispy and toasted.

Can I have a bacon sandwich to top it all off?

Back to sci.environment | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

How glow ball wamming fraudsters use malpractice to adjust data 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2017-07-11 21:50 +0000

csiph-web