Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #453999 > unrolled thread

pricing

Started byJohn Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com>
First post2017-03-28 08:59 -0700
Last post2017-03-31 00:21 +0000
Articles 3 on this page of 63 — 26 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.electronics.design


Contents

  pricing John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-28 08:59 -0700
    Re: pricing Taxed and Spent <nospamplease@nonospam.com> - 2017-03-28 09:11 -0700
    Re: pricing Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-03-28 09:34 -0700
    Re: pricing Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2017-03-28 12:05 -0500
      Re: pricing Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2017-03-28 14:52 -0400
      Re: pricing David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-03-29 10:54 +0200
    Re: pricing Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2017-03-28 12:14 -0500
      Re: pricing bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2017-03-28 16:01 -0400
    Re: pricing Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-03-28 18:19 +0100
    Re: pricing tabbypurr@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 11:58 -0700
    pricing klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-03-28 12:02 -0700
      Re: pricing John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2017-03-28 12:24 -0700
      Re: pricing John Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-28 13:06 -0700
        Re: pricing Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-28 14:15 -0700
          Re: pricing Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-28 14:18 -0700
          Re: pricing John Larkin <jjlarkinxyxy@highlandtechnology.com> - 2017-03-28 15:44 -0700
            Re: pricing krw@notreal.com - 2017-03-28 22:39 -0400
              Re: pricing Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2017-03-30 17:53 +0200
                Re: pricing Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-03-30 09:12 -0700
                  Re: pricing krw@notreal.com - 2017-03-30 20:29 -0400
                    Re: pricing Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-03-30 17:57 -0700
                      Re: pricing krw@notreal.com - 2017-03-30 21:11 -0400
                        Re: pricing bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-03-30 19:36 -0700
                  Re: pricing Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2017-03-31 08:32 +0200
                    Re: pricing John Devereux <john@devereux.me.uk> - 2017-03-31 08:36 +0100
                      Re: pricing Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2017-03-31 09:57 +0200
                        Re: pricing John Devereux <john@devereux.me.uk> - 2017-03-31 09:42 +0100
                      Re: pricing rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 05:30 -0400
                        Re: pricing John Devereux <john@devereux.me.uk> - 2017-03-31 12:04 +0100
                        Re: pricing Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-03-31 10:36 -0700
                Re: pricing krw@notreal.com - 2017-03-30 20:28 -0400
                  Re: pricing Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2017-03-31 08:41 +0200
                    Re: pricing krw@notreal.com - 2017-03-31 20:20 -0400
      Re: pricing Larry Sheldon <lfsheldon@gmail.com> - 2017-03-28 21:21 -0500
    Re: pricing Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2017-03-28 12:39 -0700
    Re: pricing doh@yipee.com - 2017-03-29 12:31 -0700
    Re: pricing Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2017-03-30 17:47 +0200
      Re: pricing Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2017-03-30 17:03 +0100
        Re: pricing krw@notreal.com - 2017-03-30 20:34 -0400
          Re: pricing Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2017-03-31 09:20 +0100
            Re: pricing krw@notreal.com - 2017-03-31 20:25 -0400
        Re: pricing bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-03-30 19:47 -0700
          Re: pricing rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 23:45 -0400
            Re: pricing bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2017-03-30 21:45 -0700
              Re: pricing Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-03-31 15:55 +1100
              Re: pricing rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-03-31 01:30 -0400
                Re: pricing krw@notreal.com - 2017-03-31 22:30 -0400
            Re: pricing Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-03-30 16:07 +1100
              Re: pricing Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2017-03-31 10:11 +0200
              Re: pricing Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-03-31 10:20 +0100
                Re: pricing Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2017-03-31 20:41 +0000
              Re: pricing krw@notreal.com - 2017-03-31 22:27 -0400
                Re: pricing Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-04-01 14:30 +1100
                  Re: pricing krw@notreal.com - 2017-03-31 23:43 -0400
                    Re: pricing Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2017-04-01 18:15 +1100
                      Re: pricing krw@notreal.com - 2017-04-01 09:46 -0400
            Re: pricing "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2017-04-03 01:32 -0400
              Re: pricing krw@notreal.com - 2017-04-03 12:55 -0400
          Re: pricing Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2017-03-31 10:05 +0200
            Re: pricing Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2017-03-31 10:21 +0100
              Re: pricing krw@notreal.com - 2017-03-31 22:31 -0400
            Re: pricing Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> - 2017-04-01 09:10 +0100
    Re: pricing Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2017-03-31 00:21 +0000

Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]


#454540

Fromkrw@notreal.com
Date2017-03-31 22:31 -0400
Message-ID<b74udct56bubmrmolqaglsto5e4c9qc3cg@4ax.com>
In reply to#454380
On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:21:34 +0100, Tom Gardner
<spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

>On 31/03/17 09:05, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
>> bill.sloman@ieee.org wrote:
>>
>>> He talks about "excellent" companies - Hewlett Packard,
>>> and IBM at that time - who could charge half-as-much-again
>>> more than the competition for essentially the same product
>>> because they had built up a reputation for quality and reliability.
>>
>> I have recently thrown away an HP notebook (Pavilion x2, if
>> that matters), exactly because of its "quality" and "reliability".
>> I hated it so much that I was actually happy when it developed
>> a failure. It was still protected by the warranty, but the worst
>> thing they could do for me was to fix it.
>>
>> I'll never, ever, buy anything from HP.
>
>As people on this group are aware, the "real HP"
>is now called Keysight.

The "real HP" doesn't make notebooks.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#454573

FromMartin Brown <'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk>
Date2017-04-01 09:10 +0100
Message-ID<obnn91$1e9e$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#454365
On 31/03/2017 09:05, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
> bill.sloman@ieee.org wrote:
>
>> He talks about "excellent" companies - Hewlett Packard,
>> and IBM at that time - who could charge half-as-much-again
>> more than the competition for essentially the same product
>> because they had built up a reputation for quality and reliability.
>
> I have recently thrown away an HP notebook (Pavilion x2, if
> that matters), exactly because of its "quality" and "reliability".

That is modern HP still trading on a once great brandname as a former 
innovative scientific instrument maker but mainly flogging cheap 
consumer PCs and printers. My ancient true HP 5300C scanner is still 
going strong and will still give modern ones a run for their money - the 
miserable curs stopped supporting when Vista came out.

> I hated it so much that I was actually happy when it developed
> a failure. It was still protected by the warranty, but the worst
> thing they could do for me was to fix it.
>
> I'll never, ever, buy anything from HP.

+1

But in the past they made some very nifty kit indeed.

-- 
Regards,
Martin Brown

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#454303

FromCydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com>
Date2017-03-31 00:21 +0000
Message-ID<obk7f0$qr1$1@reader1.panix.com>
In reply to#453999
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:
> Some companies are determined to not give pricing for their products.
> They want to know what it will be used for, how many we'll need, when
> we'll need them. Then they say that someone else, maybe a rep, will
> contact us about pricing, and the silly dance starts over.
> 
> I give up. If they don't want to sell stuff, that's OK with me.

Having purchased single items of little value many times and frequently as 
an individual here's what I've found works the best to get pricing.

Request a quote for item whatever with shipping and give a zip code. 
That's apparently close enough to a purchase order that somebody will 
eventually get back to you to fill in the blanks and complete the order by 
giving you a call or a quote.

Just asking "how much is x" doesn't seem to work for the most part.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]

Back to top | Article view | sci.electronics.design


csiph-web